Language change as a scientific construct of a probabilistically organized information system
-
Eike U. Decker
Abstract
The present paper discusses language change from an information and systems theoretical point of view, taking on a diachronic perspective. It is argued that human language has to be regarded as a probabilistically organized information system in which synchronizations of linguistic systems of individuals create unstable (dynamic, ever-changing) collective levels (“language systems”). Therefore, probabilistic organization of language processing on an individual level leads – via bottom-up structure – to probabilistic organization of language systems as a whole. If we thus regard linguistic objects like e.g. a Saussurean sign as generally unstable and defined by probability distributions even from a synchronic point of view, we must understand language change (diachronic developments) as probabilistic as well. Therefore, language change in its “classical sense” (a change in linguistic objects) has to be reinterpreted as a change in probability distribution. Nevertheless, the term language change and its meaning then still lack exactness regarding some details; so we have to use this term carefully and be aware of its weaknesses. With a close look at language as an information system with both a synchronic as well as a diachronic dimension, we finally have to admit that language change is a scientific construct serving as a – sometimes quite useful – simplification within the linguistic field.
References
Aitchison, Jean. 2012. Words in the mind. An introduction to the mental lexicon. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. & David W. Lightfoot. 2000. The human language faculty as an organ. Annual Review of Physiology 62. 697–722. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.physiol.62.1.697.Search in Google Scholar
Andor, Daniel, Chris Alberti, Michael Collins, Kuzman Ganchev, Slav Petrov, Alessandor Presta, Aliaksei Severyn & David Weiss. 2016. Globally normalized transition-based neural networks. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1603.06042 (accessed 06 June 2018).10.18653/v1/P16-1231Search in Google Scholar
Benecke, Georg Friedrich, Wilhelm Müller & Friedrich Zarncke, (eds.). 1990. Mittelhochdeutsches wörterbuch. M–R.Stuttgart: Hirzel Bd. 2, Abt. 1.Search in Google Scholar
Bod, Rens, Jennifer Hay & Stefanie Jannedy. 2003. Introduction. In Rens Bod, Jennifer Hay & Stefanie Jannedy, Probabilistic linguistics, 1–10. Cambridge (Massachusetts) & London: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5582.003.0002Search in Google Scholar
Cohen, Ariel. 2009. Probability in semantics. Language and Linguistics Compass 3/1. 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-818x.2008.00097.x.Search in Google Scholar
Decker, Eike U. Forthcoming. “Rezessive” information in sprache. Ein probabilistisches informationsmodell als grundlage informationslinguistischer und systemlinguistischer Ansätze / “Recessive” information in language. A probabilistic information model as the basis of informational linguistics and systems linguistics. Heidelberg: University of Heidelberg dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Euler, Wolfram & Konrad Badenheuer. 2009. Sprache und herkunft der Germanen. Abriss des protogermanischen vor der ersten lautverschiebung. Hamburg & London: Inspiration Un Limited.Search in Google Scholar
Fagen, Robert E. & Arthur David Hall. 1956. Definition of system. General Systems 1. 18–28.Search in Google Scholar
Gerjuoy, Edward. 1993. Superposition principle. In Sybil P. Parker (ed.), McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Physics. 2nd edn. 1384. New York et al.: McGraw-Hill.Search in Google Scholar
Hebb, Donald Olding. 1949. The organization of behavior. New York: Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar
Herrgen, Joachim & Jürgen Erich Schmidt. 2011. Sprachdynamik. Eine einführung in die moderne regionalsprachenforschung. Berlin: Schmidt.Search in Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman Osipovich. 1960. Closing statement: Linguistic and poetics. In Thomas Albert Sebeok (ed.), Style in language, 350–377. Cambridge (Massachusetts): MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Jäncke, Lutz. 2013. Lehrbuch kognitive neurowissenschaften. Bern: Hans Huber.Search in Google Scholar
Köbler, Gerhard. 1989. Gotisches wörterbuch. Köln & Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004625488Search in Google Scholar
Kroonen, Guus. 2013. Etymological dictionary of proto-Germanic. Boston & Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar
Krug, Manfred. 2017. Chapter 14, The great vowel shift. In Alexander Bergs and Laurel J. Brinton (eds.), The history of English. Volume 4: Early modern English, 241–266. Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110525069-014Search in Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of Linguistic change. Volume 1: Internal factors. Oxford & Cambridge (Massachusetts): Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1980. On explaining language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Leopold, Edda. 2005. Das piotrowski-gesetz. In Gabriel Altmann, Reinhard Köhler & Rajmund G. Piotrowski (eds.), Quantitative Linguistik/Quantitative Linguistics: Ein internationales Handbuch/An International Handbook, 627–633. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. 1987. Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeinen theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Search in Google Scholar
McNamara, Timothy P. 2005. Semantic priming. Perspectives from memory and word recognition. Hove & New York: Psychology Press.Search in Google Scholar
Mitchell, Bruce & Fred C. Robinson. 2007. A guide to old English. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Montague, Richard. 1970. Universal grammar. Theoria 36(3). 373–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.1970.tb00434.x.Search in Google Scholar
Montague, Richard. 1973. The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English. In Jaakko Hintikka, Julius Moravcsik & Patrick Suppes (eds.), Approaches to natural language. Proceedings of the 1970 Stanford Workshop on Grammar and Semantics, 221–242. Dordrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-010-2506-5_10Search in Google Scholar
Nübling, Damaris. 2000. Prinzipien der irregularisierung. Eine kontrastive analyse von zehn verben in zehn germanischen sprachen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.10.1515/9783110915082Search in Google Scholar
Quillian, M. Ross. 1967. Word concepts: A theory and simulation of some basic semantic capabilities. Behavioral Science 12. 410–430. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830120511.Search in Google Scholar
Quillian, M. Ross. 1968. Semantic memory. In Marvin Minsky (ed.), Semantic information processing, 227–270. Cambridge (Massachusetts): MIT Press.10.1016/B978-1-4832-1446-7.50013-3Search in Google Scholar
Quillian, M. Ross. 1969. The teachable language comprehender. Communications of the ACM 12. 459–476. https://doi.org/10.1145/363196.363214.Search in Google Scholar
Rey, Günter Daniel & Karl F. Wender. 2011. Neuronale netze: Eine einführung in die grundlagen, anwendungen und datenauswertung. Bern: Hans Huber.Search in Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale. Lausanne & Paris: Librairie Payot & Cie.Search in Google Scholar
Schlüter, Julia. 2017. Chapter 3, Phonology. In Alexander Bergs and Laurel J. Brinton (eds.): The history of English. Volume 4, Early modern English, 27–46. Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110525069-003Search in Google Scholar
Schmidt, Jürgen Erich. 2010. Language and space: The linguistic dynamics approach. In Jürgen Erich Schmidt (ed.), Language and space: An international handbook of Linguistic variation, 201–225. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110220278.201Search in Google Scholar
Schrodt, Richard. 2004. Althochdeutsche Grammatik II: Syntax. Tübingen: Niemeyer.10.1515/9783110930870Search in Google Scholar
Schweizer, Harro. 1979. Sprache und Systemtheorie. Zur modelltheoretischen Anwendung der kybernetischen Systemtheorie in der Linguistik. Tübingen:Narr.Search in Google Scholar
Shinohara, Sara. 2016. Der konjunktionale Gebrauch von auch im Siebenbürgisch-Sächsischen. In Japanische Gesellschaft für Germanistik (ed.), Beiträge zur dialektologie, 58–75. München: Iudicium.Search in Google Scholar
Simmons, Robert. 1972. Some semantic structures for representing English meanings. In John B. Carroll & Roy O. Freedle (eds.), Language comprehension and the acquisition of knowledge, 71–97. Washington (D.C.): Winston.Search in Google Scholar
Simmons, Robert. 1973. Semantic networks: Their computation and use for understanding English sentences. In Roger C. Schank & Kenneth Mark Colby (eds.), Computer models of thought and language, 63–113. San Francisco: Freeman.Search in Google Scholar
Wirtz, Markus Antonius (ed.). 2017. Dorsch – Lexikon der Psychologie. Bern: Hogrefe.Search in Google Scholar
Zoëga, Geir T. 2004. A concise dictionary of old Icelandic. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Thematic Part - Language Change
- Thematic part: Language change (Preface)
- Piotrowski-Altmann law: State of the art
- Language change and language evolution: Cousins, siblings, twins?
- Language change as a scientific construct of a probabilistically organized information system
- Drift – A change of perspective
- Hybridität als Motor und als Ergebnis von Sprachwandel
- Non-Thematic Part
- Medientextsorte Meldung in deutscher und ukrainischer Kultur aus fraktaler Perspektive
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Thematic Part - Language Change
- Thematic part: Language change (Preface)
- Piotrowski-Altmann law: State of the art
- Language change and language evolution: Cousins, siblings, twins?
- Language change as a scientific construct of a probabilistically organized information system
- Drift – A change of perspective
- Hybridität als Motor und als Ergebnis von Sprachwandel
- Non-Thematic Part
- Medientextsorte Meldung in deutscher und ukrainischer Kultur aus fraktaler Perspektive
