What’s up in nanomedicine?
-
Georgette B. Salieb-Beugelaar
First of all, I would like to wish you all a healthy, happy and successful 2015. The publications, discussed here are selected exemplarily among many other excellent publications. This also applies for the mentioned conferences or events. We very much appreciate your feedback on the column, suggestions for topics to be argued about, or other related information. As was already stated the purpose of this column is to present novel and/or significant developments within the multidisciplinary field of nanomedicine or significant developments in other scientific areas.

Publications digest
Nanomaterial bio-screening platform for neurological applications
Neural cells are classified into glia cells and neurons. The neurons transmit electrical information, whereas the glia cells are the supporting cells and exceed the neurons by about 10-fold [1–4]. Jenkins and coworkers [5] found that magnetic nanoparticles were uptaken/handled differently among different glia cells. The microglia cells (immune components) were capable of an voracious and rapid uptake of the particles with extensive degradation. A significantly lower but stable particle accumulation was found in the other glial subtypes. Therefore, the microglial cells may function as a barrier to the uptake of particles where the neural cell populations are mixed as found in the intact nervous system. Until now, the latter was concluded from post-mortem observations only [6].
Glia cells are responsible for the clearance of nanomaterials [7] in the central nervous system, according to a study of Maysinger et al. [8] even for ∼99.5% and are therefore important when investigating new nanomaterials. They also emphasized that the interactions of biomolecules with the materials at nanoscale is of extreme importance. The biomolecules form a layer around the material (also called the protein corona [9–11]) thus becoming in direct contact with the cell and influencing the provided results of an investigation.
High throughput screening of new nanomaterials is still difficult as a result of the lack of accessible neural models [12]. In addition, current available biological models are limited due to, e.g., ethical and technical issues with laboratory animals, the limitations in the control of cellular stoichiometries and/or poor reproducibility. Jenkins et al. [13] developed a novel multi-glial cell-screening model suitable for the investigation of nanomaterials. The capabilities of the novel model were evaluated by investigating well-characterized magnetic particles and examining the hypothesis of the existence of a microglial barrier. The important features of the model are:
(1) The development of a standardized culture medium that can be used for all cell types. This gliosupportive medium ensures that the protein coronas of the magnetic particles are similar, which enables a real comparison of the particle uptake among different neural celltypes. The influences of different culture media including the developed gliosupportive medium were investigated by zeta potential measurements, dynamic light scattering and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis. Differences in the global secondary structure of the proteins of the corona were observed by FTIR, which emphasize the importance of a standardized medium. (2) The use of different cell-types that originate from a single source ensures identical treatment conditions for all cells and identical age and anatomical origin in an investigation. Differences in, e.g., culturing conditions or age may lead to differences in nanoparticle uptake. (3) A highly reproducible cellular stoichiometry was provided that enables reliable intercellular comparisons. (4) The model is compatible with other analytical and microscopic techniques. (5) Nanomaterials can be delivered easily.
With this novel approach, Jenkins and coworkers confirmed for the first time the existence of a competitive microglial barrier in real time and in addition, they demonstrated the influence of culture media on the particle coronas. This work is an example of excellent multidisciplinary work that enables the acceleration of novel (nano)materials for neuroregenerative application and in addition contributing to the limitation of live animal experiments.
PEDOT nanocomposites mediated sterilization
About one-third of global mortalities are caused by bacterial infection. Medical treatment with antibiotics is possible, however, the growing amount of resistant species is alarming. Reliable sterilization methods that have few side effects are urgently required. The field of phototherapeutics includes photothermal therapy (PTT) and photodynamic therapy (PDT).
PTT is a controllable, minimally-invasive and highly efficient method for sterilization that is based on the conversion of light energy into heat energy. Nanomaterials used for this include metal-based materials (e.g., Au [14, 15], Ag [16]), carbon based [17, 18] and semiconductor nanoparticles [19–22]. Polymeric nanoparticles are successfully used in vitro and in vivo for the photothermal treatment of cancer (e.g., [23, 24]). Interestingly, all of the developed conjugated polymeric nanoparticles absorb light in the near infrared region ranging from 700 to 950 nm, whereas the region from 1000 to 1250 nm received less attention. The latter has advantages in the penetration depth and the spatial scattering effect [25–27].
PDT comprises the use of harmless light and the use of non-toxic photosensitizers to produce cytotoxic free radicals. For in-depth treatment, photosensitizers with absorption wavelengths in the near-infrared regions are required. An FDA (Food and Drug Administration) approved example of near infrared photodynamic agent is indocyanine green (ICG).
PTT in combination with PDT has already been used to treat superficial cancers [26] but not for the treatment of bacterial infections. Li and coworkers [28] developed a novel agent that might be used in combination with PTT and PDT for the inactivation of pathogenic bacteria. The photothermal coupling agent poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) was used since this material has a broad absorbance ranging from 700 to 1250 nm, suitable size ∼17 nm and a conversion efficiency of ∼71%. PEDOT nanoparticles (PEDOTs) were generated by using a hydrothermal method (environmental friendly). Then the photodynamic agent ICG was electrostatically coupled to the surface of the PEDOTs. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) and gluteraldehyde (GTA) were used to generate bacteria targeting properties. The nanoparticles were characterized using powder X-ray diffraction, FTIR spectrometer and a transmission electron microscope. The toxicity of the PEDOTs-ICG-PEG-GTA particles was investigated on Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, HeLa and U87MG cells by using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide method (assessment of cell viability as a function of the redox potential). Li and colleagues concluded that the particles have low toxicity and have a high biocompatibility. The photodynamic properties were investigated by detecting the reactive oxygen species generated by ICG after irradiation with an 808 nm laser (1.5 W) and by using the singlet oxygen sensor green reagent. From this it was concluded that the reactive oxygen production is considerably high. The photothermal properties were investigated by using a 1064 nm laser (1.5 W). Within 330 s, the temperature increases from 25.5°C to 76.6°C. Irradiation for 60 min showed the excellent photostability of the PEDOTs-ICG-PEG-GTA particles. The dual-modal sterilization of the PEDOTs-ICG-PEG-GTA particles were studied on various groups of E. coli and S. aureus: PTT + PDT (PEDOTs-ICG-PEG-GTA particles + 808, 1064 nm irradiation), PTT only (PEDOTs + 1064 nm irradiation), PDT only (ICG +808 nm), control group (PEDOTs-ICG-PEG-GTA particles 808 nm, 1064 nm) and an untreated group. From the experiments the scientists concluded that the developed dual sterilization method has a bacteria killing efficacy of ∼99%. With this, they open the door to a new generation of treatments of bacterial infections.
Bacteriophages and nanomedicine
Finally, a note to emphasize the possibilities that genetic engineering of M13 bacteriophages may offer for our field by pointing to the recent review of Chung and coworkers [29]. In this review, the authors introduce how chemoselective phage functionalization can be designed and how this might be applied in combination with the use of genetic engineering by presenting this for various recently reported medical applications.
Upcoming events
The European Foundation for Clinical Nanomedicine CLINAM and collaborators organize the 8th European Summit for Clinical Nanomedicine and Targeted Medicine in Basel (Switzerland) from 28th June to 1st July. The purpose of this conference is to bring together researchers, practitioners, industry, ventures, political decision makers and is the place to be to present and discuss your work with the experts from the multidisciplinary field of nanomedicine and targeted medicine.
The three medical focus fields for this year are: infection and inflammation, cancer and diabetes with debates dedicated to topics such as: personalized medicine, ethical and societal implications, novel materials, technologies and devices, antibodies vs. nanoparticle delivery, nanomedical imaging, tools for translational research and more. For more information about the conference and the invited speakers, see www.clinam.org.
The Nanotech France 2015 will be held from June 15th to 17th (Paris–France) and covers all frontier topics in nanotechnology. This multidisciplinary conference is interesting for scientists, technology developers, practitioners and policy makers to exchange knowledge and information. Conference topics include advanced nanomaterials, nanoscale electronics, nanotech in life sciences and medicine and nanotechnology safety. An international exhibition and various short courses will be organized in parallel to the conference. For more information, see http://www.setcor.org/conferences/Nanotech-France-2015.
The NN15 Nanotechnology Conference7–10 July 2015, to be held at Thessaloniki (Greece) is a world class event with a focus on the latest developments in nanosciences and nanotechnologies and market-related trends. This multidisciplinary conference is the place to be for experts in the research and application field, industry, and for students and practitioners to startup collaboration, to discuss their work and to exchange educational concepts. The conference also includes five workshops: (1) nanoelectronics; photonics; phononics; plasmonics; energy, (2) nanomaterials, nanofabrications, nanoengeneering and nanoconstruction, (3) nanomedicine, (4) bioelectronics and (5) graphene and related materials.
For more information about the conference and the workshop, see: http://nnconf.physics.auth.gr.
Finally, I hope to meet you at the CLINAM summit from June 28 until July 1 at the Swiss Trade Fair congress Center (www.clinam.org).
References
1. Pakkenberg B, Gundersen H. Total number of neurons and glial cells in human brain nuclei estimated by the disector and the fractionator. J Microsc 1988;150:1–20.10.1111/j.1365-2818.1988.tb04582.xSuche in Google Scholar
2. Sherwood CC, Stimpson CD, Raghanti MA, Wildman DE, Uddin M, Grossman LI, et al. Evolution of increased glia-neuron ratios in the human frontal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:13606–11.10.1073/pnas.0605843103Suche in Google Scholar
3. Pfrieger FW, Barres BA. What the fly’s glia tell the fly’s brain. Cell 1995;83:671–4.10.1016/0092-8674(95)90178-7Suche in Google Scholar
4. Hilgetag CC, Barbas H. Are there ten times more glia than neurons in the brain? Brain Struct Funct 2009;213:365–6.10.1007/s00429-009-0202-zSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
5. Jenkins SI, Pickard MR, Furness DN, Yiu HH, Chari DM. Differences in magnetic particle uptake by CNS neuroglial sub-classes: implications for neural tissue engineering. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2013;8:951–68.10.2217/nnm.12.145Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
6. Fleige G, Nolte C, Synowitz M, Seeberger F, Kettenmann H, Zimmer C. Magnetic labeling of activated microglia in experimental gliomas. Neoplasia 2001;3:489–99.10.1038/sj.neo.7900176Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
7. Allen NJ, Barres BA. Glia – more than just brain glue. Nature 2009;457:675–7.10.1038/457675aSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
8. Maysinger D, Behrendt M, Lalancette-He’bert M, Kriz J. Real-time imaging of astrocyte response to quantum dots: in vivo screening model system for biocompatibility of nanoparticles. Nano Lett 2007;7:2513–20.10.1021/nl071611tSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
9. Walczyk D, Bombelli FB, Monopoli MP, Lynch I, Dawson KA. What the cell “sees” in bionanoscience. J Am Chem Soc 2010;132:5761–8.10.1021/ja910675vSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
10. Mahmoudi M, Serpooshan V. Large protein absorptions from small changes on the surface of nanoparticles. J Phys Chem C 2011;115:18275–83.10.1021/jp2056255Suche in Google Scholar
11. Ghavami M, Saffar S, Abd Emamy B, Peirovi A, Shokrgozar MA, Serpooshan V, et al. Plasma concentration gradient influences the protein corona decoration on nanoparticles. RSC Adv 2013;3:1119–26.10.1039/C2RA22093HSuche in Google Scholar
12. Roach P, Parker T, Gadegaard N, Alexander MR. Surface strategies for control of neuronal cell adhesion: a review. Surf Sci Rep 2010;65:145–73.10.1016/j.surfrep.2010.07.001Suche in Google Scholar
13. Jenkins SI, Roach P, Chari DM. Development of a nanomaterial bio-screening platform foe neurological applications. Nanomed: Nanotech Biol Med 2015;11:77–87.10.1016/j.nano.2014.07.010Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
14. Sun T, Wang Y, Wang Y, Xu J, Zhao X, Vangveravong S, et al. Using SV119-gold nanocage conjugates to eradicate cancer stem cells through a combination of photothermal and chemo therapies. Adv Health Mater 2014;3:1283–91.10.1002/adhm.201400026Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
15. Li C, Chen T, Ocsoy I, Zhu G, Yasun E, You M, et al. Gold-coated Fe3O4 nano-roses with five unique functions for cancer cell targeting, imaging, and therapy. Adv Funct Mater 2013;24:1772–80.10.1002/adfm.201301659Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
16. Di Corato R, Palumberi D, Marotta R, Scotto M, Carregal-Romero S, Rivera Gil P, et al. Magnetic nanobeads decorated with silver nanoparticles as cytotoxic agents and photothermal probes. Small 2012;8:2731–42.10.1002/smll.201200230Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
17. Antaris AL, Robinson JT, Yaghi OK, Hong G, Diao S, Luong R, et al. Ultra-low doses of chirality sorted (6,5) carbon nanotubes for simultaneous tumor imaging and photothermal therapy. ACS Nano 2013;7:3644–52.10.1021/nn4006472Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
18. Yang K, Feng L, Shi X, Liu Z. Nano-graphene in biomedicine: theranostic applications. Chem Soc Rev 2013;42:530–47.10.1039/C2CS35342CSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
19. Zhang S, Zha Z, Yue X, Liang X, Dai Z. Gadolinium-chelates functionalized copper sulphide as a nanotheranostic agent for MR imaging and photothermal destruction of cancer cells. Chem Commun 2013;49:6776–8.10.1039/c3cc43440kSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
20. Song G, Wang Q, Wang Y, Lv G, Li C, Zou R, et al. A low-toxic multifunctional nanoplatform based on Cu9S5@mSiO2 core-shell nanocomposites: combining photothermal- and chemotherapies with infrared thermal imaging for cancer treatment. Adv Funct Mater 2013;23:4281–92.10.1002/adfm.201203317Suche in Google Scholar
21. Tian Q, Hu J, Zhu Y, Zou R, Chen Z, Yang S, et al. Sub-10 nm Fe3O4@Cu2exS coreeshell nanoparticles for dual-modal imaging and photothermal therapy. J Am Chem Soc 2013;135:8571–7.10.1021/ja4013497Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
22. Dong K, Liu Z, Li Z, Ren J, Qu X. Hydrophobic anticancer drug delivery by a 980 nm laser-driven photothermal vehicle for efficient synergistic therapy of cancer cells in vivo. Adv Mater 2013;25:4452–8.10.1002/adma.201301232Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
23. Yang J, Choi J, Bang D, Kim E, Lim E-K, Park H, et al. Convertible organic nanoparticles for near-infrared photothermal ablation of cancer cells. Angew Chem Int Ed 2011;50:441–4.10.1002/anie.201005075Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
24. Han S, Wu S, Su X, Han J. A photothermal cell viability-reporting theragnostic nanoprobe for intraoperative optical ablation and tracking of tumors. Chem Commun 2014;50:8014–7.10.1039/C4CC01823KSuche in Google Scholar
25. Tsai M-F, Chang GS-H, Cheng F-Y, Shanmugam V, Cheng Y-S, Su C-H, et al. Au nanorod design as light-absorber in the first and second biological near-infrared windows for in vivo photothermal therapy. ACS Nano 2013;7:5330–42.10.1021/nn401187cSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
26. Vijayaraghavan P, Liu C-H, Vankayala R, Chiang C-S, Hwang KC. Designing multi-branched gold nanoechinus for NIR light activated dual modal photodynamic and photothermal therapy in the second biological window. Adv Mater 2014;26:6689–95.10.1002/adma.201400703Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
27. Tao Z, Hong G, Shinji C, Chen C, Diao S, Antaris AL, et al. Biological imaging using nanoparticles of small organic molecules with fluorescence emission at wavelengths longer than 1000 nm. Angew Chem Int Ed 2013;52:13002–6.10.1002/anie.201307346Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
28. Li L, Liu Y, Hao P, Wang Z, Fu L, Ma Z, et al. PEDOT nanocomposites mediated dual-modal photodynamic and photothermal targeted sterilization in both NIR I and II window. Biomat 2015;41:132–40.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.075Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
29. Chung WJ, Lee DY, Yoo SY.Chemical modulation of M13 bacteriophage and its functional opportunities for nanomedicine. Int J Nanomed 2014;9:5825–36.Suche in Google Scholar
©2015 by De Gruyter
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- In this issue
- Guest Editorial and News
- Complement activation-related pseudoallergy: insights into a stress reaction to nanomedicines in blood
- What’s up in nanomedicine?
- Special section CARPA Part 1
- Reviews
- The possible role of factor H in complement activation-related pseudoallergy (CARPA): a failed attempt to correlate blood levels of FH with liposome-induced hypersensitivity reactions in patients with autoimmune disease
- Mini Reviews
- Rodent models of complement activation-related pseudoallergy: Inducers, symptoms, inhibitors and reaction mechanisms
- Pulmonary intravascular macrophages: prime suspects as cellular mediators of porcine CARPA
- Regular contributions
- Critical Review
- Towards nano-diagnostics for bacterial infections
- Review
- Effects of silver nanoparticles on human health
- Original article
- Potential of rod, sphere and semi-cube shaped gold nanoparticles to induce cytotoxicity and genotoxicity in human blood lymphocytes in vitro
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- In this issue
- Guest Editorial and News
- Complement activation-related pseudoallergy: insights into a stress reaction to nanomedicines in blood
- What’s up in nanomedicine?
- Special section CARPA Part 1
- Reviews
- The possible role of factor H in complement activation-related pseudoallergy (CARPA): a failed attempt to correlate blood levels of FH with liposome-induced hypersensitivity reactions in patients with autoimmune disease
- Mini Reviews
- Rodent models of complement activation-related pseudoallergy: Inducers, symptoms, inhibitors and reaction mechanisms
- Pulmonary intravascular macrophages: prime suspects as cellular mediators of porcine CARPA
- Regular contributions
- Critical Review
- Towards nano-diagnostics for bacterial infections
- Review
- Effects of silver nanoparticles on human health
- Original article
- Potential of rod, sphere and semi-cube shaped gold nanoparticles to induce cytotoxicity and genotoxicity in human blood lymphocytes in vitro