A construct of cognitive discourse functions for conceptualising content-language integration in CLIL and multilingual education^[1]

7 References

Lyster, Roy. 1998. Negotiation of form, recasts and explicit error correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning 48, 183–199.Suche in Google Scholar

Thürmann, Eike & Johannes Helmut Vollmer. 2012. Schulsprache und sprachsensibler Fachunterricht: Eine Checkliste mit Erläuterungen. In: Röhner, C. & Hövelbrinks B. (eds.) Fachbezogene Sprachförderung in Deutsch als Zweitsprache. Weinheim: Juventa Beltz, 212–232.Suche in Google Scholar

Adolphs, Svenja. 2008. Corpus and context: Investigating pragmatic functions in spoken discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/scl.30Suche in Google Scholar

Ahrenholz, Bernt (ed.). 2010. Fachunterricht und Deutsch als Zweitsprache. Tübingen: Narr.Suche in Google Scholar

Aijmer, Karin. 1996. Conversational routines in English: Convention and creativity. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Alvermann, Donna E., David G. O’Brien & Deborah R. Dillon. 1990. What teachers do when they say they’re having discussions of content area reading assignments: A qualitative analysis. Reading Research Quarterly 25(4). 296–322.10.2307/747693Suche in Google Scholar

Ammon, Ulrich. 1972. Dialekt, soziale Ungleichheit und Schule. Weinheim & Basel: Beltz.Suche in Google Scholar

Anderson, Lorin W., David R. Krathwohl (eds.), Peter W. Airasian, Kathleen A. Cruikshank, Richard, E. Mayer, Paul R. Pintrich, James Raths & Merlin C. Wittrock. 2001. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Anstrom, K., P. DiCerbo, F. Butler, A. Katz, J. Millet & C. Rivera. 2010. A review of the literature on academic language: Implications for K–12 English language learners. Arlington, VA: George Washington University Center for Equity and Excellence in Education.Suche in Google Scholar

August, Diane & Timothy Shanahan (eds.). 2006. Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on language-minority children and youth. Mahwah, NJ, London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Suche in Google Scholar

Badertscher, Hans & Thomas Bieri. 2009. Wissenserwerb im Content and Language Integrated Learning. Bern, Stuttgart & Wien: Haupt.Suche in Google Scholar

Bailey, Alison L. 2007. Introduction: Teaching and assessing students learning English in school. In Alison L. Bailey (ed.), Language demands of school: Putting academic English to the test. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Bailey, Alison L., & Frances A. Butler. 2003. An evidentiary framework for operationalizing academic language for broad application to K-12 education: A design document. Los Angeles: CSE Technical Report 611. University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST). http://www.cse.ucla.edu/products/reports/R611.pdf (accessed 20 February 2013).Suche in Google Scholar

Bailey, Alison L., Frances A. Butler & Edynn Sato. 2007. Standards-to-standards linkage under title III: Exploring common language demands in ELD and science standards. Applied Measurement in Education 20(1). 53–78.10.1080/08957340709336730Suche in Google Scholar

Bailey, Alison L., Frances A. Butler, M. Borrego, Charmien LaFramenta & Christine Ong. 2002. Towards the characterization of academic language in upper elementary classrooms. Language Testing Update 31. 45–52.Suche in Google Scholar

Bailey, Alison L., Frances. A. Butler, Charmien LaFramenta, & Christine Ong. 2001. Towards the characterization of academic language in upper elementary classrooms (Final Deliverable to OERI/OBEMLA, Contract No. R305B960002). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).Suche in Google Scholar

Bailey, Alison. L. (ed.). 2007. The language demands of school: Putting academic English to the test. New Heaven, CT: Yale University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Baker, Colin. 1993. Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Suche in Google Scholar

Barnes, Douglas. 1992 [1976]. From communication to curriculum, 2^nd edn. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Suche in Google Scholar

Beacco, Jean-Claude, Daniel Coste, Piet-Hein van de Ven & Helmut Vollmer 2010. Language and school subjects. Linguistic dimensions of knowledge building in school curricula. Language Policy Division. Directorate of Education and Languages, DGIV. Council of Europe, Strasbourg. http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/LangEduc/BoxD2-OtherSub_en.asp#s1_1 (accessed 15 April 2013).Suche in Google Scholar

Beacco, Jean-Claude. 2010. Items for a description of linguistic competence in the language of schooling necessary for learning/teaching history (end of obligatory education). An approach with reference points. Language and school subjects: Linguistic dimensions of knowledge building in school curricula N° 1. Language Policy Division. Directorate of Education and Languages, DGIV. Council of Europe, Strasbourg. http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/LangEduc/BoxD2-OtherSub_en.asp (accessed15 April 2013).Suche in Google Scholar

Beacco, Jean-Claude, Martin Sachse, Arild Thorbjørnsen & Werner Wiater. 2007. A descriptive framework for communicative/linguistic competences involved in the teaching and learning of history. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Language Policy Division.Suche in Google Scholar

Becker-Mrotzek, Michael, Karen Schramm, Eike Thürmann, Johannes H. Vollmer (eds.) 2013. Sprache im Fach. Sprachlichkeit und fachliches Lernen. Münster etc.: Waxmann.Suche in Google Scholar

Bernstein, Basil. 1971. Class, code and control: Volume 1 – Theoretical studies towards a sociology of language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Suche in Google Scholar

Bernstein, Basil. 1975. Class, code and control: Volume 3 – Towards a theory of educational transmissions. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Suche in Google Scholar

Bernstein, Basil. 1996. Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity. London: Taylor & Francis.Suche in Google Scholar

Bertschi-Kaufmann, Andrea & Cornelia Rosebrock (eds.). 2009. Literalität: Bildungsaufgabe und Forschungsfeld. Weinheim, München: Juventa.Suche in Google Scholar

Biggs, John & Catherine Tang. 2011. Teaching for quality learning at university, 4th edn. London: Open University Press McGraw Hill Education.Suche in Google Scholar

Bloom, Benjamin S. 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York: McKay.Suche in Google Scholar

Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House & Gabriele Kasper (eds.). 1989. Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publications.Suche in Google Scholar

Bühler, Karl. 1934. Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Verlag von Gustav Fischer: Jena.Suche in Google Scholar

Bunch, George. 2006. “Academic English’’ in the 7th grade: Broadening the lens, expanding access. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5(4). 284–301.Suche in Google Scholar

Bunch, George. 2009. “Going up there”: Challenges and opportunities for language minority students during a mainstream classroom speech event (student presentation). Linguistics and Education 20. 81–108.10.1016/j.linged.2009.04.001Suche in Google Scholar

Chamot, Anna U. & J. M. O’Malley. 1994. The CALLA handbook: Implementing the Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar

Christie, Frances, & Beverly Derewianka. 2008. School discourse: Learning to write across the years of schooling. London, UK: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Christie, Frances. 2002. Classroom discourse analysis. A functional perspective. London: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Cline, Tony & Nora Frederickson. 1996. A model of curriculum-related assessment. In Tony Cline & Nora Frederickson (eds.), Curriculum related assessment, Cummins and bilingual children, 2–22. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Suche in Google Scholar

Coetzee-Lachmann, Debbie. 2007. Assessment of subject-specific task performance of bilingual geography learners: Analysing aspects of subject-specific written discourse. Doctoral dissertation, University of Osnabrück. http://repositorium.uni-osnabrueck.de/bitstream/urn:nbn:de:gbv:700-2009030617/2/E-Diss864_thesis.pdfSuche in Google Scholar

Coffin, Caroline. 2006. Historical discourse: The language of time, cause and evaluation. London: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Coyle, Do, Philip Hood & David Marsh. 2010. CLIL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Coyle, Do. 2007. Content and Language Integrated Learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 10(5). 543–562.10.2167/beb459.0Suche in Google Scholar

Creese, Angela. 2002. The discursive construction of power in teacher partnerships: Language and subject specialists in mainstream schools. TESOL Quarterly 36(4). 597–616.10.2307/3588242Suche in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2001. Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Cummins, Jim & E. Y.-F. Man. 2007. Academic language: What is it and how do we acquire it?. In Jim Cummins & Chris Davison (eds.), International handbook of English language teaching, vol. 2, 797–810. New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-46301-8_53Suche in Google Scholar

Cummins, Jim. 1992. Language proficiency, bilingualism and academic achievement. In Patricia A. Richards-Amato & Marguerite A. Snow (eds.), The multicultural classroom. New York: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Cummins, Jim. 2000. Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781853596773Suche in Google Scholar

D’Andrade, Roy. 1987. A folk model of the mind. In Dorothy Holland & Naomi Quinn (eds.), Cultural models in language and thought, 112–148. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511607660.006Suche in Google Scholar

Dalton-Puffer, Christiane, Julia Hüttner, Silvia Jexenflicker, Veronika Schindelegger & Ute Smit. 2008. Content and language integrated learning an Österreichs Höheren Technischen Lehranstalten. Forschungsbericht. Vienna, Austria: Universität Wien & Bundesministerium für Unterricht, Kunst und Kultur.Suche in Google Scholar

Dalton-Puffer, Christiane. 2007a. Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.20Suche in Google Scholar

Dalton-Puffer, Christiane. 2007b. Academic language functions in a CLIL environment. In David Marsh & Dieter Wolff (eds.), Diverse contexts – converging goals, 201–210. Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.Suche in Google Scholar

Davison, Chris & Alan Williams. 2001. Integrating language and content: Unresolved issues. In Bernard Mohan, Constant Leung & Chris Davison (eds.), English as a second language in the mainstream. Teaching, learning and identity, 51–70. Harlow etc.: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Deppermann, Arnulf. 2006. Construction Grammar – Eine Grammatik für die Interaktion?. In Arnulf Deppermann, Reinhard Fiehler & Thomas Spranz-Fogasy (eds.), Grammatik und Interaktion. Untersuchungen zum Zusammenhang von grammatischen Strukturen und Gesprächsprozessen, 43–66. Radolfzell: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung .Suche in Google Scholar

Ehlich, Konrad & Jochen Rehbein. 1979. Sprachliche Handlungsmuster. In H.-G. Soeffner (ed.), Interpretative Verfahren in den Sozial- und Textwissenschaften, 243–275. Stuttgart: Metzler.10.1007/978-3-476-03120-4_14Suche in Google Scholar

Ehlich, Konrad & Jochen Rehbein. 1986. Muster und Institution. Untersuchungen zur schulischen Kommunikation. Tübingen: Narr.Suche in Google Scholar

Ehlich, Konrad. 1991. Funktional-pragmatische Kommunikationsanalyse. In Dieter Flader (ed.), Verbale Interaktion. Studien zur Empirie und Methodologie der Pragmatik, 127–143. Stuttgart: Metzler.10.1007/978-3-476-03329-1_6Suche in Google Scholar

Ernst-Slavit, Gisela and Michele R. Mason. 2011. “Words that hold us up:” Teacher talk and academic language in five upper elementary classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 22/4, 430–440.Suche in Google Scholar

Evnitskaya, Natalia. 2012. Talking science in a second language: The interactional co-construction of dialogic explanations in the CLIL science classroom. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona unpublished doctoral dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Gee, John Paul. 2008. Social linguistics and literacies. Ideology in discourses, 3rd edn. London & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203944806Suche in Google Scholar

Geeraerts, Dirk. 2006. Introduction. A rough guide to Cognitive Linguistics. In: Dirk Geeraerts (ed.) Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings, 1–28. Berlin etc.: Mouton de Gruyter10.1515/9783110199901.1Suche in Google Scholar

Gentner, Dedre & Susan Golding-Meadow (eds.). 2003. Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4117.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Gibbons, Pauline. 1998. Classroom talk and the learning of new registers in a second language. Language and Education 12(2). 99–118.10.1080/09500789808666742Suche in Google Scholar

Gibbons, Pauline. 2006. Bridging discourses in ESL. London: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Gläser, Rosemarie. 1990. Fachtextsorten im Englischen. Tübingen: Gunther Narr Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Gogolin, Ingrid, Imke Lange, Ute Michel & Hans H. Reich (eds.). 2012. Herausforderung Bildungssprache. Münster, New York: Waxmann-Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Gogolin, Ingrid. 2008. Der monolinguale Habitus der multilingualen Schule. Münster: Waxmann.10.31244/9783830970989Suche in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Gumperz, John & Stephen Levinson (eds.). 1996. Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen 1971. Vorbereitende Bemerkung zur Kommunikativen Kompetenz. In Jürgen Habermas & Niklas Luhman (eds.), Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie, 102–141. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Suche in Google Scholar

Halbach, Ana. 2012. Questions about basic interpersonal communication skills and cognitive language proficiency. Applied Linguistics 33(5). 608–613.10.1093/applin/ams058Suche in Google Scholar

Halldén, Ola. 1998. Personalization in historical descriptions and explanations. Learning and Instruction 8(2). 131–139.10.1016/S0959-4752(97)00012-1Suche in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. & James R. Martin. 1993. Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Critical perspectives on literacy and education. London: Falmer Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A.K. & Christian Matthiessen. 2004. An introduction to functional grammar, 3^rd edn. London, UK: Arnold.Suche in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A.K. 2006. Studies in Chinese Language. (edited by Jonathan J. Webster. The seventh volume of a series of the Collected Works of M.A.K. Halliday). London/New York: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A.K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2^nd ed. London: Arnold.Suche in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A.K. 1978. Language as social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.Suche in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A.K. 1993. Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education 5. 93–116.10.1016/0898-5898(93)90026-7Suche in Google Scholar

Heine, Lena. forthc. 2014. Models of the bilingual lexicon and their theoretical implications for CLIL. In Christiane Dalton-Puffer and Tarja Nikula (eds.). Language Learning Journal 42(3) [Special Issue].Suche in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Lothar. 1988. Vom Fachwort zum Fachtext. Beiträge zur angewandten Linguistik. Tübingen: Gunther Narr Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Holland, Dorothy & Naomi Quinn. 1987. Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511607660Suche in Google Scholar

Hornberger, Nancy. 1989. Continua of biliteracy. Review of Educational Research 59(3). 271–296.10.3102/00346543059003271Suche in Google Scholar

Hornberger, Nancy. 2001. Educational linguistics as a field: A view from Penn’s program on the occasion of its 25th anniversary. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics 17(1&2). 1–26.Suche in Google Scholar

Hult, Francis. 2008. The history and development of educational linguistics. In Bernard Spolsky & Francis Hult (eds.), Handbook of Educational Linguistics, 10–24. Malden, Mass., & Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470694138.ch2Suche in Google Scholar

Hüttner, Julia, Christiane Dalton-Puffer & Ute Smit. 2013. The power of beliefs: Lay theories and their influence on the implementation of CLIL programmes. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 16(3). 267--284.10.1080/13670050.2013.777385Suche in Google Scholar

Hymes, Dell 1972. On communicative competence. In J.B. Pride and J. Holmes (eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings, 269–293. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Suche in Google Scholar

Hymes, Dell. 1974. Foundations in sociolinguistics. An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hymes, Dell. 1992. The concept of communicative competence revisited. In M. Pütz (ed.), Thirty years of linguistic evolution: Studies in honour of Rene Dirven on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday, 31–57. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/z.61.08hymSuche in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1980. Metalanguage as a linguistic problem. In Roman Jakobson. The framework of language., 81–92. Ann Arbor: Michigan Studies in the Humanities.Suche in Google Scholar

Johns, Ann M. 1997. Text, role, and context: Developing academic literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524650Suche in Google Scholar

Kidd, Richard. 1996. Teaching academic language functions at the secondary level. Canadian Modern Language Review 52. 285–307.10.3138/cmlr.52.2.285Suche in Google Scholar

Koch, Peter & Wulf Oesterreicher. 1985. Sprache der Nähe – Sprache der Distanz. Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie und Sprachgebrauch. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 36. 15–43.10.1515/9783110244922.15Suche in Google Scholar

Koch, Peter & Wulf Oesterreicher. 2007. Schriftlichkeit und kommunikative Distanz. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 35. 346–375.10.1515/zgl.2007.024Suche in Google Scholar

Kramer-Dahl, Anneliese, Peter Teo & Alexander Chia. 2007. Supporting knowledge construction and literate talk in secondary social studies. Linguistics and Education 18. 167–199.10.1016/j.linged.2007.07.003Suche in Google Scholar

Krathwohl, David, Benjamin S. Bloom, & B.B. Masia. 1964. Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook II: Affective domain. New York: David McKay CoSuche in Google Scholar

Krathwohl, David. 2002. A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into practice 41(4), 212–218.Suche in Google Scholar

Lackner, Martin. 2012. The use of subject-related discourse functions in upper secondary CLIL history classes. Vienna: University of Vienna MA thesis.Suche in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2001. Discourse in cognitive grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 12(2). 143--188.10.1515/cogl.12.2.143Suche in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald. 2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Lemke, Jay L. 1990. Talking science. Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar

Leung, Constant. 1996. Context, content and language. In Tony Cline & Nora Frederickson (eds.), Curriculum related assessment, Cummins and bilingual children, 26–40. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Suche in Google Scholar

Linneweber-Lammerskitten, Helmut. 2010. Items for a description of linguistic competence in the language of schooling necessary for learning/teaching mathematics (in secondary education). An approach with reference points. Language and school subjects: Linguistic dimensions of knowledge building in school curricula N° 4. Strasbourg: Language Policy Division. Directorate of Education and Languages, DGIV. Council of Europe. http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/LangEduc/BoxD2-OtherSub_en.asp (accessed15 April 2013).Suche in Google Scholar

Llinares, Ana & Tom Morton. 2010. Historical explanations as situated practice in content and language integrated learning. Classroom Discourse 1(1). 46–65.10.1080/19463011003750681Suche in Google Scholar

Lochtmann, Katja. 2007. Die mündliche Fehlerkorrektur in CLIL und im traditionellen Fremdsprachenunterricht: Ein Vergleich. In Christiane Dalton-Puffer & Ute Smit (eds.), Empirical perspectives on CLIL classrooms, 119–138. Frankfurt, Germany: Lang.Suche in Google Scholar

Lose, Jana. 2007. The language of scientific discourse: Ergebnisse einer empirisch-deskriptiven Interaktionsanalyse zur Verwendung fachbezogener Diskursfunktionen im bilingualen Biologieunterricht. In Daniela Caspari, Wolfgang Hallet, Anke Wegner & Wolfgang Zydatiß (eds.), Bilingualer Unterricht macht Schule. Beiträge aus der Praxisforschung, 97–107. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Suche in Google Scholar

Lyster, Roy & Leila Ranta. 1997. Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19. 37–66.10.1017/S0272263197001034Suche in Google Scholar

Lyster, Roy. 1998. Negotiation of form, recasts and explicit error correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning 48. 183–199.Suche in Google Scholar

Lyster, Roy. 2007. Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalanced approach. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.18Suche in Google Scholar

Mård-Miettinen, Karita. 2008. Lärarens roll i elevernas grupparbete [Teachers’ role in student groupwork]. In Mona Enell-Nilsson & Tiina Männikkö (eds.) VAKKI Symposium XXVIII “Language and Diversity”. University of Vaasa. http://www.vakki.net/publications/2008/VAKKI2008_Mard-Miettinen.pdf (29 January 2013).Suche in Google Scholar

Martin, James R. & David Rose. 2003. Working with discourse. Meaning beyond the clause. London, New York: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Martin, James R. 1993. Genre and literacy – modeling context in educational linguistics. In William Grabe (ed.), Annual review of applied linguistics (Issues in second language teaching and learning), 141–172. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/S0267190500002440Suche in Google Scholar

Martin, James R. 2002. Writing history: Construing time and value in discourses of the past. In Cecilia Colombi & Mary Schleppegrell (eds.), Developing Advanced Literacy in First and Second Languages, 87–118. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Suche in Google Scholar

Mehisto, Peeter, David Marsh & Maria Jesus Frigols. 2008. Uncovering CLIL. Content and Language Integrated Learning in bilingual and multilingual education. Oxford: MacMillan.Suche in Google Scholar

Mercer, Neil & Karen Littleton. 2007. Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A sociocultural approach. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203946657Suche in Google Scholar

Mercer, Neil & Lyn Dawes. 2008. The value of exploratory talk. In Neil Mercer & Steve Hodgkinson (eds.), Exploring Talk in School, Chapter 4. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446279526.n4Suche in Google Scholar

Mercer, Neil. 2000. Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Mohan, Bernard, Constant Leung & Chris Davison (eds.). 2001. English as a Second Language in the mainstream: Teaching, learning and identity. Harlow: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Mohan, Bernard. 1986. Language and content. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Suche in Google Scholar

Morton, Tom. 2010. Using a genre-based approach to integrating content and language in CLIL: The example of secondary history. In Christiane Dalton-Puffer, Tarja Nikula & Ute Smit (eds.), Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms, 81–104. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/aals.7.05morSuche in Google Scholar

Nation, I.S. Paul. 2001. Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524759Suche in Google Scholar

Nuyts, Jan & Eric Pedersen (eds.). 1997. Language and conceptualization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

OECD. 2004. Lifelong Learning Policy Brief. http://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/29478789.pdf (accessed 24 July 2013)Suche in Google Scholar

Oevermann, Ulrich. 1972. Sprache und soziale Herkunft. Ein Beitrag zur Analyse schichtenspezifischer Sozialisationsprozesse und ihrer Bedeutung für den Schulerfolg. Frankfurt am Main: SuhrkampSuche in Google Scholar

Pieper, Irene. 2010. Items for a description of linguistic competence in the language of schooling necessary for learning/teaching literature (end of compulsory education) An approach with reference points. Language and school subjects: Linguistic dimensions of knowledge building in school curricula N° 3. Strasbourg: Language Policy Division. Directorate of Education and Languages, DGIV. Council of Europe. http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/LangEduc/BoxD2-OtherSub_en.asp (accessed15 April 2013)Suche in Google Scholar

Portmann-Tselikas, Paul R. & Sabine Schmölzer-Eibinger. 2008. Textkompetenz Fremdsprache Deutsch. Zeitschrift für die Praxis des Deutschunterrichts 39. 5–16.10.37307/j.2194-1823.2008.39.04Suche in Google Scholar

Rehbein, Jochen. 1977. Komplexes Handeln. Elemente zur Handlungstheorie der Sprache. Stuttgart: Metzler.10.1007/978-3-476-03078-8Suche in Google Scholar

Rehbein, Jochen. 1984. Beschreiben, Berichten und Erzählen. In Konrad Ehlich, Erzählen in der Schule, 87–124. Tübingen: Narr.Suche in Google Scholar

Rosch, Eleanor & Carolyn Mervis. 1975. Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology 7. 573–605.10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9Suche in Google Scholar

Schleppegrell, Mary & Catherine L. O’Hallaron. 2011. Teaching academic language in L2 secondary settings. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31. 3–18.10.1017/S0267190511000067Suche in Google Scholar

Schleppegrell, Mary & Luciana C. de Oliveira. 2006. An integrated language and content approach for history teachers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5(4). 254–268.10.1016/j.jeap.2006.08.003Suche in Google Scholar

Schleppegrell, Mary. 2001. Linguistic features of the language of schooling. Linguistics and Education 12(4). 431–459.10.1016/S0898-5898(01)00073-0Suche in Google Scholar

Schleppegrell, Mary. 2004. The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781410610317Suche in Google Scholar

Schmidt, Wilhelm (ed.). 1981. Funktional-kommunikative Sprachbeschreibung. Leipzig: Bibliographisches Institut.Suche in Google Scholar

Schmölzer-Eibinger, Sabine. 2008. Lernen in der Zweitsprache. Grundlagen und Verfahren der Förderung von Textkompetenz in mehrsprachigen Klassen. Tübingen: Narr.Suche in Google Scholar

Schuitemaker-King, Jennifer. 2012. Teachers’ strategies in providing opportunities for second language development. Groningen: University of Groningen PhD dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Searle, John R. 1969. Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Short, Deborah. 1994. Expanding middle school horizons: Integrating language, culture, and social studies. TESOL Quarterly 28(3). 581–608.Suche in Google Scholar

Skinnari, Kristiina. In progress. The professional identities of CLIL teachers in four European contexts. (working title). CONCLIL Project. University of Jyväskylä.Suche in Google Scholar

Smit, Ute. 2010. CLIL in an English as a lingua franca classroom: On explaining terms interactively. In Christiane Dalton-Puffer, Tarja Nikula & Ute Smit (eds.), Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms, 259–277. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/aals.7.13smiSuche in Google Scholar

Suhor, Charles. 1984. Thinking skills in English and across the curriculum. ERIC Digest. ERIC Clearing House on Reading and Communication Skills. Urbana IL, ERIC No.ED 250 693.Suche in Google Scholar

Taylor, John R. 2003. Linguistic categorization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Thürmann, Eike & Johannes Helmut Vollmer. 2013. Schulsprache und sprachsensibler Fachunterricht: Eine Checkliste mit Erläuterungen. In Charlotte Röhner & Britta Hövelbrinks (eds.), Fachbezogene Sprachförderung in Deutsch als Zweitsprache, 212–232. Weinheim: Juventa Beltz.Suche in Google Scholar

Trimble, Louis. 1985. English for science and technology: A discourse approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Uccelli, Paola & Catherine Snow. 2008. A research agenda for educational linguistics. In Bernhard Spolsky & Francis Hult (eds.), Handbook of Educational Linguistics, 626–642. Malden, Mass., & Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470694138.ch44Suche in Google Scholar

Unsworth, Len (ed.). 2000. Researching language in schools and communities. Functional Linguistic perspectives. London: Cassell.Suche in Google Scholar

Veel, Robert & Caroline Coffin. 1996. Learning to think like an historian: The language of secondary school history. In Hasan Ryqaiya & Geoff Williams (eds.). Literacy in society. Applied Linguistics and Language Study, 191–231. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Vollmer, Helmut Johannes. 2011. Schulsprachliche Kompetenzen: zentrale Diskursfunktionen. http://www.home.uni-osnabrueck.de/hvollmer/VollmerDF-Kurzdefinitionen.pdf (accessed 20 February 2013).Suche in Google Scholar

Vollmer, Johannes Helmut 2010. Items for a description of linguistic competence in the language of schooling necessary for learning/teaching sciences (at the end of compulsory education) An approach with reference points. Language and school subjects: Linguistic dimensions of knowledge building in school curricula N° 2. Document prepared for the Policy Forum The right of learners to quality and equity in education – The role of linguistic and intercultural competences Geneva, Switzerland, 2–4 November. Language Policy Division. Directorate of Education and Languages, DGIV. Council of Europe, Strasbourg. http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/LangEduc/BoxD2-OtherSub_en.asp (accessed15 April 2013)Suche in Google Scholar

Vollmer, Johannes Helmut. 2012. Fachliche Diskursfähigkeit bei bilingualen und monolingualen Geographielernern. In Horst Bayerhuber, Ute Harms, Bernhard Muszynski, Bernd Ralle, Martin Rothgangel, Lutz-Helmut Schön, Helmut J. Vollmer & Hans-Georg Weigand (eds.), Formate Fachdidaktischer Forschung, 85–107. Münster: WaxmannSuche in Google Scholar

Wallace, Catherine. 2002. Local literacies and global literacy. In David Block & Deborah Cameron (eds.), Globalization and language teaching, 101–114. New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Walqui, Aida & Leo van Lier. 2010. Scaffolding the academic success of adolescent English language learners. San Francisco: WestEd.Suche in Google Scholar

Wells, Gordon. 1999. Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511605895Suche in Google Scholar

Wells, Gordon. 2009. The meaning makers: Learning to talk and talking to learn, 2nd edn. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847692009Suche in Google Scholar

Widdowson, Henry G. 1983. Learning purpose and language use. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical investigations.Suche in Google Scholar

Zwiers, Jeff. 2008. Building academic language: Essential practices for content classrooms, grades 5–12. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass Teacher.Suche in Google Scholar

Zydatiß, Wolfgang. 2010. Parameter einer bilingualen Diaktik für das integrierte Sach-Sprachlernen im Fachunterricht: die CLIL Perspektive. In Bernt Ahrenholz (ed.), Fachunterricht und Deutsch als Zweitsprache, 133–152. Tuebingen: Narr.Suche in Google Scholar