Startseite An examination of the convergence between the conceptualization and the measurement of humor styles: A study of the construct validity of the Humor Styles Questionnaire
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

An examination of the convergence between the conceptualization and the measurement of humor styles: A study of the construct validity of the Humor Styles Questionnaire

  • Sonja Heintz

    Sonja Heintz received her master’s degree in Psychology at the Saarland University in 2012, and she has since worked in the Section of Personality and Assessment at the University of Zurich, Switzerland. She works as a research, administration, and teaching assistant and pursues her PhD. Her main research interests are humor behaviors, individual differences in humor and positive psychological variables, methodology, and measurement.

    EMAIL logo
    und Willibald Ruch

    Willibald Ruch is a Full Professor of Psychology at the University of Zurich, Switzerland. His research interests are in the field of humor and laughter, cheerfulness, and smiling. In his doctoral dissertation at the University of Graz (Austria) in 1980, he developed a taxonomy of jokes and cartoons and studied their relation to personality. His more recent work, together with his research team at the University of Zurich, includes humor from a positive psychology perspective, the effectiveness of humor training programs and clown interventions, the ability to laugh at oneself, the fear of being laughed at (gelotophobia), and the measurement of humor.

Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 14. Oktober 2015
HUMOR
Aus der Zeitschrift HUMOR Band 28 Heft 4

Abstract

The Humor Styles Questionnaire (HSQ; Martin et al. 2003) was developed using a construct-based scale construction approach to measure four humor styles, namely affiliative, self-enhancing, aggressive, and self-defeating. The present study investigates to what extent the HSQ scales converge with and represent the conceptualizations (i.e., the definitions and construct descriptions) of the four humor styles as outlined by Martin et al. (2003). To this end, 340 participants provided self-reports on the definitions, construct descriptions, and the 32 items of the HSQ. Two multitrait-multimethod analyses yielded a good convergence of the self-defeating humor style, yet for the affiliative, self-enhancing, and aggressive humor styles convergence was lower and they were partly mismatched. The discrimination between the humor styles was mostly supported with the exception of affiliative and self-enhancing. Further, the HSQ scales predicted about two-thirds of the reliable variance in the conceptualizations in multiple regression analyses, so they represented several conceptual elements. Overall, these findings do only lend partial support for the convergence of the HSQ with the original conceptualization of the humor styles. If replicable, this implicates that either the constructs and model of the humor styles need to be adjusted or newly developed, or the HSQ does.

About the authors

Sonja Heintz

Sonja Heintz received her master’s degree in Psychology at the Saarland University in 2012, and she has since worked in the Section of Personality and Assessment at the University of Zurich, Switzerland. She works as a research, administration, and teaching assistant and pursues her PhD. Her main research interests are humor behaviors, individual differences in humor and positive psychological variables, methodology, and measurement.

Willibald Ruch

Willibald Ruch is a Full Professor of Psychology at the University of Zurich, Switzerland. His research interests are in the field of humor and laughter, cheerfulness, and smiling. In his doctoral dissertation at the University of Graz (Austria) in 1980, he developed a taxonomy of jokes and cartoons and studied their relation to personality. His more recent work, together with his research team at the University of Zurich, includes humor from a positive psychology perspective, the effectiveness of humor training programs and clown interventions, the ability to laugh at oneself, the fear of being laughed at (gelotophobia), and the measurement of humor.

References

Angleitner, Alois, Oliver P. John & Franz-Josef Löhr. 1986. It’s what you ask and how you ask it: An itemmetric analysis of personality questionnaires. In Alois Angleitner & Jerry S. Wiggins (eds.), Personality assessment via questionnaires, 61–108. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-70751-3_5Suche in Google Scholar

Caird, Sara & Rod A. Martin. 2014. Relationship-focused humor styles and relationship satisfaction in dating couples: A repeated-measures design. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 27. 227–247.10.1515/humor-2014-0015Suche in Google Scholar

Campbell, Donald T. & Donald W. Fiske. 1959. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin 56. 81–105.10.1037/h0046016Suche in Google Scholar

Cann, Arnie & Chelsea Matson. 2014. Sense of humor and social desirability: Understanding how humor styles are perceived. Personality and Individual Differences 66. 176–180.10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.029Suche in Google Scholar

Carretero-Dios, Hugo, Michael Eid & Willibald Ruch. 2011. Analyzing multitrait-mulitmethod data with multilevel confirmatory factor analysis: An application to the validation of the State-Trait Cheerfulness Inventory. Journal of Research in Personality 45. 153–164.10.1016/j.jrp.2010.12.007Suche in Google Scholar

Carretero-Dios, Hugo, Cristino Pérez & Gualberto Buela-Casal. 2009. Content validity and metric properties of a pool of items developed to assess humor appreciation. The Spanish Journal of Psychology 12. 773–787.10.1017/S1138741600002146Suche in Google Scholar

Clark, Lee A. & David Watson. 1995. Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment 7. 309–319.10.1037/14805-012Suche in Google Scholar

Cronbach, Lee J. & Paul E. Meehl. 1955. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin 52. 281–302.10.1037/h0040957Suche in Google Scholar

Delgado-Rico, Elena, Hugo Carretero-Dios & Willibald Ruch. 2012. Content validity evidences in test development: An applied perspective. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology 12. 449–460.Suche in Google Scholar

Edwards, Kim R. & Rod A. Martin. 2010. Humor creation ability and mental health: Are funny people more psychologically healthy? Europe’s Journal of Psychology 6(3). 196–212.10.1037/e676422011-010Suche in Google Scholar

Eid, Michael. 2000. A multitrait-multimethod model with minimal assumptions. Psychometrika 65. 241–261.10.1007/BF02294377Suche in Google Scholar

Eid, Michael, Fridtjof W. Nussbeck, Christian Geiser, David A. Cole, Mario Gollwitzer & Tanja Lischetzke. 2008. Structural equation modeling of multitrait-multimethod data: Different models for different types of methods. Psychological Methods 13. 230–253.10.1037/a0013219Suche in Google Scholar

Freud, Sigmund. 1928. Humour. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 9. 1–6.Suche in Google Scholar

Galloway, Graeme. 2010. Individual differences in personal humor styles: Identification of prominent patterns and their associates. Personality and Individual Differences 48. 563–567.10.1016/j.paid.2009.12.007Suche in Google Scholar

Jackson, Douglas N. 1970. A sequential system for personality scale development. In Charles D. Spielberger (ed.), Current topics in clinical and community psychology, vol. 2, 61–96. New York: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-153502-5.50008-4Suche in Google Scholar

Loevinger, Jane. 1954. The attenuation paradox in test theory. Psychological Bulletin 51. 493–504.10.1037/h0058543Suche in Google Scholar

MacCorquodale, Kenneth & Paul E. Meehl. 1948. On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables. Psychological Review 55. 95–107.10.1037/h0056029Suche in Google Scholar

Martin, Rod A., Patricia Puhlik-Doris, Gwen Larsen, Jeanette Gray & Kelly Weir. 2003. Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality 3. 48–75.10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00534-2Suche in Google Scholar

R Development Core Team. 2012. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, http://www.R-project.org/.Suche in Google Scholar

Reff, Robert C. 2006. Developing the Humor Styles Questionnaire – Revised: A review of the current humor literature and a revised measure (Doctoral dissertation). Pullman, WA: Washington State University dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Rosseel, Yves. 2012. lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software 48(2). 1–36.10.18637/jss.v048.i02Suche in Google Scholar

Ruch, Willibald & Sonja Heintz. 2013. Humour styles, personality, and psychological well-being: What’s humour got to do with it? European Journal of Humour Research 1(4). 1–24.10.7592/EJHR2013.1.4.ruchSuche in Google Scholar

Ruch, Willibald & Sonja Heintz. 2014. Test measurements of humor. In Salvatore Attardo (ed.), Encyclopedia of humor studies, vol. 2, 759–761. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Suche in Google Scholar

Ruch, Willibald & Sonja Heintz. 2015. Extracting vs. replacing the core content in questionnaire items: An exemplification with the Humor Styles Questionnaire.Switzerland: University of Zurich (Unpublished manuscript).Suche in Google Scholar

Zillmann, Dolf. 1983. Disparagement humor. In Paul E. McGhee & Jeffrey H. Goldstein (eds.), Handbook of humor research: Vol. 1. Basic issues, 85–107. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4612-5572-7_5Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2015-10-14
Published in Print: 2015-10-1

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton

Heruntergeladen am 27.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/humor-2015-0095/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen