Interaction and conventionalized expressions create the contexts for bleaching and constructional expansion: the case of GRAB

References

Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2003. Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In Richard Janda & Brian Joseph (eds.), Handbook of historical linguistics, 602–623. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.10.1002/9780470756393.ch19Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511750526Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan, Revere D. Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan & Rena Torres Cacoullos. 2009. The role of prefabs in grammaticization: How the particular and the general interact in language change. In Roberta Corrigan, Edith Moravcsik, Hamid Ouali & Kathleen Wheatley (eds.), Formulaic language, vol. I, 187–217. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, Typological Studies in Language.10.1075/tsl.82.09theSearch in Google Scholar

Carston, Robin & Catherine Wearing. 2015. Hyperbolic language and its relation to metaphor and irony. Journal of Pragmatics 79. 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.011.Search in Google Scholar

Claridge, Claudia. 2011. Hyperbole in English: A corpus study of exaggeration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511779480Search in Google Scholar

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2014. What does grammar tell us about action? Pragmatics. Quarterly. Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 24(3). 623–647. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.24.3.08cou.Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Mark. 2008–. The corpus of contemporary American English (COCA). Available at: https://www.english-corpora.org/coca/.Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Mark. 2010. The corpus of historical American English (COHA). Available at: https://www.english-corpora.org/coha/.Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Mark. 2011–. Corpus of American soap operas. Available at: https://www.english-corpora.org/soap.Search in Google Scholar

Diewald, Gabriele. 2002. A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 104–120. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.49.09dieSearch in Google Scholar

Erman, Britt & Beatrice Warren. 2000. The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text 20(1). 29–62. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.2000.20.1.29.Search in Google Scholar

Flöck, Ilka. 2016. Requests in American and British English: A contrastive multi-method analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.265Search in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 2018 [1979]. On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.10.1075/z.213Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Haiman, John. 1994. Ritualization and the development of language. In William Pagliuca (ed.), Perspectives on grammaticalization, 3–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.109.07haiSearch in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 1999. Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics 37(6). 1043–1068. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.37.6.1043.Search in Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd. 2002. On the role of context in grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 84–101. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.49.08heiSearch in Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2007. The genesis of grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199227761.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd & Heiko Narrog (eds.). 2011. The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Traugott. 2003 [1993]. Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165525Search in Google Scholar

Israel, Michael. 1996. The way constructions grow. In Adele E. Goldberg (ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language, 217–230. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Kendrick, Kobin H. & Paul Drew. 2016. Recruitment: Offers, requests, and the organization of assistance in interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49(1). 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1126436.Search in Google Scholar

Lasersohn, Peter. 1999. Pragmatic halos. Language 75(3). 522–551. https://doi.org/10.2307/417059.Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Moder, Carol Lynn. 2010. Two puzzle pieces: Fitting discourse context and constructions into cognitive metaphor theory. English Text Construction 3(2). 294–320. https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.3.2.09mod.Search in Google Scholar

Pawley, Andrew & Frances Hodgetts Syder. 1983. Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In Jack C. Richards & Richard W. Schmidt (eds.), Language and communication, 191–226. London: Longmans.Search in Google Scholar

Samuels, Michael L. 1972. Linguistic evolution. With special references to English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139086707Search in Google Scholar

Slobin, Dan I. 1996. From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In John J. Gumperz & Stephen C. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity, 70–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Stern, Gustav. 1931. Meaning and change of meaning. With special reference to the English language. Göteborg: Elanders.Search in Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 56–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, Sandra A. 1990. Information flow and dative shift in English discourse. In Jerrold Edmondson, Katherine Feagin & Peter Mühlhähsler (eds.), Development and diversity, language variation across space and time, 239–253. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meaning: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65(1). 31–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/414841.Search in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486500Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, Damián Vergara. 2015. Categorization and constructional change in Spanish expressions of “becoming”. Leiden and Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789004274457Search in Google Scholar

Wray, Alison. 2002. Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511519772Search in Google Scholar