Indexical meanings of the realization of /sˤ/ ص as [s] س in spoken and written Jordanian Arabic: a language change in progress?
-
Aseel Zibin
,
Sumaya Daoud
und
Abdel Rahman Mitib Altakhaineh
Abstract
This study examines how the phonetic realisation of the phoneme /sˤ/ and its orthographic form ص is surfacing as the variant [s] in speaking and as س in writing in Ammani Arabic (AA), which is a variety of Jordanian Arabic (JA), and how this relates to language variation. We look at instances where certain Ammani Arabic speakers, particularly females, pronounce and write words containing /sˤ/ ص as [s] س, despite both /sˤ/ and /s/ being phonemes in JA in general and in AA in particular. We used a quantitative corpus-based approach, where we obtained written data from Facebook, and elicited spoken tokens and qualitative data through interviews. Our findings reveal that females in our two corpora [spoken and written] use and prefer [s] and س more than males, and our interviews revealed that female interviewees also prefer this pronunciation and writing. We suggest that the use of [s] س instead of [sˤ] ص by females can be seen as a direct index for femininity within their community of practice, and that this pronunciation/writing can indirectly index female gender in daily conversations and on social media websites, based on orders of indexicality (Silverstein, Michael. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication 23. 193–229).
Consent for taking part in the interviews to yield phonetic tokens
You are being asked to take part in a research study. Before you decide to participate in this study, it is essential that you understand why the research is being done and what it will involve. This research is a linguistic analysis of language used by university students. If you agree to take part, you will be engaged in an interview in which you will be asked questions about your life at the University of Jordan. The session will last for approximately 25 min and it will be recorded. Your participation in this study is voluntary. You may decline to answer any or all questions and you may terminate your involvement at any time if you choose.
Participant data will be kept confidential. If you have any questions about the study or regarding your rights as a research participant, or for any other reasons in relation to your participation, please contact the first author at: a.zabin@ju.edu.jo.
I have read and I understand the provided information and have had the opportunity to ask questions. I understand that my participation is voluntary and that I am free to withdraw at any time, without giving a reason and without cost. I understand that I will be given a copy of this consent form. I voluntarily agree to take part in this study.
Participant’s signature _____________________________________ Date _______________
Consent for taking part in the qualitative interviews
You are being asked to take part in a research study. Before you decide to participate in this study, it is essential that you understand why the research is being done and what it will involve. This research is a sociolinguistic analysis of male and female speech in Jordan. If you agree to take part, you will be engaged in an interview in which you will be asked questions about the differences between male and female speech, and the factors that may influence their linguistic behaviour. The session will last for approximately 20 min and it will be recorded. Your participation in this study is voluntary. You may decline to answer any or all questions and you may terminate your involvement at any time if you choose.
Participant data will be kept confidential. If you have any questions about the study or regarding your rights as a research participant, or for any other reasons in relation to your participation, please contact the first author at: a.zabin@ju.edu.jo.
I have read and I understand the provided information and have had the opportunity to ask questions. I understand that my participation is voluntary and that I am free to withdraw at any time, without giving a reason and without cost. I understand that I will be given a copy of this consent form. I voluntarily agree to take part in this study.
Participant’s signature _____________________________________ Date _______________
References
Abudalbuh, Mujdey. 2010. Effects of gender on the production of emphasis in Jordanian Arabic: A sociophonetic study. Kansas: University of Kansas dissertation.10.17161/KWPL.1808.8096Suche in Google Scholar
Agha, Asif. 2003. The social life of cultural value. Language & Communication 23. 231–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0271-5309(03)00012-0.Suche in Google Scholar
Agha, Asif. 2005. Voice, footing, enregisterment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(1). 38–59. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2005.15.1.38.Suche in Google Scholar
Al Ahmadi, Sameeha. 2020. The effect of gender on the nativisation and lexical density of tweets by Saudi bloggers: A corpus-based study. Northumbria: Northumbria University dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Al-Hloul, Rozan, Abdel Rahman Mitib Altakhaineh, Marwan Jarrah & Al-shawashreh Ekab. 2023. A variationist analysis of/ð/in Ammani Arabic. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 16. 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-023-00373-1.Suche in Google Scholar
Almbark, Rana. 2008. A sociophonetic study of emphasis in Syrian Arabic. York: University of York MA thesis.Suche in Google Scholar
Alshaboul, Asia, Marwan Jarrah, Sharif Alghazo & Ekab Al-Shawashreh. 2022. A sociolinguistic analysis of intensifiers in Ammani Arabic. Ampersand 9. 100086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2022.100086.Suche in Google Scholar
Al-Wer, Enam. 2007. The formation of the dialect of Amman: From chaos to order. In Cathrine Miller, Enam Al-Wer, Dominique Caubet & Janet C. E. Watson (eds.), Arabic in the city, 69–90. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar
Armstrong, Nigel. 1998. The sociolinguistic gender pattern in French: A comparison of two linguistic levels. Journal of French Language Studies 8(2). 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0959269500004129.Suche in Google Scholar
Bassiouney, Reem. 2020. Arabic sociolinguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9781474457361Suche in Google Scholar
Bernard, H. Russell. 2011. Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches, 5th edn. New York: Rowman Altamira.Suche in Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2007. Sociolinguistics and discourse analysis: Orders of indexicality and polycentricity. Journal of Multicultural Discourses 2(2). 115–130. https://doi.org/10.2167/md089.0.Suche in Google Scholar
Braun, Virginia & Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2). 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.Suche in Google Scholar
Buckwalter, Tim & Dilworth Parkinson. 2011. Frequency dictionary of Arabic: Core vocabulary for learners. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2010. The sociolinguistic variant as a carrier of social meaning. Language Variation and Change 22(3). 423–440. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954394510000177.Suche in Google Scholar
Chambers, Jack K. & Peter Trudgill. 2004. Dialectology, 2nd edn Cambridge: Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics.Suche in Google Scholar
Christie, Christine. 2013. The relevance of taboo language: An analysis of the indexical values of swearwords. Journal of Pragmatics 58. 152–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.06.009.Suche in Google Scholar
Creswell, John. 2008. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 4th edn. London: Sage Publications.Suche in Google Scholar
Denscombe, Martyn. 2010. The good research guide: For small-scale social research projects. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope & Sally McConnell-Ginet. 1992. Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology 21(1). 461–488. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002333.Suche in Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope & Sally McConnell-Ginet. 2013. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language in Society 42(2). 139–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00013-2.Suche in Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12. 453–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.x.Suche in Google Scholar
Gumperz, John. 2003. Response essay. In Susan L. Eerdmans, Carlo L. Prevignano & Paul J. Thibault (eds.), Language and interaction: Discussions with John J. Gumperz, 105–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.117.09gumSuche in Google Scholar
Hamdieh, Aya Mohammad, Marwan Jarrah, Abdel Rahman Mitib Altakhaineh & Ekab Al-shawashreh. 2022. Variation in negation patterns of verbless clauses in Ammani Arabic. Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literatures 14(4). 1039–1058.10.47012/jjmll.14.4.17Suche in Google Scholar
Herring, Susan C. & John C. Paolillo. 2006. Gender and genre variation in weblogs. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10(4). 439–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2006.00287.x.Suche in Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell. 1996. Ethnography, linguistics, narrative inequality: Toward an understanding of voice. London: Taylor & Francis.Suche in Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara, Jennifer Andrus & Andrew E. Danielson. 2006. Mobility, indexicality, and the enregisterment of “Pittsburghese”. Journal of English Linguistics 34(2). 77–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424206290692.Suche in Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara. 2009. Pittsburghese shirts: Commodification and the enregisterment of an urban dialect. American Speech 84(2). 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-2009-013.Suche in Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara, Neeta Bhasin & Denise Wittkofski. 2002. “Dahntahn” Pittsburgh: Monophthongal /aw/ and representations of localness in Southwestern Pennsylvania. American Speech 77(2). 148–166.10.1215/00031283-77-2-148Suche in Google Scholar
Khattab, Ghada, Feda Al Tamimi & Heselwood Barry. 2006. Acoustic and auditory differences in the/ t/--/T/opposition in male and female speakers of Jordanian Arabic. In Khattab Ghada, Feda Al-Tamimi, Barry Heselwood & Sami Boudelaa (eds.), Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XVI: Papers from the sixteenth annual symposium on Arabic linguistics, 131–160. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.266.09khaSuche in Google Scholar
Lave, Jean & Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355Suche in Google Scholar
Milroy, James, Lesley Milroy, Sue Hartley & David Walshaw. 1994. Glottal stops and Tyneside glottalization: Competing patterns of variation and change in British English. Language Variation & Change 6(3). 327–358. https://doi.org/10.1017/s095439450000171x.Suche in Google Scholar
Moore, Emma & Robert Podesva. 2009. Style, indexicality, and the social meaning of tag questions. Language in Society 38(4). 447–485. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404509990224.Suche in Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor. 1992. Indexing gender. In Alessandro Duranti & Charles Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon, 335–358. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Omari, Osama & Aziz Jaber. 2019. Variation in the acoustic correlates of emphasis in Jordanian Arabic: Gender and social class. Folia Linguistica 53(1). 169–200. https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2019-2007.Suche in Google Scholar
Patton, Michael Quinn. 2015. Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. London: Sage Publications.Suche in Google Scholar
Pharao, Nicolai, Marie Maegaard, Janus Spindler Møller & Tore Kristiansen. 2014. Indexical meanings of [s+] among Copenhagen youth: Social perception of a phonetic variant in different prosodic contexts. Language in Society 43(1). 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404513000857.Suche in Google Scholar
Royal, Anne Marie. 1985. Male/female pharyngealization patterns in Cairo Arabic: A sociolinguistic study of two neighborhoods. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Schuring, Melissa, Laura Rosseel & Zenner Eline. 2023. Says who? Language regard towards speaker groups using English loanwords in Dutch. Folia Linguistica 57(2). 387–412. https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2023-2022.Suche in Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1995. Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In Ben. G Blount (ed.), Language, culture, and society: A book of readings, 2nd edn. 187–221. Waveland: Prospect Heights, IL.Suche in Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication 23. 193–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0271-5309(03)00013-2.Suche in Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1972. Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society 1(2). 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404500000488.Suche in Google Scholar
Wenger, Etienne. 1998. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803932Suche in Google Scholar
Zenner, Eline, Dirk Speelman & Geeraerts Dirk. 2015. A sociolinguistic analysis of borrowing in weak contact situations: English loanwords and phrases in expressive utterances in a Dutch reality TV show. International Journal of Bilingualism 19(3). 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006914521699.Suche in Google Scholar
Zibin, Aseel & Khawlah Mitib Al-Tkhayneh. 2019. A sociolinguistic analysis of the use of English loanwords inflected with Arabic morphemes as slang in Amman, Jordan. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2019(260). 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2019-2052.Suche in Google Scholar
Zibin, Aseel. 2019. A phonological analysis of English loanwords inflected with Arabic morphemes in urban Jordanian spoken Arabic. Sage Open 9(2). 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019841927.Suche in Google Scholar
Zibin, Aseel. 2021. Blood metaphors and metonymies in Jordanian Arabic and English. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 19(1). 26–50. https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00075.zib.Suche in Google Scholar
Zuraiq, Wael & Jie Zhang. 2006. Phonological assimilation in Urban Jordanian Arabic. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics 28. 33–64. https://doi.org/10.17161/kwpl.1808.1229.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Indexical meanings of the realization of /sˤ/ ص as [s] س in spoken and written Jordanian Arabic: a language change in progress?
- Nominalizations and its grammaticalization in standard Thai
- VOT in English by bilinguals with 2L1s: different approaches to voiceless and voiced stops
- An investigation of Persian response signals from an interactive perspective
- Another member out of the family: the description of manner of gait in Changana verbs of motion
- On the unified representation of continuity and discontinuity and its neurocognitive grounding
- Interaction and conventionalized expressions create the contexts for bleaching and constructional expansion: the case of GRAB
- The grammaticalization of the existential sign var in Turkish Sign Language: a Construction Grammar approach
- Morphological interpretations of syncretism in the panorama of Greek
- Book Reviews
- István Kecskés: The socio-cognitive approach to communication and pragmatics
- Jim Wood: Icelandic nominalizations and allosemy
- Carlos Acuña-Fariña: Syntactic processing: An overview
- Elly van Gelderen: The linguistic cycle: Economy and renewal in historical linguistics
- Heidrun Dorgeloh and Anja Wanner: Discourse syntax: English grammar beyond the sentence
- Rong Chen: Toward a motivation model of pragmatics
- John W. Schwieter and Julia Festman: The cognitive neuroscience of bilingualism
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Indexical meanings of the realization of /sˤ/ ص as [s] س in spoken and written Jordanian Arabic: a language change in progress?
- Nominalizations and its grammaticalization in standard Thai
- VOT in English by bilinguals with 2L1s: different approaches to voiceless and voiced stops
- An investigation of Persian response signals from an interactive perspective
- Another member out of the family: the description of manner of gait in Changana verbs of motion
- On the unified representation of continuity and discontinuity and its neurocognitive grounding
- Interaction and conventionalized expressions create the contexts for bleaching and constructional expansion: the case of GRAB
- The grammaticalization of the existential sign var in Turkish Sign Language: a Construction Grammar approach
- Morphological interpretations of syncretism in the panorama of Greek
- Book Reviews
- István Kecskés: The socio-cognitive approach to communication and pragmatics
- Jim Wood: Icelandic nominalizations and allosemy
- Carlos Acuña-Fariña: Syntactic processing: An overview
- Elly van Gelderen: The linguistic cycle: Economy and renewal in historical linguistics
- Heidrun Dorgeloh and Anja Wanner: Discourse syntax: English grammar beyond the sentence
- Rong Chen: Toward a motivation model of pragmatics
- John W. Schwieter and Julia Festman: The cognitive neuroscience of bilingualism
