Pocketbook Voting in a Polarized Era: Economic Vulnerability and Anti-incumbent Voting in Presidential Elections
-
Brian F. Schaffner
Brian F. Schaffner is a Newhouse Professor of Civic Studies in the Department of Political Science and Tisch College at Tufts University. He is also co-principal investigator of the Cooperative Election Study and the author of several books, including most recently
Hometown Inequality: Race, Class, and Representation in American Local Politics (Cambridge University Press, 2020).
und
Caroline Soler
Caroline Soler is a research associate at Tufts University with the Cooperative Election Study. She graduated from Tufts University with a degree in Political Science and Mathematics in 2024.
Abstract
Economic circumstances and vote choice have long been shown to be closely linked, but increasing partisan polarization may be weakening this traditional relationship. We examine whether pocketbook voting – the tendency to vote based on personal economic circumstances – still influences presidential vote choice in this polarized era. Using the Cooperative Election Study’s data from 2020 to 2024, we explore how different indicators of economic vulnerability affect support for incumbent presidential candidates. We find that while partisans remain largely loyal except when suffering the most difficult economic hardships, independent voters show strong anti-incumbent voting when they experience financial strains. Our findings suggest that personal economic circumstances remain influential in American elections, but primarily among voters without strong partisan attachments.
About the authors
Brian F. Schaffner is a Newhouse Professor of Civic Studies in the Department of Political Science and Tisch College at Tufts University. He is also co-principal investigator of the Cooperative Election Study and the author of several books, including most recently Hometown Inequality: Race, Class, and Representation in American Local Politics (Cambridge University Press, 2020).
Caroline Soler is a research associate at Tufts University with the Cooperative Election Study. She graduated from Tufts University with a degree in Political Science and Mathematics in 2024.
-
Research funding: This research was sponsored by the National Science Foundation, Award #2342506.
References
Anderson, Cameron D., Thomas Romualdi, Jack Lucas, and R. Michael McGregor. 2024. “Don’t Worry, Be Happy (and Vote Out the Incumbent): Economic Anxiety and Incumbent Support.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 1–25, https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2024.2349539.Suche in Google Scholar
ASPIRES. 2024. “Household Economic Vulnerability Tool Indicator Guide.” United States Agency for International Development (USAID). https://www.marketlinks.org/sites/default/files/resource/files/ASPIRES_Household_Economic_Vulnerability_Tool_Indicator_Guide.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2002. “Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions.” Political Behavior 24 (2): 117–50. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021226224601.10.1023/A:1021226224601Suche in Google Scholar
Brady, David W., John A. Ferejohn, and Brendan Parker. 2021. “Cognitive Political Economy: A Growing Partisan Divide in Economic Perceptions.” American Politics Research 50 (1): 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x211032107.Suche in Google Scholar
Conover, Pamela Johnston, Stanley Feldman, and Kathleen Knight. 1986. “Judging Inflation and Unemployment: The Origins of Retrospective Evaluations.” The Journal of Politics 48 (3): 565–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131168.Suche in Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Daniel, and Jonathan Ketcham. 2004. “Economic Voting in U.S. Presidential Elections: Who Blames Whom for what?” Topics in Economic Analysis & Policy 4 (1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.2202/1538-0653.1285.Suche in Google Scholar
Ellis, Christopher R., and Joseph Daniel Ura. 2020. “Polarization and the Decline of Economic Voting in American National Elections.” Social Science Quarterly 102 (1): 83–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12881.Suche in Google Scholar
Enns, Peter K., Jonathon Colner, Aseem Kumar, and Jillian Lagodny. 2024. “Understanding Biden’s Exit and the 2024 Election: The State Presidential Approval/State Economy Model.” PS: Political Science & Politics 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096524000994.Suche in Google Scholar
Healy, Andrew J., Mikael Persson, and Erik Snowberg. 2017. “Digging into the Pocketbook: Evidence on Economic Voting from Income Registry Data Matched to a Voter Survey.” American Political Science Review 111 (4): 771–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055417000314.Suche in Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and D. Roderick Kiewiet. 1981. “Sociotropic Politics: The American Case.” British Journal of Political Science 11 (2): 129–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123400002544.Suche in Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Charles, and Nicholas F. Martini. 2020. “Economic Perceptions and Voting Behavior in US Presidential Elections.” Research & Politics 7 (4): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168020972811.Suche in Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., Richard Nadeau, and Angelo Elias. 2008. “Economics, Party, and the Vote: Causality Issues and Panel Data.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (1): 84–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00300.x.Suche in Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Charles Tien. 2024. “The Political Economy Model: Presidential Forecast for 2024.” PS: Political Science & Politics 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096524000908.Suche in Google Scholar
Lockerbie, Brad. 2024. “The Challenge of Forecasting the 2024 Presidential and House Elections: Economic Pessimism and Election Outcomes.” PS: Political Science & Politics 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1017/s104909652400091x.Suche in Google Scholar
Rebechi, Alessio, and Nicholas Rohde. 2023. “Economic Insecurity, Racial Anxiety, and Right-Wing Populism.” Review of Income and Wealth 787–811, https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12599.Suche in Google Scholar
Rentsch, Amanda, Brian F. Schaffner, and Justin H. Gross. 2020. “The Elusive Likely Voter: Improving Electoral Predictions with More Informed Vote-Propensity Models.” Public Opinion Quarterly 84 (4): 967–91.Suche in Google Scholar
Schaffner, Brian. December 19, 2023. “Is It Really ‘the Economy, Stupid’? The Limits of Using Polls to Explore the Relationship Between Economic Circumstances and Vote Intentions.” Medium. https://medium.com/3streams/is-it-really-the-economy-stupid-a0806db9140e.Suche in Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2024. “Public Data Query.” https://data.bls.gov/pdq.Suche in Google Scholar
Wilcox, Nathaniel T., and Christopher Wlezien. 1996. “The Contamination of Responses to Survey Items: Economic Perceptions and Political Judgments.” Political Analysis 5: 181–213. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/5.1.181.Suche in Google Scholar
Wu, J. D., and G. A. Huber. 2021. “How Does Job Loss Affect Voting? Understanding Economic Voting Using Novel Data on COVID-19 Induced Individual-Level Unemployment Shocks.” American Politics Research 49 (6): 568–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x211026831.Suche in Google Scholar
Yeung, Eric S. F., and Kevin Quek. 2024. “Self-reported Political Ideology.” Political Science Research and Methods 1–22, https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2024.2.Suche in Google Scholar
Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511818691Suche in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Prologue to 2024
- Electability and Party Power Across Party Lines
- Understanding the Message(s): Spending and Content of Political Advertising on Television in 2024
- Election Advertising on Meta, Google, and Snapchat in 2024
- From the Podium to the Press: Coverage of Kamala Harris’s 2024 Convention Address
- Pocketbook Voting in a Polarized Era: Economic Vulnerability and Anti-incumbent Voting in Presidential Elections
- The 2024 U.S. Presidential Election: Public Opinion on the Economy and Immigration Helped Return Trump to the White House, but with No Clear Policy Mandate
- The 2024 Presidential Election Through Latino Lenses: Priorities and Vote Choice
- Less White than Ever? Using Ecological Inference to Probe the Trump Coalition’s Diversity in Louisiana
- The Trump Effect: Nationalized Narratives and Congressional Outcomes in the 2024 Elections
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Prologue to 2024
- Electability and Party Power Across Party Lines
- Understanding the Message(s): Spending and Content of Political Advertising on Television in 2024
- Election Advertising on Meta, Google, and Snapchat in 2024
- From the Podium to the Press: Coverage of Kamala Harris’s 2024 Convention Address
- Pocketbook Voting in a Polarized Era: Economic Vulnerability and Anti-incumbent Voting in Presidential Elections
- The 2024 U.S. Presidential Election: Public Opinion on the Economy and Immigration Helped Return Trump to the White House, but with No Clear Policy Mandate
- The 2024 Presidential Election Through Latino Lenses: Priorities and Vote Choice
- Less White than Ever? Using Ecological Inference to Probe the Trump Coalition’s Diversity in Louisiana
- The Trump Effect: Nationalized Narratives and Congressional Outcomes in the 2024 Elections
