Abstract
This paper shows how the Iamblichean intuition of time apart from change, and this through the reification of time as an Ideal transcending all soul and all genesis, resolves disagreements as to the chronology of the Timaeus myth, thus strengthening arguments for sempiternalism.
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to Maria Cristina Dalfino, the Editors, and the anonymous reader at Elenchos for their insights and suggestions, as well as to Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Dieter Harlfinger and his colleagues in Berlin for granting me access to the Aristoteles-Archiv.
References
Baltes, M. 1972. Timaios Lokros. Über die Natur des Kosmos und der Seele. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004320413Search in Google Scholar
Baltes, M. 1975. “Numenios von Apamea und der platonische Timaios.” Vigiliae Christianae 29 (4): 241–70. https://doi.org/10.2307/1582870.Search in Google Scholar
Baltes, M. 1976. Die Weltentstehung des platonischen Timaios nach den antiken Interpreten, Teil I. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004320512Search in Google Scholar
Baltes, M. 1996. “Γέγονεν (Platon, Tim. 28b7). Ist die Welt real entstanden oder nicht?” In Polyhistor. Studies in the History and Historiography of Ancient Philosophy Presented to Jaap Mansfeld on His Sixtieth Birthday, edited by K. A. Algra, P. W. van der Horst, and D. T. Runia, 76–96. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004320970_006Search in Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 2003. “Argument in Ancient Philosophy.” In The Cambridge Companion to Greek and Roman Philosophy, edited by D. N. Sedley, 20–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL0521772850.002Search in Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. 2013. “Eudorus of Alexandria and the ‘Pythagorean’ pseudepigrapha.” In On Pythagoreanism, edited by G. Cornelli, R. McKirahan, and C. Macris, 385–404. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110318500.385Search in Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. R. 2001. Post-Hellenistic Philosophy: A Study of its Development from the Stoics to Origen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198152644.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. R. 2017. Platonist Philosophy, 80 BC to AD 250: An Introduction and Collection of Sources in Translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781139050203Search in Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. R. 2018. “Numenius on Intellect, Soul, and the Authority of Plato.” In Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy, edited by J. Bryan, R. Wardy, and J. Warren, 184–201. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108186650.010Search in Google Scholar
Brisson, L. 2005. Porphyre. Sentences, 2 Vols. Paris: Vrin.Search in Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1999. “The Logic of Cosmogony.” In From Myth to Reason? Studies in the Development of Greek Thought, edited by R. G. A. Buxton, 87–106. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198152347.003.0005Search in Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. 2005. “Platonism in the Bible: Numenius of Apamea on Exodus and Eternity.” In Metaphysics, Soul, and Ethics in Ancient Thought: Themes from the Work of Richard Sorabji, edited by R. Salles, 143–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199261307.003.0007Search in Google Scholar
Centrone, B. 1982. “La cosmologia di pseudo Timeo di Locri ed il Timeo di Platone.” Elenchos 3 (2): 293–324.Search in Google Scholar
Centrone, B. 2021. “Authority and Doctrine in the Pseudo-Pythagorean Writings.” In Authority and Authoritative Texts in the Platonist Tradition, edited by M. Erler, J. E. Heßler, and F. M. Petrucci, 115–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108921596.006Search in Google Scholar
Cherniss, H. F. 1976. Plutarch. Moralia. Vol. XIII, Part I: Platonic Essays. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Dalsgaard Larsen, B. 1972. Jamblique de Chalcis. Exégète et philosophe. Thèse et Appendice: testimonia et fragmenta exegetica, 2 Vols. Aarhus: Universitetsforlaget.Search in Google Scholar
Decleva Caizzi, F. 1988. “La ‘materia scorrevole’. Sulle tracce di un dibattito perduto.” In Matter and Metaphysics. Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium Hellenisticum, edited by J. Barnes, and M. Mignucci, 425–70. Napoli: Bibliopolis.Search in Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. 1973. Iamblichi Chalcidensis in Platonis dialogos commentariorum fragmenta. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004320444Search in Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. 1977. The Middle Platonists: A Study of Platonism, 80 BC to AD 220. London: Duckworth.Search in Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. 1997. “Iamblichus’ νοερὰ θεωρία of Aristotle’s Categories.” Syllecta Classica 8: 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1353/syl.1997.0013.Search in Google Scholar
Dixsaut, M. 2003. “Le temps qui s’avance et l’instant du changement (Timée 37 C–39 E, Parménide 141 E–142 E, 151 E–155 E).” Revue Philosophique de Louvain 101 (2): 236–64. https://doi.org/10.2143/rpl.101.2.738.Search in Google Scholar
Dörrie, H. 1974. “Plotino, tradizionalista o innovatore?” In Plotino e il Neoplatonismo in Oriente e in Occidente, edited by AA. VV., 195–201. Roma: Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei.Search in Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. 1995. Dio, idee e materia. La struttura del cosmo in Plutarco di Cheronea. Napoli: M. D’Auria.Search in Google Scholar
Gioè, A. 2002. Filosofi medioplatonici del II secolo d.C.: testimonianze e frammenti. Gaio, Albino, Lucio, Nicostrato, Tauro, Severo, Arpocrazione. Napoli: Bibliopolis.Search in Google Scholar
Golitsis, P., and Ph. Hoffmann. 2024. Simplicius de Cilicie, Commentaire à la Physique d’Aristote: Digressions sur le lieu et sur le temps. Édition critique avec introduction et traduction. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110786101Search in Google Scholar
Hackforth, R. 1959. “Plato’s Cosmogony (Timaeus 27 d ff.).” Classical Quarterly 9 (1): 17–22.Search in Google Scholar
Harder, R. 1926. Ocellus Lucanus: Text und Kommentar. Berlin: Weidemann.Search in Google Scholar
Harder, R. 1936. “Timaios.” RE, Band 6 A, Halbband 11: Thesauros–Timomachos: 1203–26.Search in Google Scholar
Harlfinger, D. 1987. “Einige Aspekte der handschriftlichen Überlieferung des Physikkommentars des Simplikios.” In Simplicius, sa vie, son œuvre, sa survie, edited by I. Hadot, 267–86. Berlin: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Hatzimichali, M. 2018. “Pseudo-Archytas and the Categories.” In Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy, edited by J. Bryan, R. Wardy, and J. Warren, 162–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108186650.009Search in Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Ph. 1980. “Jamblique exégète du pythagoricien Archytas: trois originalités d’une doctrine du temps.” Les Études philosophiques 3: 307–23.Search in Google Scholar
Horky, P. S. 2021. “Archytas: Author and Authenticator of Pythagoreanism.” In Pythagoras redivivus, edited by C. Macris, T. Dorandi, and L. Brisson, 141–76. Baden-Baden: Academia Verlag.10.5771/9783896659590-139Search in Google Scholar
Johns, J. M. 2021. “Iamblichus apud Simpl. Corollarium de tempore 794.21–7 Diels.” Classical Quarterly 71 (2): 849–55. https://doi.org/10.1017/s000983882100077x.Search in Google Scholar
Karamanolis, G. E. 2006. Plato and Aristotle in Agreement? Platonists on Aristotle from Antiochus to Porphyry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199264562.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Leisegang, H. 1913. Die Begriffe der Zeit und Ewigkeit im späteren Platonismus. Münster: Aschendorff Verlag.Search in Google Scholar
Levi, A. 1952. “Il concetto del tempo nelle filosofie dell’età romana.” Rivista Critica di Storia della Filosofia 7 (3): 173–200.Search in Google Scholar
Macris, C. 2002. “Jamblique et la littérature pseudo-pythagoricienne.” In Apocryphité. Histoire d’un concept transversal aux religions du Livre: En hommage à Pierre Geoltrain, edited by S. C. Mimouni, 77–129. Turnhout: Brepols.10.1484/M.BEHE-EB.4.00836Search in Google Scholar
Macris, C. 2018. “Timée de Locres (Pseudo-Timée).” In Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, Vol. VII, edited by R. Goulet, 1009–17. Paris: CNRS Éditions.Search in Google Scholar
Marg, W. 1972. Timaeus Locrus. De natura mundi et animae. Überlieferung, Testimonia, Text und Übersetzung. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004320451Search in Google Scholar
Michalewski, A. 2024. Le dieu, le mouvement, la matière. Atticus et ses critiques dans l’Antiquité tardive. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.10.14375/NP.9782251919744Search in Google Scholar
O’Meara, D. J. 1989. Pythagoras Revived: Mathematics and Philosophy in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0198239130.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. 2023. “In the Spirit of Plato.” In The Cambridge Companion to Plutarch, edited by F. B. Titchener, and A. V. Zadorojnyi, 79–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9780511986451.005Search in Google Scholar
Petrucci, F. M. 2018. Taurus of Beirut: The Other Side of Middle Platonism. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Petrucci, F. M. 2019. “Il principio ΔΙΔΑΣΚΑΛΙΑΣ ΧΑΡΙΝ nel medioplatonismo: breve storia di un dibattito filosofico.” In Studi sul medioplatonismo e il neoplatonismo, edited by E. Cattanei, and C. Natali, with R. Medda, 15–41. Roma: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.Search in Google Scholar
Petrucci, F. M., and F. Ferrari. 2022. Platone. Timeo. Milano: Mondadori.Search in Google Scholar
Rescigno, A. 1998. “Proclo lettore di Plutarco?” In L’eredità culturale di Plutarco dall’antichità al Rinascimento. Atti del VII Convegno plutarcheo. Milano-Gargnano, 28–30 maggio 1997, edited by I. Gallo, 111–41. Napoli: M. D’Auria.Search in Google Scholar
Rescigno, A. 2004. Alessandro di Afrodisia. Commentario al De Caelo di Aristotele. Frammenti del primo libro. Amsterdam: Hakkert.Search in Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. J. 2020. Calcidius on Plato’s Timaeus: Greek Philosophy, Latin Reception, and Christian Contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Sambursky, S., and S. Pines. 1971. The Concept of Time in Late Neoplatonism: Texts with Translation, Introduction and Notes. Jerusalem: Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities.Search in Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. M. 1992. “Prose Usages of ΑΚΟΥΕΙΝ, ‘To Read’.” Classical Quarterly 42 (1): 129–41. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0009838800042634.Search in Google Scholar
Schmidt, E. A. 2012. Platons Zeittheorie. Kosmos, Seele, Zahl und Ewigkeit im Timaios. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.10.5771/9783465137306Search in Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. 1989. “Philosophical Allegiance in the Greco-Roman World.” In Philosophia Togata I: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society, edited by M. Griffin, and J. Barnes, 97–119. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198150855.003.0004Search in Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. 1997. “Plato’s Auctoritas and the Rebirth of the Commentary Tradition.” In Philosophia Togata II: Plato and Aristotle at Rome, edited by J. Barnes, and M. Griffin, 110–29. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198150565.003.0004Search in Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. 2002. “Eudemus’ Physics: Change, Place and Time.” In Eudemus of Rhodes, edited by I. Bodnár, and W. W. Fortenbaugh, 107–26. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.10.4324/9781351324489-6Search in Google Scholar
Sonderegger, E. 1982. Simplikios. Über die Zeit: ein Kommentar zum Corollarium de tempore. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.10.13109/9783666251665Search in Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. R. K. 1983. Time, Creation and the Continuum: Theories in Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages. London: Duckworth.Search in Google Scholar
Stevens, A. 2021. Simplicius. Sur le temps. Commentaire sur le Physique d’Aristote et Corollaire sur le temps. Paris: Vrin.Search in Google Scholar
Szlezák, Th. A. 1976. “Rezension: Tim. Locr. De nat. mund. et an. hrsg. von W. Marg und Tim. Lokr. Über die Natur. d. Kosmos. Komm. von M. Baltes.” Gnomon 48 (2): 135–44.Search in Google Scholar
Taormina, D. P. 1999. Jamblique critique de Plotin et de Porphyre. Quatre études. Paris: Vrin.Search in Google Scholar
Taormina, D. P. 2012. “Platonismo e pitagorismo.” In Filosofia tardoantica. Storia e problemi, edited by R. Chiaradonna, 103–27. Roma: Carocci.Search in Google Scholar
Thein, K. 2001. Le lien intraitable. Enquête sur le temps dans la République et le Timée de Platon. Paris: Vrin.Search in Google Scholar
Trostyanskiy, S. 2016. “Iamblichus’ Response to Aristotle’s and Pseudo-Archytas’ Theories of Time.” Forum Philosophicum 21 (2): 187–212. https://doi.org/10.5840/forphil201621213.Search in Google Scholar
Ulacco, A. 2020. “The Creation of Authority in Pseudo-Pythagorean Texts and their Reception in Late Ancient Philosophy.” In Falsifications and Authority in Antiquity, the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, edited by E. Gielen, and J. Papy, 183–214. Turnhout: Brepols.10.1484/M.LECTIO-EB.5.119647Search in Google Scholar
Varoli, M. 2021. “Il tempo, la Terra, i pianeti. Osservazioni sull’esegesi di Tim. 37c–39e in Ps.-Timeo di Locri.” In Pythagoras redivivus, edited by C. Macris, T. Dorandi, and L. Brisson, 229–47. Baden-Baden: Academia Verlag.10.5771/9783896659590-229Search in Google Scholar
Verde, F. 2022. Peripatetic Philosophy in Context: Knowledge, Time, and Soul from Theophrastus to Cratippus. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110772722Search in Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1939. “The Disorderly Motion in the Timaios.” Classical Quarterly 33 (2): 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0009838800020966.Search in Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1965a. “The Disorderly Motion in the Timaeus.” In Studies in Plato’s Metaphysics, edited by R. E. Allen, 379–99. London: Keegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1965b. “Creation in the Timaeus: Is it a Fiction?” In Studies in Plato’s Metaphysics, edited by R. E. Allen, 401–19. London: Keegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar
Whittaker, J. 1973. “Textual Comments on Timaeus 27C–D.” Phoenix 27 (4): 387–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/1087811.Search in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Beyond Socrates: The (Pre)history of enkrateia
- La difficile scelta di Carmide. Αἰδώς e azione politica in Platone e Senofonte
- Chez Euclide et Platon, décrire ce que sont les nombres sans additionner d’unités
- Dall’Uno al Nulla. Appunti per una nuova lettura di Arist. Ph. I 2.185b19–25
- Ghosts in the Machine? Il dibattito esegetico sulla concezione aristotelica dei φαντάσματα
- Notes
- La prospettiva filosofica dell’economia nell’Erissia pseudo-platonico. Nota alla nuova edizione a cura di M. Donato
- Why Should Iamblichus Wish to Reify Time?
- Notes on the Cambridge Companion to Ancient Logic
- Review
- Alexandra Michalewski: Le Dieu, le mouvement, la matière. Atticus et ses critiques dans l’Antiquité tardive
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Beyond Socrates: The (Pre)history of enkrateia
- La difficile scelta di Carmide. Αἰδώς e azione politica in Platone e Senofonte
- Chez Euclide et Platon, décrire ce que sont les nombres sans additionner d’unités
- Dall’Uno al Nulla. Appunti per una nuova lettura di Arist. Ph. I 2.185b19–25
- Ghosts in the Machine? Il dibattito esegetico sulla concezione aristotelica dei φαντάσματα
- Notes
- La prospettiva filosofica dell’economia nell’Erissia pseudo-platonico. Nota alla nuova edizione a cura di M. Donato
- Why Should Iamblichus Wish to Reify Time?
- Notes on the Cambridge Companion to Ancient Logic
- Review
- Alexandra Michalewski: Le Dieu, le mouvement, la matière. Atticus et ses critiques dans l’Antiquité tardive