Home Medicine Lessons in clinical reasoning ‒ pitfalls, myths, and pearls: a case of confusion, disequilibrium, and “picking at the air”
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Lessons in clinical reasoning ‒ pitfalls, myths, and pearls: a case of confusion, disequilibrium, and “picking at the air”

  • Charles D. Magee , Andrew S. Parsons EMAIL logo , Alexander S. Millard and Dario Torre
Published/Copyright: August 30, 2021

Abstract

Objectives

Defects in human cognition commonly result in clinical reasoning failures that can lead to diagnostic errors.

Case presentation

A 43-year-old female was brought to the emergency department with 4–5 days of confusion, disequilibrium resulting in several falls, and hallucinations. Further investigation revealed tachycardia, diaphoresis, mydriatic pupils, incomprehensible speech and she was seen picking at the air. Given multiple recent medication changes, there was initial concern for serotonin syndrome vs. an anticholinergic toxidrome. She then developed a fever, marked leukocytosis, and worsening encephalopathy. She underwent lumbar puncture and aspiration of an identified left ankle effusion. Methicillin sensitive staph aureus (MSSA) grew from blood, joint, and cerebrospinal fluid cultures within 18 h. She improved with antibiotics and incision, drainage, and washout of her ankle by orthopedic surgery.

Conclusions

Through integrated commentary on the diagnostic reasoning process from clinical reasoning experts, this case underscores how multiple cognitive biases can cascade sequentially, skewing clinical reasoning toward erroneous conclusions and driving potentially inappropriate testing and treatment. A fishbone diagram is provided to visually demonstrate the major factors that contributed to the diagnostic error. A case discussant describes the importance of structured reflection, a tool to promote metacognitive analysis, and the application of knowledge organization tools such as illness scripts to navigate these cognitive biases.


Corresponding author: Andrew S. Parsons, MD, MPH, Assistant Professor of Medicine and Public Health, Associate Section Head for Education, Hospital Medicine, UVA School of Medicine, 1215 Lee St Charlottesville, VA, 22908-0422, USA, Phone: (434) 243-0763, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  5. Ethical approval: Not applicable.

References

1. Wolfson, AB, Cloutier, R, Hendey, GW, Ling, LJ, Rosen, CL, Schaider, JJ. Harwood-Nuss’ clinical practice of emergency medicine [Internet], 6th ed. Wolters Kluwer Health Adis (ESP); 2014. Available from: https://ohsu.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/harwood-nuss-clinical-practice-of-emergency-medicine-sixth-editio [Accessed 27 Jun 2020].Search in Google Scholar

2. Custers, EJFM. Thirty years of illness scripts: theoretical origins and practical applications. Med Teach 2015;37:457–62. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2014.956052.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Lubarsky, S, Dory, V, Audétat, M-C, Custers, E, Charlin, B. Using script theory to cultivate illness script formation and clinical reasoning in health professions education. Can Med Educ J 2015;6:e61–70. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.36631.Search in Google Scholar

4. Bordage, G, Zacks, R. The structure of medical knowledge in the memories of medical students and general practitioners: categories and prototypes. Med Educ 1984;18:406–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1984.tb01295.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Croskerry, P. Clinical cognition and diagnostic error: applications of a dual process model of reasoning. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2009;14:27–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-009-9182-2.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Norman, GR, Monteiro, SD, Sherbino, J, Ilgen, JS, Schmidt, HG, Mamede, S. The causes of errors in clinical reasoning: cognitive biases, knowledge deficits, and dual process thinking. Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll 2017;92:23–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000001421.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Monteiro, SD, Sherbino, J, Patel, A, Mazzetti, I, Norman, GR, Howey, E. Reflecting on diagnostic errors: taking a second look is not enough. J Gen Intern Med 2015;30:1270–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015-3369-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Volpi-Abadie, J, Kaye, AM, Kaye, AD. Serotonin syndrome. Ochsner J 2013;13:533–40.Search in Google Scholar

9. Mamede, S, van Gog, T, Moura, AS, de Faria, RMD, Peixoto, JM, Rikers, RMJP, et al.. Reflection as a strategy to foster medical students’ acquisition of diagnostic competence. Med Educ 2012;46:464–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04217.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Mamede, S, Schmidt, HG, Penaforte, JC. Effects of reflective practice on the accuracy of medical diagnoses. Med Educ 2008;42:468–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03030.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Croskerry, P. The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them. Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll 2003;78:775–80. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200308000-00003.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Holt, R, Teale, EA, Mulley, GP, Young, J. A prospective observational study to investigate the association between abnormal hand movements and delirium in hospitalised older people. Age Ageing 2015;44:42–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afu110.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Cognition and categorization. Oxford, England: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1978, vol viii:328 p. (Rosch E, Lloyd BB, editors. Cognition and categorization).Search in Google Scholar

14. Smith, JD. Prototypes, exemplars, and the natural history of categorization. Psychon Bull Rev 2014;21:312–31. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0506-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Papa, FJ, Elieson, B. Diagnostic accuracy as a function of case prototypicality. Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll 1993;68:S58–60. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199310000-00046.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Papa, FJ, Li, F. Evidence of the preferential use of disease prototypes over case exemplars among early year one medical students prior to and following diagnostic training. Diagn Berl Ger 2015;2:217–25. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2015-0024.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Aguilar, J, Urday-Cornejo, V, Donabedian, S, Perri, M, Tibbetts, R, Zervos, M. Staphylococcus aureus meningitis: case series and literature review. Medicine (Baltim) 2010;89:117–25. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0b013e3181d5453d.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Lo Re, V, Bellini, LM. William of occam and occam’s razor. Ann Intern Med 2002;136:634–5. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-136-8-200204160-00022.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Croskerry, P. Achieving quality in clinical decision making: cognitive strategies and detection of bias. Acad Emerg Med Off J Soc Acad Emerg Med 2002;9:1184–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb01574.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Mamede, S, van Gog, T, van den Berge, K, Rikers, RMJP, van Saase, JLCM, van Guldener, C, et al.. Effect of availability bias and reflective reasoning on diagnostic accuracy among internal medicine residents. J Am Med Assoc 2010;304:1198–203. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.1276.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2020-07-03
Accepted: 2021-07-30
Published Online: 2021-08-30

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. From Camille Nούς to Apollonian and the Dionysian scientists
  4. Review
  5. The role of D-dimer in periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  6. Mini Reviews
  7. Updated picture of SARS-CoV-2 variants and mutations
  8. Systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of glial fibrillary acidic protein vs. S100 calcium binding protein B as blood biomarkers in observational studies of patients with mild or moderate acute traumatic brain injury
  9. Opinion Papers
  10. The 6C model for accurately capturing the patient’s medical history
  11. Webside manner: maskless communication
  12. Original Articles
  13. Ways that nurse practitioner students self-explain during diagnostic reasoning
  14. Diagnostic reasoning: relationships among expertise, accuracy, and ways that nurse practitioner students self-explain
  15. Perspectives on the current state of pre-clerkship clinical reasoning instruction in United States medical schools: a survey of clinical skills course directors
  16. Use of a structured approach and virtual simulation practice to improve diagnostic reasoning
  17. Analyzing diagnostic errors in the acute setting: a process-driven approach
  18. Morning report goes virtual: learner experiences in a virtual, case-based diagnostic reasoning conference
  19. Stroke hospitalization after misdiagnosis of “benign dizziness” is lower in specialty care than general practice: a population-based cohort analysis of missed stroke using SPADE methods
  20. Discrepancy between emergency department admission diagnosis and hospital discharge diagnosis and its impact on length of stay, up-triage to the intensive care unit, and mortality
  21. Automated capture-based NGS workflow: one thousand patients experience in a clinical routine framework
  22. Short Communication
  23. Characterizing the relationship between diagnostic intensity and quality of care
  24. Case Reports – Lessons in Clinical Reasoning
  25. Lessons in clinical reasoning ‒ pitfalls, myths, and pearls: a case of confusion, disequilibrium, and “picking at the air”
  26. Hickam’s dictum, Occam’s razor, and Crabtree’s bludgeon: a case of renal failure and a clavicular mass
  27. Letters to the Editor
  28. Three learning concepts to improve diagnosis and enhance the practice of medicine
  29. Distributed cognition: a framework for conceptualizing telediagnosis in teams
  30. Performance of Fujirebio Espline SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test for identifying potentially infectious individuals
Downloaded on 27.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dx-2020-0096/html
Scroll to top button