Stoici e Peripatetici su agire, patire e movimento: la testimonianza di Simplicio

Bibliografia

Alessandrelli, A. 2013. Il problema del lekton nello stoicismo antico. Firenze: Olschki.Suche in Google Scholar

Bénatouïl, T. 2016. “Aristotle and the Stoa.” In Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Aristotle in Antiquity, edited by A. Falcon, 56–75. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004315402_005Suche in Google Scholar

Boeri, M. D. 2001. “The Stoics on Bodies and Incorporeals.” The Review of Metaphysics 54 (4): 723–52.Suche in Google Scholar

Bonitz, H. 1870. Index Aristotelicus. Berlin: Reimer.Suche in Google Scholar

Bréhier, É. 1928. La théorie des incorporels dans l’ancien stoïcisme. Paris: Vrin.Suche in Google Scholar

Bronowski, A. 2019. The Stoics on Lekta. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198842880.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Brunschwig, J. 1988. “La théorie stoïcienne du genre suprême et l’ontologie platonicienne.” In Matter and Metaphysics, edited by J. Barnes, and M. Mignucci, 19–127. Napoli: Bibliopolis.Suche in Google Scholar

Brunschwig, J. 2003. “Stoic Metaphysics.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, edited by B. Inwood, 206–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL052177005X.009Suche in Google Scholar

Centrone, B. 2014. “The pseudo-Pythagorean Writings.” In A History of Pythagoreanism, edited by C. A. Huffmann, 315–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139028172.016Suche in Google Scholar

Chase, M. 2003. Simplicius. On Aristotle’s Categories. Ithaca & New York: Cornell University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R. 2002. Sostanza, movimento, analogia. Plotino critico di Aristotele. Napoli: Bibliopolis.Suche in Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R. 2009. “Autour d’Eudore. Les débuts de l’exégèse des Catégories dans les Moyen Platonisme.” In The Origins of the Platonic System. Platonisms of the Early Empire and their Philosophical Contexts, edited by M. Bonazzi, and J. Opsomer, 89–111. Leuven: Peeters.Suche in Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R. 2017. “Théologie et époptique aristotéliciennes dans le médioplatonisme: la réception de Métaphysique Λ.” In La réception de la théologie aristotélicienne. D’Aristote à Michel d’Éphèse, edited by F. Baghdassarian, and G. Guyomarc’h, 143–57. Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters.Suche in Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R. 2020. “Boethus of Sidon on Forms and Qualities: Some Remarks.” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 31: 39–56.Suche in Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R., and M. Rashed, éds. 2020. Boéthos de Sidon – Exégète d’Aristote et philosophe. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110699845Suche in Google Scholar

Evangeliou, C. 1996. Aristotle’s Categories and Porphyry. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004320703Suche in Google Scholar

Gaskin, R. 2012. Simplicius. On Aristotle Categories 9–15. London & New York: Bloomsbury.Suche in Google Scholar

Gigante, M. 1962. Diogene Laerzio. Vite dei filosofi. Bari: Laterza.Suche in Google Scholar

Gioè, A. 2002. Filosofi medioplatonici del II secolo d.C. Testimonianze e frammenti. Gaio, Albino, Lucio, Nicostrato, Tauro, Severo, Arpocrazione. Napoli: Bibliopolis.Suche in Google Scholar

Glucker, J. 1994. “The Origin of ὑπάρχω and ὕπαρξις as Philosophical Terms.” In Hyparxis e Hypostasis nel Neoplatonismo. I Colloquio Internazionale del Centro di Ricerca sul Neoplatonismo, edited by F. Romano, and D. P. Taormina, 1–23. Firenze: Olschki.Suche in Google Scholar

Goldschmidt, V. 1972. “Ὑπάρχειν et ὑφεστάναι dans la philosophie stoïcienne.” Revue des Études Grecques 85 (406–408): 331–44. https://doi.org/10.3406/reg.1972.1214.Suche in Google Scholar

Gottschalk, H. B. 1990. “The Earliest Aristotelian Commentators.” In Aristotle Transformed, edited by R. Sorabji, 55–81. Ithaca & New York: Cornell University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Goulet-Cazé, M.-O., dir. 1999. Diogène Laërce. Vies et doctrines des philosophes illustres, Introductions, traductions et notes de J.-F. Balaudé, L. Brisson, J. Brunschwig, T. Dorandi, M.-O. Goulet-Cazé, R. Goulet et M. Narcy. Paris: Le Livre de Poche.Suche in Google Scholar

Gourinat, J.-B. 2012. “Le premier moteur selon Physique, VIII et Méthaphysique, Λ: Physique et philosophie première.” In Physique et méthaphysique chez Aristote, edited by M. Bonelli, 175–206. Paris: Vrin.Suche in Google Scholar

Gourinat, J.-B. 2018. “L’epistemologie stoïcienne.” In Lexicon Philosophicum: International Journal for the History of Texts and Ideas. Special Issue: Hellenistic Theories of Knowledge, edited by F. Verde, and M. Catapano, 123–44.Suche in Google Scholar

Gourinat, J.-B. 2019. “Les Stoïciens et les Éthiques d’Aristote.” In Êthikê theôria. Studi sull’Etica Nicomachea in onore di Carlo Natali, edited by F. Masi, S. Maso, and C. Viano, 339–63. Roma: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.Suche in Google Scholar

Graeser, A. 1971. “À propos ὑπάρχειν bei den Stoikern.” Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 15: 299–305.Suche in Google Scholar

Graeser, A. 1978. “The Stoic Categories.” In Les Stoïciens et leur logique. Actes du colloque de Chantilly, 18–22 sept. 1976, edited by J. Brunschwig, 199–221. Paris: Vrin.Suche in Google Scholar

Griffin, M. 2012. “What does Aristotle Categorize? Semantics and the Early Peripatetic Reading of the Categories.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 55: 69–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-5370.2012.00035.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Griffin, M. 2013. “Which ‘Athenodorus’ commented on Aristotle’s Categories?” Classical Quarterly 63: 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0009838812000651.Suche in Google Scholar

Griffin, M. 2015. Aristotle’s Categories in the Early Roman Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198724735.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Griffin, M. 2020. “Articulating Preconceptions: A Reconsideration of Aristotle’s Categories in the Early Roman Empire.” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 31: 1–37.Suche in Google Scholar

Hadot, I. éd. 1990. Simplicius. Commentaire sur les Catégories, Fasc. I. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004320734Suche in Google Scholar

Hahm, D. E. 1977. The Origins of Stoic Cosmology. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hahm, D. E. 1991. “Aristotle and the Stoics: A Methodological Crux.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 73: 297–311.Suche in Google Scholar

Hahm, D. E. 1994. “Self-Motion in Stoic Philosophy.” In Self-Motion. From Aristotle to Newton, edited by M. L. Gill, and J. G. Lennox, 175–225. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400887330-012Suche in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Ph. 1987. “Catégories et langage selon Simplicius. La question du skopos du traité aristotélicien des Catégories.” In Simplicius. Sa vie, son œuvre, sa survie, edited by I. Hadot, 61–90. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Inwood, B. 1985. Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Isnardi Parente, M. 1989. Stoici Antichi, t. II. Torino: UTET.Suche in Google Scholar

Krämer, H. J. 1971. Platonismus und hellenistische Philosophie. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110843170Suche in Google Scholar

Kupreeva, I. 2018. “Kaiserzeitlicher Aristotelismus.” In Die Philosophie der Antike: Philosophie der Kaiserzeit und der Spätantike, edited by C. Riedweg, C. Horn, and D. Wyrwa, 255–455. Basel: Schwabe.Suche in Google Scholar

Long, A. A., and D. N. Sedley. 1987a. The Hellenistic Philosophers, Vol. I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Long, A. A., and D. N. Sedley. 1987b. The Hellenistic Philosophers, Vol. II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165907Suche in Google Scholar

Luna, C. 2001. “Commentaire.” In Simplicius. Commentaire sur les Catégories d’Aristote, Chapitres 2–4, edited by Ph. Hoffmann, and C. Luna, 67–687. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Suche in Google Scholar

Luna, C. 2005. “Lucius.” In Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, Vol. IV, edited by R. Goulet, 167–74. Paris: CNRS-Éditions.Suche in Google Scholar

Menn, S. 1994. “The Origins of Aristotle’s Concept of Ἐνέργεια: Ἐνέργεια and Δύναμις.” Ancient Philosophy 14: 73–114. https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil199414150.Suche in Google Scholar

Menn, S. 1999. “The Stoic Theory of Categories.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 17: 215–47.10.1093/oso/9780198250197.003.0007Suche in Google Scholar

Menn, S. 2018. “Andronicus and Boethus: Reflections on Michael Griffin’s ‘Aristotle’s Categories in the Early Roman Empire’.” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 29: 13–43.Suche in Google Scholar

Mensch, P., and J. Miller, eds. 2018. Diogenes Laertius. Lives of the Eminent Philosophers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Moraux, P. 1984. Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen. Der Aristotelismus im I. und II Jh. n. Chr., Band II. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110873580Suche in Google Scholar

Natali, C. 1999. “La critica di Plotino ai concetti di attualità e movimento in Aristotele.” In Antiaristotelismo, edited by C. Natali, and S. Maso, 211–29. Amsterdam: Hakkert.Suche in Google Scholar

Nawar, T. 2017. “The Stoics on Identity, Identification, and Peculiar Qualities.” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 32: 113–59. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134417-00321p11.Suche in Google Scholar

Praechter, K. 1922. “Nikostratos der Platoniker.” Hermes 57 (4): 481–517.Suche in Google Scholar

Rashed, M., ed. 2005. Aristote. De la génération et la corruption. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Suche in Google Scholar

Rashed, M. 2013. “Boethus’ Aristotelian Ontology.” In Aristotle, Plato and Pythagoreanism in the First Century BC, edited by M. Schofield, 53–77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139096713.005Suche in Google Scholar

Rashed, M. 2021. “Note: Un témoin arabe du fragment 2 de Boéthos de Sidon et le problème du rapport chronologique entre Andronicos et Boéthos.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 31: 257–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0957423921000084.Suche in Google Scholar

Reinhardt, T. 2007. “Andronicus of Rhodes and Boethus of Sidon on Aristotle’s Categories.” In Greek and Roman Philosophy. 100 BC–200 AD, Vol. II, edited by R. Sorabji, and R. W. Sharples, 513–29. London: Institute of Classical Studies.10.1111/j.2041-5370.2007.tb02446.xSuche in Google Scholar

Reydams-Schils, G. 1999. Demiurge and Providence: Stoic and Platonist Readings of Plato’s Timaeus. Turnhout: Brepols.10.1484/M.MON-EB.5.112278Suche in Google Scholar

Rist, J. M. 1971. “Categories and their Uses.” In Problems in Stoicism, edited by A. A. Long, 38–57. London: The Athlone Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Ross, W. D. 1936. Aristotle’s Physics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/actrade/9780198141099.book.1Suche in Google Scholar

Sandbach, H. 1985. Aristotle and the Stoics. Cambridge: Cambridge Philological Society.Suche in Google Scholar

Sedley, D. 1982. “The Stoic Criterion of Identity.” Phronesis 27 (3): 255–75. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852882x00177.Suche in Google Scholar

Sedley, D. 1999. “Hellenistic Physics and Metaphysics.” In The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, edited by K. Algra, J. Barnes, J. Mansfeld, and M. Schofield, 355–411. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CHOL9780521250283.012Suche in Google Scholar

Sedley, D. 2005. “Stoic Metaphysics at Rome.” In Metaphysics, Soul, and Ethics in Ancient Thought, edited by R. Salles, 117–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199261307.003.0006Suche in Google Scholar

Sedley, D. 2011. “Matter in Hellenistic Philosophy.” In Materia. XIII Colloquio Internazionale del Lessico Intellettuale Europeo (Roma, 7-8-9 gennaio 2010), edited by D. Giovannozzi, and M. Veneziani, 53–66. Firenze: Olschki.Suche in Google Scholar

Sleeman, J. H., and G. Pollet. 1980. Lexicon Plotinianum. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004452251Suche in Google Scholar

Szlezák, Th. A. 1972. Pseudo-Archytas. Über die Kategorien. Texte zur griechischen Aristotelesexegese. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110835458Suche in Google Scholar

Taormina, D. 1999. Jamblique critique de Plotin et Porphyre. Quatre études. Paris: Vrin.Suche in Google Scholar

Tarrant, H. 2008. “Eudorus and the Early Platonist Interpretation of the Categories.” Laval theologique et philosophique 64: 583–95. https://doi.org/10.7202/037692ar.Suche in Google Scholar

Ugaglia, M. ed. 2012. Aristotele. Fisica. Libro III. Roma: Carocci.Suche in Google Scholar

Ulacco, A. 2017. Pseudopythagorica dorica. Boston & Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9781501505485Suche in Google Scholar

Vamvoukakis, N. 1980. “Les catégories aristotéliciennes d’action et de passion vues par Simplicius.” In Concepts et catégories dans la pensée antique, edited by P. Aubenque, 247–69. Paris: Vrin.Suche in Google Scholar

Verde, F. 2022. Peripatetic Philosophy in Context. Knowledge, Time, and Soul from Theophrastus to Cratippus. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110772722Suche in Google Scholar

White, M. J. 2003. “Stoic Natural Philosophy (Physics and Cosmology).” In The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, edited by B. Inwood, 124–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL052177005X.006Suche in Google Scholar

White, S. 2020. Diogenes Laertius. Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781139047111Suche in Google Scholar

Wildberg, C. 2004. “On Generation and Corruption I 6: Aristotle on poien and paschein.” In Aristotle: On Generation and Corruption. Book I, edited by F. de Haas, and J. Mansfeld, 219–42. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/oso/9780199242924.003.0010Suche in Google Scholar