Home Comparison between neurological examination and computerized test of attention for suspected ADHD: implications for assessment of a common childhood disability
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Comparison between neurological examination and computerized test of attention for suspected ADHD: implications for assessment of a common childhood disability

  • Gary Diamond EMAIL logo , Moad Badir , Patty Sevilla , Dov Inbar and Natan Gadoth
Published/Copyright: December 6, 2012

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the role of the Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA), a computer-based continuous performance test (CPT), in assessing suspected attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), a pervasive cause of disability in children and adolescents.

Methods: One hundred and fifty children and adolescents referred to a community-hospital-based neurology clinic for suspected ADHD underwent a comprehensive clinical evaluation by a pediatric neurologist in addition to the TOVA test. Retrospective chart data were analyzed separately for children aged 6–12 years (n=101) and adolescents (13–18 years) (n=49). Parents and teachers completed Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR, 2000) questionnaires for children 6–12 years old.

Results: The correlation between the neurologist’s impression of the presence of attention deficit and the TOVA scores was good in the younger group (r=0.28, p≤0.001) and weaker in the older group (r=0.29, p≤0.05). On nonparametric analysis, the neurological evaluation did not distinguish between low and high TOVA scorers in the older group. The neurologist’s impression correlated more closely with the DSM-IV parents ratings (r=0.29, p≤0.01) than the teachers’ (r=0.08, p≤0.05).

Conclusions: The TOVA correlated well with clinical assessment of ADHD and has added value in the evaluation of ADHD in adolescents, for whom standardized rating scales are lacking. In younger children, an experienced clinician can usually reach an accurate diagnosis based on accepted clinical criteria, including parent and teacher reports.


Corresponding author: Gary Diamond, MD, Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Neurology and Child Development, Schneider Children’s Medical Center of Israel, 14 Kaplan Street, Petah Tikva, Israel, Phone: +972-3-506263456, Fax: +972-3-5797184

We would like to thank Ms. Penina Lilos for performing the statistical analysis.

Conflict of interest statement

Authors’ conflict of interest disclosure: The authors stated that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of the article.

Research funding: None declared.

Employment or leadership: None declared.

Honorarium: None declared.

References

1. Mahar P, Chalmers L. Teachers’ perceptions of students diagnosed with ADHD. Natl Forum Appl Educ Res J 2007;20:1–8.Search in Google Scholar

2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fourth edition, text revision (DSM-IV-TR). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

3. American Academy of Pediatrics. Clinical practice guidelines: treatment of the school-age children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Pediatrics 2001;108:1033–44.10.1542/peds.108.4.1033Search in Google Scholar

4. Cordes M, McLaughlin TF. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and rating scales with a brief review of the Conners Teacher Rating Scale (1998). Int J Special Educ 2004;19:23–34.Search in Google Scholar

5. Conners CK, Wells KC, Parker JD, Sitarenios G, Diamond JM, Powell JW. A new self-report scale for assessment of adolescent psychopathology: factor structure, reliability, validity, and diagnostic sensitivity. J Abnorm Child Psychol 1997;25:487–97.10.1023/A:1022637815797Search in Google Scholar

6. Conners CK, Sitarenios G, Parker JD, Epstein JN. The Revised Conners’ Parent Rating Scale (CPRS-R): factor structure, reliability, and criterion validity. J Abnorm Child Psychol 1998;26:257–68.10.1023/A:1022602400621Search in Google Scholar

7. Conners CK, Sitarenios G, Parker JD, Epstein JN. Revision and restandardization of the Conners’ Teacher Rating Scale (CTRS-R): factor structure, reliability, and criterion validity. J Abnorm Child Psychol 1998;26:279–91.10.1023/A:1022606501530Search in Google Scholar

8. Conners CK. Conners’ Rating Scales: revised technical manual. North Tanawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems 1997.10.1037/t81067-000Search in Google Scholar

9. Conners CK. Rating scales in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: use in assessment and treatment monitoring. J Clin Psychiatry 1998;59(Suppl):24–30.Search in Google Scholar

10. Biederman J, Faraone SV, Lapey K. Co-morbidity of diagnosis in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am 1992;1:335–60.10.1016/S1056-4993(18)30591-1Search in Google Scholar

11. Brown ET. Attention-deficit disorder and co-morbidities in children, adolescents, and adults. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Press, 2000:18–20.Search in Google Scholar

12. Mostofsky S. ADHD. In: Singer H, Kossoff E, Hartman A, Crawford T, editors. Treatment of pediatric neurologic disorders. London, Informa Health Care, 2005:495–500.Search in Google Scholar

13. Mostofsky SH, Newsehaffer CJ, Denckla MB. Overflow movements predict impaired response inhibition in children with ADHD. Percept Mot Skills 2003;97:1315–31.10.2466/pms.2003.97.3f.1315Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Barkley RA. Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychol Bull 1997;121:65.10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.65Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Greenberg LM, Waldman ID. Developmental normative data on the test of variables of attention (T.O.V.A.). J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1993;34:1019–30.10.1111/j.1469-7610.1993.tb01105.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Greenberg LM, Kindschi CL, Dupuy TR, Hughes SJ. T.O.V.A. Professional manual, test of variables of attention. Continuous performance test. Edition 410. Los Alamitos, CA: TOVA Co., 2007.Search in Google Scholar

17. Porumb M. Using T.O.V.A. for the assessment of ADHD: a case study. Cogn Brain Behav 2007;11:571–84.Search in Google Scholar

18. Greenberg LM. TOVA. Visual continuous performance test. Los Alamitos, CA: Universal Attention Disorders Inc., 1997.Search in Google Scholar

19. Dickerson Mayes S, Calhoun SL, Crowell EW. Clinical validity and interpretation of the Gordon Diagnostic System in ADHD assessments. Child Neuropsychol 2001;7:32–41.10.1076/chin.7.1.32.3151Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Dulcan M. Practice parameters for the assessment and treatment of children, adolescents, and adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1997;36(Suppl):S85–121.10.1097/00004583-199710001-00007Search in Google Scholar

21. Berger I, Goldzweig G. Objective measures of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a pilot study. Israel Med Assoc J 2010;12:531–5.Search in Google Scholar

22. Williams LM, Hermens DF, Thein T, Clark CR, Cooper NJ, Clarke SD, et al. Using brain-based cognitive measures to support clinical designs in ADHD. Pediatr Neurol 2010;42:118–26.10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2009.08.010Search in Google Scholar

23. Silverstein SM, Berten S, Olson P, Paul R, Willams LM, Cooper N, et al. Development and validation of a World-Wide-Web-based neurocognitive assessment battery: WebNeuro. Behav Res Methods 2007;39:940–9.10.3758/BF03192989Search in Google Scholar

24. Williams LM, Simms E, Clark CR, Rower D, Gordon E. The test-retest reliability of a standardized neurocognitive and neuropsychological test battery: neuromarker. Int J Neurosci 2005;115:1605–30.10.1080/00207450590958475Search in Google Scholar

25. BMDP statistical software. W.J. Dixon, editor. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, 1993.Search in Google Scholar

26. Nichols SL, Waschbusch DA. A review of the validity of laboratory cognitive tasks used to assess symptoms of ADHD. Child Psych Hum Dev 2004;34:297–315.Search in Google Scholar

27. Forbes GB. Clinical utility of the test of variables of attention (T.O.V.A.) in the diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Clin Psychol 1998;54:461–76.10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199806)54:4<461::AID-JCLP8>3.0.CO;2-QSearch in Google Scholar

28. Schatz AM, Ballantyne AO, Trauner DA. Sensitivity and specificity of a computerized test of attention in the diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Assessment 2001;8:357–65.10.1177/107319110100800401Search in Google Scholar

29. Green M, Wong M, Atkins D. Diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Technical Review 3, AHCPR Publication 99-0050. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, 1999.10.1037/e579532012-001Search in Google Scholar

30. Foy JM, Earls MF. A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Pediatrics 2005;115:e97–104.10.1542/peds.2004-0953Search in Google Scholar

31. Biederman J, Faraone S, Mick E, Williamson S, Wilens TE, Spencer TJ, et al. Clinical correlation of ADHD in females: findings from a large group of girls ascertained from pediatric and psychiatric referral sources. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1999;38:966–77.10.1097/00004583-199908000-00012Search in Google Scholar

32. Adler LA, Shaw DM, Spencer TJ, Newcorn JH, Sitt DJ, Davidow JV, et al. Preliminary reliability and validity of a new time-sensitive ADHD symptom scale in adolescents with ADHD. Postgrad Med 2011;123:7–13.10.3810/pgm.2011.09.2455Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2012-7-28
Accepted: 2012-9-24
Published Online: 2012-12-06
Published in Print: 2013-08-01

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Masthead
  2. Masthead
  3. Editorial
  4. Substance use, addiction, and history
  5. Reviews
  6. International accessibility: a proposal for a system of symbols for people with disabilities
  7. Perceived parenting as related to emotional competence of visually and hearing impaired adolescents
  8. Wheelchair-related falls – a review
  9. Original Articles
  10. Health-risk behaviors and a healthy lifestyle among students from different environmental and cultural backgrounds
  11. Severity of symptomatology and subtypes in ADHD children with comorbid oppositional defiant and conduct disorders
  12. Comparison between neurological examination and computerized test of attention for suspected ADHD: implications for assessment of a common childhood disability
  13. Effectiveness of a participative community singing program to improve health behaviors and increase physical activity in Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people
  14. Improving Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians’ well-being using participatory community singing approach
  15. Participatory community singing program to enhance quality of life and social and emotional well-being in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians with chronic diseases
  16. The disability gap in happiness across welfare regimes
  17. Evaluation of disable friendliness of a railway transport facility in Ludhiana city of Punjab, India
  18. The relationship between phonological awareness time and reading abilities: an assessment using self-organizing maps
  19. Patterns of adaptive performance by individuals with autism spectrum disorders on the Behavior Assessment System for Children II (BASC-2)
  20. Comparative study on the efficacy of electromyography and galvanic skin resistance biofeedback in tension type headache: a single blinded randomized controlled trial
  21. Changes in Barthel Index outcomes as result of poststroke rehabilitation using NDT-Bobath method
  22. Morbidity pattern among the disabled in Ibadan, Nigeria: a retrospective analysis
  23. Short Communication
  24. Eclectic approach as the natural way of development in neurorehabilitation of adults
  25. Case Reports
  26. Angelman syndrome patient management: 5 years of clinical experience
  27. Complex visual hallucinations in a patient with chronic schizophrenia and alcohol dependence: a case report and literature review
  28. Book Review
  29. A practitioner’s guide to prescribing antiepileptics and mood stabilizers for adults with intellectual disabilities
  30. Erratum
  31. A longitudinal study of institutional downsizing and challenging behaviors among adults with intellectual disability
Downloaded on 9.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijdhd-2012-0113/html
Scroll to top button