Home Dynamic Transmission Performances of Alumina and Mullite Refractory Ceramics in Microwave High-Temperature Heating
Article Open Access

Dynamic Transmission Performances of Alumina and Mullite Refractory Ceramics in Microwave High-Temperature Heating

  • Xiaobiao Shang , Junruo Chen EMAIL logo and Jinhui Peng
Published/Copyright: February 21, 2015

Abstract

This paper proposes an analytical approach to optimize the thickness of refractories for achieving maximum microwave power transmission in microwave heating based on the analysis of power transmission coefficient (PTC). The microwave PTCs of alumina (Al2O3) ceramics over the temperature range of 22–1,379°C at 2,450 MHz, mullite ceramics in the temperature range of 27–1,027°C at 2.45 GHz and 400–1,300°C at 915 MHz are studied. The results show that there are several transmission peaks in the PTC patterns. The transmission peak amplitude depends sensitively on the thickness of the refractory and the peak shifting towards a smaller thickness as the temperature of the refractory increases. We also show that high microwave transmission can only be achieved in a refractory with a small thickness corresponding to a slight transmission peak shift in the entire microwave heating (less than one eighth wavelength in the refractory).

PACS (2010): 41.20.jb

Introduction

In contrast with conventional heating, microwave heating has distinguishing characteristics, such as material-selective and volumetric heating, leading to extremely broad applications in high-temperature domain. These areas include mineral calcinations [13], carbothermal reduction reaction [4], ceramic sintering [5, 6]. In the field of high-temperature heating, the refractory is essential. However, the refractory used in microwave heating not only need to have basic physical and chemical properties as in conventional heating needs, but also should be a microwave transparent material or low-loss material which has better microwave transmission performance [7, 8].

Alumina and mullite ceramics have often been used to produce sample holders and lining for microwave heating due to their good fire resistance and relatively good microwave transmission at relatively low temperatures [915]. These applications generally require materials to withstand high temperatures under microwave irradiation. This indicates that microwave transmission capabilities of alumina and mullite ceramic at elevated temperatures are important for their utilization. In addition, the effect of the refractory thickness was generally neglected by researchers in microwave heating. The microwave transmission capability of alumina and mullite ceramics can be determined based on the analysis of power transmission coefficient (PTC) at commonly used microwave frequencies, 915 and 2,450 MHz, in a broad temperature range. To date, however, no detailed work on the PTCs of alumina and mullite ceramics at high temperatures has been reported.

To solve the above issue, our work is devoted to achieving the maximum microwave transmission in microwave high-temperature heating of materials by calculating the PTC of materials. The microwave PTCs of alumina ceramic over the temperature range of 22–1,379 °C at 2,450 MHz, the mullite in the temperature range of 27–1,027 °C at 2.45 GHz and 400–1,300 °C at 915 MHz are studied. The current work provides a general rule for thickness optimization of the refractories in microwave high-temperature heating, which could provide insight on achieving the maximum transmission during microwave high-temperature processing of materials.

Theory of PTC

Figure 1 shows the schematic diagram of the electromagnetic wave propagation in a single plate medium. PTC can be employed to quantify the amount of microwave power transmitted through the refractory layer. The larger PTC there is for a sample, the better (larger) the microwave transmits through the material. According to the transmission line theory, the theoretical PTC values of the medium can be obtained. When the wave is incident at an angle θi relative to the normal of the interface between dissimilar media, the PTC is given by the following relation [16, 17]:

(1)PTC=t2
(2)t=1ρ02eα+jβcosθidb1ρ02e2α+jβcosθidb
(3)ρ0=cos(θi)εrsin2(θi)cos(θi)+εrsin2(θi)
(4)α=2πfcε2{1+tg2δ1}
(5)β=2πfcε2{1+tg2δ+1}
Figure 1 Schematic diagram of the electromagnetic wave propagation in a single plate medium.
Figure 1

Schematic diagram of the electromagnetic wave propagation in a single plate medium.

where t is the transmission coefficient, ρ0 is a coefficient, α is the attenuation coefficient and β is the wave number of the propagating wave, εr is the complex relative permittivity (εr=εjε), j is the imaginary unit, tgδ is the loss tangent (tgδ=ε/ε), c is the velocity of light, f is the microwave frequency and d is the thickness of the medium.

From eqs (1)–(5), the PTC of refractory is determined by the relative permittivity at a given frequency as well as the thickness of the refractory. These properties of alumina and mullite ceramics are summarized in Table 1. The temperature and thickness dependences of PTC of the ceramics can be determined based on the reported parameters.

Table 1

Complex permittivities of mullite and Al2O3 at 915/2,450 MHz.

ParametersMulliteaAl2O3 (2,450 MHz)b
915 MHz (400 ≤ T°C ≤ 1,300)2,450 MHz (27 ≤T°C ≤ 1,027)22 °C491 °C871 °C1,050 °C1,379 °C
ε3109T34×106T2+0.0032T+4.48692.119×106T20.000337T+6.14388.99.8210.410.8111.77
ε9×107T20.0002T0.02681.7052×109T31.4616×106T2+0.000559T+0.022790.0040.0250.0930.1580.476

Results and discussion

The calculated results of PTC versus thickness for the alumina with increasing temperature at 2,450 MHz are shown in Figure 2. As shown in Figure 2, there are four microwave transmission peaks in the PTC patterns; it was observed that there is a matching thickness for matching temperature at which microwave transmission is the maximum. The peak positions (dpeak) at various temperatures are shown in Table 2. Peak 1 at 22 °C indicates that alumina ceramic with a thickness of 20.5 mm exhibits the maximum microwave transmission (PTC = 0.9976). However, as temperature increases, a shift of peak position (Δdpeak) is observed. For instance, the peak shifts from 20.5 mm to 17.5 mm as the temperature increases from 22 to 1,379 °C. This indicates that a smaller thickness of the alumina ceramic is required to achieve the maximum transmission at an elevated temperature. A temperature dependence of sample thickness corresponding to the maximum microwave transmission is also observed in other peaks. This phenomenon can be attributed to the increased microwave phase constant and, therefore, a shorter microwave wavelength in alumina (λd) as the temperature increases (Figure 3). The value of λd is determined by [20]

(6)λd=2λ{εμεμ+[(εμ)2+(εμ)2+(εμ)2+(με)2]1\2}1/2
Figure 2 Temperature dependence of PTC of the Al2O3 slab as the thickness varies from 0 to 0.1 m at 2,450 MHz: 22 °C, 491 °C, 871 °C, 1,050 °C, 1,379 °C.
Figure 2

Temperature dependence of PTC of the Al2O3 slab as the thickness varies from 0 to 0.1 m at 2,450 MHz: 22 °C, 491 °C, 871 °C, 1,050 °C, 1,379 °C.

Figure 3 Temperature dependence of the microwave wavelength in mullite and Al2O3 ceramics.
Figure 3

Temperature dependence of the microwave wavelength in mullite and Al2O3 ceramics.

Table 2

Transmission peak positions in the PTC of mullite and Al2O3 ceramics at various temperatures.

Peak nos.Mullite (2,450 MHz)
27 °C200 °C400 °C600 °C800 °C1,000 °C
dpeak (mm)PTCdpeak (mm)PTCdpeak (mm)PTCdpeak (mm)PTCdpeak (mm)PTCdpeak (mm)PTC
124.50.973024.50.937024.00.917123.50.872822.50.772721.00.6249
249.50.947249.00.878148.50.842647.00.764845.00.605342.50.4058
374.00.922574.00.824272.50.775070.50.672567.50.479864.00.2725
499.00.897798.50.774697.00.714794.00.593490.50.384485.00.1874
Mullite (915 MHz)
400 °C600 °C800 °C1,000 °C1,200 °C1,300 °C
dpeak(mm)PTCdpeak(mm)PTCdpeak(mm)PTCdpeak(mm)PTCdpeak(mm)PTCdpeak(mm)PTC
171.00.970568.50.873965.00.759960.50.650655.50.559953.00.5229
Al2O3 (2,450 MHz)
22 °C491 °C871 °C1,050 °C1,379 °C
dpeak(mm)PTCdpeak(mm)PTCdpeak(mm)PTCdpeak(mm)PTCdpeak(mm)PTC
120.50.997619.50.986319.00.951918.50.922017.50.7969
241.00.995339.00.972738.00.906837.00.850635.50.6462
361.50.992858.50.959257.00.864456.00.787053.50.5292
482.00.990478.00.945976.00.824774.50.731271.00.4388
5>10097.50.932795.00.787393.00.679589.00.3671

where λ is the microwave wavelength in free space.

In Figure 2 it can be further noticed that for all transmission peaks (peaks 1–4) in the PTC patterns, the amplitude of peak decreases with increasing temperature. For example, PTC of peak 1 decreases from 0.9976 to 0.7969 as the temperature increases from 22 to 1,379 °C. This can be explained by the fact that microwave penetration depth (Dp) of the alumina decreases with increasing temperature (Figure 4). The value of Dp is determined by [21]

(7)Dp=λ22π{εμεμ+[(εμ)2+(εμ)2+(εμ)2+(με)2]1\2}1/2
Figure 4 Temperature dependence of the microwave penetration depth of mullite and Al2O3 ceramics.
Figure 4

Temperature dependence of the microwave penetration depth of mullite and Al2O3 ceramics.

These suggest that the highest microwave transmission cannot be achieved throughout the microwave heating in the refractories with a fixed thickness because of the temperature dependence of the variation of peak amplitude and the shift of microwave transmission peaks. However, we can anticipate that a suitable thickness should be limited in the range indicated by the positions of the microwave transmission peaks in the temperature range (i.e., dpeak,1375Cddpeak,22C). This suggests that thicknesses for the alumina ceramic corresponding to four peaks in the PTC patterns, as shown in Figure 5, should be chosen for achieving high transmission throughout the microwave heating process.

Figure 5 Temperature dependence of PTC of the Al2O3 slab as the thickness varies from 19 mm to 76 mm at 2,450 MHz.
Figure 5

Temperature dependence of PTC of the Al2O3 slab as the thickness varies from 19 mm to 76 mm at 2,450 MHz.

It is also seen from Figure 2 that the Δdpeak becomes larger with the number of peak corresponding to larger thickness. This suggests that the shift of peak is slight at small thicknesses and becomes large with increasing thickness; therefore, it is impossible to achieve the highest PTC with larger shift of transmission peak.

Figure 5 shows the temperature dependence of PTC of the alumina as the thickness varies from 19 mm to 76 mm. It is seen from Figure 5 that the alumina ceramic has the maximum transmission (0.7212 ≤ PTC ≤ 0.9128) when the alumina ceramic has a thickness of 19 mm which corresponds to peak 1 in Figure 2. This PTC range indicates that more than 70% power is transmitted throughout the microwave heating process. The high-power transmission is essentially attributed to a small peak shift in the temperature range (Δdpeak=dpeak,22Cdpeak,1379Cλd/8). For the PTC curve of alumina with a larger thickness, microwave transmission tends to decrease. This is particularly true for the alumina having a thickness greater than 76 mm due to a significant variation of PTC with temperature.

The calculated results of PTC versus thickness for mullite with increasing temperature at 2,450 MHz are shown in Figure 6. As shown in Figure 6, there are also four microwave transmission peaks in the PTC patterns, which can be attributed to the microwave resonance. The peak positions (dpeak) at various temperature are shown in Table 2. Peak 1 at 27 °C indicates that the mullite ceramic with a thickness of 24.5 mm exhibits the maximum microwave transmission (PTC = 0.9730). However, as temperature increases, a shift of peak position (Δdpeak) is observed. For instance, the peak shifts from 24.5 mm to 21 mm as the temperature increases from 27 to 1,000 °C. A temperature dependence of sample thickness corresponding to the maximum microwave transmission is also observed in other peaks. This phenomenon can also be attributed to the increased microwave phase constant and, therefore, a shorter microwave wavelength in mullite (λd) as the temperature increases (Figure 3).

Figure 6 Temperature dependence of PTC of the mullite slab as the thickness varies from 0 to 0.1 m at 2,450 MHz: 27 °C, 200 °C, 400 °C, 800 °C, 1,000 °C.
Figure 6

Temperature dependence of PTC of the mullite slab as the thickness varies from 0 to 0.1 m at 2,450 MHz: 27 °C, 200 °C, 400 °C, 800 °C, 1,000 °C.

It is also seen from Figure 6 that Δdpeak becomes larger with the peak number increasing. This suggests that the shift of peak is slight at small thicknesses and becomes large with the increasing thickness which occurs in the PTC patterns of the alumina; therefore, it is impossible to achieve the highest PTC with larger shift of transmission peak throughout the microwave heating process.

In Figure 6 it can be further noticed that for all transmission peaks (peaks 1–4) in the PTC patterns, the amplitude of peak decreases with increasing temperature. For example, the PTC of peak 1 decreases from 0.9730 to 0.6249 as the temperature increases from 27 to 1,000 °C. This can also be explained by the fact that microwave penetration depth (Dp) of the alumina decreases with increasing temperature (Figure 4).

The calculated results of PTC versus thickness for mullite with increasing temperature at 915 MHz are shown in Figure 7. As shown in Figure 7, there is only one microwave transmission peak in the PTC patterns. The phenomenon can be explained by a shorter microwave wavelength in mullite at 915 MHz. The peak positions (dpeak) at various temperatures are shown in Table 2. Peak 1 at 400 °C indicates that mullite ceramic with a thickness of 71 mm exhibits the maximum microwave transmission (PTC = 0.9705). However, as temperature increases, a shift of peak position (Δdpeak) is observed. For instance, the peak shifts from 71 mm to 53 mm as the temperature increases from 400 to 1,300 °C. This phenomenon can also be attributed to the increased microwave phase constant and, therefore, a shorter microwave wavelength in mullite (λd) as the temperature increases (Figure 3).

Figure 7 Temperature dependence of PTC of the mullite slab as the thickness varies from 0 to 0.1 m at 915 MHz: 400 °C, 600 °C, 800 °C, 1,000 °C, 1,200 °C, 1,300 °C.
Figure 7

Temperature dependence of PTC of the mullite slab as the thickness varies from 0 to 0.1 m at 915 MHz: 400 °C, 600 °C, 800 °C, 1,000 °C, 1,200 °C, 1,300 °C.

In Figure 7 it can be further noticed that for all transmission peaks (peaks 1–4) in the PTC patterns, the amplitude of peak decreases with increasing temperature. For example, PTC of the peak decreases from 0.9705 to 0.5229 as the temperature increases from 400 to 1,300 °C. This can also be explained by the fact that microwave penetration depth (Dp) of mullite decreases with increasing temperature (Figure 5).

The PTC value of ≥ 0.7 is comparable to the 70% of microwave transmission and thus “PTC ≥ 0.7” is considered as an adequate microwave transmission [22, 23]. PTC values more than 0.7 are recorded, as shown in Table 3.

Table 3

The thickness ranges of the power transmission coefficient more than 70%.

Peak nos.Mullite
2,450 MHz915 MHz
27 °C200 °C400 °C600 °C800 °C1,000 °C400°C600 °C800 °C1,000°C1,200 °C1,300 °C
Thickness (mm)Thickness (mm)Thickness (mm)Thickness (mm)Thickness (mm)Thickness (mm)Thickness (mm)Thickness (mm)Thickness (mm)Thickness (mm)Thickness (mm)Thickness (mm)
10–50–50–4.50–4.50–3.50–30–170–150–120–100–8
219.5–29.520–2920–28.520–2720–24.554.5–87.555.5–80.558.0–71.5
344.5–5445–5345–5245–49
469.5–78.570–7770–75
594.5–10096–10096–98
Al2O3 (2,450 MHz)
22 °C491 °C871 °C1,050 °C1,379 °C
Thickness (mm)Thickness (mm)Thickness (mm)Thickness (mm)Thickness (mm)
10–30–2.50–2.50–2.50–2
217.5–23.517–2216.5–21.516.5–20.516.5–19
338–4436.5–41.535.5–4035.5–39
458.5–64.556–6155–5954.5–57
579–8575.5–80.574–77.573.5–75
699.5–10095–10093.5–96.5

Conclusions

The analytical approach is proposed to optimize the thickness of the refractories for achieving maximum microwave power transmission in microwave heating based on the analysis of PTC. The microwave PTCs of the alumina ceramic over the temperature range of 22–1,379 °C at 2,450 MHz, the mullite in the temperature range of 27–1,027 °C at 2.45 GHz and 400–1,300 °C at 915 MHz were studied. The calculated results show that the microwave PTC depends sensitively on the thickness of the refractories, and there is a set of transmission peaks in the PTC patterns of alumina and mullite ceramics, respectively. The transmission peak shifts towards a smaller thickness as the temperature of the ceramic increases, and Δdpeak becomes larger with the peak number increasing. We also show that high microwave transmission can only be achieved in a refractory with a small thickness corresponding to a slight transmission peak shift in the entire microwave heating (less than one eighth wavelength in the refractory). The analytical approach presented in this paper should be useful in selecting the refractories and designing microwave applicators.

Funding statement: Funding: This work was supported by the National Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program, No. 2013AA064003), the International S&T Cooperation Program of China (No. 2012DFA70570), the Yunnan Provincial International Cooperative Program (No. 2011IA004) and project (51304097) supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

References

1. LiY, PengJ, LiuB, LiW, ZhangL. Prediction model of microwave calcining of ammonium diuranate using incremental improved back-propagation neural network. Nucl Eng Des2011;241:190913.10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.12.017Search in Google Scholar

2. KanagesanS, JesuraniS, SivakumarM, ThirupathiC, KalaivaniT. Effect of microwave calcinations on barium hexaferrite synthesized via sol-gel combustion. J Sci Res2011;3:4516.10.3329/jsr.v3i3.6483Search in Google Scholar

3. ZhangH, XuY, LiuD, ZhangX, ZhaoC. Structure and performance of dual-doped LiMn2O4 cathode materials prepared via microwave synthesis method. Electrochim Acta2014;125:22531.10.1016/j.electacta.2014.01.102Search in Google Scholar

4. ZhangG, XiongW, YaoZ, ChenS, YangQ. Synthesis of ultrafine (Ti, W, Nb) C solid solution powders by microwave-assisted carbothermal reduction. Ceram Int2014;40:76215.10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.12.031Search in Google Scholar

5. SoutoPM, MenezesRR, KiminamiR. Effect of Y2O3 additive on conventional and microwave sintering of mullite. Ceram Int2011;37:2418.10.1016/j.ceramint.2010.08.043Search in Google Scholar

6. PengZ, HwangJY, AndrieseM. Design of double-layer ceramic absorbers for microwave heating. Ceram Int2013;39:67215.10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.01.114Search in Google Scholar

7. HottaM, HayashiM, NishikataA, NagataK. Complex permittivity and permeability of SiO2 and Fe3O4 powders in microwave frequency range between 0.2 and 13.5 GHz. ISIJ Int2009;49:14438.10.2355/isijinternational.49.1443Search in Google Scholar

8. LiB, MonteiroSN, PengZ, ZhangM. Microwave dielectric characterization of silicon dioxide. Characterization of minerals, metals, and materials.Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2013:38995.10.1002/9781118659045.ch45Search in Google Scholar

9. ChengJ, RoyR, AgrawalD. Radically different effects on materials by separated microwave electric and magnetic fields. Mater Res Innovations2002;5:1707.10.1007/s10019-002-8642-6Search in Google Scholar

10. HayashiM, YokoyamaY, NagataK. Effect of particle size and relative density on powdery Fe. J Microw Power Electromagn Energy2010;44:198206.10.1080/08327823.2010.11689788Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. ZhaoC, VleugelsJ, GroffilsC, LuypaertPJ, Van der BiestO. Hybrid sintering with a tubular susceptor in a cylindrical single-mode microwave furnace. Acta Mater2000;48:3795801.10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00160-9Search in Google Scholar

12. YanH, HuangX, LuZ, HuangH, XueR, ChenL. Microwave synthesis of LiCoO2 cathode materials. J Power Sources1997;68:5302.10.1016/S0378-7753(96)02565-7Search in Google Scholar

13. HaraK, HayashiM, SatoM, NagataK. Continuous pig iron making by microwave heating with 12.5 kW at 2.45 GHz. J Microw Power Electromagn Energy2011;45:13747.10.1080/08327823.2011.11689808Search in Google Scholar

14. ClarkDE, FolzDC, WestJK. Processing materials with microwave energy. Mater Sci Eng A2000;287:1538.10.1016/S0921-5093(00)00768-1Search in Google Scholar

15. ChenJ, ZhaoJ, FengX, LiuJ, LinY. Study on microwave metallurgy refractory. Ind Heating, 2006;35:5660 (In Chinese).Search in Google Scholar

16. YahalomA, PinhasiY, ShifmanE, PetnevS. Transmission through single and multiple layers in the 3-10 GHz band and the implications for communications of frequency varying material dielectric constants. CSCC, Corfu, Greece, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

17. ReedJH, WoernerBD. Wireless personal communications: advances in coverage and capacity. Norwell: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997.Search in Google Scholar

18. KomarovVV. Handbook of dielectric and thermal properties of materials at microwave frequencies. Boston, MA: Artech House, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

19. ChatterjeeA, BasakT, AyappaKG. Analysis of microwave sintering of ceramics. AIChE J1998;44:230211.10.1002/aic.690441019Search in Google Scholar

20. PengZ, HwangJY, AndrieseM. Microwave power absorption characteristics of ferrites. Magn IEEE Trans2013;49:11636.10.1109/TMAG.2012.2227775Search in Google Scholar

21. PengZ, HwangJY, MourisJ, HutcheonR, HuangX. Microwave penetration depth in materials with non-zero magnetic susceptibility. ISIJ Int2010;50:15906.10.2355/isijinternational.50.1590Search in Google Scholar

22. BacoS, ChikA, Md YassinF. Study on optical properties of tin oxide thin film at different annealing temperature. J Sci Technol2012;4:6171.Search in Google Scholar

23. HautcoeurJ, CastelX, ColombelF, HimdiM, CcruzEM. Comparison of the microwave performance of transparent wire monopole antennas based on silver films. J Electron Mater2013;42:5527.10.1007/s11664-012-2338-5Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2014-9-22
Accepted: 2015-1-5
Published Online: 2015-2-21
Published in Print: 2016-1-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Downloaded on 12.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/htmp-2014-0167/html
Scroll to top button