Startseite Experiment and Dynamic Simulation of PIG Motion during Pigging Operation in a Slope Pipeline
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Experiment and Dynamic Simulation of PIG Motion during Pigging Operation in a Slope Pipeline

  • Jun Zhou EMAIL logo , Tao Deng EMAIL logo , Guangchuan Liang , Jinghong Peng , Tian Meng und Jing Gong
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 17. Juli 2018
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Pigging techniques are widely used in the oil and gas industry. The unsteady motion of the PIG in an undulating pipe section during the pigging process after a water pressure test affects the stable operation of the pipeline and also causes a pipe rupture accident in serious cases. First, an experimental study was conducted to investigate the pigging process of air–water two phase pipe flows, and the PIG reverse movement and hydraulic pulse phenomenon were observed. Subsequently, a hydraulic transient model of the pigging process after a water pressure test was established in a dual-grid system. The model combined mass and motion equations of gas and liquid and PIG dynamic equations, considered three types of PIG motion states, namely positive movement, reverse movement and still, and used the method of characteristics to solve the equations. The model exhibits the ability for PIG tracing and hydraulic pulse prediction. It can be used to obtain the position and speed of the PIG. Finally, the field data and simulation results were compared, and the results indicated that they are essentially identical. This verified the accuracy of the model that is established in this study and the reliability of computed results and provided a reliable and effective theoretical basis for the development of field pigging plans.

Nomenclature

A Cross-section area of the pipeline (m2)
f Friction factor
m Index number of the Darcy formula
a Acoustic speed of the fluid (m/s)
t Time (s)
x Distance along the pipeline (m)
P Pressure (Pa)
g Gravity acceleration (m·s-2)
θ Angle between the axis and horizontal direction (rad)
α Angle between the axis and horizontal direction (rad)
D Diameter of the pipeline (mm)
MPig mass (kg)
λ Hydraulic friction coefficient
ρgDensity of the gas (kg/m3)
ρlDensity of the liquid (kg/m3)
VgGas phase velocity (m/s)
Vl Liquid phase velocity (m/s)
VPIG Pig velocity(m/s);
Ql Volume rate of the liquid (m3/s)
PaPressure on the upstream face of the PIG (Pa)
Pb Pressure on the upstream face of the PIG (Pa)
as Acoustic speed of the gas phase (m/s)
Qg Volume rate of the gas phase (m3/s)
ΔPk Axial contact kinetic friction(Pa)
ΔPs Axial contact static friction(Pa)

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express sincere acknowledgements to the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51704253) and the Young Scholars Development Fund of SWPU (201599010096) for the financial support in this project.

References

Azevedo, L. F. A., A. M. B. Braga, and A. O. Nieckele. 2003. Simulating pipeline pigging operations. Houston, TX: Clarion Technical Publishers. 79–107.Suche in Google Scholar

Barua, S. 1982. “An Experimental verification and modification of the McDonald and Baker pigging model for horizontal flow.” Ph.D diss., Texas: University of Tulsa.Suche in Google Scholar

Campo, V., and F. B. Rachid. 1997. “Modeling of pig motion under transient fluid flow.” In Proc. XIV Brazilian Congress of Mechanical Engineering-COBEM. Sao Paulo, Brazil.Suche in Google Scholar

Duan, R. X. 2013. “Study on characteristics of unsteady flow during pigging process in gas-liquid flow pipeline.” PhD diss., Being: China University of Petroleum (Beijing). (in Chinese)Suche in Google Scholar

Esmaeilzadeh, F., D. Mowla, and M. Asemani. 2009. “Mathematical modeling and simulation of pigging operationin gas and liquid pipelines.” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 8 (6): 1–7.10.1016/j.petrol.2009.08.006Suche in Google Scholar

Hosseinalipour, S. M., A Zarif, Khalili., and A Aalimi. 2007. “Numerical simulationof pig motion through gas pipelines.” In 16th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference. Australia: University of Queenoland.Suche in Google Scholar

Kim, D. K., S. H. Cho, S. S. Park, Y. W. Rho, H. R. Yoo, T. T. Nguyen, and S. B. Kim. 2003. “Verification of the theoretical model for analyzing dynamic behavior of the pig from actual pigging.” KSME International Journal 17 (9): 1349–1357.10.1007/BF02982476Suche in Google Scholar

Kohda, K., Y. Suzukawa, and H. Furukwa. 1988. “A new method for analyzing transient flow after pigging scores well.” Oil and Gas Journal 86 (29): 40–47.Suche in Google Scholar

Li, Y. X., and S. C. Feng. 2004. “Simulation of pigging dynamics in two-phase flow pipelines.” Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering 55 (2): 271–274. in Chinese.Suche in Google Scholar

Lima, P. C. R. 1999. “Modeling of transient gas-liquid flow and pigging in pipes.”PhD diss., Cranfield: Cranfield University.Suche in Google Scholar

McDonald, A., and O. Baker. 1964. “Multiphase flow in (gas) pipelines.” Oil and Gas Journal 62 (24): 68–71.Suche in Google Scholar

Minami, K. 1991. “Transient flow and pigging in two-phase flow pipelines.” PhD diss., Tulsa: University of Tulsa.Suche in Google Scholar

Minami, K., and O. Shoham. 1996. “Pigging dynamics in two-phase flow pipe lines: Experiment and modeling.” International Journal of Multiphase Flow 22 (1): 145–146.10.1016/S0301-9322(97)88561-8Suche in Google Scholar

Nguyen, T. T., D. K. Kim, Y. W. Pho, and B. K. Sang. 2001. “Dynamic modeling and its analysis for PIG flow through curved section in natural gas pipeline.” In Proceedings of 2001 IEEE International Symposiumon Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation. Canada.Suche in Google Scholar

Nguyen, T. T., and S. B. Kim. 2001. “Modeling and simulation for PIG flow control in natural gas pipeline.” KSME International Journal 15 (8): 1165–1173.10.1007/BF03185096Suche in Google Scholar

Swaffield, J. A. 1969. “A study of column separation following valve closure in a pipeline carrying aviation kerosine.” Proceedings of the Institution ofMechanical Engineers 184 (7): 57–64.10.1243/PIME_CONF_1969_184_162_02Suche in Google Scholar

Tolmasquima, S. T., and A. O. Nieckele. 2008. “Design and control of pig operations through pipelines.” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 62: 102–110.10.1016/j.petrol.2008.07.002Suche in Google Scholar

Xu, X. X., and J. Gong. 2005. “Pigging simulation for horizontal gas-condensate pipelines with low-liquid loading.” Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering 48 (3): 272–280.10.1016/j.petrol.2005.06.005Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-01-29
Revised: 2018-03-30
Accepted: 2018-07-07
Published Online: 2018-07-17

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 17.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijcre-2018-0019/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen