The grammaticalization of the existential sign var in Turkish Sign Language: a Construction Grammar approach

References

Açan, Ayşe Zeynep. 2007. A linguistic analysis on basic sentence types in Turkish Sign Language (TİD). Ankara: Hacettepe University PhD dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199263882.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Aksu-Koç, Ayhan A. & Dan I. Slobin. 1986. A psychological account of the development and use of evidentials in Turkish. In Wallace L. Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, 159–167. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.Suche in Google Scholar

Arık, Engin (ed.). 2013. Current directions in Turkish Sign Language research. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar

Arık, Engin (ed.). 2016. Ellerle konuşmak: Türk İşaret Dili Araştırmaları [Talking with hands: Research on Turkish Sign Language]. İstanbul: Koç University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Arık, Engin & Ronnie Wilbur. 2008. Locatives, existentials, and possessives in Turkish Sign Language (TİD). Poster presented at the 82nd Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Chicago, IL, January 3–6.Suche in Google Scholar

Asher, Ronald E. 1982. Tamil. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Suche in Google Scholar

Barðdal, Jóhanna & Spike Gildea. 2015. Diachronic Construction Grammar: Epistemological context, basic assumptions and historical implications. In Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea (eds.), Diachronic Construction Grammar, 1–50. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.18.01barSuche in Google Scholar

Boneh, Nora & Edit Doron. 2008. Habituality and the habitual aspect. In Susan Rothstein (ed.), Theoretical and crosslinguistic approaches to the semantics of aspect, 321–347. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.110.14bonSuche in Google Scholar

Bundak, Rüveyda, Feyza Darendeliler, Hülya Günöz, Firdevs Baş, Nurçin Saka & Olcay Neyzi. 2008. Puberty and pubertal growth in healthy Turkish girls: No evidence for secular trend. Journal of Clinical Research in Pediatric Endocrinology 1(1). 8–14. https://doi.org/10.4008/jcrpe.v1i1.16.Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. 2003. Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 602–623. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470756393.ch19Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. 2006. From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82. 711–733. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0186.Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. & Östen Dahl. 1989. The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world. Studies in Language 13(1). 51–103. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.13.1.03byb.Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace L. & Johanna Nichols (eds.). 1986. Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Advances in discourse processes, vol. XX. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar

Chen Pichler, Deborah, Katharina Schalber, Julie Hochgesang, Ronnie B. Wilbur, Martina Vulje & Ljubica Pribanić. 2008. Possession and existence in three sign languages. In Ronice Müller de Quadros (ed.), The 9th theoretical issues in sign language research conference, 440–458. Petropolis/RJ, Brazil: Editora Arara Azul.Suche in Google Scholar

Clark, Eve. 1978. Locationals: A study of ‘existential,’ ‘locative,’ and ‘possessive’ sentences. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of human language, 85–126. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Cornillie, Bert. 2007. Evidentiality and epistemic modality in Spanish (semi-)auxiliaries: A cognitive-functional approach. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110204483Suche in Google Scholar

Couvee, Sascha & Roland Pfau. 2018. Structure and grammaticalization of serial verb constructions in Sign Language of the Netherlands – a corpus based study. Frontiers in Psychology 9. 993. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00993.Suche in Google Scholar

Creissels, Denis. 2014. Existential predication in typological perspective. Paper presented at the 46th annual meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea, Split, 18–21 September 2013. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9d61/a0e63c40b46d15fb0136af038355459bc8b2.pdf (accessed September 2023).Suche in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2003. Typology and universals, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Csató, Éva Á. & Larson Johanson. 2021. On the Turkish mnemonic past: An evidential category. In István Zimonyi (ed.), Altaic and Chaghatay lectures: Studies in honour of Éva Kincses-Nagy, 255–262. Szeged: University of Szeged.Suche in Google Scholar

Dahl, Östen. 1975. On generics. In Edward L. Keenan (ed.), Formal semantics of natural language, 99–111. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511897696.009Suche in Google Scholar

Davari, Shadi & Mehrdad Naghzguy-Kohan. 2017. The grammaticalization of progressive aspect in Persian. In Kees Hengeveld, Heiko Narrog & Hella Olbertz (eds.), The grammaticalization of tense, aspect, modality and evidentiality: A functional perspective, 163–189. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110519389-007Suche in Google Scholar

De Smet, Hendrik & Hubert Cuyckens. 2005. Pragmatic strengthening and the meaning of complement constructions: The case of like and love with the to-infinitive. Journal of English Linguistics 33(1). 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424204273959.Suche in Google Scholar

De Weerdt, Danny & Myriam Vermeerbergen. 2008. Observations on possessive and existential constructions in Flemish Sign Language. In Ulrike Zeshan & Pamela Perniss (eds.), Possessive and existential constructions in sign languages, 195–212. Sign Language Typology Series No. 2. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Dikyuva, Hasan, Bahtiyar Makaroğlu & Engin Arık. 2017. Turkish Sign Language grammar. Ankara: Ministry of Family and Social Policies Press.Suche in Google Scholar

ELAN. 2022. ELAN (Version 6.3) [Computer software]. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, The Language Archive. Available at: https://archive.mpi.nl/tla/elan.Suche in Google Scholar

Emmorey, Karen, Helsa B. Borinstein & Robin Thompson. 2005. Bimodal bilingualism. Code-blending between spoken English and American Sign Language. In James Cohen, Kara T. McAlister, Kellie Rolstad & Jeffrey Davis (eds.), ISB4. Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on bilingualism, 663–673. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Enç, Mürvet. 1996. Tense and modality. In Shalom Lappin (ed.), The handbook of contemporary semantic theory, 345–358. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1111/b.9780631207498.1997.00016.xSuche in Google Scholar

Endo, Tomoko & Hongyin Tao. 2009. From volition and enjoyment to habituality: The cases of ai ‘love to’ and xihuan ‘like to’ in Chinese. In Janet Zhiqun Xing (ed.), Studies of Chinese linguistics: Functional approaches, 155–183. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Fischer, Olga. 1994. The development of quasi-auxiliaries in English and changes in word order. Neophilologus 78. 137–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00999959.Suche in Google Scholar

Freeze, Ray. 1992. Existentials and other locatives. Language 68(3). 553–595. https://doi.org/10.2307/415794.Suche in Google Scholar

Givόn, Talmy. 1979. On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Göksel, Aslı & Celia Kerslake. 2011. Turkish: An essential grammar. New York, NY: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Göksel, Aslı, Süleyman S. Taşçı, Buket Ela Demirel, Elvan Tamyürek Özparlak, Burcu Saral & Hasan Dikyuva. 2021. Deafness in Turkey 1930–2020: Administrative, social, and cultural aspects. In Roland Pfau, Aslı Göksel & Jana Hosemann (eds.), Our lives – our stories. Life experiences of elderly deaf people, 91–127. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110701906-005Suche in Google Scholar

Greenberg, Yael. 2003. Manifestations of genericity: Outstanding dissertations in linguistics. New York & London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 1998. The semantic development of old presents. New futures and subjunctives without grammaticalization. Diachronica 15(1). 29–62. https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.15.1.03has.Suche in Google Scholar

Hazout, Ilan. 2004. The syntax of existential constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 35. 393–430. https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389041402616.Suche in Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd. 1997. Possession: Cognitive sources, forces, and grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511581908Suche in Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd & Mechthild Reh. 1984. Grammaticalization and reanalysis in African languages. Hamburg: H. Buske.Suche in Google Scholar

Hilpert, Martin. 2008. The English comparative – language structure and language use. English Language and Linguistics 12(3). 395–417. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674308002694.Suche in Google Scholar

Hilpert, Martin. 2014. Construction Grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2004. Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds.), What makes grammaticalization: A look from its components and its fringes, 21–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197440.1.21Suche in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2003 [1993]. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165525Suche in Google Scholar

Iatridou, Sabine. 2000. The grammatical ingredients of counterfactuality. Linguistic Inquiry 31(2). 231–270. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438900554352.Suche in Google Scholar

İlkbaşaran, Deniz. 2015. Literacies, mobilities and agencies of deaf youth in Turkey: Constraints and opportunities in the 21st century. San Diego: University of California dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Janzen, Terry. 2012. Lexicalization and grammaticalization. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, 816–841. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110261325.816Suche in Google Scholar

Janzen, Terry & Barbara Shaffer. 2002. Gesture as the substrate in the process of ASL grammaticization. In Richard P. Meier, Kearsy Cormier & David Quinto-Pozos (eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages, 199–223. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486777.010Suche in Google Scholar

Johnston, Trevor, Donovan Cresdee, Adam Schembri & Bencie Woll. 2015. finish variation and grammaticalization in a signed language: How far down this well-trodden pathway is Auslan (Australian Sign Language)? Language Variation and Change 27(1). 117–155. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954394514000209.Suche in Google Scholar

Karabüklü, Serpil. 2016. Time and aspect in Turkish Sign Language (TİD): Manual and nonmanual realization of ‘finish’. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University MA Thesis.Suche in Google Scholar

Karabüklü, Serpil & Ronnie Wilbur. 2019. Is the mouth marking evidential in Turkish Sign Language (TİD)? Expressing Evidence Workshop, Konstanz, Germany, Jun 6–8.Suche in Google Scholar

Karabüklü, Serpil & Ronie Wilbur. 2021. Marking various aspects in Turkish Sign Language: bı̇t (‘finish’) and ‘bn’. Sign Language & Linguistics 24(2). 182–225. https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.20006.kar.Suche in Google Scholar

Kornfilt, Jaklin. 1997. Turkish. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Krifka, Manfred, Francis J. Pelletier, Gregory N. Carlson, Alice ter Meulen, Gennaro Chierchia & Godehard Link. 1995. Genericity: An introduction. In Gregory N. Carlson & Francis J. Pelletier (eds.), The generic book, 1–124. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee. 2019. World lexicon of grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316479704Suche in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1963. The social motivation of a sound change. Word 19(3). 273–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1963.11659799.Suche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.Suche in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2005. Construction Grammars: Cognitive, radical and less so. In Ruiz de Mendoza Ibàñez, Fransico Jose & Maria Sandra Peña Cervel (eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction, 101–159. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197716.1.101Suche in Google Scholar

Lazard, Gilbert. 2001. On the grammaticalization of evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33(3). 359–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(00)00008-4.Suche in Google Scholar

Lehmann, Christian. 1995 [1982]. Thoughts on grammaticalization. Munich: Lincom Europa.Suche in Google Scholar

Lehmann, Christian. 2004. Theory and method in grammaticalization. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 32. 152–187. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfgl.2004.32.2.152.Suche in Google Scholar

Lyons, John. 1967. A note on possessive, existential and locative sentences. Foundations of Language 3. 390–396.Suche in Google Scholar

Lyons, John. 1968. Introduction in theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165570Suche in Google Scholar

Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Makaroğlu, Bahtiyar. 2021. What the frequency list can teach us about Turkish Sign Language? Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 57(4). 619–654. https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2021-0022.Suche in Google Scholar

Makaroğlu, Bahtiyar & Hasan Dikyuva (eds.). 2017. The contemporary Turkish Sign Language dictionary. Ankara: The Turkish Ministry of Family and Social Policy. Available at: https://tidsozluk.aile.gov.tr/.Suche in Google Scholar

McNally, Louise. 2011. Existential sentences. In Klaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, vol. 2, 1829–1848. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

McNally, Louise. 2016. Existential sentences crosslinguistically: Variations in form and meaning. Annual Review of Linguistics 2. 211–231. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011415-040837.Suche in Google Scholar

Meir, Irit. 1983/1998. Thematic structure and verb agreement in Israeli Sign Language. Jerusalem: University of Hebrew dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Miles, Mike. 2000. Signing in the seraglio: Mutes, dwarfs and jesters at the Ottoman court 1500–1700. Disability & Society 15(1). 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590025801.Suche in Google Scholar

Mohammadirad, Masoud. 2020. Predicative possession across Western Iranian languages. Folia Linguistica 54(3). 497–526. https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2020-2038.Suche in Google Scholar

Mohr, Susanne. 2014. Mouth actions in sign languages: An empirical study of Irish Sign Language. Boston & Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9781614514978Suche in Google Scholar

Neidle, Carol, Judy Kegl, Dawn MacLaughlin, Ben Bahan & Robert G. Lee. 2000. The syntax of American Sign Language. Functional categories and hierarchical structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Özyürek, Aslı, Inge Zwitserlood & Pamela Perniss. 2010. Locative expressions in signed languages: A view from Turkish Sign Language (TİD). Linguistics 48(5). 1111–1145. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2010.036.Suche in Google Scholar

Palmer, Frank R. 2001 [1986]. Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139167178Suche in Google Scholar

Pfau, Roland & Josep Quer. 2010. Nonmanuals: Their grammatical and prosodic roles. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages, 381–402. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511712203.018Suche in Google Scholar

Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach. 2006. Modality-independent and modality-specific aspects of grammaticalization in sign languages. Linguistics in Potsdam 24. Available at: https://publishup.uni-potsdam.de/opus4-ubp/frontdoor/index/index/docId/1005.Suche in Google Scholar

Plungian, Vladimir. 2001. The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space. Journal of Pragmatics 33(3). 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(00)00006-0.Suche in Google Scholar

Quiñonez, Katherine Elisabeth Bolaños. 2016. A grammar of Kakua. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam PhD thesis.Suche in Google Scholar

Rayson, Paul & Roger Garside. 2000. Comparing corpora using frequency profiling. Proceedings of the Workshop on Comparing Corpora [WCC’00], 1–6. Hong Kong: Association for Computational Linguistics.10.3115/1117729.1117730Suche in Google Scholar

Shaffer, Barbara. 2004. Information ordering and speaker subjectivity: Modality in ASL. Cognitive Linguistics 15. 175–195.10.1515/cogl.2004.007Suche in Google Scholar

Shaffer, Barbara. 2012. Reported speech as an evidentiality strategy in American Sign Language. In Barbara Dancygier & Eve Sweetser (eds.), Viewpoint in language, 139–155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139084727.011Suche in Google Scholar

Shaffer, Barbara & Terry Janzen. 2016. Mood and modality in American Sign Language. In Jan Nuyts & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), The Oxford handbook of mood and modality, 448–469. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591435.013.17Suche in Google Scholar

Shaffer, Barbara, Maria Josep Jarque & Sherman Wilcox. 2011. The expression of modality: Conversational data from two signed languages. In Márcia Teixeira Nogueira & Maria Fabíola Vasconcelos Lopes (eds.), Modo e modalidade: gramática, discurso e interação, 11–39. Fortaleza: Edições UFC.Suche in Google Scholar

Slobin, Dan I. & Ayhan A. Aksu. 1982. Tense, aspect, and modality in the use of the Turkish evidential. In Paul J. Hopper (ed.), Tense-aspect: Between semantics and pragmatics, 185–200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.1.13sloSuche in Google Scholar

Tatevosov, Sergei. 2005. From habituals to futures. Discerning the path of diachronic development. In Henriette de Swart, Henk J. Verkuyl & Angeliek van Hout (eds.), Perspective on aspect, 181–197. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/1-4020-3232-3_10Suche in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2003. From subjectification to intersubjectification. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Motives for language change, 124–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486937.009Suche in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486500Suche in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Wilcox, Sherman & Corrine Occhino. 2016. Historical change in signed languages. In Oxford handbooks online. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935345.013.24Suche in Google Scholar

Wilcox, Sherman & Barbara Shaffer. 2006. Modality in American Sign Language. In William Frawley (ed.), The expression of modality, 207–237. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197570.207Suche in Google Scholar

Wilcox, Sherman & Barbara Shaffer. 2018. Evidentiality and information source in signed languages. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 741–754. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.36Suche in Google Scholar

Wilcox, Sherman & Phyllis Perrin Wilcox. 1995. The gestural expression of modality in American Sign Language. In Joan Bybee & Suzanne Fleischman (eds.), Modality in grammar and discourse, 135–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.32.07wilSuche in Google Scholar

Yap, Foong Ha, Ariel Shuk-ling Chan & Tak-sum Wong. 2013. On the grammaticalization of stative verbs into continuative markers. Paper presented at the EALS 2013, Chulalongkorn University. Bangkok, Thailand, May 31.Suche in Google Scholar

Zeshan, Ulrike. 2003. Aspects of Türk İşaret Dili (Turkish Sign Language). Sign Language & Linguistics 6(1). 43–75. https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.6.1.04zes.Suche in Google Scholar

Zeshan, Ulrike & Pamela Perniss (eds.). 2008. Possessive and existential constructions in sign languages. Sign Language Typology Series No. 2. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Zucchi, Sandro. 2003. The semantics of ‘fatto’. Paper presented at the 14th Amsterdam Colloquium, December. http://filosofia.dipafilo.unimi.it/∼filoling/abstractFATTO.pdf (accessed 02 February 2022).Suche in Google Scholar