Startseite Examining the Creative Self-Efficacy, Goal Interdependence, and Satisfaction of New Venture Teams in the Board Game Industry
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Examining the Creative Self-Efficacy, Goal Interdependence, and Satisfaction of New Venture Teams in the Board Game Industry

  • R. Gabrielle Swab ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Aviel Cogan ORCID logo , Tobias Pret ORCID logo und David R. Marshall ORCID logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 11. Oktober 2021
Entrepreneurship Research Journal
Aus der Zeitschrift Entrepreneurship Research Journal Band 14 Heft 1

Abstract

This study theoretically and empirically examines the important role that goal structures play in new venture teams. Specifically, we examine how creative self-efficacy affects the satisfaction of team members through cooperative and competitive goal interdependence. Relying on social cognitive and social interdependence theories, we contend that new venture teams’ creative self-efficacy leads to higher team satisfaction because it promotes the perception of cooperative goal structures among team members. We test our theory on new venture teams in the independent board game industry. Results generally support our hypotheses and we discuss the implications for entrepreneurship research and practice.

Keywords: new venture teams; creative self-efficacy; goal interdependence; team satisfaction; entrepreneurship
Corresponding author: R. Gabrielle Swab, Towson University, Towson, USA, E-mail:

Appendix A: Scale items testing focal variables

Creative Self-Efficacy

  1. I have confidence in my ability to solve problems creatively. (Creative item)

  2. I feel that I am good at generating novel ideas. (Creative item)

  3. I feel as though my ideas are unique and innovative. (Innovation item)

Goal Interdependence

Cooperation

  1. Our team members “swim or sink” together.

  2. Our team members want each other to succeed.

  3. Our team members seek compatible goals.

  4. The goals of team members go together.

  5. When our team members work together, we usually have common goals.

Competition

  • 6. Team members structure things in ways that favor their own goals rather than the goals of other team members.

  • 7. Team members have a “win-lose” relationship.

  • 8. Team members like to show that they are superior to each other.

  • 9. Team members’ goals are incompatible with each other.

  • 10. Team members give high priority to the things they want to accomplish and low priority to the things other team members want to accomplish.

Team Satisfaction

  1. I am very satisfied working with this team.

  2. I am very happy working with this group.

  3. I enjoy working on this project with my team member(s).

References

Aldrich, H. E., and P. H. Kim. 2007. “Small Worlds, Infinite Possibilities? How Social Networks Affect Entrepreneurial Team Formation and Search.” Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 1 (1–2): 147–65, https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.8.Suche in Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M. 1983. “The Social Psychology of Creativity: A Componential Conceptualization.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45 (2): 357–76, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357.Suche in Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M. 1988. “A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations.” In Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 10, edited by B. M. Straw, and L. L. Cummings, 123–67. Greenwich: JAI Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Baer, M. 2010. “The Strength-Of-Weak Ties Perspective on Creativity: A Comprehensive Examination and Extension.” Journal of Applied Psychology 95 (3): 592–601, https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018761.Suche in Google Scholar

Bandura, A. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Suche in Google Scholar

Bandura, A. 1997. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W. H. Freeman.Suche in Google Scholar

Bandura, A. 2001. “Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective.” Annual Review of Psychology 52 (1): 1–26, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1.Suche in Google Scholar

Baum, J. R., and E. A. Locke. 2004. “The Relationship of Entrepreneurial Traits, Skill, and Motivation to Subsequent Venture Growth.” Journal of Applied Psychology 89 (4): 587–98, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.587.Suche in Google Scholar

Baum, J. R., E. A. Locke, and S. A. Kirkpatrick. 1998. “A Longitudinal Study of the Relation of Vision and Vision Communication to Venture Growth in Entrepreneurial Firms.” Journal of Applied Psychology 83 (1): 43–54, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.1.43.Suche in Google Scholar

Bedford, E. 2020. Cards and Board Games Market Value Worldwide from 2018 to 2025. Also available at https://statista.com/statistics/1072042/global-card-and-board-games-market-value/.Suche in Google Scholar

Beersma, B., J. R. Hollenbeck, S. E. Humphrey, H. Moon, D. E. Conlon, and D. R. Ilgen. 2003. “Cooperation, Competition, and Team Performance: Toward a Contingency Approach.” Academy of Management Journal 46 (5): 572–90, https://doi.org/10.5465/30040650.Suche in Google Scholar

Bliese, P. D. 2000. “Within-group Agreement, Non-independence, and Reliability: Implications for Data Aggregation and Analysis.” In Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions, edited by K. J. Klein, and S. W. J. Kozlowski, 349–81. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Suche in Google Scholar

Breugst, N., and D. A. Shepherd. 2017. “If You Fight with Me, I’ll Get Mad! A Social Model of Entrepreneurial Affect.” Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 41 (3): 379–418, https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12211.Suche in Google Scholar

Campion, M. A., E. M. Papper, and G. J. Medsker. 1996. “Relations between Work Team Characteristics and Effectiveness: A Replication and Extension.” Personnel Psychology 49 (2): 429–52, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01806.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Cardon, M. S., M. Glauser, and C. Y. Murnieks. 2017. “Passion for what? Expanding the Domains of Entrepreneurial Passion.” Journal of Business Venturing Insights 8: 24–32, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2017.05.004.Suche in Google Scholar

Cardon, M. S., C. Post, and W. R. Forster. 2017. “Team Entrepreneurial Passion: Its Emergence and Influence in New Venture Teams.” Academy of Management Review 42 (2): 283–305, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0356.Suche in Google Scholar

Cardon, M. S., J. Wincent, J. Singh, and M. Drnovsek. 2009. “The Nature and Experience of Entrepreneurial Passion.” Academy of Management Review 34 (3): 511–32, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.40633190.Suche in Google Scholar

Cogan, A., and T. Pret. 2020. “True Colors: Pursuing Social Entrepreneurship as Verifying Identity Work.” Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research 40: 307–12.Suche in Google Scholar

Cogan, A., T. Pret, and M. S. Cardon. 2022. “Everyday Social Support Processes: Household Members’ Instrumental and Emotional Support of Entrepreneurs.” International Small Business Journal 40 (5): 537–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/02662426211054098.Suche in Google Scholar

Cooper, A. C., and K. W. Artz. 1995. “Determinants of Satisfaction for Entrepreneurs.” Journal of Business Venturing 10 (6): 439–57, https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(95)00083-K.Suche in Google Scholar

Cronin, M. A., K. Bezrukova, L. R. Weingart, and C. H. Tinsley. 2011. “Subgroups within a Team: The Role of Cognitive and Affective Integration.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 32 (6): 831–49, https://doi.org/10.1002/job.707.Suche in Google Scholar

Delea, M. G., G. D. Sclar, M. Woreta, R. Haardörfer, C. L. Nagel, B. A. Caruso, R. Dreibelbis, A. G. Gobezayehu, T. F. Clasen, and M. C. Freeman. 2018. “Collective Efficacy: Development and Validation of a Measurement Scale for Use in Public Health and Development Programmes.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15 (10): 2139, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102139.Suche in Google Scholar

De Mol, E., S. N. Khapova, and T. Elfring. 2015. “Entrepreneurial Team Cognition: A Review.” International Journal of Management Reviews 17 (2): 232–55, https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12055.Suche in Google Scholar

Deutsch, M. 1949. “A Theory of Co-operation and Competition.” Human Relations 2 (2): 129–52, https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674900200204.Suche in Google Scholar

Deutsch, M. 1973. The Resolution of Conflict. New Haven: Yale University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Drakopoulou Dodd, S., T. Pret, and E. Shaw. 2016. “Advancing Understanding of Entrepreneurial Embeddedness: Forms of Capital, Social Contexts and Time.” In A Research Agenda for Entrepreneurship and Context, edited by F. Welter, and W. B. Gartner, 120–33. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.10.4337/9781784716844.00014Suche in Google Scholar

Elliot, A. J., M. Jury, and K. Murayama. 2018. “Trait and Perceived Environmental Competitiveness in Achievement Situations.” Journal of Personality 86 (3): 353–67, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12320.Suche in Google Scholar

Ensley, M. D., and C. L. Pearce. 2001. “Shared Cognition in Top Management Teams: Implications for New Venture Performance.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 22 (2): 145–60, https://doi.org/10.1002/job.83.Suche in Google Scholar

Foo, M. D., H. P. Sin, and L. P. Yiong. 2006. “Effects of Team Inputs and Intrateam Processes on Perceptions of Team Viability and Member Satisfaction in Nascent Ventures.” Strategic Management Journal 27 (4): 389–99, https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.514.Suche in Google Scholar

Forbes, D. P. 2005. “Are Some Entrepreneurs More Overconfident Than Others?” Journal of Business Venturing 20 (5): 623–40, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.05.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Forbes, D. P., P. S. Borchert, M. E. Zellmer–Bruhn, and H. J. Sapienza. 2006. “Entrepreneurial Team Formation: An Exploration of New Member Addition.” Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 30 (2): 225–48, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00119.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Forster, W., and K. Jansen. 2010. “Co-creating New Ventures: Attraction, Search, and Uncertainty in Founding Partnership Formation.” Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research 30 (10): 1–15.Suche in Google Scholar

Francis, D. H., and W. R. Sandberg. 2000. “Friendship within Entrepreneurial Teams and its Association with Team and Venture Performance.” Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 25 (2): 5–26, https://doi.org/10.1177/104225870002500201.Suche in Google Scholar

Franke, N., M. Gruber, D. Harhoff, and J. Henkel. 2006. “What You Are Is What You Like – Similarity Biases in Venture Capitalists’ Evaluations of Start-Up Teams.” Journal of Business Venturing 21 (6): 802–26, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.07.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Gartner, W. B., K. G. Shaver, E. Gatewood, and J. A. Katz. 1994. “Finding the Entrepreneur in Entrepreneurship.” Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 18 (3): 5–9, https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879401800301.Suche in Google Scholar

Gemmell, R. M., R. J. Boland, and D. A. Kolb. 2012. “The Socio-Cognitive Dynamics of Entrepreneurial Ideation.” Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 36 (5): 1053–73, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00486.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Gimeno, J., T. Folta, A. Cooper, and C. Woo. 1997. “Survival of the Fittest? Entrepreneurial Human Capital and the Persistence of Underperforming Firms.” Administrative Science Quarterly 42 (4): 750–83, https://doi.org/10.2307/2393656.Suche in Google Scholar

Gully, S. M., K. A. Incalcaterra, A. Joshi, and J. M. Beaubien. 2002. “A Meta-Analysis of Team-Efficacy, Potency, and Performance: Interdependence and Level of Analysis as Moderators of Observed Relationships.” Journal of Applied Psychology 87 (5): 819–32, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.819.Suche in Google Scholar

Hackman, J. R. 1991. Groups that Work (And Those that Don’t): Creating Conditions for Effective Teamwork. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Suche in Google Scholar

Hackman, J. R., and C. G. Morris. 1978. “Group Processes and Group Effectiveness: A Reappraisal.” In Group Processes, edited by L. Berkowitz, 47–9. New York: Academic Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Harper, D. A. 2008. “Towards a Theory of Entrepreneurial Teams.” Journal of Business Venturing 23 (6): 613–26, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.01.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Hayes, A. F. 2017. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: Guilford Press.Suche in Google Scholar

He, H., Y. Baruch, and C. P. Lin. 2014. “Modeling Team Knowledge Sharing and Team Flexibility: The Role of Within-Team Competition.” Human Relations 67 (8): 947–78, https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713508797.Suche in Google Scholar

Hechavarria, D. M., M. Renko, and C. H. Matthews. 2012. “The Nascent Entrepreneurship Hub: Goals, Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy and Start-Up Outcomes.” Small Business Economics 39 (3): 685–701, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9355-2.Suche in Google Scholar

Heidemeier, H., and J. V. Bittner. 2012. “Competition and Achievement Goals in Work Teams.” Human Performance 25 (2): 138–58, https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2012.658929.Suche in Google Scholar

Higashide, H., and S. Birley. 2002. “The Consequences of Conflict between the Venture Capitalist and the Entrepreneurial Team in the United Kingdom from the Perspective of the Venture Capitalist.” Journal of Business Venturing 17 (1): 59–81, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00057-4.Suche in Google Scholar

Hinsz, V. B., R. S. Tindale, and D. A. Vollrath. 1997. “The Emerging Conceptualization of Groups as Information Processors.” Psychological Bulletin 121 (1): 43–64, https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.43.Suche in Google Scholar

Hirst, G., D. Van Knippenberg, and J. Zhou. 2009. “A Cross-Level Perspective on Employee Creativity: Goal Orientation, Team Learning Behavior, and Individual Creativity.” Academy of Management Journal 52 (2): 280–93, https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.37308035.Suche in Google Scholar

Hmieleski, K. M., and A. C. Corbett. 2008. “The Contrasting Interaction Effects of Improvisational Behavior with Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy on New Venture Performance and Entrepreneur Work Satisfaction.” Journal of Business Venturing 23 (4): 482–96, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2007.04.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Hmieleski, K. M., and M. D. Ensley. 2007. “A Contextual Examination of New Venture Performance: Entrepreneur Leadership Behavior, Top Management Team Heterogeneity, and Environmental Dynamism.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 28 (7): 865–89, https://doi.org/10.1002/job.479.Suche in Google Scholar

Horwitz, S. K., and I. B. Horwitz. 2007. “The Effects of Team Diversity on Team Outcomes: A Meta-Analytic Review of Team Demography.” Journal of Management 33 (6): 987–1015, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307308587.Suche in Google Scholar

Hwong, N. C., A. Caswell, D. W. Johnson, and R. T. Johnson. 1993. “Effects of Cooperative and Individualistic Learning on Prospective Elementary Teachers’ Music Achievement and Attitudes.” The Journal of Social Psychology 133 (1): 53–64, https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1993.9712118.Suche in Google Scholar

Ilgen, D. R., J. R. Hollenbeck, M. Johnson, and D. Jundt. 2005. “Teams in Organizations: From Input-Process-Output Models to IMOI Models.” Annual Review of Psychology 56: 517–43, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250.Suche in Google Scholar

Janz, B. D., J. A. Colquitt, and R. A. Noe. 1997. “Knowledge Worker Team Effectiveness: The Role of Autonomy, Interdependence, Team Development, and Contextual Support Variables.” Personnel Psychology 50 (4): 877–904, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb01486.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Jehn, K. A., G. B. Northcraft, and M. A. Neale. 1999. “Why Differences Make a Difference: A Field Study of Diversity, Conflict and Performance in Workgroups.” Administrative Science Quarterly 44 (4): 741–63, https://doi.org/10.2307/2667054.Suche in Google Scholar

Jehn, K. A., S. Rispens, and S. M. Thatcher. 2010. “The Effects of Conflict Asymmetry on Work Group and Individual Outcomes.” Academy of Management Journal 53 (3): 596–616, https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.51468978.Suche in Google Scholar

Jin, L., K. Madison, N. D. Kraiczy, F. W. Kellermanns, T. R. Crook, and J. Xi. 2017. “Entrepreneurial Team Composition Characteristics and New Venture Performance: A Meta‐Analysis.” Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 41 (5): 743–71, https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12232.Suche in Google Scholar

Johnson, D. W., and R. T. Johnson. 1989. Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research. Edina: Interaction Book Company.Suche in Google Scholar

Jordan, P. J., N. M. Ashkanasy, C. E. Härtel, and G. S. Hooper. 2002. “Workgroup Emotional Intelligence: Scale Development and Relationship to Team Process Effectiveness and Goal Focus.” Human Resource Management Review 12 (2): 195–214, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00046-3.Suche in Google Scholar

Kamm, J. B., J. C. Shuman, J. A. Seeger, and A. J. Nurick. 1990. “Entrepreneurial Teams in New Venture Creation: A Research Agenda.” Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 14 (4): 7–17, https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879001400403.Suche in Google Scholar

Kimberly, J. R. 1980. “Data Aggregation in Organizational Research: The Temporal Dimension.” Organization Studies 1 (4): 367–77, https://doi.org/10.1177/017084068000100404.Suche in Google Scholar

Kistruck, G. M., R. B. Lount, B. R. Smith, B. J. Bergman, and T. W. Moss. 2016. “Cooperation vs. Competition: Alternative Goal Structures for Motivating Groups in a Resource Scarce Environment.” Academy of Management Journal 59 (4): 1174–98, https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0201.Suche in Google Scholar

Klotz, A. C., K. M. Hmieleski, B. H. Bradley, and L. W. Busenitz. 2014. “New Venture Teams: A Review of the Literature and Roadmap for Future Research.” Journal of Management 40 (1): 226–55, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313493325.Suche in Google Scholar

Klotz, A. C., and D. O. Neubaum. 2016. “Research on the Dark Side of Personality Traits in Entrepreneurship: Observations from an Organizational Behavior Perspective.” Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 40 (1): 7–17, https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12214.Suche in Google Scholar

Kollmann, T., C. Stöckmann, and J. W. Linstaedt. 2019. “Task Conflict, Narcissism and Entrepreneurial Capability in Teams Planning a Business: A Moderated Moderation Approach to Explaining Business Planning Performance.” Journal of Small Business Management 57 (4): 1399–423, https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12418.Suche in Google Scholar

Langfred, C. W. 2005. “Autonomy and Performance in Teams: The Multilevel Moderating Effect of Task Interdependence.” Journal of Management 31 (4): 513–29, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206304272190.Suche in Google Scholar

Langfred, C. W. 2007. “The Downside of Self-Management: A Longitudinal Study of the Effects of Conflict on Trust, Autonomy, and Task Interdependence in Self-Managing Teams.” Academy of Management Journal 50 (4): 885–900, https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.26279196.Suche in Google Scholar

Lazar, M., E. Miron-Spektor, R. Agarwal, M. Erez, B. Goldfarb, and G. Chen. 2020. “Entrepreneurial Team Formation.” Academy of Management Annals 14 (1): 29–59, https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2017.0131.Suche in Google Scholar

LeBreton, J. M., and J. L. Senter. 2008. “Answers to 20 Questions about Interrater Reliability and Interrater Agreement.” Organizational Research Methods 11 (4): 815–52, https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106296642.Suche in Google Scholar

Lent, R. W., J. Schmidt, and L. Schmidt. 2006. “Collective Efficacy Beliefs in Student Work Teams: Relation to Self-Efficacy, Cohesion, and Performance.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 68 (1): 73–84, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.04.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Lester, S. W., B. M. Meglino, and M. A. Korsgaard. 2002. “The Antecedents and Consequences of Group Potency: A Longitudinal Investigation of Newly Formed Work Groups.” Academy of Management Journal 45 (2): 352–68, https://doi.org/10.5465/3069351.Suche in Google Scholar

Li, F., Y. Li, and E. Wang. 2009. “Task Characteristics and Team Performance: The Mediating Effect of Team Member Satisfaction.” Social Behavior and Personality: International Journal 37 (10): 1373–82, https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2009.37.10.1373.Suche in Google Scholar

Liden, R. C., B. Erdogan, S. J. Wayne, and R. T. Sparrowe. 2006. “Leader‐member Exchange, Differentiation, and Task Interdependence: Implications for Individual and Group Performance.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 27 (6): 723–46, https://doi.org/10.1002/job.409.Suche in Google Scholar

Lloyd, A., and M. Somerville. 2006. “Working Information.” Journal of Workplace Learning 18 (3): 186–98, https://doi.org/10.1108/13665620610654603.Suche in Google Scholar

Marshall, D. R., W. R. Meek, R. G. Swab, and E. Markin. 2020. “Access to Resources and Entrepreneurial Well-Being: A Self-Efficacy Approach.” Journal of Business Research 120: 203–12, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.015.Suche in Google Scholar

Miller, D. 2015. “A Downside to the Entrepreneurial Personality?” Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 39 (1): 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12130.Suche in Google Scholar

Mitchell, T. R., and W. S. Silver. 1990. “Individual and Group Goals when Workers Are Interdependent: Effects on Task Strategies and Performance.” Journal of Applied Psychology 75 (2): 185–93, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.2.185.Suche in Google Scholar

Mumford, M. D., and S. B. Gustafson. 1988. “Creativity Syndrome: Integration, Application, and Innovation.” Psychological Bulletin 103 (1): 27–43, https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.1.27.Suche in Google Scholar

Murayama, K., and A. J. Elliot. 2012. “The Competition–Performance Relation: A Meta-Analytic Review and Test of the Opposing Processes Model of Competition and Performance.” Psychological Bulletin 138 (6): 1035–70, https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028324.Suche in Google Scholar

Newman, A., H. M. Herman, G. Schwarz, and I. Nielsen. 2018. “The Effects of Employees’ Creative Self-Efficacy on Innovative Behavior: The Role of Entrepreneurial Leadership.” Journal of Business Research 89: 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Park, N. K., W. Jang, E. L. Thomas, and J. Smith. 2021. “How to Organize Creative and Innovative Teams: Creative Self-Efficacy and Innovative Team Performance.” Creativity Research Journal 33 (2): 168–79, https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1842010.Suche in Google Scholar

Pearsall, M. J., and A. P. Ellis. 2006. “The Effects of Critical Team Member Assertiveness on Team Performance and Satisfaction.” Journal of Management 32 (4): 575–94, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306289099.Suche in Google Scholar

Perry-Smith, J. E., and R. W. Coff. 2011. “In the Mood for Entrepreneurial Creativity? How Optimal Group Affect Differs for Generating and Selecting Ideas for New Ventures.” Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 5 (3): 247–68, https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.116.Suche in Google Scholar

Powell, E. E., and T. Baker. 2017. “In the Beginning: Identity Processes and Organizing in Multi-Founder Nascent Ventures.” Academy of Management Journal 60 (6): 2381–414, https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0175.Suche in Google Scholar

Preller, R., H. Patzelt, and N. Breugst. 2020. “Entrepreneurial Visions in Founding Teams: Conceptualization, Emergence, and Effects on Opportunity Development.” Journal of Business Venturing 35 (2): 105914, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.11.004.Suche in Google Scholar

Pret, T. 2017. The Influence of Contexts on Entrepreneurial Practices: A Qualitative Study. Unpublished PhD thesis. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde.Suche in Google Scholar

Pret, T. in press. “Accumulation and Conversion of Capital: The Resource Management Practices of Entrepreneurs.” Pathways to Research.Suche in Google Scholar

Pret, T., and S. Carter. 2017. “The Importance of ‘fitting in’: Collaboration and Social Value Creation in Response to Community Norms and Expectations.” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 29 (7–8): 639–67, https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2017.1328903.Suche in Google Scholar

Pret, T., and A. Cogan. 2019. “Artisan Entrepreneurship: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda.” International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research 25 (4): 592–614, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-03-2018-0178.Suche in Google Scholar

Pret, T., E. Shaw, and S. Drakopoulou Dodd. 2016. “Painting the Full Picture: The Conversion of Economic, Cultural, Social and Symbolic Capital.” International Small Business Journal 34 (8): 1004–27, https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242615595450.Suche in Google Scholar

Raveendran, M., L. Silvestri, and R. Gulati. 2020. “The Role of Interdependence in the Microfoundations of Organization Design: Task, Goal, and Knowledge Interdependence.” Academy of Management Annals 14 (2): 828–68, https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0015.Suche in Google Scholar

Richter, A. W., G. Hirst, D. Van Knippenberg, and M. Baer. 2012. “Creative Self-Efficacy and Individual Creativity in Team Contexts: Cross-Level Interactions with Team Informational Resources.” Journal of Applied Psychology 97 (6): 1282–90, https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029359.Suche in Google Scholar

Saavedra, R., P. C. Earley, and L Van Dyne. 1993. “Complex Interdependence in Task-performing Groups.” Journal of Applied Psychology 78 (1): 61–72, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.61.Suche in Google Scholar

Santos, S. C., and M. S. Cardon. 2019. “What’s Love Got to Do With It? Team Entrepreneurial Passion and Performance in New Venture Teams.” Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 43 (3): 475–504, https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258718812185.Suche in Google Scholar

Shalley, C. E., and J. E. Perry-Smith. 2008. “The Emergence of Team Creative Cognition: The Role of Diverse outside Ties, Sociocognitive Network Centrality, and Team Evolution.” Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 2 (1): 23–41, https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.40.Suche in Google Scholar

Shane, S., E. A. Locke, and C. J. Collins. 2003. “Entrepreneurial Motivation.” Human Resource Management Review 13 (2): 257–79, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(03)00017-2.Suche in Google Scholar

Shaw, E., J. Wilson, and T. Pret. 2017. “The Process of Embedding a Small Firm in its Industrial Context.” International Small Business Journal 35 (3): 219–43, https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242616671170.Suche in Google Scholar

Slevin, D. P., and J. G. Covin. 1992. “Creating and Maintaining High-Performance Teams.” In The State of the Art of Entrepreneurship, edited by D. L. Sexton, and J. D. Kasarda, 358–86. Boston: PWS-Kent.Suche in Google Scholar

Simons, T. L., and R. S. Peterson. 2000. “Task Conflict and Relationship Conflict in Top Management Teams: The Pivotal Role of Intragroup Trust.” Journal of Applied Psychology 85 (1): 102–11, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.102.Suche in Google Scholar

Stanne, M. B., D. W. Johnson, and R. F. Johnson. 1999. “Does Competition Enhance or Inhibit Motor Performance: A Meta-Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 125 (1): 133–54, https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.1.133.Suche in Google Scholar

Swab, R. G., and P. D. Johnson. 2019. “Steel Sharpens Steel: A Review of Multilevel Competition and Competitiveness in Organizations.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 40 (2): 147–65, https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2340.Suche in Google Scholar

Tierney, P., and S. M. Farmer. 2002. “Creative Self-Efficacy: Its Potential Antecedents and Relationship to Creative Performance.” Academy of Management Journal 45 (6): 1137–48, https://doi.org/10.5465/3069429.Suche in Google Scholar

Tjosvold, D., M. M. Tang, and M. West. 2004. “Reflexivity for Team Innovation in China: The Contribution of Goal Interdependence.” Group & Organization Management 29 (5): 540–59, https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601103254911.Suche in Google Scholar

Tumasjan, A., and R. Braun. 2012. “In the Eye of the Beholder: How Regulatory Focus and Self-Efficacy Interact in Influencing Opportunity Recognition.” Journal of Business Venturing 27 (6): 622–36, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.08.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Vallerand, R. J., and G. F. Losier. 1999. “An Integrative Analysis of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation in Sport.” Journal of Applied Sport Psychology 11 (1): 142–69, https://doi.org/10.1080/10413209908402956.Suche in Google Scholar

Van der Vegt, G. S., B. Emans, and E. Van De Vliert. 2001. “Patterns of Interdependence in Work Teams: A Two‐level Investigation of the Relations with Job and Team Satisfaction.” Personnel Psychology 54 (1): 51–69, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00085.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Van Dijk, W. W., and M. Zeelenberg. 2002. “What Do We Talk about when We Talk about Disappointment? Distinguishing Outcome-Related Disappointment from Person-Related Disappointment.” Cognition & Emotion 16 (6): 787–807, https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930143000563.Suche in Google Scholar

Van Ginkel, W. P., and D. van Knippenberg. 2009. “Knowledge about the Distribution of Information and Group Decision Making: When and Why Does it Work?” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 108 (2): 218–29, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.10.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Wageman, R. 1995. “Interdependence and Group Effectiveness.” Administrative Science Quarterly 40 (1): 145–80, https://doi.org/10.2307/2393703.Suche in Google Scholar

Wang, X., X. Yu, and X. Meng. 2023. “Entrepreneurial Bricolage and New Product Development Performance in New Ventures: The Contingent Effects of Founding Team Involvement.” Entrepreneurship Research Journal 13 (4): 813–839. https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2020-0485.Suche in Google Scholar

West, G. P. 2007. “Collective Cognition: When Entrepreneurial Teams, Not Individuals, Make Decisions.” Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 31 (1): 77–102, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00164.x.Suche in Google Scholar

West, G. P., and R. M. Gemmell. 2021. “Learning Behaviors Across Levels in New Ventures and Innovation Outcomes.” Journal of Small Business Management 59 (1): 73–106, https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12484.Suche in Google Scholar

Welter, F., T. Baker, D. B. Audretsch, and W. B. Gartner. 2017. “Everyday Entrepreneurship – A Call for Entrepreneurship Research to Embrace Entrepreneurial Diversity.” Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 41 (3): 311–21, https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12258.Suche in Google Scholar

Yoo, S., J. Lee, and Y Lee. 2024. “Entrepreneurial Team Conflict and Cohesion: Meta-structural Equation Modeling.” Entrepreneurship Research Journal 14 (1): 121–147. https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2020-0501.Suche in Google Scholar

Zampetakis, L. A., and V. Moustakis. 2006. “Linking Creativity with Entrepreneurial Intentions: A Structural Approach.” The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 2 (3): 413–28, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-006-0006-z.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhao, H., and S. E. Seibert. 2006. “The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Entrepreneurial Status: A Meta-Analytical Review.” Journal of Applied Psychology 91 (2): 259–71, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.259.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhou, W., and E. Rosini. 2015. “Entrepreneurial Team Diversity and Performance: Toward an Integrated Model.” Entrepreneurship Research Journal 5 (1): 31–60, https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2014-0005.Suche in Google Scholar

Zolin, R., A. Kuckertz, and T. Kautonen. 2011. “Human Resource Flexibility and Strong Ties in Entrepreneurial Teams.” Journal of Business Research 64 (10): 1097–103, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.11.026.Suche in Google Scholar
Received: 2021-03-31
Accepted: 2021-09-18
Published Online: 2021-10-11

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Competitive Research Articles
  3. Examining the Creative Self-Efficacy, Goal Interdependence, and Satisfaction of New Venture Teams in the Board Game Industry
  4. The Startup Selection Process in Accelerators: Qualitative Evidence from Turkey
  5. Social Entrepreneurship and Volunteering: Moderation Effects of Volunteer Experience Levels on Social Entrepreneurial Intent Model
  6. Reassessing Passion and Perseverance as Dimensions of Individual Entrepreneurial Orientation: A Conceptual and Empirical Investigation into Theory and Measurement
  7. Entrepreneurial Team Conflict and Cohesion: Meta-structural Equation Modeling
  8. Corporate Entrepreneurship as a Learning Process: Development of New Capabilities
  9. Constructing an Entrepreneurial Identity: How Enterprise Intentions Among Young People are Motivationally Formed
  10. Does Start-Up Founding Strategy Increase or Decrease the Effects of Strategic Capabilities on New Venture Performance?
  11. Capturing Transnational Entrepreneurial Opportunities through Dual Identification: Immigrant Entrepreneurs and Transnational Activities
  12. A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of Entrepreneurial Personality
  13. The Curvilinear Relationship Between Collective Team Identification and New Venture Performance: The Moderating Effect of Environmental Uncertainty
  14. Entrepreneurial Orientation, Dynamic Capability, and Franchisee Performance: The Role of Market Responsiveness
  15. Commentary
  16. Mariusz Soltanifar, Mathew Hughes, Lutz Gocke – Digital Entrepreneurship, Impact on Business and Society (2021, Springer International Publishing)
https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2021-0142
Schlagwörter für diesen Artikel
new venture teams; creative self-efficacy; goal interdependence; team satisfaction; entrepreneurship

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Competitive Research Articles
  3. Examining the Creative Self-Efficacy, Goal Interdependence, and Satisfaction of New Venture Teams in the Board Game Industry
  4. The Startup Selection Process in Accelerators: Qualitative Evidence from Turkey
  5. Social Entrepreneurship and Volunteering: Moderation Effects of Volunteer Experience Levels on Social Entrepreneurial Intent Model
  6. Reassessing Passion and Perseverance as Dimensions of Individual Entrepreneurial Orientation: A Conceptual and Empirical Investigation into Theory and Measurement
  7. Entrepreneurial Team Conflict and Cohesion: Meta-structural Equation Modeling
  8. Corporate Entrepreneurship as a Learning Process: Development of New Capabilities
  9. Constructing an Entrepreneurial Identity: How Enterprise Intentions Among Young People are Motivationally Formed
  10. Does Start-Up Founding Strategy Increase or Decrease the Effects of Strategic Capabilities on New Venture Performance?
  11. Capturing Transnational Entrepreneurial Opportunities through Dual Identification: Immigrant Entrepreneurs and Transnational Activities
  12. A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of Entrepreneurial Personality
  13. The Curvilinear Relationship Between Collective Team Identification and New Venture Performance: The Moderating Effect of Environmental Uncertainty
  14. Entrepreneurial Orientation, Dynamic Capability, and Franchisee Performance: The Role of Market Responsiveness
  15. Commentary
  16. Mariusz Soltanifar, Mathew Hughes, Lutz Gocke – Digital Entrepreneurship, Impact on Business and Society (2021, Springer International Publishing)
Jetzt anmelden und 20% sparen
Institutioneller Zugang
Wie funktioniert Authentifizierung?
Haben Sie eine Idee, wie wir unsere Website verbessern können?
Bitte schreiben Sie uns.
© 2025 De Gruyter Brill
Heruntergeladen am 26.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/erj-2021-0142/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen