Home Hickam’s dictum, Occam’s razor, and Crabtree’s bludgeon: a case of renal failure and a clavicular mass
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Hickam’s dictum, Occam’s razor, and Crabtree’s bludgeon: a case of renal failure and a clavicular mass

  • Simone Blaser , Verity Schaye , John Hwang , Patrick Cocks and David Kudlowitz
Published/Copyright: August 5, 2021

Abstract

Objectives

Our discussant’s thoughtful consideration of the patient’s case allows for review of three maxims of medicine: Occam’s razor (the simplest diagnosis is the most likely to be correct), Hickam’s dictum (multiple disease entities are more likely than one), and Crabtree’s bludgeon (the tendency to make data fit to an explanation we hold dear).

Case presentation

A 66-year-old woman with a history of hypertension presented to our hospital one day after arrival to the United States from Guinea with chronic daily vomiting, unintentional weight loss and progressive shoulder pain. Her labs are notable for renal failure, nephrotic range proteinuria and normocytic anemia while her shoulder X-ray shows osseous resorption in the lateral right clavicle. Multiple myeloma became the team’s working diagnosis; however, a subsequent shoulder biopsy was consistent with follicular thyroid carcinoma. Imaging suggested the patient’s renal failure was more likely a result of a chronic, unrelated process.

Conclusions

It is tempting to bludgeon diagnostic possibilities into Occam’s razor. Presumption that a patient’s signs and symptoms are connected by one disease process often puts us at a cognitive advantage. However, atypical presentations, multiple disease processes, and unique populations often lend themselves more to Hickam’s dictum than to Occam’s razor. Diagnostic aids include performing a metacognitive checklist, engaging analytic thinking, and acknowledging the imperfections of these axioms.


Corresponding author: David Kudlowitz, MD, Assistant Professor of Medicine (Clinical), Division of General Internal Medicine & Clinical Innovation, NYU Langone Health, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA; and Division of Hospital Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: The local Institutional Review Board deemed the study exempt from review.

References

1. Mani, N, Slevin, N, Hudson, A. What three wise men have to say about diagnosis. BMJ 2011;343:d7769. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d7769.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Martin, M, Manesh, RS, Henderson, MC, Critchfield, JM. Diagnostic scheming. J Gen Intern Med 2015;30:1874–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015-3478-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Ratcliffe, TA, Durning, SJ. Theoretical concepts to consider in providing clinical reasoning instruction. In: Rencic, JJ, During, SJ, Trowbridge, RJ, editors. Teaching clinical reasoning. Philadelphia, PA: American College of Physicians; 2015:13–30 pp.Search in Google Scholar

4. Trowbridge, RL. Twelve tips for teaching avoidance of diagnostic errors. Med Teach 2008;30:496–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590801965137.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Sandhu, H, Carpenter, C, Freeman, K, Nabors, SG, Olson, A. Clinical decision making: opening the black box of cognitive reasoning. Ann Emerg Med 2006;48:713–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.03.011.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Croskerry, P. The cognitive imperative thinking about how we think. Acad Emerg Med 2000;7:1223–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb00467.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Friedman, CP, Gatti, GG, Franz, TM, Murphy, GC, Wolf, FM, Heckerling, PS, et al.. Do physicians know when their diagnoses are correct? J Gen Intern Med 2005;20:334–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.30145.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Santhosh, L, Chou, CL, Connor, DM. Diagnostic uncertainty: from education to communication. Diagnosis 2019;6:121–6. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2018-0088.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Ilgen, JS, Eva, KW, Bruin, AD, Cook, DA, Regehr, G. Comfort with uncertainty: reframing our conceptions of how clinicians navigate complex clinical situations. Adv Health Sci Educ 2018;24:797–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-018-9859-5.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Feltovich, PJ, Barrows, HS. Issues of generality in medical problem solving. In: Tutorials in problem-based learning: new directions in training for the health profession. Assen: Van Gorcum; 1984:128–42 pp.Search in Google Scholar

11. Balogh, E, Miller, BT, Ball, JR. Improving diagnosis in health care. Washington, DC: National Academies; 2015.10.17226/21794Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Kahneman, D. Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux; 2015.Search in Google Scholar

13. Nickerson, RS. Confirmation bias: a ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev Gen Psychol 1998;2:175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175.Search in Google Scholar

14. Clinical Excellence Commission. Cognitive autopsy guidelines [Online]. Available from: http://www.cec.health.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/306570/Cognitive-Autopsy-Guideline-Information-sheet.pdf [Accessed 1 Mar 2020].Search in Google Scholar

15. Mehdi, A, Foshee, C, Green, W, Spencer, A. Cognitive autopsy: a transformative group approach to mitigate cognitive bias. J Grad Med Educ 2018;0:345–7. https://doi.org/10.4300/jgme-d-17-00884.1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Wu, K, Hou, S-M, Huang, T-S, Yang, R-S. Thyroid carcinoma with bone metastases: a prognostic factor study. Clinical medicine. Oncology 2008;2:129–34. https://doi.org/10.4137/cmo.s333.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Krishnamurthy, A. Clavicle metastasis from carcinoma thyroid- an atypical skeletal event and a management dilemma. Indian J Surg Oncol 2015;6:267–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-015-0387-y.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Muresan, MM, Olivier, P, Leclère, J, Sirveaux, F, Brunaud, L, Klein, M, et al.. Bone metastases from differentiated thyroid carcinoma [Internet]. Endocr Relat Canc 2008;15:37–49. https://doi.org/10.1677/erc-07-0229.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Aschebrook-Kilfoy, B, Grogan, RH, Ward, MH, Kaplan, E, Devesa, SS. Follicular thyroid cancer incidence patterns in the United States, 1980–2009. Thyroid 2013;23:1015–21. https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2012.0356.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. Gharib, H. Does iodine cause thyroid cancer? Acta Endocrinol 2018;14:525–6. https://doi.org/10.4183/aeb.2018.525.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2020-11-15
Accepted: 2021-07-08
Published Online: 2021-08-05

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. From Camille Nούς to Apollonian and the Dionysian scientists
  4. Review
  5. The role of D-dimer in periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  6. Mini Reviews
  7. Updated picture of SARS-CoV-2 variants and mutations
  8. Systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of glial fibrillary acidic protein vs. S100 calcium binding protein B as blood biomarkers in observational studies of patients with mild or moderate acute traumatic brain injury
  9. Opinion Papers
  10. The 6C model for accurately capturing the patient’s medical history
  11. Webside manner: maskless communication
  12. Original Articles
  13. Ways that nurse practitioner students self-explain during diagnostic reasoning
  14. Diagnostic reasoning: relationships among expertise, accuracy, and ways that nurse practitioner students self-explain
  15. Perspectives on the current state of pre-clerkship clinical reasoning instruction in United States medical schools: a survey of clinical skills course directors
  16. Use of a structured approach and virtual simulation practice to improve diagnostic reasoning
  17. Analyzing diagnostic errors in the acute setting: a process-driven approach
  18. Morning report goes virtual: learner experiences in a virtual, case-based diagnostic reasoning conference
  19. Stroke hospitalization after misdiagnosis of “benign dizziness” is lower in specialty care than general practice: a population-based cohort analysis of missed stroke using SPADE methods
  20. Discrepancy between emergency department admission diagnosis and hospital discharge diagnosis and its impact on length of stay, up-triage to the intensive care unit, and mortality
  21. Automated capture-based NGS workflow: one thousand patients experience in a clinical routine framework
  22. Short Communication
  23. Characterizing the relationship between diagnostic intensity and quality of care
  24. Case Reports – Lessons in Clinical Reasoning
  25. Lessons in clinical reasoning ‒ pitfalls, myths, and pearls: a case of confusion, disequilibrium, and “picking at the air”
  26. Hickam’s dictum, Occam’s razor, and Crabtree’s bludgeon: a case of renal failure and a clavicular mass
  27. Letters to the Editor
  28. Three learning concepts to improve diagnosis and enhance the practice of medicine
  29. Distributed cognition: a framework for conceptualizing telediagnosis in teams
  30. Performance of Fujirebio Espline SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test for identifying potentially infectious individuals
Downloaded on 9.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dx-2020-0149/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button