Home Test vectors for local periods
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Test vectors for local periods

  • U. K. Anandavardhanan ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Nadir Matringe
Published/Copyright: December 25, 2016

Abstract

Let E/F be a quadratic extension of non-Archimedean local fields of characteristic zero. An irreducible admissible representation π of GL(n,E) is said to be distinguished with respect to GL(n,F) if it admits a non-trivial linear form that is invariant under the action of GL(n,F). It is known that there is exactly one such invariant linear form up to multiplication by scalars, and an explicit linear form is given by integrating Whittaker functions over the F-points of the mirabolic subgroup when π is unitary and generic. In this paper, we prove that the essential vector of [14] is a test vector for this standard distinguishing linear form and that the value of this form at the essential vector is a local L-value. As an application we determine the value of a certain proportionality constant between two explicit distinguishing linear forms. We then extend all our results to the non-unitary generic case.


Communicated by Freydoon Shahidi


Award Identifier / Grant number: ANR-13-BS01-0012 FERPLAY

Funding statement: The second author was supported by the grant ANR-13-BS01-0012 FERPLAY.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dipendra Prasad for asking the question about an explicit test vector for the invariant linear form for (Gn(E),Gn(F)). They would also like to thank Omer Offen for useful conversations on the theme of this paper. This paper began when the authors were visiting CIRM Luminy as part of the Chaire Jean-Morlet 2016 Programme and they thank Dipendra Prasad and Volker Heiermann for the invitation to participate in the programme. Thanks are due to the anonymous referee for a careful reading of the manuscript and several useful suggestions.

References

[1] U. K. Anandavardhanan, Root numbers of Asai L-functions, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2008 (2008), Article ID rnn125. 10.1093/imrn/rnn125Search in Google Scholar

[2] U. K. Anandavardhanan, A. C. Kable and R. Tandon, Distinguished representations and poles of twisted tensor L-functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 132 (2004), no. 10, 2875–2883. 10.1090/S0002-9939-04-07424-6Search in Google Scholar

[3] U. K. Anandavardhanan and C. S. Rajan, Distinguished representations, base change, and reducibility for unitary groups, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2005 (2005), no. 14, 841–854. 10.1155/IMRN.2005.841Search in Google Scholar

[4] I. N. Bernšteĭn and A. V. Zelevinskiĭ, Representations of the group GL(n,F), where F is a local non-Archimedean field, Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 31 (1976), no. 3(189), 5–70. 10.1070/RM1976v031n03ABEH001532Search in Google Scholar

[5] Y. Z. Flicker, Twisted tensors and Euler products, Bull. Soc. Math. France 116 (1988), no. 3, 295–313. 10.24033/bsmf.2099Search in Google Scholar

[6] Y. Z. Flicker, On distinguished representations, J. Reine Angew. Math. 418 (1991), 139–172. 10.1515/crll.1991.418.139Search in Google Scholar

[7] Y. Z. Flicker, On zeroes of the twisted tensor L-function, Math. Ann. 297 (1993), no. 2, 199–219. 10.1007/BF01459497Search in Google Scholar

[8] A. Fröhlich and J. Queyrut, On the functional equation of the Artin L-function for characters of real representations, Invent. Math. 20 (1973), 125–138. 10.1007/BF01404061Search in Google Scholar

[9] I. M. Gelfand and D. A. Kajdan, Representations of the group GL(n,K) where K is a local field, Lie Groups and Their Representations (Budapest 1971), Halsted, New York (1975), 95–118. Search in Google Scholar

[10] R. Godement and H. Jacquet, Zeta Functions of Simple Algebras, Lecture Notes in Math. 260, Springer, Berlin, 1972. 10.1007/BFb0070263Search in Google Scholar

[11] M. Gurevich, On a local conjecture of Jacquet, ladder representations and standard modules, Math. Z. 281 (2015), no. 3–4, 1111–1127. 10.1007/s00209-015-1522-8Search in Google Scholar

[12] J. Hakim, Distinguished p-adic representations, Duke Math. J. 62 (1991), no. 1, 1–22. 10.1215/S0012-7094-91-06201-0Search in Google Scholar

[13] J. Hakim and O. Offen, Distinguished representations of GL(n) and local converse theorems, Manuscripta Math. 148 (2015), no. 1–2, 1–27. 10.1007/s00229-015-0740-zSearch in Google Scholar

[14] H. Jacquet, I. I. Piatetski-Shapiro and J. A. Shalika, Conducteur des représentations du groupe linéaire, Math. Ann. 256 (1981), no. 2, 199–214. 10.1007/BF01450798Search in Google Scholar

[15] H. Jacquet, I. I. Piatetskii-Shapiro and J. A. Shalika, Rankin–Selberg convolutions, Amer. J. Math. 105 (1983), no. 2, 367–464. 10.2307/2374264Search in Google Scholar

[16] H. Jacquet and J. Shalika, The Whittaker models of induced representations, Pacific J. Math. 109 (1983), no. 1, 107–120. 10.2140/pjm.1983.109.107Search in Google Scholar

[17] A. C. Kable, Asai L-functions and Jacquet’s conjecture, Amer. J. Math. 126 (2004), no. 4, 789–820. 10.1353/ajm.2004.0030Search in Google Scholar

[18] E. Lapid and Z. Mao, On a new functional equation for local integrals, Automorphic Forms and Related Geometry: Assessing the Legacy of I. I. Piatetski-Shapiro (New Haven 2012), Contemp. Math. 614, American Mathematical Society, Providence (2014), 261–294. 10.1090/conm/614/12271Search in Google Scholar

[19] E. Lapid and Z. Mao, A conjecture on Whittaker–Fourier coefficients of cusp forms, J. Number Theory 146 (2015), 448–505. 10.1016/j.jnt.2013.10.003Search in Google Scholar

[20] E. Lapid and Z. Mao, Model transition for representations of metaplectic type, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2015 (2015), no. 19, 9486–9568. 10.1093/imrn/rnu225Search in Google Scholar

[21] N. Matringe, Conjectures about distinction and local Asai L-functions, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2009 (2009), no. 9, 1699–1741. 10.1093/imrn/rnp002Search in Google Scholar

[22] N. Matringe, Distinguished representations and exceptional poles of the Asai-L-function, Manuscripta Math. 131 (2010), no. 3–4, 415–426. 10.1007/s00229-009-0327-7Search in Google Scholar

[23] N. Matringe, Distinguished generic representations of GL(n) over p-adic fields, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2011 (2011), no. 1, 74–95. 10.1093/imrn/rnq058Search in Google Scholar

[24] N. Matringe, Essential Whittaker functions for GL(n), Doc. Math. 18 (2013), 1191–1214. 10.4171/dm/425Search in Google Scholar

[25] N. Matringe and O. Offen, Distinction and gamma factors, preprint (2016), https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.01982. Search in Google Scholar

[26] M. Miyauchi, Whittaker functions associated to newforms for GL(n) over p-adic fields, J. Math. Soc. Japan 66 (2014), no. 1, 17–24. 10.2969/jmsj/06610017Search in Google Scholar

[27] K. Morimoto, Model transition for representations of unitary type, preprint (2016). 10.1093/imrn/rny048Search in Google Scholar

[28] O. Offen, On local root numbers and distinction, J. Reine Angew. Math. 652 (2011), 165–205. 10.1515/crelle.2011.017Search in Google Scholar

[29] Y. Ok, Distinction and Gamma Factors at 1/2: Supercuspidal Case, ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, 1997; Ph.D. thesis, Columbia University. Search in Google Scholar

[30] T. Shintani, On an explicit formula for class-1 “Whittaker functions” on GLn over P-adic fields, Proc. Japan Acad. 52 (1976), no. 4, 180–182. 10.3792/pja/1195518347Search in Google Scholar

[31] J. Tate, Number theoretic background, Automorphic Forms, Representations and L-Functions (Oregon/Corvallis 1977), Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 33. Part 2, American Mathematical Society, Providence (1979), 3–26. 10.1090/pspum/033.2/546607Search in Google Scholar

[32] A. Venkatesh, Large sieve inequalities for GL(n)-forms in the conductor aspect, Adv. Math. 200 (2006), no. 2, 336–356. 10.1016/j.aim.2005.11.001Search in Google Scholar

[33] A. V. Zelevinsky, Induced representations of reductive p-adic groups. II. On irreducible representations of GL(n), Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér (4) 13 (1980), no. 2, 165–210. 10.24033/asens.1379Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-8-3
Revised: 2016-11-17
Published Online: 2016-12-25
Published in Print: 2017-11-1

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 16.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/forum-2016-0169/html
Scroll to top button