Language change and language evolution: Cousins, siblings, twins?

References

Adelung, Christoph Johann. 1781. Über den ursprung der sprache und den bau der wörter, besonders der Deutschen. Ein versuch. Leipzig: Breitkopf.10.1515/9783112688861Search in Google Scholar

Adger, David. 2015a. Mythical myths: Comments on Vyvyan Evans’ “The language myth”. Lingua 158. 76–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2015.02.006.Search in Google Scholar

Adger, David. 2015b. More misrepresentation: A response to Behme and Evans 2015. Lingua 162. 160–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2015.05.005.Search in Google Scholar

Adli, Aria. 2004. Grammatische variation und sozialstruktur. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.10.1515/9783050084275Search in Google Scholar

Arbib, Michael A. 2016. Primates, computation, and the path to language. Physics of Life Reviews 16. 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2016.02.003.Search in Google Scholar

Atkinson, Quentin D. & Russell D. Gray. 2005. Curious parallels and curious connections: Phylogenetic thinking in biology and historical linguistics. Systematic Biology 54(4). 513–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150590950317.Search in Google Scholar

Barceló-Coblijn, Lluís, Cory M. Cuthbertson, Kirsty E. Graham, Stefan Hartmann & Michael Pleyer. 2016. Conference report on evolang 11. Journal of Language Evolution 1(2). 159–162. https://doi.org/10.1093/jole/lzw010.Search in Google Scholar

Barðdal, Jóhanna, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea (eds.). 2015. Diachronic construction grammar. In Construction approaches to language 18. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.18Search in Google Scholar

Beckner, Clay, Richard Blythe, Joan Bybee, Morten H. Christiansen, William Croft, Nick C. Ellis, John Holland, Jinyun Ke, Diane Larsen-Freeman & Tom Schoenemann. 2009. Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning 59(1 Suppl). 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00533.x.Search in Google Scholar

Behme, Christina & Vyvyan Evans. 2015. Leaving the myth behind: A reply to Adger (2015). Lingua 162. 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2015.05.004.Search in Google Scholar

Benítez-Burraco, Antonio & Víctor M. Longa. 2010. Evo-Devo - of course, but which one? Some comments on Chomsky’s analogies between the biolinguistic approach and evo-devo. Biolinguistics 4(4). 308–323.10.5964/bioling.8807Search in Google Scholar

Bentz, Christian. 2018. Adaptive languages: An information-theoretic account of linguistic diversity. (Trends in linguistics. Studies and monographs 316). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110560107Search in Google Scholar

Berwick, Robert C. & Noam Chomsky. 2017. Why only us: Recent questions and answers. Journal of Neurolinguistics 43. 166–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2016.12.002.Search in Google Scholar

Bickerton, Derek. 1990. Language and species. Chicago: Chicago University Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226220949.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Bouckaert, Remco, Philippe Lemey, Michael Dunn, Simon J. Greenhill, Alexander V. Alekseyenko, Alexei J. Drummond, Russell D. Gray, Marc A. Suchard & Quentin D. Atkinson. 2012. Mapping the origins and expansion of the Indo-European language family. Science 337(6097). 957–960. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1219669.Search in Google Scholar

Bowern, Claire & Bethwyn Evans. 2015. Foundations of the new historical linguistics. In Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds.), The routledge handbook of historical linguistics, 1–42. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315794013-43Search in Google Scholar

Boyd, Robert & Peter J. Richerson. 1985. Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Boyd, Robert & Peter J. Richerson. 1996. Why culture is common, but cultural evolution is rare. Proceedings of the British Academy 88. 77–93.Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2007. Diachronic linguistics. In Dirk Geeraerts & Cuyckens Hubert (eds.), The oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics, 945–987. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738632.013.0036Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. 2010. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511750526Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2012. Domain-general processes as the basis for grammar. In Maggie Taller-man & Kathleen R. Gibson (eds.), The oxford handbook of language evolution, 528–536. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199541119.013.0055Search in Google Scholar

Caldwell, Christine A. & Ailsa E. Millen. 2008. Experimental models for testing hypotheses about cumulative cultural evolution. Evolution and Human Behavior 29(3). 165–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.12.001.Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, Lyle. 1999. Historical linguistics: An introduction. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, Lyle. 2013. Historical linguistics: An introduction, 3rd edn. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2010. Some simple evo devo theses: How true might they be for language? In Richard K. Larson, Viviane Deprez & Hiroko Yamakido (eds.), The evolution of human language, 45–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511817755.003Search in Google Scholar

Christiansen, Morten H. & Nick Chater. 2008. Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31(5). 489–558. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x08004998.Search in Google Scholar

Christiansen, Morten H. & Nick Chater. 2017. Towards an integrated science of language. Nature Human Behaviour 1(8). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0163.Search in Google Scholar

Collinge, Neville. E. 1995. History of historical linguistics. In Ernst Frideryk Konrad Koerner & Ronald E. Asher (eds.), Concise history of the language sciences: From the sumerians to the cognitivists, 203–212. New York: Pergamon.10.1016/B978-0-08-042580-1.50038-6Search in Google Scholar

Coppola, Marie & Diane Brentari. 2014. From iconic handshapes to grammatical contrasts: Longitudinal evidence from a child homesigner. Frontiers in Psychology 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00830.Search in Google Scholar

Cornish, Hannah. 2010. Investigating how cultural transmission leads to the appearance of design without a designer in human communication systems. Interaction Studies 11(1). 112–137. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.11.1.02cor.Search in Google Scholar

Creanza, Nicole, Merritt Ruhlen, Trevor J. Pemberton, Noah A. Rosenberg, Marcus W. Feld-man & Sohini Ramachandran. 2015. A comparison of worldwide phonemic and genetic variation in human populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112(5). 1265–1272. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1424033112.Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2001. Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Crowley, Terry & Claire Bowern. 2010. An introduction to historical linguistics, 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2015. What exactly is universal grammar, and has anyone seen it? Frontiers in Psychology 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00852.Search in Google Scholar

Deacon, Terrence W. 1997. The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. New York and London: Norton.Search in Google Scholar

Dediu, Dan & Bart de Boer. 2016. Language evolution needs its own journal. Journal of Language Evolution 1(1). 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/jole/lzv001.Search in Google Scholar

Dediu, Dan. 2015. An introduction to genetics for language scientists: Current concepts, methods and findings. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511735875Search in Google Scholar

Diessel, Holger. 2015. Usage-based construction grammar. In Ewa Dąbrowska & Dagmar Divjak (eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics, 296–322. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110292022-015Search in Google Scholar

Evans, Vyvyan. 2014. The language myth: Why language is not an instinct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107358300Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, Olga. 2007. What counts as evidence in historical linguistics? In Martina Penke & Anette Rosenbach (eds.), What counts as evidence in linguistics: The case of innateness, 249–281. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/bct.7.20fisSearch in Google Scholar

Fitch, W. Tecumseh. 2010. The evolution of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511817779Search in Google Scholar

Fitch, W. Tecumseh. 2017. Empirical approaches to the study of language evolution. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 24(1). 3–33. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1236-5.Search in Google Scholar

Foster, Mary LeCron. 2000. Finding the themes: Family, anthropology, language origins, peace and conflict. Interviews conducted by suzanne riess in 2000. Berkeley: Regional Oral History Office, University of California, Berkeley. https://texts.cdlib.org/view?docId=kt4s2003sn&query=&brand=calisphere (accessed 30 October 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Frank, Roslyn M. & Nathalie Gontier. 2010. On constructing a research model for historical cognitive linguistics (HCL): Some theoretical considerations. In Margaret E. Winters, Heli Tissari & Kathryn Allan (eds.), Historical cognitive linguistics, 31–69. (Cognitive Linguistics Research 47). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110226447.31Search in Google Scholar

Frank, Roslyn M. 2008. The language-organism-species analogy: A complex adaptive systems approach to shifting perspective on ‘language’. In Tom Ziemke, Jordan Zlatev & Roslyn M. Frank (eds.), Body, language and mind: vol. 2: sociocultural situatedness, 215–262. (Cognitive Linguistics Research 35.2). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Garrod, Simon, Nicolas Fay, John Lee, Jon Oberlander & Tracy MacLeod. 2007. Foundations of representation: Where might graphical symbol systems come from? Cognitive Science 31(6). 961–987. https://doi.org/10.1080/03640210701703659.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Goldin-Meadow, Susan, Carolyn Mylander & Amy Franklin. 2007. How children make language out of gesture: Morphological structure in gesture systems developed by American and Chinese deaf children. Cognitive Psychology 55. 87–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.08.001.Search in Google Scholar

Gong, Tao, Yau Wai Lam, Xinying Chen & Menghan Zhang. 2014. Evolutionary linguistics in the past two decades. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 42(2). 499–530.Search in Google Scholar

Gong, Tao. 2011. Where could biolinguists and evolutionary linguists meet? Physics of Life Reviews 8(4). 373–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2011.10.008.Search in Google Scholar

Gray, Russell D. & Quentin D. Atkinson 2003. Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin. Nature 426. 435–439. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02029.Search in Google Scholar

Gray, Russell D., Quentin D. Atkinson & Simon J. Greenhill. 2011. Language evolution and human history: What a difference a date makes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 366(1567). 1090–1100. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0378.Search in Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph H. 2005. Genetic linguistics. Essays on theory and method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Guzmán Naranjo, Matías. 2015. Unifying everything: Integrating quantitative effects into formal models of grammar. Proceedings of the 6th conference on quantitative investigations in theoretical linguistics. Tübingen: University of Tübingen. https://publikationen.uni-tuebingen.de/xmlui/handle/10900/67216. (accessed 31 October 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Guzmán Naranjo, Matías. 2019. Analogical classification in formal grammar. Berlin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar

Harnard, Stevan R., Horst D. Steklis & Jane Lancaster (eds.). 1974. Origin and evolution of language and speech. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Search in Google Scholar

Harris, Randy Allen. 1993. The linguistics wars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hartmann, Stefan, 2018. Deutsche Sprachgeschichte. Grundzüge und Methoden. Francke, Tübingen.10.36198/9783838548234Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 1999a. Optimality and diachronic adaptation. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 18(2). 180–205. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsw.1999.18.2.180.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 1999b. Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics 37(6). 1043–1068. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.37.6.1043.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2016. The evolution (or diachrony) of language evolution. https://dlc.hypotheses.org/894. (accessed 30 October 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2020. Human linguisticality and the building blocks of languages. Frontiers in Psychology 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03056.Search in Google Scholar

Hauser, Marc D., Noam Chomsky & W. Tecumseh Fitch. 2002. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298. 1569–1579. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511817755.002.Search in Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613463Search in Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2007. The genesis of grammar: A reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2012. Grammaticalization theory as a tool for reconstructing language evolution. In Maggie Taller-man & Kathleen R. Gibson (eds.), The Oxford handbook of language evolution, 511–527. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199541119.013.0054Search in Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi & Friederike Hünnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hewes, Gordon W. 1973. Primate communication and the gestural origin of language. Current Anthropology 14. 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1086/204019.Search in Google Scholar

Hilpert, Martin. 2013. Constructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word formation, and syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139004206Search in Google Scholar

Hilpert, Martin. 2014. Construction grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hilpert, Martin. 2018. Three open questions in diachronic construction grammar. In Evie Coussé, Peter Andersson & Joel Olofsson (eds.), Grammaticalization meets construction grammar, 21–39. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.21.c2Search in Google Scholar

Hockett, Charles F. & Robert Ascher. 1964. The human revolution. Current Anthropology 5(3). 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1086/204017.Search in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165525Search in Google Scholar

Hruschka, Daniel J., Morten H. Christiansen, Richard A. Blythe, Croft William, Paul Heggarty, Salikoko S. Mufwene, Janet B. Pierrehumbert & Shana Poplack. 2009. Building social cognitive models of language change. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13. 464–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.08.008.Search in Google Scholar

Hudson, Richard. 2010. An introduction to word grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511781964Search in Google Scholar

Humboldt, Wilhelm von. 1836. Über die verschiedenheit des menschlichen sprachbaues und ihren einfluß auf die geistige entwickelung des menschengeschlechts. Berlin: Akademie der Wissenschaften.Search in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 2010. Your theory of language evolution depends on your theory of language. In Richard K. Larson, Viviane Déprez & Hiroko Yamakido (eds.), The evolution of human language: Biolinguistic perspectives, 63–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511817755.004Search in Google Scholar

Johansson, Sverker. 2005. Origins of language: Constraints on hypotheses. (Converging evidence in language and communication research 5). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/celcr.5Search in Google Scholar

Johansson, Sverker. 2016. Protolanguage Possibilities in a Construction Grammar Framework. In Seán G. Roberts, Cuskley Christine, Luke McCrohon, Lluís Barceló-Coblijn, Olga Fehér & Tessa Verhoef (eds.), The evolution of language. Proceedings of the 11th international conference. Available at: https://evolang.org/neworleans/papers/149.html.Search in Google Scholar

Joseph, Brian D. & Richard Janda. 2003. On language, change, and language change - or, of history, linguistics, and historical linguistics. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 1–180. Malden: Blackwell.10.1111/b.9781405127479.2004.00002.xSearch in Google Scholar

Keller, Rudi. 1994. Sprachwandel: Von der unsichtbaren hand in der Sprache. Basel, Francke:Tübingen.Search in Google Scholar

Kempson, Ruth & Ronnie Cann. 2007. Diachronic syntax and dialogue modelling. Preliminaries for a dialogue-driven account of syntactic change. In Joseph C. Salmons & Shannon Dubenion-Smith (eds.), Historical linguistics 2005: Selected papers from the 17th international conference on historical linguistics, 73–101. (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 284). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.284.08kemSearch in Google Scholar

Kirby, Simon, Hannah Cornish & Kenny Smith. 2008. Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105(31). 10681–10686. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707835105.Search in Google Scholar

Kirby, Simon. 2012. Language is an adaptive system: The role of cultural evolution in the origins of structure. In Maggie Taller-man & Kathleen R. Gibson (eds.), The Oxford handbook of language evolution, 589–604. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199541119.013.0061Search in Google Scholar

Kirby, Simon. 2017. Culture and biology in the origins of linguistic structure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 24(1). 118–137.10.3758/s13423-016-1166-7Search in Google Scholar

Korostenskienė, Julija. 2017. Bridging the gap: Toward a cognitive semantic analysis of the Lithuanian superlexical prefix be-. In Stefan Hartmann (ed.), Yearbook of the German cognitive linguistics association 2017, 195–210. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/gcla-2017-0013Search in Google Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions, 2nd edn. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1994. Principles of linguistic change, Vol. 1. Internal factors. Malden: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 2001. Principles of linguistic change, Vol. 2. Social factors. Malden: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 2010. Principles of linguistic change, Vol. 3. Cognitive and cultural factors. Malden: Blackwell.10.1002/9781444327496Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lehmann, Christian. 2015. Thoughts on grammaticalization, 3rd edn. (Classics in Linguistics 1). Berlin: Language Science Press.10.26530/OAPEN_603353Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. 2012. The original sin of cognitive science. Topics in Cognitive Science 4(3). 396–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01195.x.Search in Google Scholar

Lightfoot, David. 1991. How to set parameters: Arguments from language change. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lupyan, Gary & Rick Dale. 2010. Language structure is partly determined by social structure. PLoS ONE 5(1). e8559. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008559.Search in Google Scholar

Maitz, Péter. 2012. Wohin steuert die Historische Sprachwissenschaft? Erkenntniswege und Profile einer scientific community im Wandel. In Péter Maitz (ed.), Historische sprachwissenschaft, 1–27. (Studia Linguistica Germanica 110). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110273304.1Search in Google Scholar

Martins, Pedro Tiago, Maties Marí & Cedric Boeckx. 2018. SRGAP2 and the gradual evolution of the modern human language faculty. Journal of Language Evolution 3(1). 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/jole/lzx020.Search in Google Scholar

Massip-Bonet, Àngels. 2013. Language as a complex adaptive system: Towards an integrative linguistics. In Àngels Massip-Bonet & Albert Bastardas-Boada (eds.), Complexity perspectives on language, communication and society, 35–60. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-32817-6_4Search in Google Scholar

Mendívil-Giró, José-Luis, 2019. Did language evolve through language change? On language change, language evolution and grammaticalization theory. Glossa: A Journal Of General Linguistics 4 (1).10.5334/gjgl.895Search in Google Scholar

Meyer, Charles F. 2002. English corpus linguistics. An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511606311Search in Google Scholar

Morin, Olivier, Piers Kelly & James Winters. 2018. Writing, graphic codes, and asynchronous communication. Topics in Cognitive Science 12(2). 727–743. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12386.Search in Google Scholar

Morin, Olivier. 2015. How traditions live and die. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2001. The ecology of language evolution. (Cambridge approaches to language contact). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Müller, Cornelia. 2013. Introduction. In Cornelia Müller, Alan J. Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill & Sedinha Tessendorf (eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, 1–6. (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 38.1). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Müller, Stefan. 2013. Unifying everything: Some remarks on simpler syntax, construction grammar, minimalism, and HPSG. Language 89(4). 920–950. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2013.0061.Search in Google Scholar

Müller, Thomas F. & James Winters. 2018. Compression in cultural evolution: Homogeneity and structure in the emergence and evolution of a large-scale online collaborative art project. (Ed.) Alex Mesoudi. PLOS ONE 13(9). e0202019. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202019.10.1371/journal.pone.0202019Search in Google Scholar

Murray, Robert W. 2006. Modern theories of linguistic change: An overview. In Sylvain Auroux, Ernst Frideryk Konrad Koerner, Niederehe Hans-Josef & Kees Versteegh (eds.), History of the language sciences. An international handbook on the evolution of the study of language from the beginnings to the present, Vol. 3, 2479–2500. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110167368.3.37.2479Search in Google Scholar

Narrog, Heiko & Bernd Heine (eds.). 2011. Oxford handbook of grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nölle, Jonas. 2014. A co-evolved continuum of language, culture and cognition: Prospects of interdisciplinary research. Studies about Languages 25. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.sal.0.25.8504.Search in Google Scholar

Osthoff, Hermann & Karl Brugmann. 1878. Morphologische untersuchungen auf dem Gebiete der indogermanischen Sprachen, Vol. 1. Leipzig: Hirzel.Search in Google Scholar

Pereltsvaig, Asya & Martin W. Lewis. 2015. The Indo-European controversy. Facts and fallacies in historical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107294332Search in Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven & Paul Bloom. 1990. Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13. 707–784. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00081061.Search in Google Scholar

Pleyer, Michael & Stefan Hartmann. 2016. Construction grammar for apes. In Seán G. Roberts, Christine Cuskley, Luke McCrohon, Lluís Barceló-Coblijn, Olga Fehér & Tessa Verhoef (eds.), The evolution of language. Proceedings of the 11th international conference.Search in Google Scholar

Pleyer, Michael & Stefan Hartmann. 2019. Constructing a consensus on language evolution? Convergences and differences between biolinguistic and usage-based approaches. Frontiers in Psychology: Language Sciences 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02537.Search in Google Scholar

Pleyer, Michael & James Winters. 2014. Integrating cognitive linguistics and language evolution research. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum 11. 19–43. https://doi.org/10.12775/ths-2014-002.Search in Google Scholar

Pleyer, Michael. 2017. Protolanguage and mechanisms of meaning construal in interaction. Language Sciences 63. 69–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2017.01.003.Search in Google Scholar

Richerson, Peter J. & Robert Boyd. 2005. Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226712130.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Ritt, Nikolaus. 2004. Selfish sounds and linguistic evolution: A Darwinian approach to language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486449Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, Séan & James Winters. 2012. Social structure and language structure: The new nomothetic approach. Psychology of Language and Communication 16(2). 89–112. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10057-012-0008-6.Search in Google Scholar

Rosenbach, Anette. 2008. Language change as cultural evolution: Evolutionary approaches to language change. In Regine Eckardt, Gerhard Jäger & Tonjes Veenstra (eds.), Variation, selection, development: Probing the evolutionary model of language change, 23–72. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Schleicher, August. 1863. Die Darwinische theorie und die sprachwissenschaft: Offenes sendschreiben an Herrn Dr. Ernst Haeckel, o. professor der Zoologie und Direktor des zoologischen museums an der Universität Jena, 2nd ed. Weimar: Böhlau.Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2017. A framework for understanding entrenchment and its psychological foundations. In Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning. How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge, 9–39. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.10.1037/15969-002Search in Google Scholar

Schoenemann, P. Thomas. 2017. A complex-adaptive-systems approach to the evolution of language and the brain. In Salikoko Mufwene, Christophe Coupe & Francois Pellegrino (eds.), Complexity in language, 67–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781107294264.004Search in Google Scholar

Senghas, Ann. 2000. The development of early spatial morphology in Nicaraguan sign language. In S. Catherine Howellee, Sarah A. Fish & Thea Keith-Lucas (eds.), Proceedings of the 24th annual Boston university conference on language development, 696–707. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Search in Google Scholar

Senghas, Ann. 2005. Language emergence: Clues from a new Bedouin sign language. Current Biology 15(12). R463–R465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.06.018.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Kenny, Monica Tamariz & Simon Kirby. 2013. Linguistic structure is an evolutionary trade-off between simplicity and expressivity. In Markus Knauff, Michael Pauen, Natalie Sebanz & Ipke Wachsmuth (eds.), Cooperative minds: Social interaction and group dynamics, 1348–1353. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Kenny. 2018. How culture and biology interact to shape language and the language faculty. Topics in Cognitive Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12377.Search in Google Scholar

Steels, Luc. 2011. Modeling the cultural evolution of language. Physics of Life Reviews 8. 339–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2011.10.014.Search in Google Scholar

Tallerman, Maggie. 2012. Protolanguage. In Maggie Tallerman & Kathleen R. Gibson (eds.), The Oxford handbook of language evolution, 479–491. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199541119.013.0051Search in Google Scholar

Tamariz, Monica & Simon Kirby. 2016. The cultural evolution of language. Current Opinion in Psychology 8. 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.09.003.Search in Google Scholar

Tamariz, Mónica. 2014. Experiments and simulations can inform evolutionary theories of the cultural evolution of language. In Marco Pina & Nathalie Gontier (eds.), The evolution of social communication in primates, vol. 1, 249–288. Cham: Springer. (16 October, 2017).10.1007/978-3-319-02669-5_14Search in Google Scholar

Tamariz, Monica. 2017. Experimental studies on the cultural evolution of language. Annual Review of Linguistics 3(1). 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011516-033807.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, John R. 1996. Possessives in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, John R. 2012. The mental corpus: How language is represented in the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199290802.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Theofanopoulou, Constantina, Simone Gastaldon, Thomas O’Rourke, Bridget D. Samuels, Angela Messner, Pedro Tiago Martins, Francesco Delogu, Saleh Alamri & Cedric Boeckx. 2017. Self-domestication in homo sapiens: Insights from comparative genomics. Michael Klymkowsky (ed.), PLOS ONE 12(10). e0185306. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185306.Search in Google Scholar

Trask, Larry. 2015. Historical linguistics. Revised and edited by Robert McColl Millar, 3rd edn. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and constructional changes. (Oxford studies in diachronic and historical linguistics 6). Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Trotzke, Andreas. 2017. Sprachevolution: Eine einführung. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110515626Search in Google Scholar

Van Trijp, Remi. 2014. Fitness landscapes in cultural language evolution: A case study on German definite articles. In Erica A. Cartmill, Séan Roberts, Heidi Lyn & Hannah Cornish (eds.), The evolution of language: Proceedings of the 10th international conference, 334–341. Singapore: World Scientific.10.1142/9789814603638_0044Search in Google Scholar

von der Gabelentz, Georg. [1892] 2016. Die Sprachwissenschaft: Ihre aufgaben, methoden und bisherigen ergebnisse. Berlin: Language Science Press.10.26530/OAPEN_611696Search in Google Scholar

Walkden, George. 2013. Null subjects in old English. Language Variation and Change 25(02). 155–178. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954394513000070.Search in Google Scholar

Zimmermann, Richard. 2017. Formal and quantitative approaches to the study of syntactic change. Three case studies from the history of English. University of Geneva PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar