Abstract
It is a significant challenge for social enterprises (SEs) to scale up their social impact, especially for those in transforming societies such as China, where the ecosystem of SEs remains at a nascent stage of development. Although previous studies have devoted attention to scaling strategies and scaling performance, none of them has examined the relationship between scaling strategies and scaling performance through empirical quantitative analysis. To address this gap, this study utilizes a hypothesis-testing quantitative method, for the first time, to investigate the divergent impact of different scaling strategies on scaling performance and the moderating role of organizational resources. Our results demonstrate that three types of scaling strategies are positively associated with scaling performance, and the magnitude of the linkages descends from knowledge dissemination through organizational growth to contractual partnerships. Additionally, our results reveal that the adequacy of financial and human resources perform as positive moderators, significantly magnifying the contribution of the scaling strategy of organizational growth to scaling performance. The findings provide important implications for SE managers and practitioners, helping them make informed decisions regarding how to choose and implement suitable scaling strategies in Chinese or other similar contexts, while considering the SEs’ organizational resources.
References
Aiken, L. S., and S. G. West. 1991. Multiple Regressions: Testing and Interpreting Interaction Effects. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Alarifi, G., P. Robson, and E. Kromidha. 2019. “The Manifestation of Entrepreneurial Orientation in the Social Entrepreneurship Context.” Journal of Social Entrepreneurship 10 (3): 307–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2018.1541015.Search in Google Scholar
André, K., and A. Pache. 2016. “From Caring Entrepreneur to Caring Enterprise: Addressing the Ethical Challenges of Scaling up Social Enterprises.” Journal of Business Ethics 133 (4): 659–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2445-8.Search in Google Scholar
Armstrong, J. S., and T. S. Overton. 1977. “Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys.” Journal of Marketing Research 14 (3): 396–402. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150783.Search in Google Scholar
Bacq, S., and K. A. Eddleston. 2018. “A Resource-Based View of Social Entrepreneurship: How Stewardship Culture Benefits Scale of Social Impact.” Journal of Business Ethics 152 (3): 589–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3317-1.Search in Google Scholar
Bauwens, T., B. Huybrechts, and F. Dufays. 2020. “Understanding the Diverse Scaling Strategies of Social Enterprises as Hybrid Organizations: The Case of Renewable Energy Cooperatives.” Organization & Environment 33 (2): 195–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026619837126.Search in Google Scholar
Beijing Incubating Centre for Social Enterprises and Social Organizations (BICSESO), and the Narada Foundation. 2019. China Social Enterprise and Social Investment Sector Research Report. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press (in Chinese).Search in Google Scholar
Bhatt, B., I. Qureshi, and S. Riaz. 2019. “Social Entrepreneurship in Non-munificent Institutional Environments and Implications for Institutional Work: Insights from China.” Journal of Business Ethics 154 (3): 605–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3451-4.Search in Google Scholar
Bloom, P. N., and A. Chatterji. 2009. “Scaling Social Entrepreneurial Impact.” California Management Review 51 (3): 114–33. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166496.Search in Google Scholar
Bloom, P. N., and B. R. Smith. 2010. “Identifying the Drivers of Social Entrepreneurial Impact: Theoretical Development and an Exploratory Empirical Test of SCALERS.” Journal of Social Entrepreneurship 1 (1): 126–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420670903458042.Search in Google Scholar
Bocken, N., A. Fil, and J. Prabhu. 2016. “Scaling up Social Businesses in Developing Markets.” Journal of Cleaner Production 139: 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.045.Search in Google Scholar
Bouchard, M. J., and D. Rousselière. 2016. “Do Hybrid Organizational Forms of the Social Economy Have a Greater Chance of Surviving? An Examination of the Case of Montreal.” Voluntas 27 (4): 1894–922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9664-1.Search in Google Scholar
Bretos, I., M. Díaz-Foncea, and C. Marcuello. 2020. “International Expansion of Social Enterprises as a Catalyst for Scaling up Social Impact across Borders.” Sustainability 12 (8): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083262.Search in Google Scholar
Cannatelli, B. 2017. “Exploring the Contingencies of Scaling Social Impact: A Replication and Extension of the SCALERS Model.” Voluntas 28 (6): 2707–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9789-x.Search in Google Scholar
Chandra, Y., S. Teasdale, and F. Tjiptono. 2021. “Social Entrepreneurship Research in the Greater China Region: A Scoping Review and New Research Framework.” Journal of Asian Public Policy 14 (2): 152–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2020.1802907.Search in Google Scholar
Cheah, J., A. Amran, and S. Yahya. 2019. “Internal Oriented Resources and Social Enterprises’ Performance: How Can Social Enterprises Help Themselves Before Helping Other?” Journal of Cleaner Production 211: 607–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.203.Search in Google Scholar
Cho, S., and A. Kim. 2017. “Relationships Between Entrepreneurship, Community Networking, and Economic and Social Performance in Social Enterprises: Evidence from South Korea.” Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance 41 (4): 376–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2017.1279094.Search in Google Scholar
Choi, Y. 2015. “How Partnerships Affect the Social Performance of Korean Social Enterprises.” Journal of Social Entrepreneurship 6 (3): 257–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2014.965723.Search in Google Scholar
Corner, P. D., and K. Kearins. 2021. “Scaling-up Social Enterprises: The Effects of Geographic Context.” Journal of Management and Organization 27 (1): 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2018.38.Search in Google Scholar
Crucke, S., and A. Decramer. 2016. “The Development of a Measurement Instrument for the Organizational Performance of Social Enterprises.” Sustainability 8 (2): 161–30. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8020161.Search in Google Scholar
Ćwiklicki, M. 2019. “Requirements of Scaling International Social Enterprises.” Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review 7 (1): 45–60. https://doi.org/10.15678/eber.2019.070103.Search in Google Scholar
Dahles, H., M. Verver, S. Khieng, I. Manders, and N. Schellens. 2020. “Scaling up Social Enterprise: Predicament or Prospect in a Comparative Perspective.” Journal of Social Entrepreneurship 11 (3): 317–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2019.1641136.Search in Google Scholar
Davies, I. A., H. Haugh, and L. Chambers. 2019. “Barriers to Social Enterprise Growth.” Journal of Small Business Management 57 (4): 1616–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12429.Search in Google Scholar
Dees, J. G., B. B. Anderson, and J. Wei-Skillern. 2004. “Scaling Social Impact.” Stanford Social Innovation Review 1 (4): 24–32.Search in Google Scholar
Dees, J. G. 2008. Scaling Social Impact Research Project: Annotated Bibliography. www.caseatduke.org/documents/annotatedbibliography_scalingsocialimpact.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Defourny, J., and S. Y. Kim. 2011. “Emerging Models of Social Enterprise in Eastern Asia: A Cross-Country Analysis.” Social Enterprise Journal 7 (1): 86–111. https://doi.org/10.1108/17508611111130176.Search in Google Scholar
Defourny, J., and M. Nyssens. 2017. “Fundamentals for an International Typology of Social Enterprise Models.” Voluntas 28: 2469–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9884-7.Search in Google Scholar
Desa, G., and J. L. Koch. 2014. “Scaling Social Impact: Building Sustainable Social Ventures at the Base-of-the-Pyramid.” Journal of Social Entrepreneurship 5 (2): 146–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2013.871325.Search in Google Scholar
Desa, G., and S. Basu. 2013. “Optimization or Bricolage? Overcoming Resource Constraints in Global Social Entrepreneurship.” Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 7 (1): 26–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1150.Search in Google Scholar
Ecer, S., M. Magro, and S. Sarpça. 2017. “The Relationship Between Nonprofits’ Revenue Composition and Their Economic-Financial Efficiency.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 46 (1): 141–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764016649693.Search in Google Scholar
Gauthier, J., S. G. Ruane, and G. R. Berry. 2019. “Evaluating and Extending SCALERS: Implications for Social Entrepreneurs.” Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship 31 (4): 349–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2018.1498260.Search in Google Scholar
Gramescu, L. 2016. “Scaling Social Innovation in Europe: An Overview of Social Enterprise Readiness.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 221: 218–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.109.Search in Google Scholar
Han, J., and S. Shah. 2020. “The Ecosystem of Scaling Social Impact: A New Theoretical Framework and Two Case Studies.” Journal of Social Entrepreneurship 11 (2): 215–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2019.1624273.Search in Google Scholar
Hua, R. 2021. “Referee, Sponsor or Coach: How Does the Government Harness the Development of Social Enterprises? A Case Study of Chengdu, China.” Voluntas 32: 1054–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-021-00379-x.Search in Google Scholar
Jenner, P. 2016. “Social Enterprise Sustainability Revisited: An International Perspective.” Social Enterprise Journal 12 (1): 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1108/sej-12-2014-0042.Search in Google Scholar
Kerlin, J. A. 2006. “Social Enterprise in the United States and Europe: Understanding and Learning from the Differences.” Voluntas 17: 247–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-006-9016-2.Search in Google Scholar
Kim, T. H., and M. J. Moon. 2017. “Using Social Enterprises for Social Policy in South Korea: Do Funding and Management Affect Social and Economic Performance?” Public Administration and Development 37: 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1783.Search in Google Scholar
Knife, K., A. Haughton, and E. Dixon. 2014. “Measuring Sustainability and Effectiveness of Social Value Creation by Social Sector Actors/Social Enterprises within Developing Countries.” Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal 20 (1): 1–22.Search in Google Scholar
Krishnan, R., X. Martin, and N. Noorderhaven. 2006. “When Does Trust Matter to Alliance Performance?” Academy of Management Journal 49 (5): 894–917. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22798171.Search in Google Scholar
Lan, H., Y. Zhu, D. Ness, K. Xing, and K. Schneider. 2014. “The Role and Characteristics of Social Entrepreneurs in Contemporary Rural Cooperative Development in China: Case Studies of Rural Social Entrepreneurship.” Asia Pacific Business Review 20 (3): 379–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2014.929300.Search in Google Scholar
Lee, K. M. E., and Y. Chandra. 2020. “Dynamic and Marketing Capabilities as Predictors of Social Enterprises’ Performance.” Voluntas 31 (3): 587–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00155-y.Search in Google Scholar
Li, W., S. A. Qalati, M. A. S. Khan, G. Y. Kwabena, D. Erusalkina, and F. Anwar. 2020. “Value Co-creation and Growth of Social Enterprises in Developing Countries: Moderating Role of Environmental Dynamics.” Entrepreneurship Research Journal 12 (4): 501–28. https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2019-0359.Search in Google Scholar
Liu, Z., G. Yue, and Z. Li. 2016. “Double Driving Factors and the Growth Performance of Social Enterprises’ Performance: The Intermediary Role of Market Legalization.” Science of Science and Management 37 (9): 114–28 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2015.08.008.Search in Google Scholar
López-Arceiz, F. J., A. J. Bellostas-Pérezgrueso, and M. P. Rivera-Torres. 2016. “The Effects of Resources on Social Activity and Economic Performance in Social Economy Organizations.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership 26 (4): 499–511. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21204.Search in Google Scholar
Lyon, F., and H. Fernandez. 2012. “Strategies for Scaling up Social Enterprise: Lessons from Early Years Providers.” Social Enterprise Journal 8 (1): 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1108/17508611211226593.Search in Google Scholar
Mamabolo, A., and K. Myres. 2020. “Performance Measurement in Emerging Market Social Enterprises Using a Balanced Scorecard.” Journal of Social Entrepreneurship 11 (1): 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2018.1561499.Search in Google Scholar
Moore, M. L., D. Riddell, and D. Vocisano. 2015. “Scaling Out, Scaling up, Scaling Deep: Strategies of Non-Profits in Advancing Systemic Social Innovation.” The Journal of Corporate Citizenship 58: 67–84. https://doi.org/10.9774/gleaf.4700.2015.ju.00009.Search in Google Scholar
Mulgan, G., R. Ali, R. Halkett, and B. Sanders. 2007. In and Out of Sync: The Challenge of Growing Social Innovations. https://youngfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/In-and-out-of-sync-thechallenge-of-growing-social-innovations-Sept-2007.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., S. B. MacKenzie, J. Y. Lee, and N. P. Podsakoff. 2003. “Common Method Biases in Behavior Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies.” Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (5): 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.Search in Google Scholar
Ruvio, A. A., and A. Shoham. 2011. “A Multilevel Study of Nascent Social Ventures.” International Small Business Journal 29 (5): 562–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242610369741.Search in Google Scholar
Scheuerle, T., and B. Schmitz. 2016. “Inhibiting Factors of Scaling up the Impact of Social Entrepreneurial Organizations – A Comprehensive Framework and Empirical Results for Germany.” Journal of Social Entrepreneurship 7 (2): 127–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2015.1086409.Search in Google Scholar
Shin, C., and J. Park. 2019. “Classifying Social Enterprises with Organizational Culture, Network, and Socioeconomic Performance: Latent Profile Analysis Approach.” Journal of Open Innovation 5: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc5010017.Search in Google Scholar
Urban, B. 2015. “Evaluation of Social Enterprise Outcomes and Self-Efficacy.” International Journal of Social Economics 42 (2): 163–78. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijse-03-2013-0071.Search in Google Scholar
Vickers, I., and F. Lyon. 2014. “Beyond Green Niches? Growth Strategies of Environmentally-Motivated Social Enterprises.” International Small Business Journal 32 (4): 449–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242612457700.Search in Google Scholar
Warnecke, T. 2018. “Social Entrepreneurship in China: Driving Institutional Change.” Journal of Economic Issues 52 (2): 368–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2018.1469866.Search in Google Scholar
Weber, C., A. Kröger, and K. Lambrich. 2012. “Scaling Social Enterprises – A Theoretically Grounded Framework.” Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research 32 (19): 1–15.10.5465/AMBPP.2012.15804abstractSearch in Google Scholar
Weber, C., A. Kröger, and K. Lambrich. 2014. “A Theoretical Model for Understanding the Scalability of Social Impact.” In Theory and Empirical Research in Social Entrepreneurship, 112–53. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.10.4337/9781782546832.00010Search in Google Scholar
Weber, C., A. Kröger, and C. Demirtas. 2015. Scaling Social Impact in Europe: Quantitative Analysis of National and Transnational Scaling Strategies of 358 Social Enterprises. https://core.ac.uk/reader/76826574.Search in Google Scholar
Westley, F., N. Antadze, D. Riddell, K. Robinson, and S. Geobey. 2014. “Five Configurations for Scaling up Social Innovation: Case Examples of Nonprofit Organizations from Canada.” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 50 (3): 234–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886314532945.Search in Google Scholar
Yin, J., and H. Chen. 2019. “Dual-goal Management in Social Enterprises: Evidence from China.” Management Decision 57 (6): 1362–81. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-02-2017-0170.Search in Google Scholar
Yiu, D. W., W. P. Wan, F. W. Ng, X. Chen, and J. Su. 2014. “Sentimental Drivers of Social Entrepreneurship: A Study of China’s Guangcai (Glorious) Program.” Management and Organization Review 10: 55–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/more.12043.Search in Google Scholar
Young, D. R., and J. D. Lecy. 2014. “Defining the Universe of Social Enterprise: Competing Metaphors.” Voluntas 25 (5): 1307–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-013-9396-z.Search in Google Scholar
Yu, X. M. 2011. “Social Enterprise in China: Driving Forces, Development Patterns and Legal Framework.” Social Enterprise Journal 7 (1): 9–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/17508611111130130.Search in Google Scholar
Yu, X. M. 2016. “Social Entrepreneurship in China’s Nonprofit Sector: The Case of Innovative Participation of Civil Society in Post-Disaster Reconstruction.” China Perspectives 3: 53–61. https://doi.org/10.4000/chinaperspectives.7051.Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, X., and K. Zhang. 2018. “The Impact of Entrepreneurial Orientation on New Social Enterprises Performance: The Mediating Role of Resource Bricolage and Moderating Role of Regulation.” Science & Technology Progress and Policy 35 (9): 91–9 (in Chinese).Search in Google Scholar
Zhao, M., and J. Han. 2020. “Tensions and Risks of Social Enterprises’ Scaling Strategies: The Case of Microfinance Institutions in China.” Journal of Social Entrepreneurship 11 (2): 134–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2019.1604404.Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Competitive Research Articles
- Impact of Entrepreneurial Orientation on MSME Performance: Mediating Role of Entrepreneurial Competency
- The Development of Corporate Entrepreneurship among Emerging Economy SMEs: Insights from Both Institutional and Contingency Theory
- The Dynamic Capabilities of High-Turbulent Markets: Indonesian Start-Up Cases During COVID-19 Pandemic
- Entrepreneurship, Resource Rents and Institutions
- The Scaling Strategies and the Scaling Performance of Chinese Social Enterprises: The Moderating Role of Organizational Resources
- Research on Corporate Entrepreneurship in Developing Countries: A Review and Agenda for Future Directions
- The Impact of Initial Intellectual Property Decisions of Start-Ups on Innovation Performance
- Social Capital and Innovative Performance in Networks: The Journey of Romanian SaaS Entrepreneurs
- Gender Differences in the use of Social Capital for Entrepreneurial Activity Within Contexts of Poverty
- Commitment Helps: The Positive Effects of Long-Term Orientation and Family Ownership on Firms’ International Expansion
- Institutional Environment, Executive Equity Incentive, and Enterprise Innovation: The Case of China
- Determinants of Entrepreneurial Employee Activity in Saudi Arabia
- How Does Entrepreneurial Role Model Connect to Entrepreneurial Perceptions: The Moderating Role of Psychological Distance
- The Influence of Top Management’s Strategic Planning Capacity and Entrepreneurial Orientation on Corporate Entrepreneurship
- Innovation Ambidexterity and Firm Performance: The Moderating Effects of Contextual Factors
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Competitive Research Articles
- Impact of Entrepreneurial Orientation on MSME Performance: Mediating Role of Entrepreneurial Competency
- The Development of Corporate Entrepreneurship among Emerging Economy SMEs: Insights from Both Institutional and Contingency Theory
- The Dynamic Capabilities of High-Turbulent Markets: Indonesian Start-Up Cases During COVID-19 Pandemic
- Entrepreneurship, Resource Rents and Institutions
- The Scaling Strategies and the Scaling Performance of Chinese Social Enterprises: The Moderating Role of Organizational Resources
- Research on Corporate Entrepreneurship in Developing Countries: A Review and Agenda for Future Directions
- The Impact of Initial Intellectual Property Decisions of Start-Ups on Innovation Performance
- Social Capital and Innovative Performance in Networks: The Journey of Romanian SaaS Entrepreneurs
- Gender Differences in the use of Social Capital for Entrepreneurial Activity Within Contexts of Poverty
- Commitment Helps: The Positive Effects of Long-Term Orientation and Family Ownership on Firms’ International Expansion
- Institutional Environment, Executive Equity Incentive, and Enterprise Innovation: The Case of China
- Determinants of Entrepreneurial Employee Activity in Saudi Arabia
- How Does Entrepreneurial Role Model Connect to Entrepreneurial Perceptions: The Moderating Role of Psychological Distance
- The Influence of Top Management’s Strategic Planning Capacity and Entrepreneurial Orientation on Corporate Entrepreneurship
- Innovation Ambidexterity and Firm Performance: The Moderating Effects of Contextual Factors