Abstract
The term enkrateia appears for the first time in Greek testimonies from the fourth century BC with the meaning of “mastery” or “control over” pleasures. This paper analyzes certain cases of cognates of enkrateia that precede this noun, in order to identify the anticipations of the idea of self-control in the fields of oratory, tragedy and philosophy of the fifth century BC. I will try to show that at this time the verb krateo and the adjective enkrates begin to develop a usage that we can call ‘behavioral’ or ‘ethical’ – since it refers to the character (ethos) of the person –, which, in the following century, allowed for the formation of the noun enkrateia to represent this usage.
References
Allan, W. 2008. Euripides. Medea. London: Duckworth.Search in Google Scholar
Annas, J. 2002. “Democritus and Eudaimonism.” In Presocratic Philosophy. Essays in Honour of Alexander Mourelatos, edited by V. Caston, and D. W. Graham, 169–83. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Bailey, C. 1964. The Greek Atomists and Epicurus. New York: Russell & Russell.Search in Google Scholar
Bevilacqua, F. 2010. Memorabili di Senofonte. Classici Greci. Torino: Unione Tipografico-Editrice Torinese.Search in Google Scholar
Bieda, E. 2006. “Medea, madre enfurecida: sobre los alcances del thymos en la Medea de Eurípides.” In La tragedia griega, edited by V. Juli, 85–98. Buenos Aires: La Isla de la Luna.Search in Google Scholar
Bieda, E. 2021. Platón y la voluntad. Acción, razón y deseo en la obra platónica. Buenos Aires: Miño y Dávila.Search in Google Scholar
Blass, F. 1889. Die attische Beredsamkeit, II: Isokrates und Isaios. Leipzig: Teubner.Search in Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. 2009. “Antifonte, Socrate e i maestri d’infelicità.” Études platoniciennes 6: 25–39. Available at https://journals.openedition.org/etudesplatoniciennes/762.10.4000/etudesplatoniciennes.762Search in Google Scholar
Brancacci, A. 2019. “El concepto de pónos en Antístenes.” Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofía 45 (2): 155–73. https://doi.org/10.36446/rlf2019178.Search in Google Scholar
Canto, M. 1987. Platon. Gorgias. Paris: Flammarion.Search in Google Scholar
Cataudella, Q. 1932. “L’Anonymus Iamblichi e Democrito.” Studi italiani di filologia classica 10: 5–22.Search in Google Scholar
Cataudella, Q. 1935. “Due note ad Aristofane.” Athenaeum 23 n.s. 13: 195–204.Search in Google Scholar
Cataudella, Q. 1937. “Nuove ricerche sull’Anonimo di Giamblico e sulla composizione del Protreptico.” Rendiconti della Classe di Scienze morali, storiche e filologiche dell’Accademia dei Lincei s. 6 vol. 13: 182–210.Search in Google Scholar
Chantraine, P. 1968. Dictionnaire Étymologique de la Langue Grecque. Paris: Klincksieck.Search in Google Scholar
Ciriaci, A. 2011. L’Anonimo di Giamblico. Saggio critico e analisi dei frammenti. Napoli: Bibliopolis.Search in Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. 1999. Reason and Emotion. Essays on Ancient Moral Psychology and Ethical Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691223261Search in Google Scholar
Cordero, N. 2000. “Los atomistas y los celos de Platón.” Méthexis 13: 7–16.10.1163/24680974-90000351Search in Google Scholar
Danzig, G. 2024. “Sōphrosunē and Enkrateia in Xenophon’s Writings.” In Xenophon’s Virtue, edited by G. Danzig, D. M. Johnson, and D. Konstan, 275–314. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783111313573-012Search in Google Scholar
Davidson, J. 1998. Courtesans & Fishcake. The Consuming Passions of Classical Athens. London: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Davidson, J. 2001. “Dover, Foucault and Greek Homosexuality: Penetration and the Truth of Sex.” Past & Present 170: 3–51.10.1093/past/170.1.3Search in Google Scholar
Decharme, P. 1893. Euripide et l’esprit de son théâtre. Paris: Garnier.Search in Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. 2006. Foucault. London & New York: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. 2015. La subjetivación: curso sobre Foucault. Buenos Aires: Cactus.Search in Google Scholar
Dodds, E. 1973. The Greeks and the Irrational. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar
Dorion, L.-A. 2003. “Akrasia et enkrateia dans les Mémorables de Xénophon.” Dialogue 42 (4): 645–72.10.1017/S0012217300005692Search in Google Scholar
Dorion, L.-A. 2007. “Plato and Enkrateia.” In Akrasia in Greek Philosophy, edited by Ch. Bobonich, and P. Destrée, 119–38. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/ej.9789004156708.i-308.35Search in Google Scholar
Dorion, L.-A. 2011. “The Rise and Fall of the Socratic Problem.” In The Cambridge Companion to Socrates, edited by D. R. Morrison, 1–23. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL9780521833424.001Search in Google Scholar
Dorion, L.-A. 2018. “Enkrateia et partition de l’âme chez Platon.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Étranger 36: 153–213.10.3917/rpha.362.0153Search in Google Scholar
Dorion, L.-A., and M. Bandini. 2000–2011. Xénophon. Mémorables. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Search in Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. 1974. Greek Popular Morality in the Time of Plato and Aristotle. Basil: Blackwell.10.2307/324314Search in Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. 1989. Greek Homosexuality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Edmunds, L. 2018. “Xenophon’s Triad of Socratic Virtues and the Poverty of Socrates.” In Plato and Xenophon. Comparative Studies, edited by G. Danzig, D. Johnson, and D. Morrison, 252–76. Leiden & Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789004369085_012Search in Google Scholar
Erbse, H. 1961. “Die Architektonik im Aufbau von Xenophons Memorabilien.” Hermes 89 (3): 257–87.Search in Google Scholar
Finglass, P. J. 2012. Sophocles’ Ajax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1163/9789004217621_005Search in Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1985. The Use of Pleasure. Volume 2 of The History of Sexuality. New York: Random House.Search in Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 2010. The Government of Self and Others. Lectures at the Collège de France 1982–1983. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230274730Search in Google Scholar
Gagarin, M. 1989. The Murder of Herodes. A Study of Antiphon 5. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar
Gagarin, M. 2002. Antiphon, the Athenian. Oratory, Law and Justice in the Age of Sophists. Austin: University of Texas Press.Search in Google Scholar
Gallego, J. 2016. “Edipo en Colono y la Guerra civil en Atenas.” Mètis 14: 159–83.10.4000/books.editionsehess.4221Search in Google Scholar
Gigante, M. 1993. Nomos Basileus. Napoli: Bibliopolis.Search in Google Scholar
Gill, Ch. 1983. “Did Chrysippus Understand Medea?” Phronesis 28 (2): 136–49. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852883x00086.Search in Google Scholar
Gill, Ch. 1996. Personality in Greek Epic, Tragedy, and Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198146766.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Gomperz, H. 1912. Sophistik und Rhetoric. Das Bildungsideal des eu legein in seinem Verhältnis zur Philosophie des V. Jahrhunderts. Leipzig & Berlin: Teubner.Search in Google Scholar
Grant, F. 1991. “Note al testo dell’Anonymus Iamblichi.” Rivista di cultura classica e medioevale 33: 45–54.Search in Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. ed. 2003. Homosexuality in Greece and Rome. A Sourcebook of Basic Documents. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/california/9780520223813.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Humble, N. 1999. “Sōphrosynē and the Spartans in Xenophon.” In Sparta. New Perspectives, edited by S. Hodkinson, and A. Powell, 339–53. Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales.10.2307/j.ctvvn9cq.15Search in Google Scholar
Humble, N. 2002. “Sôphrosynê Revisited: Was It Ever a Spartan Virtue?” In Sparta: Beyond the Mirage, edited by S. Hodkinson, and A. Powell, 85–109. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.10.2307/j.ctv1n357hd.6Search in Google Scholar
Irwin, T. 1979. Plato. Gorgias. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Jaeger, W. 1947. Paideia, the Ideals of Greek Culture. Vol. 2: In Search of the Divine Center. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Jeremiah, E. T. 2012. The Emergence of Reflexivity in Greek Language and Thought. From Homer to Plato and Beyond. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004225152Search in Google Scholar
Joël, K. 2010. Der echte und der Xenophontische Sokrates. Dinkelscherben: Literaricon (first ed. 1901).Search in Google Scholar
Johnson, D. M. 2018. “Xenophon’s Intertextual Socrates.” In Plato and Xenophon. Comparative Studies, edited by G. Danzig, D. Johnson, and D. Morrison, 71–98. Leiden & Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789004369085_005Search in Google Scholar
Johnson, D. M. 2020. “Self-Mastery, Piety, and Reciprocity in Xenophon’s Ethics.” In Early Greek Ethics, edited by D. C. Wolfsdorf, 412–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198758679.003.0019Search in Google Scholar
Kahn, Ch. H. 1985. “Democritus and the Origins of Moral Psychology.” The American Journal of Philology 106: 1–31.10.2307/295049Search in Google Scholar
Kerferd, G. B. 1981. The Sophistic Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Levi, A. 1941. “L’Anonimo di Giamblico.” Sophia 9: 235–46.Search in Google Scholar
Lewis, R. G. 1988. “An Alternative Date for Sophocles’ Antigone.” Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 29 (1): 35–50.Search in Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, H. 1971. The Justice of Zeus. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lozano Nembrot, M. 2024. “The Problem of (In)discipline: Akolasia and kolasis in Xenophon’s Works.” In Xenophon’s Virtue, edited by G. Danzig, D. M. Johnson, and D. Konstan, 314–42. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783111313573-013Search in Google Scholar
Lyons, J. 1995. Linguistic Semantics. An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511810213Search in Google Scholar
Mayer, H. 1913. Prodikos von Keos und die Anfänge der Synonymic bei den Griechen. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schoningh.Search in Google Scholar
Mondolfo, R. 1960. Socrates. Buenos Aires: Eudeba.Search in Google Scholar
Mondolfo, R. 1997. La conciencia moral de Homero a Demócrito y Epicuro. Buenos Aires: Eudeba (first ed. 1962).Search in Google Scholar
Moore, Ch. 2023. The Virtue of Agency. Sôphrosunê and Self Constitution in Classical Greece. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780197663509.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Moore, Ch., and Ch. C. Raymond. 2019. Plato. Charmides. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar
Morel, P.-M. 1996. Démocrite et la recherche des causes. Paris: Klincksieck.Search in Google Scholar
Morrison, D. R. 2008. “Remarques sur la psychologie morale de Xénophon.” In Xénophon et Socrate. Actes du colloque d’Aix- en- Provence (6–9 novembre 2003), edited by M. Narcy, and A. Tordesillas, 11–28. Paris: J. Vrin.Search in Google Scholar
Murphy, D. J. 2013. “Isocrates and the Dialogue.” The Classical World 106 (3): 311–53. https://doi.org/10.1353/clw.2013.0048.Search in Google Scholar
Murphy, D. J. 2017. “Isocrates as a Reader of Socratic Dialogues.” In Socrates and the Socratic Dialogue, edited by A. Stavru, and Ch. Moore, 105–24. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004341227_006Search in Google Scholar
Musti, D., and M. Mari. 2003. Anonimo di Giamblico. La pace e il benessere. Idee sull’economia, la società, la morale. Milano: Rizzoli.Search in Google Scholar
Nestle, W. 1908. “Bemerkungen zu den Vorsokratikern und Sophisten.” Philologus 67: 531–81.10.1524/phil.1908.67.14.531Search in Google Scholar
North, H. 1966. Sophrosyne: Self-Knowledge and Self-Restraint in Greek Literature. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Onians, R. B. 1951. The Origins of European Thought about the Body, the Mind, the Soul, the World, Time and Fate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Page, D. L. 2001. Euripides. Medea. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Peels, S. 2015. Hosios. A Semantic Study of Greek Piety. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar
Pendrick, G. J. 2002. Antiphon the Sophist. The Fragments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. 1993. “The Seductions of Gorgias.” Classical Antiquity 12: 267–99.10.2307/25010996Search in Google Scholar
Pratt, J. 2015. “On the Threshold of Rhetoric. Gorgias’ Encomium of Helen.” Classical Antiquity 34: 163–82.10.1525/CA.2015.34.1.163Search in Google Scholar
Rademaker, A. 2005. Sōphrosynē and the Rhetoric of Self-Restraint. Polysemy and Persuasive Use of an Ancient Greek Value Term. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar
Rossetti, L. 2008. “Socrate enkrates.” Zbornik Matice srpske za klasicne studije 10: 65–79.Search in Google Scholar
Rossetti, L. 2015. “Humanitas presocrática, humanitas socrática.” Areté. Revista de Filosofía 27: 281–98.10.18800/arete.201502.007Search in Google Scholar
Sansone, D. 2012. Greek Drama and the Invention of Rhetoric. London: Blackwell.10.1002/9781118358337Search in Google Scholar
Sassi, M. 2019. “Socrate salvato dal suo isolamento. La ‘discussione’ con Simonide, Euripide e Gorgia sulla volontà morale.” In La volontarietà dell’azione tra Antichità e Medioevo, edited by F. de Luise, and I. Zavattero, 63–85. Trento: Università degli Studi di Trento.Search in Google Scholar
Seel, G. 2006. “If You Know What Is Best, You Do It. Socratic Intellectualism in Xenophon and Plato.” In Remembering Socrates. Philosophical Essays, edited by L. Judson, and V. Karasmanis, 20–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199276134.003.0003Search in Google Scholar
Snell, B. 1953. The Discovery of the Mind. The Greek Origins of European Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Snell, B. 1964. Scenes from Greek Drama. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520319080Search in Google Scholar
Snodgrass, A. M. 1893. “Cretans in Arcadia.” Antichità Cretesi 2: 196–201.Search in Google Scholar
Sorof, G. 1899. “Nomos und physis in Xenophons Anabasis.” Hermes 34: 568–89.Search in Google Scholar
Stavru, A. 2023. “Akrasia in Xenophon’s Socrates, in the Light of the 5th and 4th Century Debate over Akratic Patterns of Action.” In Xenophon, the Philosopher. Argumentation and Ethics, edited by C. Mársico, and D. Rossi Nunes Lopes, 23–53. Berlin: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar
Taylor, M. W. 2010. The Atomists: Leucippus and Democritus. Fragments. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Search in Google Scholar
Töpfer, K. 1902. Die sogenannten Fragmente des Sophisten Antiphon bei Iamblichos. Arnau: Gymnasium-Programm.Search in Google Scholar
Tordesillas, A. 2008. “Gorgias et la question de la responsabilité d’Hélène.” In Anthropine Sophia. Studi di filologia e storiografia filosofica in memoria di Gabriele Giannantoni, edited by F. Alesse, F. Aronadio, M. C. Dalfino, L. Simeoni, and E. Spinelli, 45–54. Napoli: Bibliopolis.Search in Google Scholar
Untersteiner, M. 1943–1944. “Un nuovo frammento dell’Anonymus Iamblichi. Identificazione dell’Anonimo con Ippia.” Rendiconti dell’Istituto Lombardo. Classe di Lettere, Scienze morali e storiche 77: 442–58.Search in Google Scholar
Vegetti, M. 2005. La ética de los antiguos. Madrid: Síntesis (first ed. 1989).Search in Google Scholar
Veneciano, G. 2008. “Antifonte 44 D.K.: Una investigación sobre el comportamiento humano.” Quaderni urbinati di cultura classica 89: 87–115.Search in Google Scholar
Vernant, J. P. 2002. “Esbozos de la voluntad en la tragedia griega.” In Mito y tragedia en la Grecia antigua, edited by J. P. Vernant, and P. Vidal Naquet. Buenos Aires: Paidos.Search in Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1946. “Ethics and Physics in Democritus.” The Philosophical Review 55: 53–64.10.2307/2181570Search in Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1991. Socrates: Ironist and Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511518508Search in Google Scholar
Walsh, J. J. 1963. Aristotle’s Conception of Moral Weakness. New York & London: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Waterfield, R. 2004. “Xenophon’s Socratic Mission.” In Xenophon and His World. Papers from a Conference Held in Liverpool in July 1999, edited by C. Tuplin, and V. Azoulay, 81–113. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Search in Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. 1907. Einleitung in die Griechische Tragödie. Berlin: Weidmann.Search in Google Scholar
Williams, B. 1993. Shame and Necessity. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520915282Search in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Beyond Socrates: The (Pre)history of enkrateia
- La difficile scelta di Carmide. Αἰδώς e azione politica in Platone e Senofonte
- Chez Euclide et Platon, décrire ce que sont les nombres sans additionner d’unités
- Dall’Uno al Nulla. Appunti per una nuova lettura di Arist. Ph. I 2.185b19–25
- Ghosts in the Machine? Il dibattito esegetico sulla concezione aristotelica dei φαντάσματα
- Notes
- La prospettiva filosofica dell’economia nell’Erissia pseudo-platonico. Nota alla nuova edizione a cura di M. Donato
- Why Should Iamblichus Wish to Reify Time?
- Notes on the Cambridge Companion to Ancient Logic
- Review
- Alexandra Michalewski: Le Dieu, le mouvement, la matière. Atticus et ses critiques dans l’Antiquité tardive
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Beyond Socrates: The (Pre)history of enkrateia
- La difficile scelta di Carmide. Αἰδώς e azione politica in Platone e Senofonte
- Chez Euclide et Platon, décrire ce que sont les nombres sans additionner d’unités
- Dall’Uno al Nulla. Appunti per una nuova lettura di Arist. Ph. I 2.185b19–25
- Ghosts in the Machine? Il dibattito esegetico sulla concezione aristotelica dei φαντάσματα
- Notes
- La prospettiva filosofica dell’economia nell’Erissia pseudo-platonico. Nota alla nuova edizione a cura di M. Donato
- Why Should Iamblichus Wish to Reify Time?
- Notes on the Cambridge Companion to Ancient Logic
- Review
- Alexandra Michalewski: Le Dieu, le mouvement, la matière. Atticus et ses critiques dans l’Antiquité tardive