A dual-processing approach to the effects of viewing political comedy

References

Baek, Young M. & Magdalena Wojcieszak. 2009. Don’t expect too much! Learning from late-night comedy and knowledge item difficulty. Communication Research 36(6). 783–809. doi: 10.1177/0093650209346805.10.1177/0093650209346805Suche in Google Scholar

Baum, Matthew A. 2003. Soft news and political knowledge: Evidence of absence or absence of evidence? Political Communication 20(2). 173–190. doi: 10.1080/10584600390211181.10.1080/10584600390211181Suche in Google Scholar

Baumgartner, Jody C. 2013. No laughing matter? Young adults and the “spillover effect” of candidate-centered political humor. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 26(1). 23–43. doi: 10.1515/humor-2013-0003.10.1515/humor-2013-0003Suche in Google Scholar

Baumgartner, Jody C. & Jonathan S. Morris. 2006. The Daily Show effect: Candidate evaluations, efficacy, and American youth. American Politics Research 34(3). 341–367. doi: 10.1177/1532673X1528007.10.1177/1532673X05280074Suche in Google Scholar

Baumgartner, Jody C. & Jonathan S. Morris. 2008. One ‘nation,’ under Stephen? The effects of The Colbert Report on American Youth. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 52(4). 622–634. doi: 10.1080/08838150802437487.10.1080/08838150802437487Suche in Google Scholar

Baumgartner, Jody C. & Jonathan S. Morris. 2011. Stoned slackers or super citizens?: The Daily Show viewing and political engagement of young adults. In Amarnath Amarsingam (ed.), The Stewart/Colbert effect: Essays on the real impacts of fake news, 63–78. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.Suche in Google Scholar

Baumgartner, Jody C., Jonathan S. Morris & Natasha L. Walth. 2012. The Fey effect: Young adults, political humor, and perceptions of Sarah Palin in the 2008 presidential election campaign. Public Opinion Quarterly 76(1). 95–104. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfr060.10.1093/poq/nfr060Suche in Google Scholar

Bippus, Amy. 2007. Factors predicting the perceived effectiveness of political humor during a debate. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 20(2). 105–121. doi: 10.1515/HUMOR.2007.006.10.1515/HUMOR.2007.006Suche in Google Scholar

Cao, Xiaoxia. 2010. Hearing it from Jon Stewart: The impact of The Daily Show on public attentiveness to politics. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 22(1). 26–46. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edp043.10.1093/ijpor/edp043Suche in Google Scholar

Compton, Josh. 2011. Surveying the scholarship on The Daily Show and The Colbert Report. In Amarnath Amarsingam (ed.), The Stewart/Colbert effect: Essays on the real impacts of fake news, 9–23. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.Suche in Google Scholar

Compton, Josh & B.Ivanov. 2013. Vaccinating voters: New directions for political campaign inoculation scholarship. In Elisia L. Cohen (ed.), Communication Yearbook, vol. 37, 250–283. New York: Routledge.10.1080/23808985.2013.11679152Suche in Google Scholar

Delli Carpini, Michael X. & Scott Keeter. 1996. What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressSuche in Google Scholar

Feldman, Laruen. 2013. Learning about politics from The Daily Show: The role of viewer orientation and processing motivations. Mass Communication and Society 16(4). 586–607. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2012.735742.10.1080/15205436.2012.735742Suche in Google Scholar

Feldman, Lauren, Anthony Leiserowitz & Edward Maibach. 2011. The science of satire: The Daily Show and The Colbert Report as sources of public attention to science and the environment. In Amarnath Amarsingam (ed.), The Stewart/Colbert effect: Essays on the real impacts of fake news, 25–46. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.10.2139/ssrn.1838730Suche in Google Scholar

Feldman, Lauren & Dannagal Young. 2008. Late-night comedy as a gateway to traditional news: An analysis of time trends in news attention among late-night comedy viewers during the 2004 presidential primaries. Political Communication 25(4). 401–422. doi: 10.1080/10584600802427013.10.1080/10584600802427013Suche in Google Scholar

Hardy, Bruce W., Jeffery A. Gottfried, Kenneth M. Winneg & Kathleen H. Jamieson. 2014. Stephen Colbert’s civics lesson: How Colbert Super PAC taught viewers about campaign finance. Mass Communication and Society 17(3). 329–353. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2014.891138.10.1080/15205436.2014.891138Suche in Google Scholar

Hmielowski, Jay D., R. Lance Holbert & Jayeon Lee. 2011. Predicting the consumption of political TV satire: Affinity for political humor, The Daily Show, and The Colbert Report. Communication Monographs 78(1). 96–114. doi: 10.1080/03637751.2010.542579.10.1080/03637751.2010.542579Suche in Google Scholar

Holbert, R. Lance, Jennifer L. Lambe, Anthony D. Dudo & Kristin A. Carlton. 2007. Primacy effects of The Daily Show and national TV news viewing: Young viewers, political gratifications, and internal political self-efficacy. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 51(1). 20–38. doi: 10.1080/08838150701308002.10.1080/08838150701308002Suche in Google Scholar

Hollander, Barry A. 2005. Late-night learning: Do entertainment programs increase political campaign knowledge for young viewers? Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49(4). 402–415. doi: 10.1207/s15506878jobem4904_3.10.1207/s15506878jobem4904_3Suche in Google Scholar

Kim, Young M. & John Vishak. 2008. Just laugh! You don’t need to remember: The effects of entertainment media on political information acquisition and information processing in political judgment. Journal of Communication 58(2). 338–360. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00388.x.10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00388.xSuche in Google Scholar

Kohut, Andrew. 2012. In changing news landscape, even television is vulnerable. The Pew Research Center for People and the Press. http://www.people-press.org/files/legacy-pdf/2012%20News%20Consumption%20Report.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

LaMarre, Heather. 2013. When parody and reality collide: Examining the effects of Colbert’s Super PAC satire on issue knowledge and policy engagement across media frames. International Journal of Communication 7. 394–413.Suche in Google Scholar

LaMarre, Heather L., Kristen D. Landreville & Michael A. Beam. 2009. The irony of satire: Political ideology and the motivation to see what you want to see in The Colbert Report. The International Journal of Press/Politics 14(2). 212–231. doi: 10.1177/1940161208330904.10.1177/1940161208330904Suche in Google Scholar

Lim, Joon S. & Eyun-Jung Ki. 2007. Resistance to ethically suspicious parody video YouTube: A test of inoculation theory. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 84(4). 713–728. doi: 10.1177/107769900708400404.10.1177/107769900708400404Suche in Google Scholar

Lodge, Milton, Marco Steenbergen & Shawn Brau. 1995. The responsive voter: Campaign information and the dynamics of candidate evaluation. The American Political Science Review 89(2). 309–326. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2082427.10.2307/2082427Suche in Google Scholar

Lodge, Milton & Charles S. Taber. 2013. The rationalizing voter. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139032490Suche in Google Scholar

Morris, Jonathan S. 2009. The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and audience attitude change during the 2004 party conventions. Political Behavior 31(1). 79–102. doi: 10.1007/s11109-008-9064-y.10.1007/s11109-008-9064-ySuche in Google Scholar

Moy, Patricia, Michael A. Xenos & Verena K. Hess. 2005. Communication and citizenship: Mapping the political effects of infotainment. Mass Communication and Society 8(2). 111–131. doi: 10.1207/s15327825 mcs0802_3.10.1207/s15327825mcs0802_3Suche in Google Scholar

Parkin, Michael. 2010. Taking late night comedy seriously: How candidate appearances on late night television can engage viewers. Political Research Quarterly 63(1). 3–15. doi: 10.1177/1065912908327604.10.1177/1065912908327604Suche in Google Scholar

Pfau, Michael, David Park, R. Lance Holbert & Jeaho Cho. 2001. The effects of party- and PAC-sponsored issue advertising and the potential of inoculation to combat its impact on the democratic process. American Behavioral Scientist 44(12). 2379–2397. doi: 10.1177/00027640121958384.10.1177/00027640121958384Suche in Google Scholar

Prior, Markus. 2007. Post broadcast democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139878425Suche in Google Scholar

Taber, Charles S. & Milton Lodge. 2006. Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science 50(3). 755–769. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.xSuche in Google Scholar

Xenos, Michael A. & Amy B. Becker. 2009. Moments of Zen: Effects of The Daily Show on information seeking and political learning. Political Communication 26(3). 317–332. doi: 10.1080/10584600903053569.10.1080/10584600903053569Suche in Google Scholar

Xenos, Michael A., Patricia Moy & Amy B. Becker. 2011. Making sense of The Daily Show: Understanding the role of partisan heuristics in political comedy effects. In Amarnath Amarsingam (ed.), The Stewart/Colbert effect: Essays on the real impacts of fake news, 47–62. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.Suche in Google Scholar

Young, Dannagal. 2008. The privileged role of the late-night joke: Exploring humor’s role in disrupting argument scrutiny. Media Psychology 11(1). 119–142. doi: 10.1080/15213260701837073.10.1080/15213260701837073Suche in Google Scholar

Young, Dannagal, R. Lance Holbert & Kathleen H. Jamieson. 2014. Successful practices for the strategic use of political parody and satire: Lessons from the P6 Symposium and the 2012 Election Campaign. American Behavioral Scientist 58(9). 1111–1130. doi: 10.1177/0002764213506213.10.1177/0002764213506213Suche in Google Scholar

Young, Dannagal, & Russell Tisinger. 2006. Dispelling late-night myths: News consumption among late-night comedy viewers and the predictors of exposure to various late-night shows. The International Journal of Press/Politics 11(3). 113–134. doi: 10.1177/1081180X05286042.10.1177/1081180X05286042Suche in Google Scholar