Startseite Uterine-conserving approach in ruptured intramyometrial ectopic pregnancy
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Uterine-conserving approach in ruptured intramyometrial ectopic pregnancy

  • Loh Sweet Yi Esther , Kah Teik Chew EMAIL logo , Rahana Abd Rahman ORCID logo , Ani Amelia Zainuddin , Erica Yee Hing und Nirmala Kampan
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 13. März 2020
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Intramyometrial ectopic pregnancy (IMEP) is a rare form of ectopic pregnancy. It is defined as a conceptus implanted within the myometrium and is completely surrounded by myometrium with clear separation from both the uterine cavity and tubes. IMEP possesses not only diagnostic but also therapeutic challenge. The majority of reported cases were managed by hysterectomy. Early management of unruptured IMEP using methotrexate may help to preserve fertility. We, for the first time, report a case of ruptured IMEP managed successfully using suction and curettage followed by Bakri balloon tamponade and avoiding hysterectomy. Post-procedure, the patient received two doses of intramuscular methotrexate 50 mg/m2 due to plateauing serial beta human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) levels and subsequently achieved undetectable level 10 weeks post-methotrexate. She also had complete resolution of the ectopic intramyometrial mass.

Author Statement

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Conflict of interest: None declared.

  3. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  4. Ethical approval: Not applicable.

References

[1] Parker VL, Srinivas M. Non-tubal ectopic pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;294:19–27.10.1007/s00404-016-4069-ySuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] Alalade A, Mayers K, Abdulrahman G, Oliver R, Odejinmi F. A twelve year analysis of non-tubal ectopic pregnancies: do the clinical manifestations and risk factor for these rare pregnancies differ from those of tubal pregnancies? Gynecol Surg. 2016;13:103–9.10.1007/s10397-015-0917-1Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Verghese T, Wahba K, Shah A. An interesting case of intramyometrial pregnancy. BMJ Case Rep. 2012;2012:bcr1120115187.10.1136/bcr.11.2011.5187Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[4] Fadhlaoui A, Khrouf M, Nouira K, Chaker A, Zhioua F. Ruptured intramural pregnancy with myometrial invasion treated conservatively. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2011;2011:965910.10.1155/2011/965910Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[5] Kirk E, McDonald K, Rees J, Govind A. Intramural ectopic pregnancy: a case and review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;168:129–33.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.12.036Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Karakök M, Balat O, Sari I, Kocer N, Erdogan R. Early diagnosed intramural ectopic pregnancy associated with adenomyosis: report of an unusual case. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2002;29:217–8.Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Boukhanni L, Ait Benkaddour Y, Bassir A, Aboulfalah A, Asmouki H, Soummani A. A rare localization of ectopic pregnancy: intramyometrial pregnancy in twin pregnancy following IVF. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2014;2014:893935.10.1155/2014/893935Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[8] Marotta M-L, Donnez J, Michaux N, Dupont M, Delos M, Donnez O. Spontaneous intramyometrial pregnancy mimicking an intramural myoma: a diagnostic challenge. Gynecol Surg. 2012;9:439–44.10.1007/s10397-012-0751-7Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Jin H, Zhou J, Yu Y, Dong M. Intramural pregnancy: a report of 2 cases. J Reprod Med. 2004;49:569–72.Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Tsukahara T, Kawaguchi S, Torigoe T, Asanuma H, Nakazawa E, Shimozawa K, et al. Prognostic significance of HLA class I expression in osteosarcoma defined by anti-pan HLA class I monoclonal antibody, EMR8-5. Cancer Sci. 2006;97:1374–80.10.1111/j.1349-7006.2006.00317.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Ong C, Su LL, Chia D, Choolani M, Biswas A. Sonographic diagnosis and successful medical management of an intramural ectopic pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound. 2010;38:320–4.10.1002/jcu.20703Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Reddy R. Intramyometrial gestation: a rare localization of ectopic pregnancy. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;34:73–5.10.4103/TJOG.TJOG_2_17Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Chukus A, Tirada N, Restrepo R, Reddy NI. Uncommon implantation sites of ectopic pregnancy: thinking beyond the complex adnexal mass. Radiographics. 2015;35:946–59.10.1148/rg.2015140202Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Lee GS, Hur SY, Kown I, Shin JC, Kim SP, Kim SJ. Diagnosis of early intramural ectopic pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound. 2005;33:190–2.10.1002/jcu.20107Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Ramanathan S, Raghu V, Ladumor SB, Nagadi AN, Palaniappan Y, Dogra V, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of common, uncommon, and rare implantation sites in ectopic pregnancy. Abdom Radiol. 2018;43:3425–35.10.1007/s00261-018-1604-2Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Panelli DM, Phillips CH, Brady PC. Incidence, diagnosis and management of tubal and nontubal ectopic pregnancies: a review. Fertil Res Pract. 2015;1:15.10.1186/s40738-015-0008-zSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[17] Nabeshima H, Nishimoto M, Utsunomiya H, Arai M, Ugajin T, Terada Y, et al. Total laparoscopic conservative surgery for an intramural ectopic pregnancy. Diagn Ther Endosc. 2010;2010:504062.10.1155/2010/504062Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[18] Wang S, Dong Y, Meng X. Intramural ectopic pregnancy: treatment using uterine artery embolization. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20:241–3.10.1016/j.jmig.2012.10.005Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] Carpenter T, Walker W. Pregnancy following uterine artery embolisation for symptomatic fibroids: a series of 26 completed pregnancies. BJOG. 2005;112:321–5.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00414.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2020-01-07
Accepted: 2020-02-05
Published Online: 2020-03-13

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Letters to the Editor
  2. Androgen-driven COVID-19 infection – is testosterone an enemy or a friend?
  3. Tumor necrosis factor-α gene-1031T/C promoter polymorphism and endometriosis
  4. Original Articles
  5. Serum FGF-21 and FGF-23 in association with gestational diabetes: a longitudinal case-control study
  6. Neutrophil and monocyte ratios to high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and adiponectin as biomarkers of nascent metabolic syndrome
  7. Predicting long-term cardiovascular outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction using soluble ST2
  8. Anti-inflammatory activity of emu oil-based nanofibrous scaffold through downregulation of IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α pro-inflammatory cytokines
  9. A comparative study of the antidiabetic effect of two training protocols in streptozotocin-nicotinamide diabetic rats
  10. Gonadotrophins modulate cell death-related genes expression in human endometrium
  11. Exploring the activity of the enzyme 11β-hydroxylase in the polycystic ovary syndrome
  12. The effects of follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) -29 and Ser680Asn polymorphisms in IVF/ICSI
  13. Diagnostic value of the candidate microRNAs in thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) samples
  14. Investigation of the role of β-TrCP in growth hormone transduction defect (GHTD)
  15. High-intensity interval training with long duration intervals is more effective than short duration intervals for improving glycolytic capacity in the rats’ gastrocnemius muscle
  16. The effects of circuit resistance training on plasma progranulin level, insulin resistance and body composition in obese men
  17. Sexual motivation: problem solved and new problems introduced
  18. Case Reports
  19. Ovarian and uterine leiomyosarcoma: which one is the primary?
  20. Uterine-conserving approach in ruptured intramyometrial ectopic pregnancy
Heruntergeladen am 16.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/hmbci-2020-0001/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen