Providence et passions divines dans le stoïcisme : comment prémunir un dieu bienveillant contre la colère ?

Références

Alesse, F. 2016. “La représentation de soi et les différentes formes de l’appropriation chez Hiéroclès.” In L’éthique du stoïcien Hiéroclès, edited by J.-B. Gourinat, 65–85. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.10.4000/books.septentrion.88661Search in Google Scholar

Algra, K. 2009. “Stoic Philosophical Theology and Graeco-Roman Religion.” In God and Cosmos in Stoicism, edited by R. Salles, 224–51. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199556144.003.0010Search in Google Scholar

Babut, D. 1974. La religion des philosophes grecs, de Thalès aux Stoïciens. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Search in Google Scholar

Bees, R. 2004. Die Oikeiosislehre der Stoa. 1. Rekonstruktion ihres lnhalts. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Search in Google Scholar

Bénatouïl, T. 2006. Faire usage: la pratique du stoïcisme. Paris: Vrin.Search in Google Scholar

Bénatouïl, T. 2009. “How Industrious can Zeus be? The Extent and Objects of Divine Activity in Stoicism.” In God and Cosmos in Stoicism, edited by R. Salles, 23–45. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199556144.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Collette-Dučić, B. 2022. The Stoic Doctrine of Providence: A Study of its Development and of Some of its Major Issues. London & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315647678Search in Google Scholar

Delcomminette, S. 2019. “Le dieu des philosophes.” In L’Esprit critique dans l’Antiquité I. Critique et licence dans la Grèce antique, edited by B. Collette-Dučić, M.-A Gavray, and J.-M. Narbonne, 143–66. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Search in Google Scholar

Fiasse, G. 2002. “Les fondements de la philanthropie dans le nouveau stoïcisme, deux cas concrets: l’esclavage et la gladiature.” Les Études philosophiques 63: 527–47. https://doi.org/10.3917/leph.024.0527.Search in Google Scholar

Fillion-Lahille, J. 1984. Le De ira de Sénèque et la philosophie stoïcienne des passions. Paris: Klinxksieck.Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, S. E. 2008. Seneca als Theologe: Studien zum Verhältnis von Philosophie und Tragödiendichtung. Berlin: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Frede, D. 2002. “Theodicy and Providential Care in Stoicism.” In Traditions of Theology: Studies in Hellenistic Theology, its Background and Aftermath, edited by D. Frede, and A. Laks, 85–117. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789047401063_004Search in Google Scholar

Gourinat, J.-B. 2020. “Apospasma: The World Soul and its Individual Parts in Stoicism.” In World Soul – Anima Mundi: On the Origins and Fortunes of a Fundamental Idea, edited by C. Helmig, 167–87. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110628609-008Search in Google Scholar

Graver, M. 2007. Stoicism and Emotion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226305202.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Graver, M. 2021. “Le De ira de Sénèque et les Tusculanes de Cicéron.” In Lectures plurielles du De ira de Sénèque, edited by V. Laurand, E. Malaspina, and F. Prost, 333–8. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110711547-018Search in Google Scholar

Inwood, B. 1996. “L’oikeiôsis sociale chez Epictète.” In Polyhistor. Studies in the History and Historiography of Ancient Philosophy, edited by K. A. Algra, P. W. van der Horst, and D. T. Runia, 243–64. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004320970_016Search in Google Scholar

Laurand, V. 2005. La politique stoïcienne. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.10.3917/puf.laura.2005.01Search in Google Scholar

Laurand, V., E. Malaspina, and F. Prost. 2021. Lectures plurielles du De ira de Sénèque. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110711547Search in Google Scholar

Leclerc, M.-C. 2000. “Sacrées colères. De quelques fonctions de la colère dans la fondation du sacré d’Homère à Euripide.” In La colère et le sacré. Recherches franco-brésiliennes, edited by S. de Carvalho, P. Lévêque, and L. S. Trindade, 119–40. Besançon: Institut des sciences et techniques de l’Antiquité.Search in Google Scholar

Merkel, C. 2012. Seneca theologus: la religion d’un philosophe romain, Thèse de doctorat. Strasbourg: Université de Strasbourg.Search in Google Scholar

Morana, C. 1999. “L’éthique stoïcienne des sentiments: amor, amicitia et φιλανθρωπία.” Les Études philosophiques 1: 67–89.Search in Google Scholar

Morel, P.-M. 2011. Epicure. Lettres, maximes et autres textes. Paris: Flammarion.Search in Google Scholar

Pià Comella, J. 2014. Une piété de la raison. Philosophie et religion dans le stoïcisme impérial. Turnhout: Brepols.10.1484/M.PHR-EB.5.112497Search in Google Scholar

Pià Comella, J. 2016. “Quelques remarques sur les rapports entre la religion et les passions dans les Lettres à Lucilius de Sénèque et les Satires de Perse.” In L’homme et ses passions. XVIIe congrès Guillaume Budé (Août 2013), edited by I. Boehm, J.-L. Ferrary, and S. Franchet d’Espèrey, 435–55. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Search in Google Scholar

Pià Comella, J. 2017. “Le traitement ambigu de la superstitio dans les Lettres à Lucilius de Sénèque.” Maia 69: 386–400.Search in Google Scholar

Piergiacomi, E. 2017. Storia delle antiche teologie atomiste. Roma: Sapienza Università Editrice.Search in Google Scholar

Schofield, M. 2002 [1980]. “Preconception, Argument, and God.” In Doubt and Dogmatism. Studies in Hellenic Epistemology, edited by M. Schofield, M. Burnyeat, and J. Barnes, 283–308. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Setaioli, A. 2007. “Seneca and the Divine: Stoic Tradition and Personal Developments.” International Journal of the Classical Tradition 13 (3): 333–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02856418.Search in Google Scholar

Setaioli, A. 2014. “Physics III: Theology.” In Brill’s Companion to Seneca: Philosopher and Dramatist, edited by G. Damschen, and A. Heil, 379–401. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004217089_032Search in Google Scholar

Spinelli, E., and F. Verde. 2020. “Theology.” In The Oxford Handbook of Epicurus and Epicureanism, edited by P. Mitsis, 94–117. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199744213.013.33Search in Google Scholar

Spinelli, E., and F. Verde. 2021. “La rage du sage. Philodème et la conception épicurienne de la colère.” In Lectures plurielles du De ira de Sénèque, edited by V. Laurand, E. Malaspina, and F. Prost, 316–32. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110711547-017Search in Google Scholar

Stephens, W. O. 1996. “Epictetus on How the Stoic Sage Loves.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 14: 193–210.10.1093/oso/9780198236702.003.0005Search in Google Scholar

Van der Meeren, S. 2021. “La colère divine, expression nécessaire de la providence: le De ira dei de Lactance.” In Lectures plurielles du De ira de Sénèque, edited by V. Laurand, 359–69. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110711547-021Search in Google Scholar

Warren, J. 2009. “Removing Fear.” In The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism, edited by J. Warren, 234–48. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL9780521873475.014Search in Google Scholar

Wynne, J. 2012. “God’s Indifferents: Why Cicero’s Stoic Jupiter Made the World.” Apeiron 45: 354–83. https://doi.org/10.1515/apeiron-2012-0009.Search in Google Scholar