Abstract
Modern power systems are increasingly becoming more complex and thus become vulnerable to voltage collapse due to constant increase in load demand and introduction of new operation enhancement technologies. In this study, an approach which is based on network structural properties of a power system is proposed for the identification of critical nodes that are liable to voltage instability. The proposed Network Structurally Based Closeness Centrality (NSBCC) is formulated based on the admittance matrix between the interconnection of load to load nodes in a power system. The vertex (node) that has the highest value of NSBCC is taken as the critical node of the system. To demonstrate the significance of the concept formulated, the comparative analysis of the proposed NSBCC with the conventional techniques such as Electrical Closeness Centrality (ECC), Closeness Voltage Centrality (CVC) and Modal Analysis is performed. The effectiveness of all the approaches presented is tested on both IEEE 30 bus and the Southern Indian 10-bus power systems. Results of simulation obtained show that the proposed NSBCC could serve as valuable tool for rapid real time voltage stability assessment in a power system.
Funding source: National Research Foundation
Award Identifier / Grant number: 112108
Award Identifier / Grant number: 112142
Funding source: National Research Foundation
Award Identifier / Grant number: 95687
Funding source: Eskom Tertiary Education Support Programme
Funding source: University of Johannesburg
Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: This research is supported partially by South African National Research Foundation Grants (No. 112108 and 112142), and South African National Research Foundation Incentive Grant (No. 95687), Eskom Tertiary Education Support Programme, Research grant from URC of University of Johannesburg.
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
Line data: 10 bus Southern Indian test system.
From | To | R (pu) | X (pu) | BC/2(pu) | Line limit (MVA) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 5 | 0.00272 | 0.02872 | 1.51829 | 500 |
1 | 4 | 0.00569 | 0.06008 | 0.79414 | 500 |
1 | 2 | 0.00477 | 0.05103 | 0.72673 | 500 |
2 | 10 | 0.00676 | 0.09429 | 0.75003 | 500 |
10 | 6 | 0.00546 | 0.06794 | 0.88836 | 500 |
7 | 9 | 0.00289 | 0.03603 | 0.46222 | 500 |
3 | 9 | 0.00145 | 0.01802 | 0.93968 | 500 |
7 | 4 | 0.00589 | 0.05995 | 0.7841 | 500 |
7 | 5 | 0.0043 | 0.0477 | 0.637 | 500 |
5 | 8 | 0.00388 | 0.04834 | 0.6547 | 500 |
3 | 8 | 0.00297 | 0.03706 | 0.47543 | 500 |
6 | 7 | 0.0004 | 0.004 | 0.15 | 500 |
Line data for the IEEE 30 bus test system.
S/N | From bus | To bus | R(p.u) | X(p.u) | 1/2B | Tap ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 2 | 0.0192 | 0.0575 | 0.0264 | 1 |
2 | 1 | 3 | 0.0452 | 0.1652 | 0.0204 | 1 |
3 | 2 | 4 | 0.0570 | 0.1737 | 0.0184 | 1 |
4 | 3 | 4 | 0.0132 | 0.0379 | 0.0042 | 1 |
5 | 2 | 5 | 0.0472 | 0.1983 | 0.0209 | 1 |
6 | 2 | 6 | 0.0581 | 0.1763 | 0.0187 | 1 |
7 | 4 | 6 | 0.0119 | 0.0414 | 0.0045 | 1 |
8 | 5 | 7 | 0.0460 | 0.1160 | 0.0102 | 1 |
9 | 6 | 7 | 0.0267 | 0.0820 | 0.0085 | 1 |
10 | 6 | 8 | 0.0120 | 0.0420 | 0.0045 | 1 |
11 | 6 | 9 | 0.0 | 0.2080 | 0.0 | 0.978 |
12 | 6 | 10 | 0.0 | 0.5560 | 0.0 | 0.969 |
13 | 9 | 11 | 0.0 | 0.2080 | 0.0 | 1 |
14 | 9 | 10 | 0.0 | 0.1100 | 0.0 | 1 |
15 | 4 | 12 | 0.0 | 0.2560 | 0.0 | 0.932 |
16 | 12 | 13 | 0.0 | 0.1400 | 0.0 | 1 |
17 | 12 | 14 | 0.1231 | 0.2559 | 0.0 | 1 |
18 | 12 | 15 | 0.0662 | 0.1304 | 0.0 | 1 |
19 | 12 | 16 | 0.0945 | 0.1987 | 0.0 | 1 |
20 | 14 | 15 | 0.2210 | 0.1997 | 0.0 | 1 |
21 | 16 | 17 | 0.0824 | 0.1923 | 0.0 | 1 |
22 | 15 | 18 | 0.1073 | 0.2185 | 0.0 | 1 |
23 | 18 | 19 | 0.0639 | 0.1292 | 0.0 | 1 |
24 | 19 | 20 | 0.0340 | 0.0680 | 0.0 | 1 |
25 | 10 | 20 | 0.0936 | 0.2090 | 0.0 | 1 |
26 | 10 | 17 | 0.0324 | 0.0845 | 0.0 | 1 |
27 | 10 | 21 | 0.0348 | 0.0749 | 0.0 | 1 |
28 | 10 | 22 | 0.0727 | 0.1499 | 0.0 | 1 |
29 | 21 | 23 | 0.0116 | 0.0236 | 0.0 | 1 |
30 | 15 | 23 | 0.1000 | 0.2020 | 0.0 | 1 |
31 | 22 | 24 | 0.1150 | 0.1790 | 0.0 | 1 |
32 | 23 | 24 | 0.1320 | 0.2700 | 0.0 | 1 |
33 | 24 | 25 | 0.1885 | 0.3292 | 0.0 | 1 |
34 | 25 | 26 | 0.2544 | 0.3800 | 0.0 | 1 |
35 | 25 | 27 | 0.1093 | 0.2087 | 0.0 | 1 |
36 | 28 | 27 | 0.0 | 0.3960 | 0.0 | 0.968 |
37 | 27 | 29 | 0.2198 | 0.4153 | 0.0 | 1 |
38 | 27 | 30 | 0.3202 | 0.6027 | 0.0 | 1 |
39 | 29 | 30 | 0.2399 | 0.4533 | 0.0 | 1 |
40 | 8 | 28 | 0.0636 | 0.2000 | 0.0214 | 1 |
41 | 6 | 28 | 0.0169 | 0.0599 | 0.065 | 1 |
References
1. Moger, T, Dhadbanjan, T. A novel index for identification of weak nodes for reactive compensation to improve voltage stability. IET Gener, Transm Distrib 2015;9:1826–34. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-gtd.2015.0054.Suche in Google Scholar
2. Gutiérrez, F, Nuño, J, Barocio, E. Using a graph cuts approach to analyse the structural vulnerability of the power grids. In: 2014 IEEE Central America and Panama Convention (CONCAPAN XXXIV); Panama City; 2014. p. 1–6.10.1109/CONCAPAN.2014.7000456Suche in Google Scholar
3. Ajjarapu, V, Lee, B. Bibliograph on voltage stability. IEEE Trans Power Syst 1998;13:115–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.651622.Suche in Google Scholar
4. Kessel, P, Glavitsch, H. Estimating the voltage stability of a power system. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 1986;1:346–54. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrd.1986.4308013.Suche in Google Scholar
5. Nasiruzzaman, ABM, Pota, HR. Modified centrality measures of power grid to identify critical components: method, impact, and rank similarity. In: 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting; San Diego, CA; 2012. p. 1–8.10.1109/PESGM.2012.6344566Suche in Google Scholar
6. Wang, Z, Scaglione, A, Thomas, RJ. Electrical centrality measures for electric power grid vulnerability analysis. In: 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC); Atlanta, GA; 2010. p. 5792–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/cdc.2010.5717964.Suche in Google Scholar
7. Chen, K, Hussein, A, Bradley, ME, Wan, H. A performance-index guided continuation method for fast computation of saddle-node bifurcation in power systems. In: IEEE Trans Power Syst 2003;18:753–60. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrs.2003.811203.Suche in Google Scholar
8. Nguyen, TV, Nguyen, YM, Yoon, YT. A new method for static voltage stability assessment based on the local loadability boundary. Int J Emerg Elec Power Syst 2012;13, Article 2:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1515/1553-779x.2994.Suche in Google Scholar
9. Li, P, Liu, J, Li, B, Song, Y, Zhong, J. Dynamic power system zone division scheme using sensitivity analysis. J Int Counc Electr Eng 2014;4:157–61. https://doi.org/10.5370/JICEE.2014.4.2.157.Suche in Google Scholar
10. Lim, Z, Mustafa, MW, Jamian, JJ. Voltage stability prediction on power system network via enhanced hybrid particle swarm artificial neural network. J Electr Eng Technol 2015;10:877–87. https://doi.org/10.5370/jeet.2015.10.3.877.Suche in Google Scholar
11. Caro-Ruiz, C, Mojica-Nava, E. Centrality measures for voltage instability analysis in power networks. In: 2015 IEEE 2nd Colombian Conference on Automatic Control (CCAC); Manizales; 2015. p. 1–6.10.1109/CCAC.2015.7345182Suche in Google Scholar
12. Zhang, G, Wang, C, Zhang, J, Yang, J, Zhang, Y, Duan, M, et al. Vulnerability assessment of bulk power grid based on complex network theory. In: 2008 Third International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technologies; Nanjing; 2008. p. 1554–8.10.1109/DRPT.2008.4523652Suche in Google Scholar
13. Adebayo, IG, Jimoh, AA, Yusuff, AA, Sun, Y. Alternative method for the identification of critical nodes leading to voltage instability in a power system. Afr J Sci Technol Innovat Dev 2018;10:323–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2018.1461967.Suche in Google Scholar
14. Bonacich, P, Lloyd, P. Eigenvector-like measures of centrality for asymmetric relations. Elsevier, Social Networks; 2001, vol 23:191–201 pp.10.1016/S0378-8733(01)00038-7Suche in Google Scholar
15. Adebayo, IG, Jimoh, AA, Yusuff, AA. Voltage stability assessment and identification of important nodes in power transmission network through network response structural characteristics. IET Gener, Transm Distrib 2017;11:1398–408. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-gtd.2016.0745.Suche in Google Scholar
16. Sikiru, TH, Jimoh, AA, Agee, JT. Inherent structural characteristic indices of power system networks. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst Eng 2013;47:218–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.11.011.Suche in Google Scholar
17. Youssef, H, Kamel, S, Ebeed, M. Optimal power flow considering loading margin stability using lightning attachment optimization technique. In: 2018 Twentieth International Middle East Power Systems Conference (MEPCON); Cairo, Egypt; 2018. pp. 1053–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/MEPCON.2018.8635110.Suche in Google Scholar
18. Ebeed, M, Kamel, S, Youssef, H. Optimal setting of STATCOM based on voltage stability improvement and power loss minimization using moth-flame algorithm. In: 2016 Eighteenth International Middle East Power Systems Conference (MEPCON); Cairo; 2016. p. 815–20. https://doi.org/10.1109/MEPCON.2016.7836988.Suche in Google Scholar
19. Gao, B, Morison, GK, Kundur, P. Voltage stability evaluation using modal analysis. IEEE Trans Power Syst 1992;7:1529–42. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.207377.Suche in Google Scholar
20. Curtis, EB, Morrow, JA. Inverse problems for electrical networks. SIAM J Appl Math 2000;13:1–196.10.1142/4306Suche in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Review
- Power quality problem and key improvement technology for regional power grids
- Research Articles
- Machine learning roles in advancing the power network stability due to deployments of renewable energies and electric vehicles
- Analysis between graph-based and Power Transfer Distribution Factors (PTDF)-based model reduction methods in Electric Power Systems
- Experimental control of photovoltaic system using neuro – Kalman filter maximum power point tracking (MPPT) technique
- Data compression techniques for Phasor Measurement Unit (PMU) applications in smart transmission grid
- Influence of inter-turn short circuit on the performance of 10 kV, 1000 kW induction motor
- Detection of coherent groups using measured signals, in an inter-area mode, for creating controlled islands to protect the power system from blackout
- Multi-objective optimization of optimal capacitor allocation in radial distribution systems
- A novel approach of closeness centrality measure for voltage stability analysis in an electric power grid
- Dynamic Simulation of Eastern Regional Grid of India using Power System Simulator for Engineering PSS®E
- Optimal total harmonic distortion minimization in multilevel inverter using improved whale optimization algorithm
- A cost effective accumulator management system for electric vehicles
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Review
- Power quality problem and key improvement technology for regional power grids
- Research Articles
- Machine learning roles in advancing the power network stability due to deployments of renewable energies and electric vehicles
- Analysis between graph-based and Power Transfer Distribution Factors (PTDF)-based model reduction methods in Electric Power Systems
- Experimental control of photovoltaic system using neuro – Kalman filter maximum power point tracking (MPPT) technique
- Data compression techniques for Phasor Measurement Unit (PMU) applications in smart transmission grid
- Influence of inter-turn short circuit on the performance of 10 kV, 1000 kW induction motor
- Detection of coherent groups using measured signals, in an inter-area mode, for creating controlled islands to protect the power system from blackout
- Multi-objective optimization of optimal capacitor allocation in radial distribution systems
- A novel approach of closeness centrality measure for voltage stability analysis in an electric power grid
- Dynamic Simulation of Eastern Regional Grid of India using Power System Simulator for Engineering PSS®E
- Optimal total harmonic distortion minimization in multilevel inverter using improved whale optimization algorithm
- A cost effective accumulator management system for electric vehicles