Abstract
There is a wide array of spellings attested in Middle English for initial OE hw- in words such as when, where, what, who, which. Those beginning with ‘q’, found mostly in the North (including Scotland) and Northeast Midlands, have long been the subject of scholarly debate. The consensus is that they represented an articulation stronger than [hw], usually assumed to be [xw]. Just a handful of scholars have suggested that the articulation could have been [kw], but there is so far little detailed argument for this position. We propose that at least a subset of reflexes of OE hw- words came at least variably to be pronounced with initial [kw]. We suggest that this strengthened pronunciation existed alongside [xw], and lenited [hw] and [w], as well as simple [h] with the [w] deleted. We link (as some other scholars have) the history of these spellings with that of northern lenition of original initial [kw] to [xw]/[hw]/[w]. We approach the problem from a strongly variationist perspective, presenting (in accompanying appendices) detailed information on the ‘q’ spellings accessible from LAEME and eLALME. We review all the data, from the earliest attested forms through to modern dialect surveys, including place-name evidence, and we assess previous arguments on the topic.
Acknowledgement
We thank the Arts and Humanities Research Council and the Angus McIntosh Centre for Historical Linguistics for travel assistance. We also thank Rhona Alcorn, Philip Bennett, Michael Benskin, Donka Minkova and Patrick Stiles for helpful comments on an early draft. We are grateful to Pavel Iosad for help with Celtic. We also thank an anonymous reviewer and especially Stephen Laker for a very detailed review including some useful extra references.
References
Allen, W. Sidney. 1965. Vox Latina. A guide to the pronunciation of Classical Latin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Ashby, Michael & John Maidment. 2005. Introducing phonetic science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511808852Suche in Google Scholar
AND = Anglo-Norman Dictionary. online. http://www.anglo-norman.net/Suche in Google Scholar
Barnes, Michael. 2004. The Scandinavian languages in the British Isles: The runic evidence. In Jonathan Adams & Katherine Adams (eds.), Scandinavia and Europe 800–1350: Contact, conflict, and coexistence, 121–136. Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols.10.1484/M.TCNE-EB.3.4104Suche in Google Scholar
Benskin, Michael. 1989. Some aspects of Cumbrian English, mainly mediæval. In Leiv Egil Breivik, Arnoldus Hille & Stig Johansson (eds.), Essays on English Language in honour of Bertil Sundby, 13–45. Oslo: Novus.Suche in Google Scholar
Benskin, Michael. 1997. Texts from a township in late medieval Ireland. Collegium Medievale 10. 91–173.Suche in Google Scholar
Benskin, Michael. 2001. The language of the English texts. In Tony Hunt (ed.), Three receptaria from medieval England (Medium Ævum Monographs NS 21). chapter 4, 193–230. Oxford: The Society for the Study of Medieval Languages and Literature.Suche in Google Scholar
Brøndum-Nielsen, Johannes. 1932. Gammeldansk grammatik i sproghistorisk fremstilling. II Konsonantisme. København: J. H. Schultz.Suche in Google Scholar
Brugmann, Karl. 1886. Grundriss der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen. Erster Band: Einleitung und Lautlehre. Strassburg: Karl J. Trübner.Suche in Google Scholar
Campbell, Alistair. 1959. Old English grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Catford, J.C. 1988. A practical introduction to phonetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Suche in Google Scholar
CoNE = Roger Lass, Margaret Laing, Rhona Alcorn & Keith Williamson, A corpus of narrative etymologies from proto-old English to early middle English and accompanying corpus of changes. Edinburgh: Version 1.1, 2013-, © The University of Edinburgh. http://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/ihd/CoNE/CoNE.html.Suche in Google Scholar
Darby, H.C & G.R. Versey. 1975. Domesday gazeteer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Dietz, Klaus. 1989. Die historische Schichtung phonologischer Isoglossen in den englischen Dialekten: II Mittelenglische Isoglossen. In Andreas Fischer (ed.), The History and the dialects of English. Festschrift for Eduard Kolb, 133–175. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.10.1515/angl.1989.1989.107.295Suche in Google Scholar
Dietz, Klaus. 2006. Schreibung und Lautung im mittelalterlichen Englisch. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Suche in Google Scholar
Dobson, E.J. 1968. English pronunciation 1500–1700, 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Suche in Google Scholar
DOE Web Corpus (cited in Sections 2.3 and 3.3.1)Suche in Google Scholar
Domesday Book. Online http://www.domesdaybook.co.uk/Suche in Google Scholar
DOST = Dictionary of the Older Scottish Tongue online. Now part of the online Dictionary of the Scots Language http://www.dsl.ac.uk/.Suche in Google Scholar
Ekwall, Eilert. 1922. The place-names of Lancashire. Manchester: The University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Ekwall, Eilert. 1960 [1936]. The concise Oxford dictionary of English place-names, 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
eLALME = Michael Benskin & Margaret Laing 2013-. An electronic version of a linguistic atlas of late mediaeval English with webscripts by Vasilis Karaiskos & Keith Williamson. http://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/ihd/elalme/elalme.html Edinburgh: © The Authors and The University of Edinburgh.Suche in Google Scholar
Ellis, Alexander J. 1889. On early English pronunciation. Part V. The existing phonology of English dialects. London: Trübner & Co.Suche in Google Scholar
Fellows-Jensen, Gillian. 2004. Scandinavian settlement in the British Isles and Normandy: What the place-names reveal. In Jonathan Adams & Katherine Adams (eds.), Scandinavia and Europe 800–1350: Contact, conflict, and coexistence, 137–147. Turnhout: Brepols.10.1484/M.TCNE-EB.3.4105Suche in Google Scholar
Grimm, Jacob. 1822. Deutsche Grammatik. Göttingen: Bei Dieterich.Suche in Google Scholar
Härke, Heinrich. 2011. Anglo-Saxon immigration and ethnogenesis. Medieval Archaeology 55. 1–28.10.1179/174581711X13103897378311Suche in Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 2007. Irish English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511551048Suche in Google Scholar
Hoenigswald, Henry. 1992. Comparative method, reconstruction, typology. In Edgar C. Polomé & Werner Winter (eds.), Reconstructing languages and cultures, 23–34. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Suche in Google Scholar
Hogg, Richard M. 1992. A grammar of Old English. Volume 1: Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar
IPA. 1999. Handbook of the International Phonetic Association. A guide to the use of the International Phonetic Alphabet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Johnston, Paul. 1997. Older Scots phonology and its regional variation. In Charles Jones (ed.), The Edinburgh history of the Scots language, 47–111. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9781474410977-005Suche in Google Scholar
Jones, Charles. 1997. Phonology. In Charles Jones (ed.), The Edinburgh history of the Scots language, 267–334. Edinburgh. Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9781474410977Suche in Google Scholar
Jordan, Richard. 1968. Handbuch der mittelenglischen Grammatik. Lautlehre, 3rd edn. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Suche in Google Scholar
Kluge, Friedrich. 1901. Geschichte der englischen Sprache. In Hermann Paul (ed.), Grundriss der germanischen Philologie I, 2nd edn, 926–1151. Strassburg: Trübner.10.1515/9783111337098-017Suche in Google Scholar
Kristensson, Gillis. 1967. A survey of Middle English dialects 1290–1350: The six northern counties and Lincolnshire. Lund: C.W.K. Gleerup.Suche in Google Scholar
Kristensson, Gillis, 1987. A survey of Middle English dialects 1290–1350: The west midland counties. Lund: Lund University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Kristensson, Gillis. 1995. A survey of Middle English dialects 1290–1350: The east midland counties. Lund: Lund University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Kristensson, Gillis. 2002. A survey of Middle English dialects 1290–1350: The southern counties II. Diphthongs and consonants. Lund: Lund University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of linguistic change. Volume 1: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. 1964. A phonetic study of West African languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. 1975, A course in phonetics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Suche in Google Scholar
LAE = Orton, Harold, Stewart Sanderson & John Widowson (eds.). 1978. Linguistic Atlas of England. London: Croom Helm.Suche in Google Scholar
LAEME = Laing, Margaret 2013-. A Linguistic Atlas of Early Middle English, 1150–1325, Version 3.2 (With Roger Lass (Introduction) and webscripts by Keith Willamson, Vasilis Karaiskos & Sherrylyn Branchaw.) http://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/ihd/laeme2/laeme2.html. Edinburgh: © The University of Edinburgh.Suche in Google Scholar
Laing, Margaret & Roger Lass. 2003. Tales of the 1001nists: The phonological implications of litteral substitution sets in some thirteenth-century South-West Midland texts. English Language and Linguistics 7(2). 257–278.10.1017/S1360674303001102Suche in Google Scholar
Laing, Margaret & Roger Lass. 2009. Shape-shifting, sound change and the genesis of prodigal writing systems. English Language and Linguistics 13(1). 1–31.10.1017/S1360674308002840Suche in Google Scholar
Laing, Margaret & Roger Lass. forthcoming. Old and Middle English spellings for Old English hw-, with special reference to the ‘qu-’ type: In celebration of LAEME, (e)LALME, LAOS and CoNE.Suche in Google Scholar
Laker, Stephen. 2002. An explanation for the changes kw-, hw- > χw- in the English dialects. In Markku Filppula, Juhani Klemola & Heli Pitkänen (eds.), The Celtic Roots of English, 183–198. Joensuu: Joensuu University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Laker, Stephen 2008. Changing views about Anglo-Saxons and Britons. In Henk Aertsen & Bart Veldhoen (eds.), Six papers from the 28th symposium on medieval studies held at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam on 15 December 2006, 1–38. Leiden: Leiden University Department of English.Suche in Google Scholar
Laker, Stephen. 2009. On the geography and date of the merger /kw/, /hw/ > /χw/. In Esa Penttila & Heli Paulasto (eds.), Language contacts meet English dialects: Studies in honour of Markku Filppula, 179–198. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar
LAOS = Williamson, Keith. 2013. A Linguistic Atlas of Older Scots, Phase 1, 1380 to 1500, Version 1.2. http://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/ihd/laos1/laos1Z.html. Edinburgh: © The University of Edinburgh.Suche in Google Scholar
LAS = Mather, James Y. & Hans-Henning Speitel. 1986. Linguistic Atlas of Scotland. Scots Section. Volume III. Phonology. London: Croom Helm.Suche in Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1976. English phonology and phonological theory: Synchronic and diachronic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1993. How real(ist) are reconstructions? In Charles Jones, Charles (ed.), Historical linguistics: Problems and perspectives, 156–89. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1997. Historical linguistics and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620928Suche in Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 2015. Lineage and the constructive imagination. The birth of historical linguistics. In Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans, (eds.), The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics, 45–63. Abingdon & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315794013-12Suche in Google Scholar
Lass, Roger & Margaret Laing. 2013. The early Middle English reflexes of Germanic *ik ‘I’: Unpacking the changes. Folia Linguistica Historica 34. 1–21.10.1515/flih.2013.004Suche in Google Scholar
Laver, John. 1994. Principles of phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139166621Suche in Google Scholar
Lowe, Kathryn. 2010. Linguistic geography, demography, and monastic community: Scribal language at Bury St Edmunds. In Alaric Hall, Matti Kilpiö, Olga Timofeeva, Ágnes Kiricsi & Bethany Fox (eds.), Interfaces between language and culture in Medieval England: A Festschrift for Matti Kilpiö, 147–178. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/ej.9789004180116.i-340.40Suche in Google Scholar
Luick, Karl. 1914/1940. Historische Grammatik der englischen Sprache, 2 Vols. Stuttgart: Bernhard Tauchnitz.Suche in Google Scholar
Lutz, Angelika. 1991. Phonotaktisch gesteuerte Konsonantenveränderungen in der Geschichte des Englischen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.10.1515/9783111353876Suche in Google Scholar
Maguire, Warren. 2012. Mapping the existing phonology of English dialects. Dialectologia et Geolinguistica 20. 84–107.10.1515/dialect-2012-0006Suche in Google Scholar
McIntosh, Angus. 1969. Review of Kristensson (1967). Medium Ævum 38. 210–216.10.2307/43627552Suche in Google Scholar
McLaughlin, John C. 1963. A graphemic-phonemic study of a Middle English Manuscript. The Hague: Mouton.Suche in Google Scholar
MED Middle English Dictionary. Online http://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/med/.Suche in Google Scholar
MED The electronic Middle English Dictionary. http://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/med/.Suche in Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley. 2004. An essay in historical sociolinguistics?: On Donka Minkova’s philology, linguistics, and the history of [hw] ~ [w]. In Anne Curzan & Kimberley Emmons (eds.), Studies in the history of the English language II. Unfolding Conversations, 47–53. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Suche in Google Scholar
Minkova, Donka. 2003. Alliteration and sound change in Early English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486968Suche in Google Scholar
Minkova, Donka. 2004. Philology, linguistics, and the history of [hw] ~ [w]. In Anne Curzan & Kimberley Emmons (eds.), Studies in the history of the English language II. Unfolding Conversations, 7–46. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Suche in Google Scholar
Murray, J.A.H. 1873. The dialect of the southern counties of Scotland. London: Asher.Suche in Google Scholar
Noreen, Adolf. 1923. Altnordische Grammatik I. Altisländische und altnorwegische Grammatik (Laut- und Flexionslehre) unter Berücksichtigung des Urnordischen, 4th edn. Halle: Max Niemeyer.Suche in Google Scholar
Oakden, J.P. 1930. Alliterative poetry in Middle English: The dialectal and metrical survey. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
OED = Oxford English Dictionary.Online (OED3): http://www.oed.com.Suche in Google Scholar
Open Domesday. http://opendomesday.org/Suche in Google Scholar
Orton, Harold. 1933. The phonology of a South Durham dialect. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Ltd.Suche in Google Scholar
Osthoff, Hermann & Karl Brugmann. 1878. Morphologische Untersuchungen auf dem Gebiete der indogermanischen Sprachen, I. Leipzig: S. Hirzel.Suche in Google Scholar
Parsons, David N. 2011. Sabrina in the thorns: Place-names as evidence for British and Latin in Roman Britain. Transactions of the Philological Society 109. 113–137.10.1111/j.1467-968X.2011.01276.xSuche in Google Scholar
Pilch, Herbert. 1970. Altenglische Grammatik: Dialektologie, Phonologie, Morphologie, Syntax. München: M. Hueber.Suche in Google Scholar
Pope, Mildred Katherine. 1934. From Latin to modern French with especial consideration of Anglo-Norman. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Prevost, E.W. 1905. A supplement to the glossary of the dialect of Cumberland, with a grammar of the dialect by S. Dickson Brown. London: Henry Frowde.Suche in Google Scholar
Sawyer, Peter Hayes. 1968. Anglo-saxon charters: An annotated list and bibliography. London: Royal Historical Society.Suche in Google Scholar
Schrijver, Peter. 2002. The rise and fall of British Latin: Evidence from English and Brittonic. In Markku Filppula, Juhani Klemola & Heli Pitkänen (eds.), The Celtic Roots of English, 87–110. Joensuu: Joensuu University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Schumacher, Karl. 1914. Studien über den mittelenglischen Alliterationsdichtungen. Bonner Studien zur englischen Philologie XI. Bonn: Peter Hanstein Verlagsbuchhandlung.Suche in Google Scholar
Scragg, Donald George. 1974. A history of English spelling. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
SED Survey of English Dialects.Suche in Google Scholar
Orton, Harold & William James Halliday (eds.). 1962. Vol. 1. The basic material. The six northern counties and the Isle of Man. Leeds: E. J. Arnold.Suche in Google Scholar
Orton, Harold & Michael V Barry (eds.). 1969. The basic material. The West Midland counties,Vol. 2. Leeds: E. J. Arnold.Suche in Google Scholar
Orton, Harold & Philip Michael Tilling (eds.). 1969. The basic material. The East Midland counties and East Anglia,Vol. 3. Leeds: E. J. Arnold.Suche in Google Scholar
Orton, Harold & Martyn Francis Wakelin (eds.). 1967. The basic material. The southern counties,Vol. 4. Leeds: E. J. Arnold.Suche in Google Scholar
Trask, R. L. 1996. A dictionary of phonetics and phonology. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar
Tucker, Abraham [pseud. Edward Search, Esq.]. 1773. Vocal sound. London: T. Jones.Suche in Google Scholar
Wang, William S-Y. 1969. Competing changes as a cause of residue. Language 45. 9–25.10.2307/411748Suche in Google Scholar
Watts, Victor. 2004. The Cambridge Dictionary of English Place-Names. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Wessén, Elias. 1968. Svensk Språkhistoria. Ljudlära och ordböjningslära, 8th edn. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Suche in Google Scholar
Wright, Joseph. 1898–1905. The English dialect dictionary, 7 Vols. London: Henry Frowde.Suche in Google Scholar
Wright, Joseph. 1905. The English dialect grammar. Oxford: Henry Frowde.Suche in Google Scholar
Wright, Joseph & Elizabeth Mary Wright. 1925. Old English Grammar, 3rd edn. London: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Supplementary Material
The online version of this article (DOI: 10.1515/flih-2016-0003) offers supplementary material, available to authorized users. It includes Appendix 1 and Appendix 2, the data-sets referred to on pp. 61, 65, 74 and 98–100.
©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Reading the intentions of be going to. On the subjectification of future markers
- Third-person singular zero in Norfolk English: An addendum
- Q is for WHAT, WHEN, WHERE?: The ‘q’ spellings for OE hw-
- The Romanian alternating gender in diachrony and synchrony
- Particle placement in Late Modern English and Twentieth-century English: Morpho-syntactic variables
- Language norms and language use: Hypercorrections in the Independence period of Chilean Spanish
- Basic valency orientation in Homeric Greek
- Why English is not dead: A rejoinder to Emonds and Faarlund
- Daily jottings: Preposition placement in English diaries and travel journals from 1500 to 1900
- Reviews
- James N. Adams: Social variation and the Latin language
- Emanuel J. Drechsel: Language contact in the early colonial Pacific: Maritime Polynesian Pidgin before Pidgin English
- Lucien Tesnière: Elements of structural syntax
- Carlotta Viti, ed.: Perspectives on historical syntax
- Buschfeld, Sarah, Thomas Hoffmann, Magnus Huber & Alexander Kautzsch: The evolution of Englishes. The dynamic model and beyond
- 2016. IE2.com. Online lexica for ancient Indo-European languages
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Reading the intentions of be going to. On the subjectification of future markers
- Third-person singular zero in Norfolk English: An addendum
- Q is for WHAT, WHEN, WHERE?: The ‘q’ spellings for OE hw-
- The Romanian alternating gender in diachrony and synchrony
- Particle placement in Late Modern English and Twentieth-century English: Morpho-syntactic variables
- Language norms and language use: Hypercorrections in the Independence period of Chilean Spanish
- Basic valency orientation in Homeric Greek
- Why English is not dead: A rejoinder to Emonds and Faarlund
- Daily jottings: Preposition placement in English diaries and travel journals from 1500 to 1900
- Reviews
- James N. Adams: Social variation and the Latin language
- Emanuel J. Drechsel: Language contact in the early colonial Pacific: Maritime Polynesian Pidgin before Pidgin English
- Lucien Tesnière: Elements of structural syntax
- Carlotta Viti, ed.: Perspectives on historical syntax
- Buschfeld, Sarah, Thomas Hoffmann, Magnus Huber & Alexander Kautzsch: The evolution of Englishes. The dynamic model and beyond
- 2016. IE2.com. Online lexica for ancient Indo-European languages