Home Medicine Characterizing the relationship between diagnostic intensity and quality of care
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Characterizing the relationship between diagnostic intensity and quality of care

  • Michael I. Ellenbogen ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Laura Prichett , David E. Newman-Toker and Daniel J. Brotman
Published/Copyright: July 14, 2021

Abstract

Objectives

The relationship between diagnostic intensity and quality of care has not been well-characterized at the hospital level. We performed an exploratory analysis to better delineate this relationship using a hospital-level diagnostic overuse index and accepted hospital quality metrics (readmissions and mortality).

Methods

We previously developed and published a hospital-level diagnostic overuse index. A hospital’s overuse index value (which ranges from 0 to 0.986, with larger numbers indicating more overuse) was our predictor variable of interest. The outcome variables were excess readmission ratios and mortality rates for common medical conditions, which CMS publicly reports. The model controlled for Elixhauser comorbidity score, hospital bed size, hospital teaching status, and random effects that vary by state.

Results

We did not find a statistically significant relationship between our overuse index and the quality measures we evaluated.

Conclusions

The lack of a significant relationship between diagnostic intensity and quality, at least as measured by our overuse index and the tested quality metrics, suggests that well-targeted efforts to reduce diagnostic overuse in hospitals may not adversely impact quality of care.


Corresponding author: Michael I. Ellenbogen, MD, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, 600 N Wolfe St Meyer 8-134P, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA; and Hopkins Business of Health Initiative, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA, Phone: +443 287 4362, Fax: +410 502 0923, E-mail:

Funding source: Johns Hopkins Hospitalist Scholars Fund

Funding source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 10.13039/100000133

Award Identifier / Grant number: R01 #HS 27614

Funding source: Armstrong Institute Center for Diagnostic Excellence

  1. Research funding: Drs. Ellenbogen and Brotman are supported by the Johns Hopkins Hospitalist Scholars Fund (internal funding). Dr. Newman-Toker’s effort was supported by a grant from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R01 #HS 27614) and the Armstrong Institute Center for Diagnostic Excellence.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  5. Ethical approval: Not applicable.

References

1. Tsugawa, Y, Jha, AK, Newhouse, JP, Zaslavsky, AM, Jena, AB. Variation in physician spending and association with patient outcomes. JAMA Intern Med 2017;177:675. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0059.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Safavi, KC, Li, S-X, Dharmarajan, K, Venkatesh, AK, Strait, KM, Lin, H, et al.. Hospital variation in the use of noninvasive cardiac imaging and its association with downstream testing, interventions, and outcomes. JAMA Intern Med 2014;174:546. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.14407.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Douglas, PS, Patel, MR, Bailey, SR, Dai, D, Kaltenbach, L, Brindis, RG, et al.. Hospital variability in the rate of finding obstructive coronary artery disease at elective, diagnostic coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:801–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.05.019.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Krumholz, HM, Wang, Y, Wang, K, Lin, Z, Bernheim, SM, Xu, X, et al.. Association of hospital payment profiles with variation in 30-day medicare cost for inpatients with heart failure or pneumonia. JAMA Netw Open 2019;2:e1915604. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15604.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Ellenbogen, MI, Prichett, L, Johnson, PT, Brotman, DJ. Development of a simple index to measure overuse of diagnostic testing at the hospital level using administrative data. J Hosp Med 2021;16:77–83. https://doi.org/10.12788/jhm.3547.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Moore, BJ, White, S, Washington, R, Coenen, N, Elixhauser, A. Identifying increased risk of readmission and in-hospital mortality using hospital administrative data: the AHRQ elixhauser comorbidity index. Med Care 2017;55:698–705. https://doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0000000000000735.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Complications and Deaths - Hospital [Internet]. CMS hospital compare. Available from: https://data.cms.gov/provider-data/dataset/ynj2-r877 [Cited 2020 Mar 15].Search in Google Scholar

8. Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program [Internet]. CMS hospital compare. Available from: https://data.cms.gov/provider-data/dataset/9n3s-kdb3 [Cited 2020 Mar 2].Search in Google Scholar

9. Hussey, PS, Wertheimer, S, Mehrotra, A. The association between health care quality and cost: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2013;158:27. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-158-1-201301010-00006.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Desai, NR, Ott, LS, George, EJ, Xu, X, Kim, N, Zhou, S, et al.. Variation in and hospital characteristics associated with the value of care for medicare beneficiaries with acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia. JAMA Netw Open 2018;1:e183519. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.3519.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Liberman, AL, Newman-Toker, DE. Symptom-Disease Pair Analysis of Diagnostic Error (SPADE): a conceptual framework and methodological approach for unearthing misdiagnosis-related harms using big data. BMJ Qual Saf 2018;27:557–66. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007032.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2021-05-06
Accepted: 2021-07-05
Published Online: 2021-07-14

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. From Camille Nούς to Apollonian and the Dionysian scientists
  4. Review
  5. The role of D-dimer in periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  6. Mini Reviews
  7. Updated picture of SARS-CoV-2 variants and mutations
  8. Systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of glial fibrillary acidic protein vs. S100 calcium binding protein B as blood biomarkers in observational studies of patients with mild or moderate acute traumatic brain injury
  9. Opinion Papers
  10. The 6C model for accurately capturing the patient’s medical history
  11. Webside manner: maskless communication
  12. Original Articles
  13. Ways that nurse practitioner students self-explain during diagnostic reasoning
  14. Diagnostic reasoning: relationships among expertise, accuracy, and ways that nurse practitioner students self-explain
  15. Perspectives on the current state of pre-clerkship clinical reasoning instruction in United States medical schools: a survey of clinical skills course directors
  16. Use of a structured approach and virtual simulation practice to improve diagnostic reasoning
  17. Analyzing diagnostic errors in the acute setting: a process-driven approach
  18. Morning report goes virtual: learner experiences in a virtual, case-based diagnostic reasoning conference
  19. Stroke hospitalization after misdiagnosis of “benign dizziness” is lower in specialty care than general practice: a population-based cohort analysis of missed stroke using SPADE methods
  20. Discrepancy between emergency department admission diagnosis and hospital discharge diagnosis and its impact on length of stay, up-triage to the intensive care unit, and mortality
  21. Automated capture-based NGS workflow: one thousand patients experience in a clinical routine framework
  22. Short Communication
  23. Characterizing the relationship between diagnostic intensity and quality of care
  24. Case Reports – Lessons in Clinical Reasoning
  25. Lessons in clinical reasoning ‒ pitfalls, myths, and pearls: a case of confusion, disequilibrium, and “picking at the air”
  26. Hickam’s dictum, Occam’s razor, and Crabtree’s bludgeon: a case of renal failure and a clavicular mass
  27. Letters to the Editor
  28. Three learning concepts to improve diagnosis and enhance the practice of medicine
  29. Distributed cognition: a framework for conceptualizing telediagnosis in teams
  30. Performance of Fujirebio Espline SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test for identifying potentially infectious individuals
Downloaded on 27.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dx-2021-0062/html
Scroll to top button