Home On the complete integrability of the periodic quantum Toda lattice
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

On the complete integrability of the periodic quantum Toda lattice

  • Augustin-Liviu Mare EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: January 12, 2017

Abstract

We prove that the periodic quantum Toda lattice corresponding to any extended Dynkin diagram is completely integrable. This has been conjectured and proved in all classical cases and E6 by Goodman and Wallach at the beginning of the 1980s. As a direct application, in the context of quantum cohomology of affine flag manifolds, results that were known to hold only for some particular Lie types can now be extended to all types.

MSC 2010: 37K10; 17B35; 37N20

Communicated by Karl-Hermann Neeb


A The case when β is the highest root: The theorem of Etingof

The complete integrability of the periodic quantum Toda lattice corresponding to a Dynkin diagram extended by the highest root was proved by Etingof in [3]. We considered necessary to include the details of his proof for reasons of completeness and clarity. The approach below is slightly different from the original one, in that we preferred to use complex Lie groups and loop spaces rather than formal groups. As background references we indicate [9], [14], and [13]. Let G be a simple, simply connected, complex Lie group of Lie algebra 𝔤 and TG a maximal torus, whose Lie algebra we denote by 𝔥. Let also , be the Killing form on 𝔤 normalized such that α,α=2 for any long root α. Pick a simple root system α1,,αr𝔥* and let θ be the corresponding highest root. Consider the differential operator on 𝔥 given by

M=12Δ-Ke-θ-i=1reαi,

where Δ is the Laplacian relative to , and K is a parameter. The goal is to construct differential operators on 𝔥 which commute with M. Recall [9] that the corresponding (non-twisted) affine Kac–Moody Lie algebra is 𝔤^=pol(𝔤)c, where pol(𝔤)=𝔤[z,z-1] is the space of Laurent polynomials with coefficients in 𝔤, z being on the unit circle S1. The Lie bracket on 𝔤^ is defined by

[u,v](z)=[u(z),v(z)]+(Resu(z),v(z))c

for any u,vpol(𝔤), where Res stands for residue (the coefficient of z-1) and c is a central element.

The Chevalley generators of 𝔤^ are ei,hi,fi, where 0ir. Here {hi} is the basis of 𝔥^:=𝔥c consisting of the simple affine coroots, {ei} are root vectors for simple affine roots and {fi} root vectors for the negatives of those roots. Denote by 𝔫+ and 𝔫- the Lie subalgebras of 𝔤^ generated by {ei} and {fi}, respectively. They can be described as

𝔫+=αR^+𝔤^α,𝔫-=αR^-𝔤^α,

where the first sum runs over all positive affine roots and the second sum over all negative affine roots, 𝔤^α being the corresponding root space. We thus have the triangular decomposition 𝔤^=𝔫+𝔥^𝔫-.

Let us now consider the group (G) of all smooth maps from the circle S1 to G along with its universal central extension ~(G), see [14, Section 4.4]. Both (G) and ~(G) are Fréchet–Lie groups, of Lie algebras (𝔤) (space of all smooth maps S1𝔤) and (𝔤)c, respectively. There is a well-defined exponential map exp:~(𝔤)~(G), which is smooth.

Let U+,U-G be the unipotent radicals of the two standard “opposite” Borel subgroups that contain T. Denote by 𝒰+ the subgroup of (G) whose elements are smooth boundary values of holomorphic maps γ:{z:|z|<1}G with γ(0)U+. Similarly, 𝒰- is the subgroup of (G) consisting of smooth boundary values of holomorphic maps γ:{z:|z|>1}{}G such that γ()U-. There exist canonical embeddings 𝒰±~(G). Moreover, if 𝒯:=exp(𝔥^)=T×*, then the map 𝒰+×𝒯×𝒰-~(G), (u+,g,u-)u+gu- is injective onto 𝒰+𝒯𝒰-, which is an open subspace of ~(G), see [14, Theorem 8.7.2]. Any element of 𝔤^ induces a canonical left-invariant vector field on ~(G), hence also on its open subspace 𝒰+𝒯𝒰-. One obtains in this way a representation of the universal enveloping algebra U(𝔤^) on C(𝒰+𝒯𝒰-,). Concretely, for ξ𝔤^, u±𝒰±, g𝒯, and f:𝒰+𝒯𝒰- smooth,

(A.1)(ξ.f)(u+gu-)=ddt|t=0f(exp(tξ)u+gu-).

Note that 𝔫+𝔥𝔫-=pol(𝔤), which is a dense subspace of (𝔤) relative to the Fréchet topology. Moreover, the Lie algebra of 𝒰± is the closure of 𝔫± in (𝔤) relative to the aforementioned topology. Recall that 𝔫+ is generated as a Lie algebra by ei, 0ir. Pick some complex numbers χ0+,,χr+ and consider the Lie algebra homomorphism χ+:𝔫+ determined by χ+(ei)=χi+ for all 0ir. Since 𝒰+ is simply connected and its Lie algebra contains 𝔫+ as a dense subspace, there is a unique lift χ+:𝒰+* (which is a group homomorphism). In the same way, by picking χ0-,,χr-, one attaches to them a Lie algebra homomorphism χ-:𝔫- such that χ-(fi)=χi-, 0ir, and then a Lie group homomorphism χ-:𝒰-*. A smooth function ϕ:𝒰+𝒯𝒰- is called a Whittaker function if

(A.2)ϕ(u+gu-)=χ+(u+)ϕ(g)χ-(u-)for all u±𝒰± and g𝒯,
(A.3)c.ϕ=-hϕ,

where h is the dual Coxeter number of 𝔤. Such a function ϕ is clearly determined by its restriction to 𝒯. In turn, for any gT and any t0,

ddt|t=t0ϕ(exp(tc)g)=-hϕ(exp(t0c)g).

The initial value problem formed by this equation along with the condition ϕ(exp(tc)g)|t=0=ϕ(g) has a unique solution. Thus, ϕ is uniquely determined by its values on T, hence the space of Whittaker functions can be naturally identified with C(T,).

Equation (A.2) implies readily that for any Whittaker function ϕ and any 0i,jr one has

(A.4)ei.ϕ=χi+ϕon 𝒯,
(A.5)fi.ϕ=χi-eαiϕon 𝒯,
(A.6)fi.ei.ϕ=χi-χi+eαiϕon 𝒯,
(A.7)fi.fj.ϕ=χi-χj-eαieαjϕon 𝒯,
(A.8)if α is an affine positive nonsimple root and ξ𝔤^α, then ξ.ϕ=0 on 𝒯.

There exists a certain completion U~(𝔤^) of U(𝔤^) such that the center of U~(𝔤^)/(c+h) is rich, see [4, 5]. First of all, it contains a degree two Casimir element C, which can be expressed as

(A.9)C=i=1rξi2+2hρ+2αR^+(kfαkeαk).

Here ξ1,,ξr is an orthonormal basis of 𝔥, and for each positive affine root αR^+, the vectors eαk are a basis of 𝔤^α and fαk a basis of 𝔤^-α such that eαk,fα=δk. For α=αi both 𝔤^α and 𝔤^-α are one-dimensional and we take eαi1=ei, fαi1=fi, 0ir. Finally, ρ denotes the half-sum of all positive roots of (𝔤,𝔥) relative to the basis α1,,αr and hρ the element of 𝔥 that corresponds to it via the Killing form. Note that even though the second sum in (A.9) is infinite, C belongs to the completion U~(𝔤^).

To any ξ𝔱 we attach the directional derivative ξ on C(T,) given by

(ξf)(g)=ddt|t=0f(exp(tξ)g)

for all fC(T,) and all gT. Equations (A.4)–(A.9) above imply that for any Whittaker function ϕ we have (C.ϕ)|T=D(ϕ|T), where D is the differential operator on C(T,) given by

D=i=1rξi2+2hρ+2i=0rχi+χi-eαi.

Here ξ1,,ξr,hρ are derivatives and eαi is the function T given by exp(h)eαi(h) for all h𝔥, 0ir. Observe now that hρ=i=1rρ(ξi)ξi, hence the composition of D with e-ρ is

De-ρ=(i=1rξi2+2hρ+2i=0rχi+χi-eαi)e-ρ
=i=1re-ρ(ρ(ξi)2-2ρ(ξi)ξi+ξi2)+2i=1rρ(ξi)e-ρ(-ρ(ξi)+ξi)+2i=0rχi+χi-eαie-ρ
=e-ρ(i=1rξi2-i=1rρ(ξi)2+2i=0rχi+χi-eαi).

Since i=1rρ(ξi)2=ρ,ρ and α0=-θ on 𝔥, one obtains

eρDe-ρ=i=1rξi2+2χ0+χ0-e-θ+2i=1rχi+χi-eαi-ρ,ρ.

Choose χi+ and χi- such that χi+χi-=-1 for i0, χ0+=-1, and χ0-=K. Then

M=12(eρDe-ρ+ρ,ρ).

The center of U~(𝔤^/(c+h) contains Y1:=C along with Y2,,Yr, which are of the form Yi=ui+Yi+, where uiSym(𝔥) are fundamental generators of Sym(𝔥)W and Yi+ is a sum of monomials in U(𝔤^)𝔫+ of degree at most equal to degui, see [4, 5]. From equations (A.4)–(A.8) one deduces that for any Whittaker function ϕ one has (Yi.ϕ)|T=Di(ϕ|T), 1ir, where Di is a differential operator on C(T,) which admits a presentation as a polynomial in Ke-θ,eα1,,eαr, ξ1,,ξr (one also uses that (f0.ϕ)|T=χ0-eα0ϕ|T=Ke-θϕ|T). Furthermore, the symbol of Di is ui(ξ1,,ξr). The differential operators D=D1,D2,,Dr commute with each other. But then also

D1:=M=12(eρDe-ρ+ρ,ρ),
D2:=eρD2e-ρ,
Dr:=eρDre-ρ

commute with each other. Each of them is a polynomial in Ke-θ,eα1,,eαr, ξ1,,ξr, since

eρξie-ρ=-ρ(ξi)+ξi.

Moreover, the symbol of Di is ui(ξ1,,ξr) as well.

Let us now consider the “ax+b” algebra 𝔟=𝔞𝔲 corresponding to the Dynkin diagram of 𝔤 extended with the highest root. Its complexification is 𝔟=𝔞𝔲, where one can identify 𝔞=𝔥. Then 𝔲 has a -basis X0,,Xr such that the Lie bracket [,] on 𝔟 is identically zero on both 𝔥 and 𝔲 and for any h𝔥 one has

[h,Xi]=αi(h)Xi,1ir,[h,X0]=-θ(h)X0.

Let Ω1,,Ωr be the elements of U(𝔟) which are obtained from the differential operators D1,,Dr above by making the following replacements:

eαi/2-122Xi,Ke-θ/2-122X0,Hi12Hi,1ir.

In this way

M=12i,j=1rαi,αjHiHj-Ke-θ-i=1reαi

turns into 18Ω, see equation (1.1). Moreover, if θ=m1α1++mrαr, then for any 1i,jr we have

[12Hi,-122Xj]=δij12-122Xj,[12Hi,-122X0]=-mi12-122X0,
[Hi,eαj/2]=δij12eαj/2,[Hi,e-θ/2]=-mi12e-θ/2.

Thus Ωi is in U(𝔟)ev and satisfies the three conditions in Theorem 1.1.

Proposition A.1.

The conclusion of Theorem 1.1 is true in the case when Π is an arbitrary irreducible root system and β is the highest root.

Proof.

The operators Ω1,,Ωr satisfy the conditions in Theorem 1.1. However, we only know that the operators Ω2,,Ωr are in U(𝔟), although not necessarily in U(𝔟). For i{2,,r} one considers the expansion of Ωi relative to the PBW basis XIHJ. By writing each coefficient as a+-1b, with a,b, one obtains

Ωi=Ωi+-1Ωi′′,

where both Ωi and Ωi′′ are in U(𝔟). But then [Ωi+-1Ωi′′,Ω]=[Ωi,Ω]+-1[Ωi′′,Ω], which is equal to 0. This implies that [Ωi,Ω]=0. Thus Ω2,,Ωr are in U(𝔟) and satisfy the three conditions in Theorem 1.1. It remains to justify the last statement in the theorem, that is, that [Ωi,Ωj]=0 for all 2i,jr. This can be proved as follows. First note that, since both Ωi and Ωj are in U(𝔟)ev, their bracket [Ωi,Ωj] is in U(𝔟)ev as well. Also, since both Ωi and Ωj commute with Ω, their bracket [Ωi,Ωj] commutes with Ω as well. Since μ([Ωi,Ωj])=[μ(Ωi),μ(Ωj)]=0, one can use Proposition 2.1 to deduce that [Ωi,Ωj] is a multiple of (X0X1m1Xrmr)2. On the other hand the degree of [Ωi,Ωj] is at most equal to degΩi+degΩj-1, which is the same as degui+deguj-1. Table 1 shows that degui+deguj-1 is strictly smaller that 2(1+m1++mr) for all 1i<jr (recall that m1,,mr are the coefficients of the highest root expansion). We conclude that [Ωi,Ωj]=0, as required. ∎

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Leonardo Mihalcea for discussions about the topics of this paper. I also thank the referee for valuable comments.

References

[1] D. Applebaum, Probability on Compact Lie Groups, Probab. Theory Stoch. Model. 70, Springer, New York, 2014. 10.1007/978-3-319-07842-7Search in Google Scholar

[2] A. J. Bordner, R. Sasaki and K. Takasaki, Calogero–Moser models II: Symmetries and foldings, Progr. Theor. Phys. 101 (1999), 487–518. 10.1143/PTP.101.487Search in Google Scholar

[3] P. Etingof, Whittaker functions on quantum groups and q-deformed Toda operators, Differential Topology, Infinite-Dimensional Lie Algebras, and Applications, Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. Ser. 2 194, American Mathematical Society, Providence (1999), 9–25. 10.1090/trans2/194/02Search in Google Scholar

[4] E. Feigin and B. Frenkel, Affine Kac–Moody algebras at the critical level and Gelfand–Dikii algebras, Internat. J. Modern Phys. A 7 (1992), 197–215. 10.1142/S0217751X92003781Search in Google Scholar

[5] E. Frenkel, Langlands Correspondence for Loop Groups, Cambridge Stud. Adv. Math. 103, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007. Search in Google Scholar

[6] R. Goodman and N. R. Wallach, Classical and quantum-mechanical systems of Toda lattice type I, Comm. Math. Phys. 83 (1982), 355–386. 10.1007/BF01213608Search in Google Scholar

[7] R. Goodman and N. R. Wallach, Classical and quantum-mechanical systems of Toda lattice type III, Comm. Math. Phys. 105 (1986), 473–509. 10.1007/BF01205939Search in Google Scholar

[8] S. Helgason, Differential Geometry, Lie Groups, and Symmetric Spaces, Grad. Stud. Math. 34, American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2001. 10.1090/gsm/034Search in Google Scholar

[9] V. Kac, Infinite Dimensional Lie Algebras, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985. Search in Google Scholar

[10] A.-L. Mare, Quantum cohomology of the infinite dimensional generalized flag manifolds, Adv. Math. 185 (2004), 347–369. 10.1016/j.aim.2003.07.005Search in Google Scholar

[11] A.-L. Mare and L. C. Mihalcea, An affine quantum cohomology ring for flag manifolds and the periodic Toda lattice, preprint (2015). 10.1112/plms.12077Search in Google Scholar

[12] M. L. Mehta, Basic sets of invariant polynomials for finite reflection groups, Comm. Algebra 16 (1988), 1083–1098. 10.1080/00927878808823619Search in Google Scholar

[13] K.-H. Neeb, Borel–Weil theory for loop groups, Infinite Dimensional Kähler Manifolds, DMV Semin. 31, Birkhäuser, Basel (2001), 179–229. 10.1007/978-3-0348-8227-9_3Search in Google Scholar

[14] A. Pressley and G. Segal, Loop Groups, Oxford Math. Monogr., Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1986. Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-5-9
Revised: 2016-11-16
Published Online: 2017-1-12
Published in Print: 2017-11-1

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 13.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/forum-2016-0117/html
Scroll to top button