Home Medicine Predictors of violence and depression: the case of adolescents in Turkey
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Predictors of violence and depression: the case of adolescents in Turkey

  • Ali Çiftçi and Aytul Kasapoglu EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: January 23, 2015

Abstract

Violence is a leading problem that has a negative impact on daily living. Today, it continues to be an important topic owing to its widespread occurrence, especially among the youth. The main objective of this study is to specify the predictors that influence violence and depression observed among youth aged 15–18 years. While some of these factors are individual (age, gender, flirting, sports. etc.), the subjects’ background, such as the family’s education level, sibling number, etc., were investigated as social and environmental factors. In the survey, data were obtained from 109 high school students receiving education in a private teaching institution using a structured questionnaire technique. With regards the reliability of the survey, equal numbers of boys and girls were chosen from each year in high school lasting for 4 years. After asking questions that aim to obtain students’ sociodemographic features, their depression level was surveyed using the Beck Depression Scale; meanwhile, the Violence Tendency Scale was used to survey their tendency to be violent. Findings revealed that some individual and domestic features of adolescents have significant impacts on their tendencies towards violence and depression.


Corresponding author: Aytul Kasapoglu, Faculty of Letters, Department of Sociology, Ankara University, Turkey, E-mail:

References

1. Gençoğlu C, Kumcagız H, Ersanlı K. Family factors affecting violent tendency in adolescents. International periodical for the languages, literature and history of Turkish or Turkic 2014;9:63952.Search in Google Scholar

2. Akpınar O. Aile içi şiddete maruz kalan kadınlarda aile içi şiddetle başa çıkma özyeterliği. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi 2013;4:2436.Search in Google Scholar

3. Koç M. Şiddetin ortaya çıkardığı psikolojik travmayla baş etmede sporun işlevselliği”, 1. Şiddet ve Okul: Okul ve Çevresinde Çocuğa Yönelik Şiddet ve Alınabilecek Tedbirler Sempozyumu. İstanbul: Mart 2006:2831.Search in Google Scholar

4. Pişkin M. Okul zorbalığı tanımı, türleri, ilişkili olduğu faktörler ve alınabilecek önlemler. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri 2002;3:53162.Search in Google Scholar

5. Anderson CA. Bushman BJ. Human agression. Annu Rev Psychol 2002;53:2751.10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135231Search in Google Scholar

6. Olweus D. Bullying prevention program. Boulder, CO: Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence, Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado at Boulder, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

7. Englander EK. Understanding Violence. London: Lawrance Erlbaum Associates, 2003.10.4324/9781410606693Search in Google Scholar

8. Bilge F. Danışandan hız alan ve bilişsel davranışçı yaklaşımlarla yapılan grupla psikolojik danışmanın üniversite öğrencilerinin kızgınlık düzeyleri üzerindeki etkileri. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi 1996;2:916.Search in Google Scholar

9. Köknel Ö. Bireysel ve Toplumsal Şiddet. İstanbul: Altın, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

10. Moeller TG. Youth aggression and violence: a psychological approach. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2001.10.4324/9781410606488Search in Google Scholar

11. Özmen A. Öfke ile başa çıkma; grup rehberliği programı. In: Öner U, editor. Catisma cozme egitimi ve akran arabuluculugu. Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

12. Howells K. Anger and links to violent offending. Psychiatr Psychol Law 2004;11:18991.10.1375/pplt.2004.11.2.189Search in Google Scholar

13. Bora T. Milliyetçilik ve Şiddet. Şiddet Sempozyumu. 3 Mart Ankara: Türk Tabipler Birliği Yayınları, 2007:714.Search in Google Scholar

14. Yılmaz İ. Endüstri meslek lisesi öğrencilerinin saldırganlık düzeylerinin çok boyutlu olarak incelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Yeditepe Üniversitesi, İstanbul, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

15. Furlong M, Morrison G. The school in school violence: definitions and facts. J Emot Behav Disord 2000;8:7181.10.1177/106342660000800203Search in Google Scholar

16. Pişkin M. Zorbalığa ilişkin yanlış algı, inanç ve düşünceler. Öğretmen Dünyası 2006;27:135.Search in Google Scholar

17. İnanç BY, Bilgin M, ve Atıcı MK. Gelişim Psikolojisi: Çocuk ve Ergen Gelişimi. Adana: Nobel, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

18. Sharron MC. Dating violence prevention in middle school and high school youth. J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs 2005;18:2–9.10.1111/j.1744-6171.2005.00003.xSearch in Google Scholar

19. Kılıç R. Okullarda şiddetin önlenmesi ve azaltılması. In: Gelbal S, editor. Okullarda Şiddetin önlenmesi: Mevcut uygulamalar ve sonuçları. Ankara: Türk Eğitim Derneği Yayınları, 2007:25–48.Search in Google Scholar

20. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Okullarda şiddetin önlenmesi, Genelge no: 2006 /26. Özel Eğitim Rehberlik ve Danışma Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü. 2006, Erişim: 01 9. 2008, http://orgm.meb.gov.tr/Mevzuat/genelgeler/okullardasiddet.htm.Search in Google Scholar

21. Gittins C, editor. Okullarda şiddetin azaltılması. Avrupa Konseyi: El kitabı, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

22. TBMM Araştırma Komisyonu Çocuklarda ve gençlerde artan şiddet eğilimi ile okullarda meydana gelen olayların araştırılarak alınması gereken önlemlerin belirlenmesi amacıyla kurulan (10/337,343,356,357) esas numaralı meclis araştırma komisyon raporu. Ankara: MEB Özel Eğitim Rehberlik ve Danışma Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

23. TUİK. National Statistics. Ankara: TUIK, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

24. Sağlık Bakanlığı Ulusal hastalık yükü ve maliyet etkililik projesi, hastalık yükü final raporu. Sağlık Bakanlığı Refik Saydam Hıfzısıhha Merkezi Başkanlığı, Hıfzısıhha Merkezi Müdürlüğü, Başkent Üniversitesi, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

25. Çuhadaroğlu F. Şiddetin psikolojik boyutu: Gençlik ve şiddet araştırmaları. Çocuk ve Ergene Yönelik Şiddetin Önlenmesi Sempozyumu Mayıs. Ankara: AEM Kitap, 2006:15–6.Search in Google Scholar

26. Cowie H. Bystanding or standing by: gender issues in coping with bullying in schools. Aggressive Behav 2000;26:85–97.10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(2000)26:1<85::AID-AB7>3.0.CO;2-5Search in Google Scholar

27. Heinrich LM, ve Gullone E. The clinical significance of loneliness: a literatüre review. Clin Psychol Rev 2006;26: 695–718.10.1016/j.cpr.2006.04.002Search in Google Scholar

28. Kasapoğlu A, Ecevit M. A sociological study of adolescent health in Ankara, Turkey. IJAMH 2004;16:325–36.10.1515/IJAMH.2004.16.4.325Search in Google Scholar

29. Kasapoğlu A, Kaya ÇN. A sociological case study on urban adolescents in four neighborhood of Ankara-Turkey. Educ Res Eval 2005;11:349–64.10.1080/13803610500110562Search in Google Scholar

30. Cohen S, Wills TA. Stress, social support and the buffering hypothesis. 1985, erişim:10 4.2009 http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=search.displayRecord&uid=1986-01119-001.Search in Google Scholar

31. Yüksel N. Bilişsel işlevleri yönünden normallerle depresif hastaların karşılaştırılması. Psikoloji Dergisi 1984;5:14–5.Search in Google Scholar

32. Bellack A. Social skills training compared with pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy in the treatment of depression. Inventory Pharmachopsychiatry 1981;7:151–69.Search in Google Scholar

33. Burns D. Feeling good: the new mood therapy. New York: Signet Books, 1982.Search in Google Scholar

34. Hisli N. Beck depresyon envanterinin üniversite öğrencileri için geçerliği, güvenirliği. Psikoloji Dergisi 1988;7:3–13.Search in Google Scholar

35. WHO. World Statistics. Geneva:WHO, 1990.Search in Google Scholar

36. Beaumont G, Hetzel W. Patients at risk of suicide and overdose. 2nd International Symposium on Moclobemide: RIMA: a new concept in the treatment of depression. Psychopharmacol 1992;106:123–6.10.1007/BF02246255Search in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Kasapoğlu A, Ecevit M. A sociological case study on attitudes and behavior of students in urban Turkey. Urban Education 2005;40:550–64.10.1177/0042085905278018Search in Google Scholar

38. Kasapoğlu A, Çabuk N. Relationship between adolescent health behaviors and self-esteem in Turkey. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2006;18:623–32.10.1515/IJAMH.2006.18.4.623Search in Google Scholar

39. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. Eğitim İstatistikleri. Ankara: MEB, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

40. YOK. Yüksek Öğretim İstatistikleri. Ankara: YOK, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

41. TUIK. Youth in Statistics (www.turksat.gov.tr.), 2012.Search in Google Scholar

42. Bourdieu P. The distinctions: a social critique of judgemet of taste. London: Routledge, 1984.Search in Google Scholar

43. Haskan O. Ergenlerde Şiddet Eğilimi, Yalnızlık ve Sosyal Destek, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

44. Tezcan M. Bir şiddet ortamı olarak okul. Cogito 1996;6–7: 105–8.Search in Google Scholar

45. Johnson DW, ve Johnson RT. Reducing school violence through conflict resolution. 1995, erişim: 1 5.2009, http://books.google.com/books.Search in Google Scholar

46. Varış F. Ergenin Gelişimine Etki Yapan Kültürel Faktörler. Ankara: E.B.F., 1968.Search in Google Scholar

47. Tan H. Ergenlerin anne-babalarıyla ile olan en önemli problem alanları.10. Milli Psikiyatri ve nörolojik Bilimler Kongresi, Ankara, 1977.Search in Google Scholar

48. Oskay, G. Değer yargıları yönünden ana-baba ile çatışma. Psikoloji Dergisi 1982;4:14–25.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2014-8-21
Accepted: 2014-11-22
Published Online: 2015-1-23
Published in Print: 2015-11-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Traumatic brain injury: some good news
  4. Mini Review
  5. Premenstrual disorder and the adolescent: clinical case report, literature review, and diagnostic and therapeutic challenges
  6. Original articles
  7. The relationship between physical fitness and obesity among a sample of adolescents in Cyprus
  8. Exposing young people to cooking and new foods: findings from a feasibility study in an alternative education setting
  9. Prolonged rooming-in in infancy is associated with generalized anxiety disorder in the adolescent period
  10. Prevalence of bullying in secondary schools in Port Harcourt
  11. Prevalence and determinants of smoking initiation among school students in Bosnia and Herzegovina
  12. Effects of lifetime tobacco, alcohol and drug use on psychological and behavioral problems among 10th grade students in Istanbul
  13. Internal resilience, peer victimization, and suicidal ideation among adolescents
  14. Predictors of violence and depression: the case of adolescents in Turkey
  15. Barriers to health education in adolescents: health care providers’ perspectives compared to high school adolescents
  16. Eating disorders in adolescents: how does the DSM-5 change the diagnosis?
  17. Perceptions of family styles by adolescents with eating disorders and their parents
  18. Age at menarche and diet among adolescents in slums of Nashik, India
  19. Case Reports
  20. Charging of the penis: an unusual method for sexual gratification
  21. An adolescent with asthma presenting with worsening cough
  22. Urethral foreign body in an adolescent boy: report of two rare cases and review of literature
  23. Short Communication
  24. HIV testing among non-incarcerated substance-abusing juvenile offenders
  25. Letter to the Editor
  26. Is the Internet the only factor of negative health outcomes amongst college students?
Downloaded on 31.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijamh-2014-0048/html
Scroll to top button