Abstract
In recent discourse approaches to the peripheries, sentence adverbs have received less attention than categories such as pragmatic markers or discourse connectors. This study compares the development of sentence adverbs and discourse connectors via a case study of evidential apparently, evaluative sadly, and discourse-connector instead. These expressions occur in present-day English in all three ‘peripheral slots’. The study shows that the three expressions evolved into peripheral stance expressions via similar mechanisms, the developments being favoured by occurrence in constructions which appear to provide ‘bridging contexts’. The expressions are viewed in the light of two models of the development of such peripherals: Grammaticalization theory and Diachronic Construction Grammar. The findings point to some compatibility with a discourse-prominence-based approach to grammaticality and some compatibility with a model of productivity within a higher-level modification schema. Apparent regularities in the diachronic development, together with parallels between sentence modifiers and constituent modifiers, and synchronic relations between the constituent source items and the emergent peripheral items, suggest that the ‘boundary’ between core and periphery is both permeable and gradient rather than clear-cut.
Acknowledgments
Many thanks to the editors Matthias Klumm and Augustin Speyer and to two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.
-
Author contributions: The author has accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
-
Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest: The author states no conflict of interest.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Data availability: Not applicable.
Primary sources
BLOB-1931 Corpus. Compiled by Geoffrey Leech and Paul Rayson (University of Lancaster).Suche in Google Scholar
British National Corpus, v. 2. 2001. Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium. <http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/>Suche in Google Scholar
EEBO-TCP, Early English Books Online - Text Creation Partnership. 2015. Oxford and Ann Arbor. Via CQP-Web Lancaster. <https://cqpweb.lancs.ac.uk/>Suche in Google Scholar
Freiburg-LOB Corpus (FLOB), compiled by Christian Mair, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg.Suche in Google Scholar
Lancaster-Oslo/Bergen Corpus (LOB). Compiled 1970–1978 by Geoffrey Leech (Lancaster) and Stig Johansson (Oslo) with Knut Hofland (Bergen). Distributed by ICAME.Suche in Google Scholar
OED Oxford English Dictionary on line, Oxford University Press. <https://www.oed.com/>Suche in Google Scholar
Old Bailey Corpus 2.0 (1710–1913), based on The Old Bailey Proceedings, 1674–1913. Compiled at Justus Liebig University Giessen.Suche in Google Scholar
Spoken BNC2014 (Love et al. 2017). Compiled at the University of Lancaster and Cambridge University Press. <https://cqpweb.lancs.ac.uk/>Suche in Google Scholar
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2021. The web of knowledge: Evidentiality at the cross-roads. Leiden: Brill.Suche in Google Scholar
Bellert, Irena. 1977. On semantic and distributional properties of sentential adverbs. Linguistic Inquiry 8(2). 337–351.Suche in Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Victoria Clark. 2002. Historical shifts in modification patterns with complex noun phrase structures: How long can you go without a verb? In Teresa Fanego, María Jesús López Couso & Javier Pérez Guerra (eds.), English historical syntax and morphology, 43–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1972. Degree words. The Hague: Mouton.Suche in Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper. 2024. Evidentiality, discourse prominence and grammaticalization. Studies in Language 48(3). 575–607. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.23001.boy.Suche in Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder. 2012. A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language 88. 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0020.Suche in Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder. 2021. Complement-taking predicates, parentheticals and grammaticalization. Language Sciences 88. 101416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2021.101416.Suche in Google Scholar
Breivik, Leiv E. & Toril Swan. 1994. Initial adverbials and word order in English with special reference to the Early Modern English period. In Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Studies in early modern English, 11–43. Berlin: De Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 2017. Evolution of pragmatic markers in English: Pathways of change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Coussé, Evie, Peter Andersson & Joel Olofsson. 2018. Grammaticalization meets construction grammar. Opportunities, challenges and potential incompatibilities. In Evie Coussé, Peter Andersson & Joel Olofsson (eds.), Grammaticalization meets construction grammar, 3–19. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth & Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul. 2015. Grammaticalization or pragmaticalization of discourse markers: More than a terminological issue. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16(1). 59–85. https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.16.1.03deg.Suche in Google Scholar
Dehé, Nicole. 2007. The relation between syntactic and prosodic parenthesis. In Nicole Dehé & Yordanka Kavalova (eds.), Parentheticals, 261–284. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 2007. Morphosyntactic change: Functional and formal perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney. 1969. Studies in English adverbial usage. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar
Hardie, Andrew. 2012. CQPweb – combining power, flexibility and usability in a corpus analysis tool. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 17(3). 380–409. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17.3.04har.Suche in Google Scholar
Haselow, Alexander. 2013. Arguing for a wide conception of grammar: The case of final particles in spoken discourse. Folia Linguistica 47(2). 375–424. https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2013.015.Suche in Google Scholar
Haselow, Alexander. 2015. Left vs. right periphery in grammaticalization: The case of anyway. In Andrew Smith, Graeme Trousdale & Richard Waltereit (eds.), New directions in grammaticalization research, 157–186. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2002. On the role of context in grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 83–102. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2013. On discourse markers: Grammaticalization, pragmaticalization, or something else? Linguistics 51(6). 1205–1247. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2013-0048.Suche in Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Gunther Kaltenböck, Tania Kuteva & Haiping Long. 2021. The rise of discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2004. Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal? In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components, 21–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar
Huber, Magnus, Magnus Nissel & Karin Puga. 2016. Old Bailey Corpus 2.0. hdl:11858/00-246C-0000-0023-8CFB-2.Suche in Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Jasinskaya, Ekaterina, Sofiana Chiriacescu, Marta Donazzan, Klaus von Heusinger & Stefan Hinterwimmer. 2015. Prominence in discourse. In Amedeo De Dominicis (ed.), Prominences in linguistics: Proceedings of the pS-prominenceS international conference, 134–153. Viterbo: DISUCOM Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Evelien Keizer & Arne Lohmann (eds.). 2016. Outside the clause: Form and function of extra-clausal constituents. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar
Kemp, Lois. 2018. English evidential -ly adverbs in main clauses: A functional approach. Open Linguistics 4. 743–761. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2018-0036.Suche in Google Scholar
Lenker, Ursula. 2010. Argument and rhetoric: Adverbial connectors in the history of English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar
Lenker, Ursula. 2014. Knitting and splitting information: Medial placement of linking adverbials in the history of English. In Simone E. Pfenninger, Olga Timofeeva, Anne-Christine Gardner, Alpo Honkapohja, Marianne Hundt & Daniel Schreier (eds.), Contact, variation, and change in the history of English, 11–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar
Lewis, Diana. 2020. Speaker stance and evaluative -ly adverbs in the Modern English period. In Gunther Kaltenböck, María José López Couso & Belén Méndez Naya (eds.), Investigating stance in English: Synchrony and diachrony. [Special issue]. Language Sciences 82, 101332.Suche in Google Scholar
Love, Robbie, Claire Dembry, Andrew Hardie, Vaclav Brezina & Tony McEnery. 2017. The Spoken BNC2014: Designing and building a spoken corpus of everyday conversations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22(3). 319–344. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22.3.02lov.Suche in Google Scholar
Mauri, Caterina. 2008. Coordination relations in the languages of Europe and beyond. Berlin: De Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar
Mélac, Eric. 2024. The links between evidentiality, modality and grammaticalization. Studies in Language 48(3). 513–542. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.24011.mel.Suche in Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu. 1994. Aspects of adverbial change in Early Modern English. In Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Studies in Early Modern English, 243–259. Berlin: De Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar
Núñez Pertejo, Paloma. 2003. Adjectival participles or present participles? On the classification of some dubious examples from the Helsinki Corpus. Sederi 13. 141–153.Suche in Google Scholar
Onodera, Noriko. 2011. The grammaticalization of discourse markers. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 611–620. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Paradis, Carita. 2008. Configurations, construals and change: Expressions of degree. In Belén Méndez Naya (ed.), English intensifiers. [Special issue]. English Language and Linguistics 12(2), 317–343.Suche in Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher. 2005. The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxfordː Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Rissanen, Matti. 1999. Syntax. In Roger Lass (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. III, 1476–1776, 187–331. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Smitterberg, Eric. 2023. Syntactic change in Late Modern English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Swan, Toril. 1988. Sentence adverbials in English: A synchronic and diachronic investigation. Oslo: Novus Forlag.Suche in Google Scholar
Swan, Toril. 1991. Adverbial shifts: Evidence from Norwegian and English. In Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Historical English syntax, 409–438. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar
Swan, Toril. 1997. From manner to subject modification: Adverbialization in English. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 20(2). 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0332586500004108.Suche in Google Scholar
Tabor, Whitney & Elizabeth C. Traugott. 1998. Structural scope expansion and grammaticalization. In Anna Giacolone Ramat & Paul J. Hopper (eds.), The limits of grammaticalization, 229–272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2015. Investigating ‘periphery’ from a functionalist perspective. Linguistics Vanguard 1(1). 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2014-1003.Suche in Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2016. On the rise of types of clause-final pragmatic markers in English. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17(1). 26–54. https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.17.1.02tra.Suche in Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2017. Low salience as an enabling factor in morphosyntactic change. In Marianne Hundt, Sandra Molin & Simone E. Pfenninger (eds.), The changing English language: Psycholinguistic perspectives, 93–110. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2022. Discourse structuring markers in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 2006. English: Meaning and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Ziv, Yael. 2002. This, I believe, is a processing instruction: Discourse linking via parentheticals. Proceedings of IATL 18. http://linguistics.huji.ac.il/IATL/18/Ziv.html.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Left and right peripheries in discourse: an introduction
- Articles
- Between core and periphery: the development in English of a modal adverb, an evaluative adverb and a discourse connector
- The emergence of last I checked fragments: a story of shifting allegiance
- Left-peripheral bottom line sequences
- Peripheral versus non-peripheral optative particles
- Adverbials in Extra-left position in spoken Danish
- Right-peripheral subjects in German and Persian across registers
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Left and right peripheries in discourse: an introduction
- Articles
- Between core and periphery: the development in English of a modal adverb, an evaluative adverb and a discourse connector
- The emergence of last I checked fragments: a story of shifting allegiance
- Left-peripheral bottom line sequences
- Peripheral versus non-peripheral optative particles
- Adverbials in Extra-left position in spoken Danish
- Right-peripheral subjects in German and Persian across registers