Home Comparative evaluation of routine coagulation testing on Stago sthemO 301 and Werfen ACL TOP 750
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Comparative evaluation of routine coagulation testing on Stago sthemO 301 and Werfen ACL TOP 750

  • Simone Denitto , Elia Ponchini , Nicola Baratto , Alessandro Lorenzetto , Davide Demonte ORCID logo , Gian Luca Salvagno , Emmanuel J. Favaloro ORCID logo and Giuseppe Lippi ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 2, 2025

Abstract

Objectives

We performed a comparative evaluation of analytical performance between the novel bench-top Stago sthemO 301 hemostasis analyzer and the Werfen ACL TOP 750 coagulometer using routine plasma samples.

Methods

A minimum of 100 fresh plasma samples per test were analyzed using both analytical systems. The tests included prothrombin time (PT) expressed as international normalized ratio (INR) and seconds (s), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) in ratio and seconds, fibrinogen, antithrombin and D-dimer. Clotting assays were performed using mechanical clot detection on sthemO and optical detection on ACL TOP. The comparative evaluation included the calculation of Spearman’s correlation, Passing–Bablok regression and Bland–Altman plots.

Results

Correlation coefficients ranged between 0.76 for APTT to 0.98 for PT-INR and D-dimer, indicating a generally acceptable/good agreement. The regression slopes varied from 0.82 for D-dimer to 1.17 for APTT-s. A significant bias was observed for all tests except antithrombin, with differences for sthemO ranging between −31 % for D-dimer and 13.7 % for PT-s.

Conclusions

SthemO demonstrates acceptable global comparability with ACL TOP for routine coagulation testing. Nevertheless, reagent- and method-dependent bias has been observed, which highlight the need for additional harmonization efforts.


Corresponding author: Prof. Giuseppe Lippi, Section of Clinical Biochemistry, University Hospital of Verona, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134, Verona, Italy, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Barbara Cortivo, Livia Tretti, Francesco Russo and Chiara Zecchetto for their skilled technical assistance. The manufacturers had no role in directing the study or influencing the interpretation of the study results.

  1. Research ethics: This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was approved by the local Ethics Committee (approval number 971CESC; July 20, 2016).

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: Not applicable.

  5. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  6. Research funding: None declared.

  7. Data availability: Data will be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

1. Favaloro, EJ, Lippi, G. Recent advances in mainstream hemostasis diagnostics and coagulation testing. Semin Thromb Hemost 2019;45:228–46. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1676579.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Favaloro, EJ, Gosselin, RC, Pasalic, L, Lippi, G. Hemostasis and thrombosis: an overview focusing on associated laboratory testing to diagnose and help manage related disorders. Methods Mol Biol 2023;2663:3–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3175-1_1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Song, J. Advances in laboratory assessment of thrombosis and hemostasis. Blood Res 2022;57:93–100. https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2022.2022048.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Favaloro, EJ, Pasalic, L, Lippi, G. Getting smart with coagulation. J Thromb Haemostasis 2022;20:1519–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.15691.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Favaloro, EJ, Pasalic, L. Innovative diagnostic solutions in hemostasis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024;14:2521. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14222521.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Bai, B, Christie, DJ, Gorman, RT, Wu, JR. Comparison of optical and mechanical clot detection for routine coagulation testing in a large volume clinical laboratory. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2008;19:569–76. https://doi.org/10.1097/mbc.0b013e3283070872.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Lippi, G, Salvagno, GL, Gelati, M, Poli, G, Giavarina, D, Favaloro, EJ. Analytical assessment of the new Roche Cobas t 711 fully automated coagulation analyzer. Semin Thromb Hemost 2019;45:308–14. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1676578.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Favaloro, EJ, Mohammed, S, Vong, R, McVicker, W, Chapman, K, Swanepoel, P, et al.. Verification of the ACL top 50 family (350, 550, and 750) for harmonization of routine coagulation assays in a large network of 60 laboratories. Am J Clin Pathol 2021;156:661–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqab004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Bellio, P, De Angelis, S, Piccirilli, A, Di Michele, G, Barnabei, R, Amicosante, G, et al.. Evaluation of the analytical performances of the Biolabo SOLEA 100 optical coagulometer and comparison with the Stago STA-R MAX analyser in the determination of PT, APTT, and fibrinogen. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022;13:85. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13010085.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Pontis, A, Delanoe, M, Schilliger, N, Carlo, A, Guéret, P, Nédélec-Gac, F, et al.. A performance evaluation of sthemO 301 coagulation analyzer and associated reagents. J Clin Lab Anal 2023;37:e24929. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24929.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Measurement procedure comparison and bias estimation using patient samples. In: CLSI guideline EP09c, 3rd ed. Malvern, PA, USA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2018. [Accessed 2018].Search in Google Scholar

12. Lippi, G, Ippolito, L, Favaloro, EJ. Technical evaluation of the novel preanalytical module on instrumentation laboratory ACL TOP: advancing automation in hemostasis testing. J Lab Autom 2013;18:382–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/2211068213491747.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Fan, BE, Lippi, G, Favaloro, EJ. D-dimer Levels for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism: making sense of international guideline recommendations. J Thromb Haemostasis 2024;22:604–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtha.2023.12.015.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Favaloro, EJ, Gosselin, R, Olson, J, Jennings, I, Lippi, G. Recent initiatives in harmonization of hemostasis practice. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56:1608–19. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2018-0082.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Favaloro, EJ, Mohammed, S, Vong, R, Pasalic, L. Harmonization of hemostasis testing across a large laboratory network: an example from Australia. Methods Mol Biol 2023;2663:71–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3175-1_5.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Favaloro, EJ, Arunachalam, S, Chapman, K, Pasalic, L. Continued harmonization of the international normalized ratio across a large laboratory network: evidence of sustained low interlaboratory variation and bias after a change in instrumentation. Am J Clin Pathol 2025;163:28–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqae090.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Müller, J, Büchsel, M, Timme, M, App, U, Miesbach, W, Sachs, UJ, et al.. Reference intervals in coagulation analysis. Hämostaseologie 2022;42:381–9. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1945-9490.Search in Google Scholar PubMed


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2025-0018).


Received: 2025-02-03
Accepted: 2025-03-02
Published Online: 2025-04-02

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Reviews
  3. Accuracy of pulse wave velocity for screening coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  4. Prenatal screening for genetic disorders: updated guidelines, proposed counseling, a holistic approach for primary health care providers in developing countries
  5. A scoping review of fever of unknown origin with normal serum C-reactive protein
  6. Mini Review
  7. Overview of dengue diagnostic limitations and potential strategies for improvement
  8. Opinion Papers
  9. Demystifying cognitive bias in the diagnostic process for frontline clinicians and educators; new words for old ideas
  10. Physicians’ prism: illuminating history with structured expertise
  11. Original Articles
  12. Implementation of a curriculum on communicating diagnostic uncertainty for clerkship-level medical students: a pseudorandomized and controlled study
  13. A synthesized differential diagnosis is associated with fewer diagnostic errors compared to an inventorial list
  14. Equity-Driven Diagnostic Excellence framework: An upstream approach to minimize risk of diagnostic inequity
  15. Two decades of autopsy-detected diagnostic errors in Japan
  16. Does management reasoning display context specificity? An exploration of sleep loss and other distracting situational (contextual) factors in clinical reasoning
  17. Cognitive biases in osteopathic diagnosis: a mixed study among French osteopaths
  18. Racial and ethnic disparities in pediatric emergency department patients with missed opportunities for diagnostic excellence
  19. Diagnostic accuracy of non-mydriatic fundus photography as a triage and telemedicine tool for patients with vision loss
  20. “Innumerable” lesion burden on brain MRI ‒ a diagnostic approach
  21. Factors associated with positive findings of deep infection on computed tomography among patients with extremity cellulitis
  22. Exploring emergency department providers’ uncertainty in neurological clinical reasoning
  23. Analytical performance and user-friendliness of four point-of-care measuring systems for monitoring prothrombin time international normalized ratio in the hands of the intended users
  24. Fetal hematological phenotypes of various hemoglobinopathies and demonstration of embryonic hemoglobins on capillary electrophoresis: a large cohort data from prenatal screening program
  25. Development and assessment of autoverification system for routine coagulation assays in inpatient and outpatient settings of tertiary care hospital: algorithm performance and impact on laboratory efficiency
  26. Validation of new, circulating biomarkers for gliomas
  27. Short Communications
  28. Using language to evaluate curricular impact: a novel approach in assessing clinical reasoning curricula
  29. Comparative evaluation of routine coagulation testing on Stago sthemO 301 and Werfen ACL TOP 750
  30. Letters to the Editor
  31. Reversible systemic vasoconstriction syndrome: a new diagnostic family of generalized vasospasm in multiple organs
  32. The value of designating symptoms as “vague” in diagnosis
  33. Immunoglobulin E in an inverted skin-prick test for rapid detection of cutaneous antigens
Downloaded on 4.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dx-2025-0018/html
Scroll to top button