Home Mathematics The ℓ∞-semi-norm on uniformly finite homology
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The ℓ-semi-norm on uniformly finite homology

  • Francesca Diana and Clara Löh EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 30, 2016

Abstract

Uniformly finite homology is a coarse homology theory, defined via chains that satisfy a uniform boundedness condition. By construction, uniformly finite homology carries a canonical -semi-norm. We show that, for uniformly discrete spaces of bounded geometry, this semi-norm on uniformly finite homology in degree 0 with -coefficients allows for a new formulation of Whyte’s rigidity result. In contrast, we prove that this semi-norm is trivial on uniformly finite homology with -coefficients in higher degrees.

MSC 2010: 55N35; 20F65; 52C25

Communicated by Frederick R. Cohen


Funding statement: This work was supported by the GRK 1692 Curvature, Cycles and Cohomology (funded by the DFG, Universität Regensburg).

A Review of uniformly finite homology

We will recall terms and notation for UDBG spaces, uniformly finite homology, and amenability in this context.

A.1 UDBG spaces

For simplicity, we will work in the category of UDBG spaces:

Definition A.1 (UDBG space).

A metric space X is a UDBG space if it is uniformly discrete and of bounded geometry, i.e., if

  1. there exists ε>0 such that for all x,yX,

    d(x,y)<εx=y.
  2. for every r>0 there exists K>0 such that for all xX we have

    |Br(x)|<K.

For example, every finitely generated group equipped with some word metric of a finite generating set is a UDBG space.

The category of UDBG spaces has UDBG spaces as objects and morphisms are quasi-isometric embeddings modulo the relation of being uniformly close. Clearly, quasi-isometries of UDBG spaces correspond to isomorphisms in the category 𝖴𝖣𝖡𝖦.

A.2 Uniformly finite homology of UDBG spaces

Uniformly finite chains are combinatorial infinite chains on UDBG spaces that satisfy certain geometric finiteness conditions. We consider uniformly finite chains with coefficients in a normed ring with unit.

Definition A.2 (Normed ring).

Let R be a ring with unit. A norm on R is a function ||:R0 satisfying the following conditions:

  1. For all rR we have |r|=0 if and only if r=0.

  2. For all r,rR we have |r+r||r|+|r|.

  3. For all r,rR we have |rr|=|r||r|.

Definition A.3 (Uniformly finite homology).

Let R be a normed ring with unit and X be a UDBG space. For each n the space of uniformly finite n-chains is the R-module Cnuf(X;R) whose elements are functions of type Xn+1R, written as formal sums of the form c=xXn+1cxx, satisfying the following conditions:

  1. For any xXn+1, we have cxR. Moreover, there exists a constant K>0 such that for all xXn+1,

    |cx|<K.
  2. There exists a constant R>0 such that for all x=(x0,,xn)Xn+1,

    supi,j{0,,n}d(xi,xj)>Rcx=0.

For n, we define a boundary operator n:Cnuf(X;R)Cn-1uf(X;R) that takes every xXn+1 to

n(x)=j=0n(-1)j(x0,,x^j,,xn)

and is extended in the obvious way to all of Cnuf(X;R); this map is indeed well-defined. Moreover, for each n we have

nn+1=0.

In this way we get a well-defined chain complex. The homology of (Cnuf(X;R),n)n is the uniformly finite homology of X and it is denoted by H*uf(X;R).

Block and Weinberger [4, Proposition 2.1] observed that uniformly finite homology is quasi-isometry invariant:

Proposition A.4 (Quasi-isometry invariance).

Let R be a normed ring with unit. Let X,Y be UDBG spaces and let f:XY be a quasi-isometric embedding. Then f induces a chain map, defined for each nN by

Cnuf(f;R):Cnuf(X;R)Cnuf(Y;R),xXn+1cxxxXn+1cx(f(x0),,f(xn)).

If f is uniformly close to a quasi-isometric embedding f:XY, then

H*uf(f;R)=H*uf(f;R):Hnuf(X;R)Hnuf(Y;R).

In particular, any quasi-isometry induces an isomorphism in uniformly finite homology.

In view of Proposition A.4, uniformly finite homology with coefficients in a normed ring R defines a functor from the category of UDBG spaces to the category of graded R-modules.

A.3 Uniformly finite homology of groups

As a consequence of quasi-isometry invariance (Proposition A.4) we obtain that for finitely generated groups uniformly finite homology is independent from the chosen word metric.

We now recall the relation of uniformly finite homology of finitely generated groups with group homology with twisted coefficients: Let R be a ring with unit endowed with a norm ||. The space (G,R) of functions φ:GR that are bounded with respect to the supremum norm φ:=supgG|φ(g)| has a natural R[G]-module structure with respect to the action

G×(G,R)(G,R),(g,φ)(gφ:gφ(g-1g)).

Notice that, in the case of uniformly finite homology, the simplices of a given uniformly finite chain are tuples in Gn+1 of uniformly bounded diameter; therefore they are contained in the G-orbit of finitely many simplices of the form (e,t1,,tn)Gn+1. Hence, we have [5], [7, Proposition 2.2.4]:

Proposition A.5 (Uniformly finite homology as group homology).

Let G be a finitely generated group endowed with the word metric with respect to some finite generating set and let R be a normed ring with unit. For nN consider

ρn:Cnuf(G;R)Cn(G;(G,R)),gGn+1cggt=(t1,,tn)Gn(e,t1,,tn)φc,t,

where for all tGn the map φc,t(G,R) is given by

φc,t:gcg-1(e,t1,,tn).

Then ρ*:C*uf(G;R)C*(G;(G,R)) is a chain isomorphism; in particular, ρ* induces an isomorphism H*(ρ*):H*uf(G;R)H*(G;(G,R)).

A.4 The fundamental class in uniformly finite homology

In degree 0 there is a canonical uniformly finite homology class: Let X be a UDBG space and let R be a normed ring with unit. The R-fundamental class of X in H0uf(X;R) is the class [X]RH0uf(X;R) represented by the uniformly finite cycle xX1xC0uf(X;R).

We recall now a central application of uniformly finite homology, due to Whyte [16, Theorem 1.1]:

Theorem A.6 (Bilipschitz equivalence rigidity).

Let X,Y be UDBG spaces and let f:XY be a quasi-isometry. Then f is uniformly close to a bilipschitz equivalence if and only if H0uf(f;Z)([X]Z)=[Y]Z.

One step in Whyte’s proof is the following characterisation of the trivial class in uniformly finite homology in degree 0 (see [16, Theorem 7.6]):

Theorem A.7 (Vanishing criterion in degree 0).

Let X be a UDBG space, and let c=xXcxx be a cycle in C0uf(X;Z). Then [c]=0H0uf(X;Z) if and only if there exist constants C,rN such that for all finite subsets FX we have

C|rF||xFcx|.

These boundary conditions are closely related to amenability.

Definition A.8 (Amenable UDBG space).

A UDBG space X is amenable if it admits a Følner sequence, i.e., sequence (Sn)n of non-empty finite subsets SnX such that

limn|r(Sn)||Sn|=0for all r>0.

Whyte [16, Theorem 7.1] used the vanishing criterion Theorem A.7 to provide a new proof of the characterisation of amenability for UDBG spaces by Block and Weinberger [4, Theorem 3.1].

Theorem A.9 (Characterisation of amenability).

Let X be a UDBG space. The following are equivalent:

  1. The UDBG space X is non-amenable.

  2. We have H0uf(X;)=0.

  3. We have H0uf(X;)=0.

  4. We have [X]=0.

Theorem A.6 and Theorem A.9 imply the following rigidity result:

Corollary A.10.

Any quasi-isometry between non-amenable UDBG spaces is uniformly close to a bilipschitz equivalence.

References

[1] O. Attie, Quasi-isometry classification of some manifolds of bounded geometry, Math. Z. 216 (1994), no. 4, 501–527. 10.1007/BF02572337Search in Google Scholar

[2] M. Blank, Relative bounded cohomology, Ph.D. thesis, Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, 2015. Search in Google Scholar

[3] M. Blank and F. Diana, Uniformly finite homology and amenable groups, Alg. Geom. Topol. 15 (2015), 467–492. 10.2140/agt.2015.15.467Search in Google Scholar

[4] J. Block and S. Weinberger, Aperiodic tilings, positive scalar curvature and amenability of spaces, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 5 (1992), no. 4, 907–918. 10.1090/S0894-0347-1992-1145337-XSearch in Google Scholar

[5] J. Brodzki, G. Niblo and N. Wright, Pairings, duality, amenability and bounded cohomology, J. Eur. Math. Soc. 14 (2012), no. 5, 1513–1518. 10.4171/JEMS/338Search in Google Scholar

[6] T. Ceccherini-Silberstein and M. Coornaert, Cellular Automata and Groups, Springer Monogr. Math., Springer, Berlin, 2010. 10.1007/978-3-642-14034-1Search in Google Scholar

[7] F. Diana, Aspects of uniformly finite homology, Ph.D. thesis, Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

[8] A. Dranishnikov, On macroscopic dimension of rationally essential manifolds, Geom. Topol. 15 (2011), no. 2, 1107–1124. 10.2140/gt.2011.15.1107Search in Google Scholar

[9] T. Dymarz, Bijective quasi-isometries of amenable groups, Geometric Methods in Group Theory, Contemp. Math. 372, American Mathematical Society, Providence (2005), 181–188. 10.1090/conm/372/06883Search in Google Scholar

[10] A. Engel, Rough index theory of manifolds with polynomial volume growth, preprint (2015), https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.03988. Search in Google Scholar

[11] M. Gromov, Volume and bounded cohomology, Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 56 (1983), 5–99. Search in Google Scholar

[12] M. Gromov, Metric Structures for Riemannian and Non-Riemannian Spaces, Progr. Math. 152, Birkhäuser, Basel, 1999. Search in Google Scholar

[13] C. Löh, Isomorphisms in 1-homology, Münster J. Math. 1 (2008), 237–266. Search in Google Scholar

[14] C. Löh, Finite functorial semi-norms and representability, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2016 (2016), no. 2, 3616–3638. 10.1093/imrn/rnv250Search in Google Scholar

[15] M. Marcinkowski, Intersection of kernels of all invariant means and uniformly finite homology group, preprint, http://math.uni.wroc.pl/~marcinkow/papers/zerouf.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

[16] K. Whyte, Amenability, bi-Lipschitz equivalence, and the von Neumann conjecture, Duke Math. J. 99 (1999), no. 1, 93–112. 10.1215/S0012-7094-99-09904-0Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-12-21
Revised: 2016-9-27
Published Online: 2016-11-30
Published in Print: 2017-11-1

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 4.2.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/forum-2015-0258/pdf
Scroll to top button