Notes on the Cambridge Companion to Ancient Logic

Riccardo Zanichelli

doi:10.1515/elen-2025-0008

Article

Notes on the Cambridge Companion to Ancient Logic

Riccardo Zanichelli

Published/Copyright: June 25, 2025

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Author Information

From the journal Elenchos Volume 46 Issue 1

Abstract

This note undertakes an examination of The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Logic, edited by Luca Castagnoli and Paolo Fait, by analysing the majority of its contributions. It explores how the essays elucidate the major developments of ancient logical thought, from its earliest foundations to the Aristotelian and Stoic traditions, and their enduring influence. The chapters are assessed with regard to clarity and interpretative approach, highlighting both their strengths and points of debate. Ultimately, the review acknowledges that the volume provides an excellent introduction to ancient logic, offering an insightful guide to its key themes and inquiries.

Keywords: Ancient logic; syllogistic; Stoic logic; logical methodology; philosophical analysis

Corresponding author: Riccardo Zanichelli, Istituto Europeo di Studi Superiori, Reggio Emilia, Italy, E-mail: r.zanichelli@iess.it

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to Riccardo Chiaradonna, Paolo Fait, and Leonardo Mazzanti for many helpful comments.

References

Acerbi, F. 2021. The Logical Syntax of Greek Mathematics. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-76959-8Search in Google Scholar

Barnes, J. 2007. Truth, etc. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brenner, H. 2000. “Eine vollständige Formalisierung der Aristotelischen Notwendigkeitssyllogistik.” In Beiträge zum Satz vom Widerspruch und zur Aristotelischen Prädikationstheorie, edited by N. Öffenberger, and M. Skarica, 333–56. Hildesheim: Olms.Search in Google Scholar

Crivelli, P. 2012. “Aristotle’s Logic.” In The Oxford Handbook of Aristotle, edited by Ch. Shields, 113–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195187489.013.0006Search in Google Scholar

Maffezioli, P., and R. Zanichelli. 2023. “The Arithmetical dictum.” History and Philosophy of Logic 44 (4): 373–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/01445340.2023.2190309.Search in Google Scholar

Malink, M. 2013. Aristotle’s Modal Syllogistic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674726352Search in Google Scholar

Malink, M., and J. Rosen. 2013. “Proof by Assumption of the Possible in Prior Analytics 1.15.” Mind 122 (488): 953–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzt095.Search in Google Scholar

Mancosu, P., and M. Mugnai. 2023. Syllogistic Logic and Mathematical Proof. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198876922.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Morison, B. 2015. “What is a Perfect Syllogism?” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 48: 107–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198735540.003.0004.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198735540.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

Opsomer, J. 2013. “The Lives and Opinions of Socrates and Stilpo as Defended by Plutarch against the Insidious yet Ignorant Attacks of Colotes.” Aitia 3. Available at https://journals.openedition.org/aitia/677?lang=en.10.4000/aitia.677Search in Google Scholar

Rosen, J., and M. Malink. 2012. “A Method of Modal Proof in Aristotle.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 42: 179–261.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199644384.003.0006Search in Google Scholar

Whitaker, C. W. A. 1996. Aristotle’s De Interpretatione. Contradiction and Dialectic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Zanichelli, R. 2023. “Aristotle’s Proofs through the Impossible in Prior Analytics 1.15.” History and Philosophy of Logic 44 (4): 395–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/01445340.2023.2241183.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2025-06-25

Published in Print: 2025-06-26

You are currently not able to access this content.

Articles in the same Issue

https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2025-0008

Keywords for this article

Ancient logic; syllogistic; Stoic logic; logical methodology; philosophical analysis