Startseite The only thing not known how to be dealt with: Political humor as a weapon during Gezi Park Protests
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The only thing not known how to be dealt with: Political humor as a weapon during Gezi Park Protests

  • Şenay Yavuz Görkem

    Senay Yavuz Görkem is an Assistant Professor at Maltepe University. She completed her PhD degree on corporate communication at İstanbul University in 2013. She has been lecturing at Maltepe University since 1999. Her current academic interests include political humor and digital activism.

    EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 14. Oktober 2015
HUMOR
Aus der Zeitschrift HUMOR Band 28 Heft 4

Abstract

This study investigates the underlying grounds and outcomes of nationwide antigovernment demonstrations that began as an environmentalist protest against the razing of Gezi Park in Istanbul. Humor became a weapon for the protestors for targeting and degrading Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, the government and the police forces. Captions, caricatures, graffiti, posters and slogans that were used as a means for humorous criticism of social reality in Turkey proliferated during and after this period. The slogan “the only thing they do not know how to deal with is passive activism and humor” was prevalent among protestors. The phrase ‘disproportionate intelligence’, which was used as an umbrella term for all humorous material, showed the protestors’ effort to react to the disproportionate violence they were exposed to while positioning themselves as more civilized and able as compared to the police and the government who could only resort to violence. This study includes semiotic analyses of composition and content of examples with humorous content.

About the author

Şenay Yavuz Görkem

Senay Yavuz Görkem is an Assistant Professor at Maltepe University. She completed her PhD degree on corporate communication at İstanbul University in 2013. She has been lecturing at Maltepe University since 1999. Her current academic interests include political humor and digital activism.

References

Akkuş, Serkan. 2013. Gezi’den Orantısız Zeka. Ankara: Sınırsız Kitap.Suche in Google Scholar

Akyazı, Erhan, Miray Neşeli & Fatih Yılmaz. 2014. Agenda setting in the digital age and the role of social media: an evaluation on the social media based news in national press. 1st International Communication Science and Media Studies Congress Proceedings I, 183–194.Suche in Google Scholar

Anti Kapitalist Müslümanlar Geziyi Anlattı. 2013. http://www.insanhaber.com/insan-ozel/anti-kapitalist-muslumanlar-geziyi-anlatti-h20335.html (accessed 21 July 2014).Suche in Google Scholar

Aşkın, Deniz. 2014. Virtual environment, observance and power: The case of Facebook social networking. 1st International Communication Science and Media Studies Congress Proceedings I, 222–230.Suche in Google Scholar

Aydemir Advan, Aslı. 2014. Someone is Watching Us!: 1984-Foucault-Technology Triangle. 1st International Communication Science and Media Studies Congress Proceedings I, 195–207.Suche in Google Scholar

Aydın, Sena. 2014. The conventional press as one of ideological state apparatus: The nationalist discourse on Turkish newspapers. 1st International Communication Science and Media Studies Congress Proceedings II, 578–588.Suche in Google Scholar

Badarneh, A. Muhammad. 2011. Carnivalesque politics: A Bakhtinian case study of contemporary Arab political humor. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 24(3). 305–327.10.1515/humr.2011.019Suche in Google Scholar

Bölükbaşı, M. Deniz. 2013. Devrim Taksim’de Göz Kırptı. İstanbul: Kaldıraç Yayınevi.Suche in Google Scholar

Bräuer, Marco & Christiana Schumann. 2014. The media demand the spectacle: Protest repertoires of local protest actors. 1st International Communication Science and Media Studies Congress Proceedings I, 146–159.Suche in Google Scholar

Carlson, Marybeth. 2008. Humor and social protest. History: Review of New Books 37(1). 34–35.10.1080/03612759.2008.10527296Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. n.d. In Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noam_Chomsky (accessed 20 July 2014).Suche in Google Scholar

Davies, Christie. 1998. Jokes and their relation to society. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Demirtaş, Mine & Burcu Akkaya. 2014. New panoptic domain of surveillance society: Social networks. 1st International Communication Science and Media Studies Congress Proceedings I, 208–221.Suche in Google Scholar

Drüeke, Ricarda. 2014. Rethinking the public sphere and the internet-a feminist perspective. 1st International Communication Science and Media Studies Congress Proceedings I, 56–68.Suche in Google Scholar

Gerbaudo, Paolo. 2012. Tweets and the streets: Social media and contemporary activism. London: Pluto Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Göncü, Gürsel. 2013. Gezi Direnişi ve Halk Hareketlerinin Geçmişi#Yaşarken Yazılan Tarih. İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.Suche in Google Scholar

Griffin, Em. 2012. A first look at communication theory. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.Suche in Google Scholar

İşeri, Gülşen., Soner Çetin & İnsan Özel. 2013. Anti-Kapitalist Müslümanlar Geziyi Anlattı. İnsanhaber. http://www.insanhaber.com/insan-ozel/anti-kapitalist-muslumanlar-geziyi-anlatti-h20335.html (accessed 22 August 2013).Suche in Google Scholar

Kılıç, Mehmet. 2013. Chapulling Turkish spring: Strike of an unpredictable synchronization. Turkish Journal of Politics 4(1). 133–146.Suche in Google Scholar

Lippmann, Walter. 1991. Public opinion. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Suche in Google Scholar

May, Asena. 2013. Twelve sycamore trees have set the limits on Turkish PM Erdoğan’s power. American Foreign Policy Interests 35. 298–302.10.1080/10803920.2013.836016Suche in Google Scholar

McCombs, Maxwell. 2014. Setting the agenda. The mass media and public opinion. Cambridge: Polity Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Milner, M. Ryan. 2013. Pop polyvocality: Internet memes, public participation and the occupy wall street movement. International Journal of Communication 7. 2357–2390.Suche in Google Scholar

Monro, D. Hector. 1988. Theories of Humor. In Laurence Behrens & Leonard J. Rosen (eds.), Writing and reading across the curriculum, 3rd edn, 349–355. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.Suche in Google Scholar

Orwell, George. 1968 [1945]. Funny, but not vulgar. The collected essays, journalism and letters of George Orwell. London: Secker & Warburg.Suche in Google Scholar

Özel, A. Pelenk & Neslihan Yolçu. 2014. Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s address to the nation speeches as a rhetorical element in political communication. 1st International Communication Science and Media Studies Congress Proceedings I, 333–354.Suche in Google Scholar

Panzaru, Olga. 2012. Semiotic interdependence between text and visual image. Lucrari Stiintifice Seria Agronomie 55(2). 409–412.Suche in Google Scholar

Penn, Gemma. 2000. Semiotic analysis of still images. In W. Martin Bauer & George Gaskell (eds.), Qualitative researching with text, image and sound, 227–245. London: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781849209731.n13Suche in Google Scholar

Protests in Turkey. n.d. In Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013%E2%80%9314_protests_in_Turkey (accessed 21 July 2014).Suche in Google Scholar

Reyhanlı Bombings. n.d. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reyhanl%C4%B1_bombings (accessed 21 July 2014).Suche in Google Scholar

Rolfe, Mark. 2010. The pleasures of political humour in Australian democracy. Journal of Australian Studies 34(3). 363–376.10.1080/14443058.2010.498334Suche in Google Scholar

Salamey, Imad & Frederic Pearson. 2012. The collapse of middle eastern authoritarianism: Breaking the barriers of fear and power. Third Word Quarterly 33(5). 931–948.10.1080/01436597.2012.674702Suche in Google Scholar

Saran, Ceren. 2014. Media ownership in Turkey: The changes in media ownership during AKP period. Ist International Communication Science and Media Studies Congress Proceedings I, 355–373.Suche in Google Scholar

Sebeok, T. Albert & Marcel Danesi. 2000. The forms of meaning: Modeling systems theory and semiotic analysis. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110816143Suche in Google Scholar

Shifman, Limor, Stephen Coleman & Stephen Ward. 2007. Only joking? Online humour in the 2005 UK general election. Information, Communication & Society 10(4). 465–487.10.1080/13691180701559947Suche in Google Scholar

Simpson, Paul. 2003. On the discourse of humor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar

Tsakona, Villy & D. Elena Popa. 2011. Humour in politics and the politics of humour: An introduction. In V. Tsakona & D. E. Popa (eds.), Studies in political humor: In between political critique and public entertainment, 1–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/dapsac.46Suche in Google Scholar

Ünsay, Yiğit & Pelin Ügümü. 2014. Humorous side of digital activism in Turkey: ‘Caps’es. Ist International Communication Science and Media Studies Congress Proceedings II, 249–268.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2015-10-14
Published in Print: 2015-10-1

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton

Heruntergeladen am 27.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/humor-2015-0094/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen