Evaluation of a leadership and intrapersonal development subject for university students in Hong Kong: findings based on 2 years

References

1. WHO. Core competencies in adolescent health and development for primary care providers: Including a tool to assess the adolescent health and development component in pre-service education of health-care providers. Available at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/148354/1/9789241508315_eng.pdf?ua=1. Accessed: 5 Oct 2015.Search in Google Scholar

2. Edlund MJ, Forman-Hoffman VL, Winder CR, Heller DC, Kroutil LA, Lipari RN, et al. Opioid abuse and depression in adolescents: results from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Drug Alcohol Depend 2015;152:131–8.10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.04.010Search in Google Scholar

3. Chiao C, Yi C-C, Ksobiech K. Exploring the relationship between premarital sex and cigarette/alcohol use among college students in Taiwan: a cohort study. BMC Public Health 2012;12:527.10.1186/1471-2458-12-527Search in Google Scholar

4. Walther B, Morgenstern M, Hanewinkel R. Co-occurrence of addictive behaviours: Personality factors related to substance use, gambling and computer gaming. Eur Addict Res 2012;18:167–74.10.1159/000335662Search in Google Scholar

5. Ahmadi K, Saghafi A. Psychosocial profile of Iranian adolescents’ Internet addiction. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2013;16:543–8.10.1089/cyber.2012.0237Search in Google Scholar

6. Song Y, Huang Y, Liu D, Kwan JS, Zhang F, Sham PC, et al. Depression in college: depressive symptoms and personality factors in Beijing and Hong Kong college freshmen. Compr Psychiatry 2008;49:496–502.10.1016/j.comppsych.2008.02.005Search in Google Scholar

7. Shek DT, Yu L. Self-harm and suicidal behaviors in Hong Kong adolescents: prevalence and psychosocial correlates. Sci World J 2012;2012:Article 932540.10.1100/2012/932540Search in Google Scholar

8. Yu L, Shek DT. Internet addiction in Hong Kong adolescents: A three-year longitudinal study. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2013;26:S10–7.10.1016/j.jpag.2013.03.010Search in Google Scholar

9. Chan A. Universities urged to ban alcohol sales on campus. Available at: http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/ article/1581516/hong-kong-universities-urged-ban-alcohol-sales-campus. Accessed: 5 Oct 2015.Search in Google Scholar

10. Shek DT. Development of a positive youth development subject in a university context in Hong Kong. Int J Disabil Hum Dev 2012;11:173–9.10.1515/ijdhd-2012-0036Search in Google Scholar

11. Lerner RM, editors. Liberty: thriving and civic engagement among American youth, 1st ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

12. Roth JL, Brooks-Gunn J. Youth development programs: risk, prevention and policy. J Adolesc Health 2003;32:170–82.10.1016/S1054-139X(02)00421-4Search in Google Scholar

13. Catalano RF, Berglund ML, Ryan JA, Lonczak HS, Hawkins JD. Positive youth development in the United States: research findings on evaluations of positive youth development programs. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 2004;591:98–124.10.1177/0002716203260102Search in Google Scholar

14. Catalano RF, Fagan AA, Gavin LE, Greenberg MT, Irwin CE, Ross DA, et al. Worldwide application of prevention science in adolescent health. Lancet 2012;379:1653–64.10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60238-4Search in Google Scholar

15. Shek DT, Sun RC. The Project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong: development, training, implementation, and evaluation. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2013;26:S2–9.10.1016/j.jpag.2013.03.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Shek DT, Sun RC, editors. Development and evaluation of Positive Adolescent Training through Holistic Social Programs (PATHS). Singapore: Springer, 2013.10.1007/978-981-4451-54-3Search in Google Scholar

17. Shek DT, Ma C. Impact of the Project P.A.T.H.S. in the junior secondary school years: objective outcome evaluation based on eight waves of longitudinal data. Scientific World J 2012;2012:Article 170345.10.1100/2012/170345Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Shek DT, Sun RC. Positive youth development programs for adolescents with greater psychosocial needs: subjective outcome evaluation over 3 years. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2014;27:S17–25.10.1016/j.jpag.2014.02.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Shek DT, Tam S-y. Process evaluation of the Project P.A.T.H.S. (Secondary 2 Program): Findings based on the co-walker scheme. Adolescence 2009;44:813–25.Search in Google Scholar

20. Shek DT, Ma C. Do university students change after taking a subject on leadership and intrapersonal development? Int J Disabil Hum Dev 2014;13:451–6.10.1515/ijdhd-2014-0341Search in Google Scholar

21. Shek DT. Post-lecture evaluation of a positive youth development subject for university students in Hong Kong. Int J Child Health Hum Dev 2013;6:69–79.Search in Google Scholar

22. Shek DT, Sun RC. Focus group evaluation of a positive youth development course in a university in Hong Kong. Int J Disabil Hum Dev 2012;11:249–54.Search in Google Scholar

23. Kember D, Leung DY. Establishing the validity and reliability of course evaluation questionnaires. Assess Eval High Educ 2008;33:341–53.10.1080/02602930701563070Search in Google Scholar

24. Shek DT, Yu L. Student feedback on a subject on leadership and intrapersonal development for university students in Hong Kong. Int J Disabil Hum Dev in press.Search in Google Scholar

25. Shek DT, Yu L. An evaluative survey on a university general education subject in Hong Kong. Int J Adolesc Med Health in press.Search in Google Scholar

26. Educationnal Development Centre (EDC). The PolyU Student Feedback Questionnaire (SFQ) System. Available at: http://edc.polyu.edu.hk/sfq-collect.htm. Accessed: 5 Oct 2015.Search in Google Scholar

27. Shek DT, Sun RC. Process evaluation of a leadership and intrapersonal development subject for university students. Int J Disabil Hum Dev 2013;12:203–11.10.1515/ijdhd-2013-0018Search in Google Scholar

28. Akiri AA. Effects of teachers’ effectiveness on students’ academic performance in public secondary schools; Delta State-Nigeria. J Educ Soc Res 2013;3:105–11.10.5901/jesr.2013.v3n3p105Search in Google Scholar

29. Phipps SD, Kidd RS, Latif DA. Relationships among student evaluations, instructor effectiveness, and academic performance. Pharm Educ 2006;6:237–43.10.1080/15602210600886175Search in Google Scholar

30. Shek DT. Subjective outcome and objective outcome evaluation findings: Insights from a Chinese context. Res Soc Work Pract 2010;20:293–301.10.1177/1049731509331951Search in Google Scholar

31. Lizzio A, Wilson K, Simons R. University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: implications for theory and practice. Stud High Educ 2002;27:27–52.10.1080/03075070120099359Search in Google Scholar

32. Clough MP. The Teacher’s crucial role in helping students learn through inquiry. Lowa Sci Teach J 2006;33:2.Search in Google Scholar

33. Darling-Hammond L, Bransford J, editors. Preparing teachers for a changing world: what teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

34. Shek DT, Wu FK. The role of teachers in youth development: reflections of students. Int J Disabil Hum Dev 2014;13: 473–80.Search in Google Scholar

35. Bundick MJ, Tirri K. Student perceptions of teacher support and competencies for fostering youth purpose and positive youth development: Perspectives from two countries. Appl Dev Sci 2014;18:148–62.10.1080/10888691.2014.924357Search in Google Scholar

36. Denson N, Loveday T, Dalton H. Student evaluation of courses: What predicts satisfaction? High Educ Res Dev 2010;29:339–56.10.1080/07294360903394466Search in Google Scholar

37. Spiel C, Gossler PM. The effects of biasing variables on students’ ratings of courses. Z Padagog Psychol 2000;14: 38–47.Search in Google Scholar

38. LeBard R, Thompson R, Micolich A, Quinnell R, editors. Identifying common thresholds in learning for students working in the ‘hard’ discipline of science. Proceedings of The Australian Conference on Science and Mathematics Education (formerly UniServe Science Conference); 2009; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.Search in Google Scholar

39. Morgan DL. Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. J Mix Methods Res 2007;1:48–76.10.1177/2345678906292462Search in Google Scholar

40. Shek DT. Promotion of holistic development in university students. Best Pract Ment Health 2013;9:47–61.Search in Google Scholar

41. Shek DT, Yu L. Post-course subjective outcome evaluation of a subject on leadership and intrapersonal development for university students in Hong Kong. Int J Disabil Hum Dev 2014;13:457–64.Search in Google Scholar

42. Shek DT. Is subjective outcome evaluation related to objective outcome evaluation? Insights from a longitudinal study in Hong Kong. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2014;27:S50–6.10.1016/j.jpag.2014.02.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed