Startseite Institutional Environment, Executive Equity Incentive, and Enterprise Innovation: The Case of China
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Institutional Environment, Executive Equity Incentive, and Enterprise Innovation: The Case of China

  • Haijie Yu und Hong Li EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 26. Juni 2023
Entrepreneurship Research Journal
Aus der Zeitschrift Entrepreneurship Research Journal Band 14 Heft 4

Abstract

The increase in national-level innovation driven by corporate innovation is an inherent requirement for the current shift from high-speed growth to high-quality development in China’s economy. In this study, we empirically analysed the influence of the institutional environment on corporate innovation and its underlying mechanism based on panel data of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2008 to 2016. The empirical results demonstrated that the institutional environment is conducive to the improvement of corporate innovation, and this result is validated by further robustness tests. The analysis of the companies’ subsamples showed that the stimulation effect of the institutional environment on corporate innovation is more significant in Central and Western China than in Eastern China. The role of the institutional environment is also more evident in non-state-owned small and medium-sized enterprises. Further analysis demonstrated that investment in R&D plays a mediator role in the context where the institutional environment promotes corporate innovation, and the executive equity incentives in this process have a moderating effect.

Keywords: enterprise innovation; executive equity incentive; institutional environment
JEL Classification: F743
Corresponding author: Hong Li, School of Economics, Tianjin University of Finance and Economics, 25 Zhujiang Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300222, China, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: This work was supported by the General Project of National Social Science Foundation of China “Research on the Strategy of Building Global Value Chain of Chinese Manufacturing Industry Based on New Competitive Advantage” (20BGJ025).

References

Arellano, M., and S. Bond. 1991. “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations.” The Review of Economic Studies 58 (2): 277–97. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968.Suche in Google Scholar

Balasubramanian, N., and M. B. Lieberman. 2011. “Learning-By-Doing and Market Structure.” The Journal of Industrial Economics 59 (2): 177–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6451.2011.00450.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Belloc, F. 2012. “Corporate Governance and Innovation: A Survey.” Journal of Economic Surveys 26 (5): 835–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2011.00681.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, J., T. Xiangxi, and J. Sun. 2015. “Managerial Ownership Incentive and Corporate Innovation.” Soft Science 9: 29–33. https://doi.org/10.13956/j.ss.1001-8409.2015.09.07.Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, W. 2015. “An Evaluation on Enterprise Management Innovation Effectiveness Based on the Contribution of Enterprise Performance.” Journal of Technical Economics & Management 3: 37–42. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-292X.2015.03.008.Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, Z., and Q. Chen. 2020. “How Does Option Incentive Affect Enterprise Innovation?—An Analysis Based on the Roles of Senior Managers and Core Employees in Enterprise’s Innovation Activities.” Review of Economy and Management 36 (6): 112–24. https://doi.org/10.13962/j.cnki.37-1486/f.2020.06.010.Suche in Google Scholar

Dai, L., and D. Song. 2018. “The Influence of Mandatory Requirement of Performance Hurdles in Executive Equity Incentive Contracts on Corporate Management Performance.” China Industrial Economics 4: 117–36. https://doi.org/10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2018.04.007.Suche in Google Scholar

Demirgüç-Kunt, A., and V. Maksimovic. 1998. “Law, Finance, and Firm Growth.” The Journal of Finance 53 (6): 2107–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00084.Suche in Google Scholar

Duan, J., and X. Zhuang. 2021. “Financial Investment Behavior and Enterprise Technological Innovation-Motivation Analysis and Empirical Evidence.” China Industrial Economics 4 (01): 155–73. https://doi.org/10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2021.01.009.Suche in Google Scholar

Feng, W. N. 2010. “A Correlation Analysis on High-Tech Enterprise R&D Input and Innovation Output: The Experience Proof Come From High-Tech Enterprises in Shandong Province.” On Economic Problems 9: 74–8, https://doi.org/10.16011/j.cnki.jjwt.2010.09.011.Suche in Google Scholar

Feng, G., and J. Wen. 2018. “An Empirical Study on Relationship Between Corporate Governance and Technical Innovation of Chinese Listed Companies.” China Industrial Economics 7: 91–101. https://doi.org/10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2008.07.009.Suche in Google Scholar

Ghosh, A., D. Moon, and K. Tandon. 2007. “CEO Ownership and Discretionary Investments.” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 34 (5–6): 819–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2007.02011.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Griffith, R., E. Huergo, J. Mairesse, and B. Peters. 2006. “Innovation and Productivity Across Four European Countries.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22 (4): 483–98. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grj028.Suche in Google Scholar

Gu, Y., and K. Shen. 2012. “The Effect of Local Governments’ Behavior on Corporate R&D Investment: Empirical Analysis Based on China’s Provincial Panel Data.” China Industrial Economics 10: 77–88. https://doi.org/10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2012.10.007.Suche in Google Scholar

He, H., Q. Cai, and T. Zhang. 2021. “Import Liberalization and Chinese Firm’s Innovation – Evidence From Patent Quality and Quantity.” China Economic Quarterly 21 (2): 597–616. https://doi.org/10.13821/j.cnki.ceq.2021.02.11.Suche in Google Scholar

Hong, J., B. Feng, Y. Wu, and L. Wang. 2016. “Do Government Grants Promote Innovation Efficiency in China’s High-Tech Industries?” Technovation 57: 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.06.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Hsu, P.-H., X. Tian, and Y. Xu. 2014. “Financial Development and Innovation: Cross-Country Evidence.” Journal of Financial Economics 112: 116–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.12.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Huang, P., and Y. Jiao. 2019. “Employee Ownership, Information Transparency and Enterprise Innovation – a Quasi-Natural Experiment Based Employee Stock Ownership Plans.” Science & Technology Progress and Policy 36 (22): 102–11.Suche in Google Scholar

James, L. R., and J. M. Brett. 1984. “Mediators, Moderators, and Tests for Mediation.” Journal of Applied Psychology 69 (2): 307–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.2.307.Suche in Google Scholar

Jia, N., X. Tian, and W. Zhang. 2016. “The Real Effects of Tournament Incentives: The Case of Firm Innovation.” Kelley School of Business Research Paper 16–21, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2732911.Suche in Google Scholar

Jiang, D., and Y. Zhang. 2008. “Institutional Constraints on FDI Productivity Spillovers: The Case of China.” Economic Research Journal 7: 26–38. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:JJYJ.0.2008-07-004.Suche in Google Scholar

Jiang, H., and J. He. 2021. “Problems and Countermeasures for the Innovation Development of Chinese Corporate Bodies in the 14th Five-Year Plan Period.” Macroeconomics 12: 105–15. https://doi.org/10.16304/j.cnki.11-3952/f.2021.12.008.Suche in Google Scholar

King, R. G., and R. Levine. 1993. “Finance, Entrepreneurship and Growth.” Journal of Monetary Economics 32 (3): 513–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(93)90028-e.Suche in Google Scholar

Li, P., and Y. Shi. 2020. “Import Trade, Productivity and Corporate Innovation.” Journal of International Trade 4 (3): 131–46. https://doi.org/10.13510/j.cnki.jit.2020.03.009.Suche in Google Scholar

Li, W., and M. Zheng. 2016. “Is it Substantive Innovation or Strategic Innovation? Impact of Macroeconomic Policies on Micro-enterprises’ Innovation.” Economic Research Journal 51 (04): 60–73. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:JJYJ.0.2016-04-005.Suche in Google Scholar

Li, B., Y. Yue, and T. Chen. 2016. “Export and Innovation: Empirical Evidence From Patent Data at Firm Level.” The Journal of World Economy 39 (12): 72–94. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:SJJJ.0.2016-12-005.Suche in Google Scholar

Liang, B., and C. Qi. 2019. “Does Executive Incentives or Market Competition Promote R&D Investment.” Taxation and Economy 4 (2): 56–73. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:SWYJ.0.2019-02-009.Suche in Google Scholar

Lin, X., H. Wei, and B. Li. 2017. “Liberalization of Trade and Innovation of Enterprises in China – Evidence of China’s Manufacturing Enterprises.” Journal of International Trade 4 (2): 97–106. https://doi.org/10.13510/j.cnki.jit.2017.02.009.Suche in Google Scholar

Liu, C., and L. Tian. 2021. “Can Talent Policy Endorsement Promote Firm Innovation.” China Industrial Economics 4 (3): 156–75. https://doi.org/10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2021.03.009.Suche in Google Scholar

Liu, S., Z. Lin, and Z. Leng. 2020. “Tax Incentives Stimulate Corporate Innovation: Empirical Evidence Based on Corporate Life Cycle Theory.” Economic Research Journal 4 (6): 94–107.Suche in Google Scholar

Lu, X., and D. Zhu. 2019. “Measure and Calculate of Chinese Institutional Transaction and its Comparison of Regional Differences.” Jianghan Tribune 10: 32–5. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-854X.2019.10.005.Suche in Google Scholar

Lu, C., H. Zeng, M. Yan, and J. Xu. 2009. “The Design for Listed Companies’ System of Stimulation by Stock Option and Purchase: Is it an Incentive or Welfare.” Management World 9: 33–44.Suche in Google Scholar

Luo, Y., Q. Xue, and B. Han. 2010. “How Emerging Market Governments Promote Outward FDI: Experience From China.” Journal of World Business 45 (1): 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2009.04.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Ma, W., Yu. Hou, and G. Zhu. 2013. “The Impact of R&D Investment and Personnel Incentive on Innovative Performance: A Comparative Study on Emerging Industries and Traditional Industries.” Science of Science and Management of S. & T. 34 (03): 58–68. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:KXXG.0.2013-03-008.Suche in Google Scholar

Ma, Y., C. Jianfeng, and M. Wang. 2018. “The Impact of Venture Capital’s Background, Shareholding Ratio on Start-Ups’ Innovation Output—Based on the Intermediary Effect of R&D.” Science & Technology Progress and Policy 35 (15): 1–8.Suche in Google Scholar

Ma, L., J. Liao, and R. Chen. 2020. “Research on the Impact of Technical Directors and Equity Incentives on Enterprise Innovation Efficiency.” Science & Technology Progress and Policy 37 (21): 82–90. https://doi.org/10.6049/kjjbydc.Q201908502.Suche in Google Scholar

Manso, G. 2011. “Motivating Innovation.” The Journal of Finance 66 (5): 1823–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01688.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Prud’homme, D., and M. Von Zedtwitz. 2018. “The changing face of innovation in China.” MIT Sloan Management Review. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/the-changing-face-of-innovation-in-china/.Suche in Google Scholar

Pu, Y., and R. Gu. 2019. “How Do Labor Wage Distortions Affect Enterprise Innovation.” China Industrial Economics 7: 137–54. https://doi.org/10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2019.07.008.Suche in Google Scholar

Qiu, L., M. Kang, and C. Zhang. 2017. “Foreign Investment Entry, Technology Distance to Frontier and R&D Innovation.” Journal of International Trade 4 (9): 142–148+152–153, https://doi.org/10.13510/j.cnki.jit.2017.09.013.Suche in Google Scholar

Quan, X., J. Liu, and Y. Sun. 2020. “Has the Setting of Postdoctoral Workstation in Enterprise Promoted Technological Innovation-Based on the Empirical Evidences of Chinese Listed Companies.” China Industrial Economics 4 (9): 175–92. https://doi.org/10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2020.09.009.Suche in Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Pose, A., and M. Zhang. 2020. “The Cost of Weak Institutions for Innovation in China.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 153: 119937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119937.Suche in Google Scholar

Shen, G., and Z. Yuan. 2020. “The Effect of Enterprise Internetization on the Innovation and Export of Chinese Enterprises.” Economic Research Journal 55 (1): 33–48.Suche in Google Scholar

Sheng, D., and Y. Wang. 2010. “Can Contract Enforcement Influence the Distribution of Foreign Direct Investment?” China Economic Quarterly 9 (4): 1239–60. https://doi.org/10.13821/j.cnki.ceq.2010.04.009.Suche in Google Scholar

Sun, H., and W. Yang. 2019. “Executive Incentives, Innovation Input and Innovation Performance Based on Executive “Double Dollar” Capital Regulating Effect.” Science and Technology Management Research 39 (10): 9–16. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:KJGL.0.2019-10-002.Suche in Google Scholar

Tong, T. W., W. He, Z. He, and J. Lu. 2014. “Patent Regime Shift and Firm Innovation: Evidence From the Second Amendment to China’s Patent Law.” In Academy of Management Proceedings. Briarcliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management.10.5465/ambpp.2014.14174abstractSuche in Google Scholar

Wang, J., and J. Deng. 2021. “Research on the Effect of Executive Incentive Institutional Innovation on the Cost of Equity—Evidence From Chinese Listed Companies.” Frontiers in Psychology 12: 686955. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686955.Suche in Google Scholar

Wang, Y., and X. Feng. 2018. “The Reform of Administration Approval System and Firms’ Innovation.” China Industrial Economics 2: 24–42. https://doi.org/10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.20180206.007.Suche in Google Scholar

Wang, X., G. Fan, and L. Hu. 2019. Marketization Index Report by Province of China (2018), 11, 39–55. Guangzhou: Social Science Literature Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Wang, J., Li. Tian, Z. Huo, and Y. Mao. 2020. ““R&D Investment – Innovation Output” Transformation Difference: From the Perspective of Core Employees Equity Incentives.” Industrial Economic Review 11 (6): 39–55. https://doi.org/10.14007/j.cnki.cjpl.2020.06.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Wen, Z., L. Zhang, and J. Hou. 2006. “Mediated Moderator and Moderated Mediator.” Acta Psychologica Sinica 38 (3): 448. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:XLXB.0.2006-03-018.Suche in Google Scholar

Wu, J., and R. Tu. 2007. “CEO Stock Option Pay and R&D Spending: A Behavioral Agency Explanation.” Journal of Business Research 60 (5): 482–92, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.006.Suche in Google Scholar

Xie, Y., S. Gao, X. Jiang, and C. F. Fey. 2015. “Social Ties and Indigenous Innovation in China’s Transition Economy: The Moderating Effects of Learning Intent.” Industry and Innovation 22 (2): 79–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2015.1033198.Suche in Google Scholar

Yang, Y., and Xi. Hu. 2021. “Tax Incentives and Corporate innovation Performance: Based on the Mediation Effect of R&D Investment and Non-R&D Innovation Investment.” Industrial Economic Review 12 (1): 85–103. https://doi.org/10.14007/j.cnki.cjpl.2021.01.006.Suche in Google Scholar

Yang, F., and M. Wang. 2020. “Financing Structure, Institutional Environment and Innovation Capacity: Mathematical Analysis and Empirical Test From Microscopic Perspective.” Research on Economics and Management 41 (10): 59–85. https://doi.org/10.13502/j.cnki.issn1000-7636.2020.10.005.Suche in Google Scholar

Yang, Z., and H. Zhao. 2020. “Chinese Enterprise’s Open Innovation: Institutional Environment, Co-Opetition Relationship and Innovation Performance.” Management World 36 (02): 139–60. https://doi.org/10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2020.0027.Suche in Google Scholar

Yu, J., and W. Cai. 2021. “The Impact of Executive Incentive on Corporate Innovation: A Mediating Effect Study Based on Analyst Attention.” Technology Economics 40 (1): 20–9. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-980X.2021.01.004.Suche in Google Scholar

Yu, Y., Q. Zhao, and X. Ju. 2018. “Inventor Executives and Innovation.” China Industrial Economics 4 (3): 136–54. https://doi.org/10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2018.03.008.Suche in Google Scholar

Zahra, S. A., D. O. Neubaum, and F. M. Huse. 2000. “Entrepreneurship in Medium-Size Companies: Exploring the Effects of Ownership and Governance Systems.” Journal of Management 26 (5): 947–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0149-2063(00)00064-7.Suche in Google Scholar

Zeng, G., and Y. Ma. 2020. “A Heterogeneity-Based Study of FDI’s Impact on Innovation of Chinese Local Enterprises.” Journal of International Trade 4 (3): 162–74. https://doi.org/10.13510/j.cnki.jit.2020.03.011.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhang, W., and X. Jin. 2020. “Are Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions Conducive to Corporate Innovation.” Journal of International Trade 4 (10): 128–43. https://doi.org/10.13510/j.cnki.jit.2020.10.009.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhang, B., and C. Li. 2018. “Research on the Strategy of Promoting China’s Science and Technology Innovation Ability Under the Background of “New Economy”.” Economic Review Journal 2: 78–82. https://doi.org/10.16528/j.cnki.22-1054/f.201802078.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhang, H., X. Tian, and Z. Wang. 2010. “An Empirical Study of the Effect of Corporate Governance on Innovative Efficiency of Chinese Enterprises.” R&D Management 22 (3): 44–50. https://doi.org/10.13581/j.cnki.rdm.2010.03.008.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhang, X., B. Liu, T. Wang, and C. Li. 2017. “Credit Rent-Seeking, Financing Constraint and Corporate Innovation.” Economic Research Journal 52 (5): 161–74. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:JJYJ.0.2017-05-020.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhang, J., Z. Chen, S. Wu, W. Sun, and Z. Tong. 2020. “Foreign Technology Introduction and Local Firms’ Innovation in China.” Economic Research Journal 55 (7): 92–105. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:JJYJ.0.2020-07-008.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhao, C., and X. Li. 2017. “OFDI and Enterprises’ Technological Innovation—An Empirical Analysis Based on Listed Companies in China.” Journal of International Trade 6: 107–19. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:GJMW.0.2017-06-010.Suche in Google Scholar

Zheng, Y., and Y. Zhu. 2013. “Bank Lending Incentives and Firm Investment Decisions in China.” Journal of Multinational Financial Management 23 (3): 146–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2013.03.004.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhou, X., L. Cheng, and H. Wang. 2012. “Is Higher the Level of Technological Innovation, Better the Financial Performance? An Empirical Analysis of Patent Applications of the Listed Chinese Pharmaceutical Company.” Journal of Financial Research 4 (8): 166–79. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:JRYJ.0.2012-08-016.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhu, D. 2019. “The Impact of Equity Incentives on Enterprise Innovation Under Uncertain Environment.” Business and Management Journal 2: 55–72. https://doi.org/10.19616/j.cnki.bmj.2019.02.004.Suche in Google Scholar

Zou, H. L., S. X. Zeng, L. Han, and X. M. Xie. 2015. “Top Executives’ Compensation, Industrial Competition, and Corporate Environmental Performance: Evidence From China.” Management Decision. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2014-0515.Suche in Google Scholar
Received: 2022-09-26
Accepted: 2023-05-11
Published Online: 2023-06-26

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Competitive Research Articles
  3. Impact of Entrepreneurial Orientation on MSME Performance: Mediating Role of Entrepreneurial Competency
  4. The Development of Corporate Entrepreneurship among Emerging Economy SMEs: Insights from Both Institutional and Contingency Theory
  5. The Dynamic Capabilities of High-Turbulent Markets: Indonesian Start-Up Cases During COVID-19 Pandemic
  6. Entrepreneurship, Resource Rents and Institutions
  7. The Scaling Strategies and the Scaling Performance of Chinese Social Enterprises: The Moderating Role of Organizational Resources
  8. Research on Corporate Entrepreneurship in Developing Countries: A Review and Agenda for Future Directions
  9. The Impact of Initial Intellectual Property Decisions of Start-Ups on Innovation Performance
  10. Social Capital and Innovative Performance in Networks: The Journey of Romanian SaaS Entrepreneurs
  11. Gender Differences in the use of Social Capital for Entrepreneurial Activity Within Contexts of Poverty
  12. Commitment Helps: The Positive Effects of Long-Term Orientation and Family Ownership on Firms’ International Expansion
  13. Institutional Environment, Executive Equity Incentive, and Enterprise Innovation: The Case of China
  14. Determinants of Entrepreneurial Employee Activity in Saudi Arabia
  15. How Does Entrepreneurial Role Model Connect to Entrepreneurial Perceptions: The Moderating Role of Psychological Distance
  16. The Influence of Top Management’s Strategic Planning Capacity and Entrepreneurial Orientation on Corporate Entrepreneurship
  17. Innovation Ambidexterity and Firm Performance: The Moderating Effects of Contextual Factors
https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2022-0383
Schlagwörter für diesen Artikel
enterprise innovation; executive equity incentive; institutional environment

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Competitive Research Articles
  3. Impact of Entrepreneurial Orientation on MSME Performance: Mediating Role of Entrepreneurial Competency
  4. The Development of Corporate Entrepreneurship among Emerging Economy SMEs: Insights from Both Institutional and Contingency Theory
  5. The Dynamic Capabilities of High-Turbulent Markets: Indonesian Start-Up Cases During COVID-19 Pandemic
  6. Entrepreneurship, Resource Rents and Institutions
  7. The Scaling Strategies and the Scaling Performance of Chinese Social Enterprises: The Moderating Role of Organizational Resources
  8. Research on Corporate Entrepreneurship in Developing Countries: A Review and Agenda for Future Directions
  9. The Impact of Initial Intellectual Property Decisions of Start-Ups on Innovation Performance
  10. Social Capital and Innovative Performance in Networks: The Journey of Romanian SaaS Entrepreneurs
  11. Gender Differences in the use of Social Capital for Entrepreneurial Activity Within Contexts of Poverty
  12. Commitment Helps: The Positive Effects of Long-Term Orientation and Family Ownership on Firms’ International Expansion
  13. Institutional Environment, Executive Equity Incentive, and Enterprise Innovation: The Case of China
  14. Determinants of Entrepreneurial Employee Activity in Saudi Arabia
  15. How Does Entrepreneurial Role Model Connect to Entrepreneurial Perceptions: The Moderating Role of Psychological Distance
  16. The Influence of Top Management’s Strategic Planning Capacity and Entrepreneurial Orientation on Corporate Entrepreneurship
  17. Innovation Ambidexterity and Firm Performance: The Moderating Effects of Contextual Factors
Jetzt anmelden und 20% sparen
Institutioneller Zugang
Wie funktioniert Authentifizierung?
Haben Sie eine Idee, wie wir unsere Website verbessern können?
Bitte schreiben Sie uns.
© 2025 De Gruyter Brill
Heruntergeladen am 18.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/erj-2022-0383/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen