Home Linguistics & Semiotics From Traditional Narratives to Literary Innovation: A Quantitative Analysis of Virginia Woolf’s Stylistic Evolution
Article Open Access

From Traditional Narratives to Literary Innovation: A Quantitative Analysis of Virginia Woolf’s Stylistic Evolution

  • Lei Huang EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: June 19, 2024

Abstract

Virginia Woolf, one of the most renowned modernist British writers, left an enduring imprint on the literary landscape with her distinct and influential writing style. Her literary journey is characterized by an evolution, transitioning from conformity with Victorian and Edwardian literary conventions to pioneering a groundbreaking and experimental approach, notably employing the innovative technique of stream of consciousness. This investigation seeks to identify and quantify this transformation. To achieve this goal, I curated two distinct corpora representing Woolf’s early and later works and meticulously processed them using the multi-dimensional analysis tagger. Subsequently, a battery of independent samples was conducted to compare six distinct dimensions and then 67 linguistic features between the two corpora. This study uncovers a discernible evolution in Woolf’s writing style, with her later works displaying a lessened degree of persuasiveness, abstraction, and online communicativeness, and an enhanced degree of personal involvement and subjectivity. Our findings not only enrich our comprehension of Woolf’s literary development and accomplishments but also shed light on the broader context of the modernist movement and its profound influence on the modernist literary style.

1 Introduction

Virginia Woolf, one of the most prominent figures in modernist literature, is widely recognized for her innovative narrative techniques and profound exploration of human consciousness. Her works delve into various themes, including the complexities of gender, identity, and the human experience within a rapidly changing society. Her writing is characterized by a nuanced dissection of the themes that underpin society, such as the intricate dynamics of gender and the multifaceted nature of identity. Woolf’s work transcends the superficial, delving into the very core of what it means to be human in an era marked by swift and tumultuous change. She captures the essence of the human experience, reflecting on the individual’s struggle and triumph within the shifting landscape of a modernizing world.

“Style”, the object of study in stylistics, generally refers to “the way in which language is used in a given context, by a given person, for a given purpose, and so on (Leech and Short 1981, p. 11).” Woolf’s writing style throughout her career underwent a notable transformation, shifting from a predominantly Victorian and Edwardian influence to a more experimental and introspective approach (Zwerdling 1986). In her early works, such as The Voyage Out (1915) and Night and Day (1919), Woolf displayed a preference for the Victorian and Edwardian style prevalent in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. These works featured a relatively conservative narrative structure and thematic exploration, often adhering to societal norms and expectations. However, as Woolf delved further into her literary journey, her style gradually evolved, acquiring a distinct experimental character. Her later works, most notably Mrs. Dalloway (1925), To the Lighthouse (1927), and The Waves (1931), are characterized by a narrative technique known as ‘stream of consciousness.’ This approach aims to depict the continuous flow of thoughts, perceptions, and emotions experienced by characters, abandoning traditional linear storytelling. Through this approach, Woolf sought to capture the fluidity and subjectivity of human perceptions, offering readers an intimate and unfiltered glimpse into the inner worlds of her characters.

The existing body of work has mapped the general landscape of Woolf’s literary achievements, acknowledging her transition from the traditional narratives of the Victorian and Edwardian eras to the experimental and introspective narratives that define her later works. Scholars have lauded her use of stream-of-consciousness and her exploration of multiple perspectives as groundbreaking techniques that resist dominant narratives and embrace a more inclusive representation of reality. However, the gap in the literature lies in the empirical analysis of these stylistic shifts and the lack of a comprehensive, multidimensional assessment of her writing evolution. For the quantification and analysis of the stylistic transformation in Woolf’s writing, I employed the multi-dimensional analysis tagger, which allows for the identification and calculation of various linguistic features in a text. Furthermore, I conducted statistical analysis to examine linguistic variation in the early and later works across six dimensions. These analyses involve a series of independent samples t-tests to check the existence of significant differences in linguistic features in the corpora from the two periods. The dimensions with significant differences were further explored through another round of independent samples t-tests to identify specific linguistic features that displayed significant variations. In addition to the quantitative analysis, qualitative interpretations of the linguistic features were conducted. By analysing examples from the corpora, I aimed to gain a deeper understanding of the observed shifts in Woolf’s writing style and to provide empirical evidence supporting these subjectively-observed transformations. Through this multidimensional analysis, combining quantitative and qualitative approaches, I aim to illuminate the artistic development of Virginia Woolf and provide valuable insights into the evolution of her unique and influential writing style. By uncovering the stylistic shifts in Woolf’s works, I hope to contribute to a better understanding of her literary career and the broader context of literary modernism.

2 Literature Review

2.1 Previous Studies of Virginia Woolf’s Writing Style

One notable aspect of Virginia Woolfs writing is her experimentation with narrative forms and styles. Researchers have examined the various narrative techniques employed by the author in her works (Beer 1990; Panken 1993; Zwerdling 1986). Zwerdlings study (1986) highlights Virginia Woolf’s development from traditional, linear narratives in her early works such as The Voyage Out (1915) to more complex and fragmented structures in her later novels such as The Waves (1931). The use of multiple perspectives and a fragmented narrative in Virginia Woolf’s work has been further explored by Beer (1990), which states that the author’s exploration of multiple voices and views resists the dominant narratives of her time, allowing for a more inclusive and diverse representation of reality and others (Banfield 2000; Lee 1999).

The development and use of the stream-of-consciousness technique in Virginia Woolfs writing have been widely analysed by scholars (Caws 2000; Humm 2002; Neuman 2003). Humm (2002) provides a comprehensive overview of Virginia Woolf’s employment of this technique in her major novels, tracing its evolution and impact on her works. The author argues that Virginia Woolfs stream-of-consciousness technique allows for a more intimate portrayal of her characters inner lives, emphasizing the importance of individual perceptions and subjectivity. A quantitative study conducted by Moretti (2013) supports this view by analysing the frequency of personal pronouns in Virginia Woolfs novels. The study finds a significant increase in the use of first-person pronouns in her later works, suggesting a more pronounced focus on interiority. Scholars have also explored the influence of Virginia Woolfs own personal experiences on her writing style (Bell 1996; DeSalvo 1989; Marcus 2000). DeSalvo (1989) examines the impact of Virginia Woolfs mental illness on her work, arguing that her unique writing style can be seen as a response to her struggles with madness and depression. Marcus (2000) investigates the effects of Virginia Woolfs experiences with trauma, particularly related to her sexual abuse as a child, on her development as a writer. Bell (1996) offers another perspective, focusing on the role of Virginia Woolf’s personal relationships in shaping her writing style. The study highlights the influence of key figures in Virginia Woolfs life, such as her husband Leonard Woolf and her close friend Vita Sackville-West, on her development as a writer.

It should be noted that while the mentioned studies contribute to the research on the stylistics of Virginia Woolfs writings and their evolution, few of them focus solely on the texts, excluding qualitative elements, and none of them systematically projected the linguistic changes in writing style in different stages onto linguistic feature indicators. The current study aims to fill the gap by employing the multi-dimensional analysis tagger, which provides a comprehensive and detailed calculation of the linguistic features of the imported texts.

2.2 Multi-Dimensional Analysis and Its Application in Stylistic Studies

2.2.1 Multi-Dimensional Analysis

Introduced by Douglas Biber in 1988, multi-dimensional analysis (MDA) is an influential approach to studying linguistic variation in large corpora of texts. This quantitative method combines statistical techniques and linguistic analysis to identify systematic patterns of variation across different text types. Since its inception, multi-dimensional analysis has been widely adopted in corpus linguistics and stylistics, contributing to our understanding of linguistic diversity and text typologies. It is based on the principle that linguistic features co-occur in systematic ways to serve specific communicative functions. The operational laws of multi-dimensional analysis rely on statistical methods, primarily factor analysis (Biber 1988). Factor analysis is a statistical technique that reduces a large set of variables into a smaller, more interpretable set of factors by identifying the underlying dimensions of variation (Biber 1988). In multi-dimensional analysis, linguistic features, such as lexical, grammatical, and discourse structures, are treated as variables, and the goal is to identify the underlying dimensions that explain their co-occurrence patterns across different text types. There are 67 linguistic features which are specific, observable characteristics of language that serve as indicators of the underlying dimensions. Once the dimensions are identified, texts can be scored on each dimension to reveal their characteristic linguistic profiles, which can then be used to classify and compare text types (Biber 1988). This process enables researchers to uncover the underlying communicative functions of various linguistic features and understand how these functions are distributed across different text types.

The primary aim of multi-dimensional analysis is to provide a comprehensive and quantifiable description of linguistic variation across different text types in a large corpus (Biber 1988). By revealing systematic patterns of co-occurrence among linguistic features, multi-dimensional analysis seeks to uncover the functional motivations for these patterns and elucidate the communicative purposes they serve in different contexts. Another important aim of multi-dimensional analysis is to develop empirically-based text typologies that can account for the spectrum of linguistic diversity that may be present within a corpus (Biber 1988). By classifying texts based on their characteristic linguistic profiles, multi-dimensional analysis can reveal the underlying dimensions of variation that differentiate text types, offering insights into the communicative functions that distinguish them. Finally, multi-dimensional analysis can add to the understanding of the relationship between linguistic form and function, as well as the ways in which these relationships are mediated by context (Biber 1988). By uncovering the functional motivations for linguistic variation across different text types, multi-dimensional analysis can inform our understanding of the ways in which language is used to achieve specific communicative goals in different contexts and shed light on different register features.

Since its introduction in 1988, multi-dimensional analysis has undergone several refinements and extensions, both in terms of its methodological foundations and its applications to various research questions. Early work by Biber and colleagues focused on developing multi-dimensional analysis as a method for describing linguistic variation in English texts (Biber 1988, 1995). This work led to the identification of several dimensions of variation labelled as ‘interactive versus informational production,’ ‘narrative versus non-narrative concerns,’ ‘explicit versus situation-dependent reference,’ and ‘abstract versus concrete style.’ Subsequent research has applied multi-dimensional analysis to other languages, including Spanish (Biber 1992), Korean (Biber et al. 2021), and Russian (Conrad and Biber 2001). These studies have revealed both similarities and differences in the underlying dimensions of variation across languages, suggesting that some dimensions may be universal, while others may be language-specific. Moreover, multi-dimensional analysis has been used to investigate a wide range of research questions in corpus linguistics and stylistics, including genre analysis (Biber 1989), register variation (Biber, Conrad, and Reppen 1998), and the diachronic study of language use (Biber 2003). These diverse applications of multi-dimensional analysis have demonstrated its versatility as a method for exploring linguistic variation and its functional motivations.

Multi-dimensional analysis has proven to be a valuable tool in the field of stylistics, which aims to analyse and describe the linguistic features of texts and their functional roles in creating meaning and style. By quantifying linguistic variation and uncovering the underlying dimensions that structure this variation, multi-dimensional analysis offers insights into the ways in which authors use language to achieve specific stylistic effects and convey particular meanings. One notable application of multi-dimensional analysis in stylistics is the study of literary genres. For example, Biber (1989) examined the linguistic features of various genres in the British National Corpus, revealing distinct patterns of variation corresponding to different literary traditions and communicative functions. multi-dimensional analysis has also been applied to the study of historical change in literary styles.

In essence, multi-dimensional analysis has been instrumental in advancing our comprehension of linguistic variation and its functional drivers. By utilizing statistical methods to detect co-occurring linguistic patterns, multi-dimensional analysis has uncovered the key dimensions that shape language across diverse text categories and settings. This methodology has become integral to corpus linguistics and stylistics, aiding in the examination of genres, registers, linguistic evolution over time, and distinctive authorial voices.

2.2.2 Multi-Dimensional Analysis in Stylistic Studies

Multi-dimensional analysis has emerged as a pivotal tool in the quantitative exploration of stylistic studies. It is able to distil complex linguistic features into interpretable dimensions, which has not only enhanced our understanding of authorial voices but also facilitated cross-disciplinary studies. The utility of multi-dimensional analysis lies in its ability to capture the nuanced relationships between linguistic features and their communicative functions. For example, Egbert and Biber (2018) adeptly demonstrated how factor analysis and discriminant analysis, when applied within the multi-dimensional analysis framework, reveal the underlying discourse functions that drive register variation. This application underscores the strength of multi-dimensional analysis in uncovering the systematic patterns that characterize different text types. Moreover, multi-dimensional analysis has been instrumental in academic writing research. Crosthwaite (2016) conducted a longitudinal study on English for Academic Purposes (EAP) writing, illustrating how EAP instruction influences students to adopt academic writing conventions. This study exemplifies the potential of multi-dimensional analysis to shed light on the impact of language instruction on writing development. While numerous studies have applied multi-dimensional analysis to a wide range of linguistic phenomena, for the purpose of brevity and relevance, this review will focus on a select few that are most pertinent to our research on stylistic evolution. For instance, Alyousef’s (2023) examination of rhetorical move structures in Geography research abstracts highlighted the capacity of multi-dimensional analysis to dissect scholarly writing and emphasize the role of specific linguistic features in academic discourse.

Overall, multi-dimensional analysis is a powerful tool to examine the extent to which specific linguistic features vary across texts (Friginal and Weigle 2014), offering insights into linguistic analysis, register variation, and stylistic shifts across languages and cultures. A key advantage of multi-dimensional analysis is its ability to handle vast datasets, which enables it to identify patterns of co-occurring linguistic features that other methods might not be able to detect. This capacity to manage large volumes of data and uncover complex linguistic patterns is what sets multi-dimensional analysis apart from other methods and contributes to its value in stylistic studies. Unlike keyword analysis, which focuses on individual lexical items, multi-dimensional analysis considers the systemic relationships between features, offering a more comprehensive view of register variation. The other advantages of multi-dimensional analysis include its sensitivity to subtle linguistic patterns, and its potential for revealing underlying structures in language use. Multi-dimensional analysis also allows for the statistical testing of hypotheses about linguistic variation, providing a robust framework for empirical research. Therefore, the multi-dimensional analysis is deemed suitable for studying the writing evolution of Virginia Woolf.

3 Methodology

3.1 Corpus Description

This study adopts a quantitative approach to investigate the stylistic evolution of Virginia Woolf’s writing by employing the multi-dimensional analysis tagger. To evaluate the stylistic differences between Virginia Woolf’s early and later works, two separate corpora are compiled. The Early Works Corpus (EWC) comprises the novels The Voyage Out (1915), Night and Day (1919), and Jacob s Room (1922), while the Later Works Corpus (LWC) includes the novels To the Lighthouse (1927), The Waves (1931), Between the Acts (1941).

This choice of sampling covers Virginia Woolf’s first two novels, which are more conventional and realistic, two of her most famous novels, which are more experimental and modernist, and her last novel. I made each corpus out of only three novels for a valid comparison between her early and late writing stages, which are most represented respectively by her first and last works. A selection of more of her works involve her works in the transition stage, which are not prototypical in terms of their writing style. The basic information about the two corpora is provided in Table 1 (generated by Wordsmith 6.0).

Table 1:

Corpus description of EWC and LWC.

Corpus EWC LWC
Tokens 363,572 194,041
Types 16,385 13,583
Standardized type/token ratio 44.85 44.59
Mean word length 4.36 4.26
Mean sentence length 16.76 14.21

3.2 Tool

Multi-dimensional analysis is a comprehensive linguistic methodology developed by Biber (1988) designed to study linguistic variation across different text types. To implement this methodology effectively, researchers often utilize the multi-dimensional analysis tagger, a computational tool specifically created for the purpose of conducting multi-dimensional analysis. The multi-dimensional analysis tagger allows for the detailed examination of textual data by capturing multiple linguistic dimensions simultaneously. It provides the means to quantify and analyse various linguistic features within a corpus, thereby enabling a deeper exploration of the co-occurring patterns that multi-dimensional analysis seeks to identify. In this way, the multi-dimensional analysis tagger serves as the practical instrument that brings the theoretical framework of multi-dimensional analysis to life, offering researchers a powerful means to investigate and understand language use and its functional motivations within diverse textual contexts. It can be used to explore and quantify linguistic features, semantic relationships, and emotional expressions within a given corpus. Researchers can utilize this advanced tool to explore and quantify linguistic features, semantic relationships, emotional expressions, and stylistic features across multiple dimensions within a given corpus. Its purpose, as highlighted by Biber, Conrad and Reppen (1998), focuses on identifying linguistic patterns in large text collections. Table 2 provides a summary of the six dimensions from Biber’s (1988) study, adapted from Nini (2019). The software enables the examination of each linguistic feature’s frequency, distribution, and variation within and between the Early Works Corpus and Later Works Corpus.

Table 2:

Descriptions of dimensions (adapted from Biber 1988; Nini 2019).

Dimension Descriptions
D1 Involved versus informational discourse
D2 Narrative versus non-narrative concerns
D3 Context-independent discourse versus context dependent discourse
D4 Overt expression of persuasion
D5 Abstract versus non-abstract information
D6 On-line informational elaboration
  1. The D in D1, D2, D3, D4, D5, and D6 is short for dimension.

Studies have effectively utilized the multi-dimensional analysis tagger to explore genre variation within literary corpora. This application of the multi-dimensional analysis tagger has underscored its capability to identify and analyse patterns that characterize different literary forms. These studies exemplify the multi-dimensional analysis tagger’s utility in bringing to light the nuances of language use and stylistic evolution within and across different genres and time periods. The versatility of the multi-dimensional analysis tagger in capturing diachronic variation and its contribution to our understanding of form and meaning in literary texts is a testament to its value in the field of corpus stylistics.

3.3 Procedure

To avoid copyright disputes, I obtained the texts comprising the two corpora were from open-source digital libraries such as the Gutenberg Project, which primarily focuses on older works with expired copyright. Prior to the multi-dimensional analysis tagger analysis, I processed the texts to remove non-linguistic elements including illustrations and page numbers, ensuring that the analysis solely focused on Virginia Woolf’s writings.

To execute the independent samples t-test, it was necessary to obtain two distinct datasets. Consequently, the Early Works Corpus (EWC) and Later Works Corpus (LWC) were each divided into discrete segments. Given that the novels within the Early Works Corpus are structured into natural chapters, I treated each chapter as a separate segment, yielding a total of 75 segments. However, certain novels within the Later Works Corpus do not adhere to a chapterized format. To maintain the integrity of the t-test and to ensure comparability in segment size, I systematically divided Later Works Corpus was into 75 segments based on a uniform criterion of line count.

About the settings of the variables in the multi-dimensional analysis tagger, I chose Yes for Only VASW tags to calculate only Biber’s (1988) linguistic features, excluding dimensions such as punctuation marks. I chose No for Z-score correction, which is particularly for extremely short texts. After I imported the text, a folder was generated which included: (1) Frequency information of linguistic features (normalized to frequency per 100 words); (2) Standardized scores (Z-scores) of the frequency of each linguistic feature; Z-Scores for each dimension; and (3) a picture identifying the register type closest to the text overall; and pictures identifying the language domain type closest to the text on each dimension. For further statistical analysis, I imported the generated statistics and z-scores for each dimension of the two corpora into SPSS 27. To examine linguistic variation between Early Works Corpus and Later Works Corpus across the six dimensions, a series of independent samples t-tests. Subsequently, I identified specific dimensions with significant differences, leading to another series of independent samples t-tests to explore the linguistic features within each dimension that displayed significant variations. I then conducted qualitative analysis to interpret each of these linguistic features, utilizing examples from the corpora. The results obtained from the statistical analysis were interpreted to determine whether the observed shifts in Virginia Woolf’s literary style were supported by empirical evidence found within the texts.

4 Results and Discussion

Table 3 presents the mean and standard deviation of dimension scores for Early Works Corpus and Later Works Corpus, along with the corresponding genres that exhibit the most similarity on each dimension in Biber’s (1988) dimensions. As presented in Table 3, both corpora align with the same type of texts as identified by Biber (1988) in D2, D3, and D6 (‘D’ for ‘dimension’, see Table 2). Additionally, Early Works Corpus and Later Works Corpus have some similarities in their dimensional scores. In D1, D4, D5, and D6, the scores are negative for both corpora, whereas in D2 and D3, the scores are positive. Overall, the two corpora are predominantly associated with the text type of general narrative exposition.

Table 3:

Dimensional differences between EWC and LWC.

EWC LWC
Mean SD Closest type Mean SD Closest type
D1 −2.12 4.45 General fiction −4.51 4.71 Broadcasts
D2 6.94 1.63 General fiction 6.63 4.43 General fiction
D3 1.32 1.35 Prepared speeches 1.58 1.93 Prepared speeches
D4 −0.19 1.99 Official documents −2.36 2.49 Press reportage
D5 −0.34 0.81 Press reportage −1.08 1.26 Broadcasts
D6 −0.63 0.81 Official documents −1.37 1.20 Official documents

Table 4 below presents the results of t-tests conducted on the two sets of 75 text files from the two corpora across the six dimensions. The analysis indicates significant differences in their scores for D1, D4, D5, and D6, while no significant difference is observed for D2 and D3, which indicates that the more significant stylistic gaps lie in the former four dimensions.

Table 4:

t-Tests for six-dimension scores between ECM and LCM.

Dimension t df p
D1 3.128 148 0.002
D2 −0.579 93.629 0.564
D3 −0.942 148 0.348
D4 5.919 148 <0.001
D5 4.285 126.49 <0.001
D6 4.414 148 <0.001

I will now delve into a more detailed examination and discussion of the results for each one of the four dimension that show a significant difference between the two corpora, namely ‘Involved versus Informational discourse,’ ‘Overt Expression of Persuasion,’ ‘Abstract versus Non-Abstract Information,’ and ‘On-line Informational Elaboration.’

4.1 Dimension 1: Involved versus Informational Discourse

As mentioned above, Dimension 1 represents the contrast between involved and informational discourse (Nini 2019). Lower scores in this dimension indicate a composition that is informationally concise, similar to scholarly prose, while higher scores suggest an emotive and interpersonal text resembling informal dialogue. The scores of Early Works Corpus and Later Works Corpus (−2.12 and −4.51 respectively) for Dimension 1 indicate that both corpora exhibit a relatively condensed information nature, although there is significant variation between the two periods of works represented by the two corpora, with Later Works Corpus leaning further towards information condensation. The primary linguistic features associated with the negative polarity in Dimension 1 include the frequent use of nouns, prepositions, attributive adjectives, and a high word length type/token ratio (Biber 1988). These features collectively contribute to the profound informational essence observed in Virginia Woolf’s works. Furthermore, when comparing specific language features, the independent sample t-test results reveal significant differences in 14 language features between ECM and LCM, as shown in Table 5.

Table 5:

Features with the most significant difference in D1.

Feature ECM LCM p Absolute value of the difference Effect size
AMP 0.4207 −0.4103 <0.001 0.8310 1.498
EMPH −0.1672 −0.8061 <0.001 0.6389 1.465
PIN −0.2172 −0.6747 <0.001 0.4575 1.044
SERE 3.4667 1.6233 <0.001 1.8434 0.961
WHCL 0.7960 0.1030 <0.001 0.6930 0.896
PRIV 0.1983 −0.2092 <0.001 0.4075 0.794
SPP2 −0.0393 −0.3280 <0.001 0.2887 0.759
CAUS −0.2417 −0.4588 <0.001 0.2171 0.690
AWL −0.3443 −0.5319 <0.001 0.1876 0.653
TTR 0.9708 0.6020 <0.001 0.3688 0.582
JJ 5.4804 4.9864 <0.001 0.4940 0.541
DPAR 0.1261 0.2129 <0.001 0.0868 −0.572
DEMP 0.3293 0.4761 <0.001 0.1468 −0.750
  1. AMP, sentence relatives; EMPH, emphatics; PIN, prepositions; SERE, sentence relatives; WHCL, WH-clauses; PRIV, private verbs; SPP2, second person pronouns; CAUS, causative adverbial subordinators; AWL, word length; TTR, type-token ratio; JJ, adjectives; DPAR, discourse particles; DEMP, demonstrative pronouns.

As is shown above, I identified 13 linguistic features that demonstrated significant differences between Early Works Corpus and Later Works Corpus. It was not feasible to provide an in-depth case study for each of these features. Therefore, I made a deliberate methodological choice to focus on the one feature that exhibited the most pronounced difference as a representative case study.[1]

4.1.1 Amplifiers

As mentioned above, the amplifiers that come into play in D1 include absolutely, altogether, completely, enormously, entirely, extremely, and so on, which mark heightened feeling (Biber 1988), as in (1):

  1. As the rooms in which people live are apt to give off something of the same shock as their faces when seen for the first time, Rachel walked very slowly downstairs, lost in wonder at her uncle, and his books, and his neglect of dances, and his queer, utterly inexplicable, but apparently satisfactory view of life, when her eye was caught by a note with her name on it lying in the hall. (The Voyage Out)

In this sentence, the amplifiers ‘very’ and ‘utterly’ (marked bold by me, as with other example sentences below) emphasize the frequency of the nervous tremor felt by the character. By utilizing these amplifiers, Woolf effectively heightens the emotional impact of the sentence. They bring attention to Rachel’s contemplative state, her uncle’s eccentricity, and the conflicting emotions and thoughts she experiences. The amplifiers contribute to the overall atmosphere of the narrative, adding depth and intensity to Rachel’s observations and reactions. However, in the works of Virginia Woolf’s later writing career, when the need for amplification arises, metaphors, symbolic language, and imagery, as well as sensory expressions, are employed to achieve a more precise and poetic description, as in (2):

  1. Low murmurings, a small hooting breeze and a tinkling of little bells sounded as if far, far away. I could not hear them distinctly. I had to strain to hear the murmurs, the hooting, the tinkling. (The Waves)

In this excerpt, Woolf employs auditory imagery and sensory details to depict the character’s attempt to discern distant sounds. The phrases ‘low murmurings’, ‘a small hooting breeze’, and a ‘tinkling of little bells’ create an atmosphere of subtle and distant sounds. The repetition of ‘I’ had to strain to hear emphasizes the character’s effort to capture these faint auditory cues. Through her vivid and evocative descriptions of sounds, Woolf artistically represents the character’s heightened sensitivity and the nuanced experience of perception. The choice of these specific auditory images serves to create a symbolic landscape that reflects the character’s internal state without the need for explicit amplification.

4.2 Dimension 4: Overt Expression of Persuasion

As mentioned above, the positive pole of D4 means that the corpus abounds with overt expressions of persuasion, while the negative pole suggests a lack of them (Biber 1988). Early Works Corpus and Later Works Corpus both have negative weights (−0.19 vs. −2.36) along D4. This result indicates that the conclusions in both corpora have a non-persuasive orientation, which is consistent with what is expected of general fiction. Persuasion is expressed by using infinitives (to), suasive verbs, and modal verbs and so on (Biber 1988). The persuasive strength of Virginia Woolf’s writings is a result of these combined elements. The decreased frequency of these features in Later Works Corpus may reflect a departure from explicit persuasion and a move towards more subtle narrative techniques.

The independent samples t-test results reveal that two language features, namely infinitives (TO) and (SPAU), show a significant difference between ECM and LCM when comparing their specific language features (see Table 6 above).

Table 6:

Features with the most significant difference in D4.

Feature ECM LCM p Absolute value of the difference Effect size
SPAU −0.9179 −1.6293 <0.001 0.7114 1.573
TO 0.1793 −0.8431 <0.001 1.0224 1.466
  1. SPAU, split auxiliaries; TO, Infinitives.

4.2.1 Split Auxiliaries

Split auxiliaries occur when adverbs are placed between auxiliaries and their main verb. They mark the speaker’s persuasion, that is, the speaker’s own assessment of likelihood or advisability (Biber 1988), as in (3):

  1. It was a gift that they would impart if you asked them for it, and thus no dinner-party could possibly be dull, and little Mr. Peyton on her right and William Rodney on her left were in equal measure endowed with the quality which seemed to her so unmistakable and so precious that the way people neglected to demand it was a constant source of surprise to her. (The Voyage Out)

In this sentence, the split auxiliary construction ‘could possibly be’ includes the auxiliary verb could, the adverb possibly, and the verb be. This construction conveys the characters’ affirmation that the dinner-party is not dull. In her early works, Virginia Woolf employed split auxiliaries to emphasize characters’ sentiments, preferences, or reservations, allowing for a clearer expression of persuasion or intention. The decreased frequency of split auxiliaries in the LWC suggests a stylistic shift away from this construction in Woolf’s later works. This change may reflect her exploration of more streamlined sentence structures and a departure from explicitly conveying persuasion through split auxiliary constructions. In her later works, Woolf focused on experimental techniques and delved into the subjective experiences and inner thoughts of her characters, utilizing diverse narrative strategies to evoke meaning and captivate readers.

4.2.2 Infinitives

Although infinitives can have other functions, they are most commonly used as adjective and verb complements in English; in these constructions, the head adjective or verb frequently (e.g., happy to do it; hoped to see it) encodes the speaker’s attitude or stance towards the proposition encoded in the infinitival clause (Biber 1988), as in (4):

  1. He began to think that he would be justified in saying what he thought. (Night and Day)

In this sentence, the infinitive ‘to think’ is used to convey the character’s internal thought process and justification for expressing the character’s opinions. Virginia Woolf’s early works employed infinitives to portray characters’ reasoning, decision-making, or introspection. The lower frequency of infinitives in the Later Works Corpus suggests a stylistic change in Virginia Woolf’s later works. This shift may indicate her exploration of sentence structures alternative to infinitives and a departure from explicitly expressing persuasion through infinitive constructions. In her later works, Virginia Woolf prioritized experimental narrative techniques and delved into subjective experiences and stream of consciousness. She also utilized different stylistic devices, such as free direct speech, to convey meaning and captivate readers, as in (5):

  1. What is the meaning of life? That was all – a simple question; one that tended to close in on one with years. The great revelation had never come. The great revelation perhaps never did come. Instead there were little daily miracles, illuminations, matches struck unexpectedly in the dark. (To the Lighthouse)

In (5), Virginia Woolf portrays the character’s contemplation on the meaning of life. Through these introspective musings, she captures the character’s continuous pursuit of understanding and personal development. Virginia Woolf frequently grants direct access to characters’ inner thoughts, which enables readers to witness their thoughts, doubts, and reflections from a first-person perspective, avoiding constructions such as someone begins to do something. By delving into introspective moments, she explores the intricacies of characters’ decision-making processes and internal conflicts. This technique is characteristic of Woolf’s stream of consciousness writing.

4.3 Dimension 5: Abstract versus Non-Abstract Information

Both Early Works Corpus and Later Works Corpus load negatively on D5, illustrating highly non-abstract, non-technical, and informal language in these texts. The dimension scores for conclusion texts from Early Works Corpus and Later Works Corpus are −0.34 and −1.08 respectively. A significant difference is found between the two corpora. The significant difference suggests a shift towards a more concrete and direct writing style in Woolf’s later works.

The features involved in D5, as mentioned above, are conjuncts, agentless passives, past participial clauses and so on, which function together to convey abstract or impersonal information (Biber 1988). Two language features, conjuncts (CONJ) and by-passives (BYPA), show the most significant difference between ECM and LCM, according to the independent samples t-test results (Table 7).

Table 7:

Features with the most significant difference in D5.

Feature ECM LCM p Absolute value of the difference Effect size
BYPA −0.0497 −0.4219 <0.001 0.3722 1.573
CONJ 0.3429 −0.2597 <0.001 0.6026 1.198
  1. BYPA, By-passives; CONJ, conjuncts.

4.3.1 By-Passives

The use of the passive voice, particularly the increased utilization of by-passives, can contribute to the abstract nature of a text. In passive voice constructions, the emphasis is shifted from the subject performing the action or event to the recipient or target of the action or event. This shift in emphasis creates a sense of distance or detachment, which enhances the abstract quality of the writing, as in (6):

  1. She was struck by it herself, for she stopped writing and looked up; looked at Terence deep in the arm-chair, looked at the different pieces of furniture, at her bed in the corner, at the window-pane which showed the branches of a tree filled in with sky, heard the clock ticking, and was amazed at the gulf which lay between all that and her sheet of paper. (The Voyage Out)

In this construction, the use of the by-passive voice focuses on the occurrence of events rather than the person experiencing them. It directs the reader’s attention to the actions taking place, such as a character’s gaze being drawn to a particular object, rather than emphasizing the character’s own agency in these events. The focus is on the abstract notion of actions occurring, which could be likened to flowers being swayed by the wind, rather than on the specific details of who might be involved in those actions or the precise manner in which they are executed. However, in Virginia Woolf’s later works, a shift towards a less abstract style can be observed through various linguistic features, including a decrease in the use of by-passives. Therefore, a reduction in their usage indicates a move towards a more concrete and direct writing style. By employing these strategies and minimizing the use of by-passives, Woolf’s later works may exhibit a writing style that is more immediate, focused, and less abstract. The increased agency, clarity of responsibility, directness of expression, and attention to specific details contribute to a style that is more accessible to readers and emphasizes a concrete representation of events and actions, as in (7):

  1. Now we have fallen through the tree-tops to the earth. The air no longer rolls its long, unhappy, purple waves over us. We touch earth; we tread ground. That is the close-clipped hedge of the ladies’ garden. There they walk at noon, with scissors, clipping roses. Now we are in the ringed wood with the wall round it. This is Elvedon. I have seen signposts at the cross-roads with one arm pointing “To Elvedon”. No one has been there. The ferns smell very strong, and there are red funguses growing beneath them. Now we wake the sleeping daws who have never seen a human form; now we tread on rotten oak apples, red with age and slippery. There is a ring of wall round this wood; nobody comes here. Listen! That is the flop of a giant toad in the undergrowth; that is the patter of some primeval fir-cone falling to rot among the ferns. (The Waves)

In this paragraph, Virginia Woolf departs from abstraction and adopts a more concrete and immediate writing style. Woolf consistently uses the active voice and in most of the cases explicitly identifies the agent of each action. This approach enhances agency and accountability, making the actions more tangible and directly associated with specific subjects. It improves clarity and immediacy in the narrative. The absence of by-passives contributes to the overall directness and immediacy of the writing style. By avoiding the distancing effect created by by-passives, Virginia Woolf provides a closer connection between the subjects and the actions they perform, resulting in a less abstract narrative.

4.3.2 Conjuncts

Conjuncts are connective words or phrases that join different elements within a sentence, such as alternatively, altogether, consequently, conversely. When conjuncts are employed, they often serve to provide additional information, establish logical connections, or express contrasting ideas. By using conjuncts, writers can offer more abstract and formal discourse, enhancing the overall non-abstractness of the text. The increased use of conjuncts in Early Works Corpus compared to Later Works Corpus suggests a greater emphasis on establishing connections, relationships, and concrete details within the narrative, as in (8):

  1. Mr. Durrant knew him; and therefore blushed slightly, and said, awkwardly, something about being sure – looking at Mr. Plumer and hitching the right leg of his trouser as he spoke. (Jacob’s Room)

In this sentence, the conjunct therefore is used to link two verb phrases. The presence of the conjunct therefore in the sentence establishes a logical connection between the described actions and the ultimate outcome, highlighting the cause-and-effect relationship. It conveys a sense of finality and reinforces the notion that John’s exceptional performance is a direct consequence of his diligent studying, timely completion of assignments, and active participation in class. By utilizing the conjunct, the sentence maintains coherence, clarity, and persuasiveness by establishing a logical link between the stated actions and the anticipated result. In her early works, Virginia Woolf frequently employed conjuncts to articulate abstract concepts and explore their ramifications. However, this is not the case with Later Works Corpus. For example, (9) from Later Works Corpus lacks conjuncts. The ‘ring’, with its quivering motion, the ‘loop of light’, the ‘slab of pale yellow’, and the ‘white cluster of little creatures’, are described in a fragmented and disjointed manner. This style reflects Woolf’s experimental approach in her later works. The absence of conjuncts in this example emphasizes the abstraction and focuses on individual images and impressions rather than establishing explicit connections between them.

  1. “I see a ring hanging above me. It quivers, hangs in a loop of light – a slab of pale yellow, a white cluster of little creatures.” (The Waves)

4.4 Dimension 6: On-Line Informational Elaboration

Dimension 6 consists of linguistic features such as demonstratives, that adjective complements, that verb complements and so on. This dimension distinguishes between highly constrained informational discourse, in which information is presented in a loose and fragmented manner, and other types of discourse. It encompasses both highly integrated informational discourse and non-informational discourse (Biber 1988). The dimension scores for conclusion texts from Early Works Corpus and Later Works Corpus are −0.63 and −1.37 respectively. A significant difference in online information elaboration is found between the two corpora. The Later Works Corpus’s lower scores suggest a move towards a more fragmented and less integrated informational discourse, which is characteristic of Woolf’s later, more experimental style. The independent samples t-test results reveal that the most significant difference between ECM and LCM is with three language features, that verb complements (THVC), that adjective complements (THAC), and that relative clauses on object position (TOBJ) (Table 8).

Table 8:

Features with the most significant difference in D6.

Feature ECM LCM p Absolute value of the difference Effect size
THVC 0.0049 −0.6221 <0.001 0.6270 1.209
TOBJ 0.4324 −0.0613 <0.001 0.4937 0.706
THAC 0.6112 0.1087 <0.001 0.5025 0.571
  1. THVC, that verb complements; TOBJ, that relative clauses on object position; THAC, that adjective complements.

4.4.1 That Verb Complements

In this sentence, the verb complements with that provide a list of specific actions that the subject, she, was forced to undertake. By using a clause introduced by that, Woolf clearly delineates each action. This level of specificity enhances the explicitness of the sentence, leaving no room for ambiguity regarding the actions the subject had been forced to do. The directness of the language conveys a sense of clarity and straightforwardness, as in (10):

  1. She had been forced to accept her lot, to marry St. John Hirst, to live with him in a small house in Manchester, to go with him to parties and dinners, and to see that he was comfortable when he came home at night. (The Voyage Out)

4.4.2 That Relative Clauses on Object Position

In example (11), the use of a relative clause with that in the object position contributes to the explicit expression of the character’s ‘theory.’ By employing this relative clause with that, Woolf presents a clear and direct statement of the theory, leaving no room for ambiguity.

  1. She had a theory that it was only on this condition that life was worth living; that one should be one of the best, should be conscious of a fine organization, should move in the realm of light, and have ideas and friends. (The Voyage Out)

4.4.3 That Adjective Complements

In example (12), the adjective complement with that plays a crucial role in expressing the character’s conviction and sense of duty. The use of that introduces two clauses: one regarding his ability to mention Katharine’s name and the other emphasizing his belief that it was his duty to do so. By employing these that complements, Woolf presents the character’s thoughts directly and explicitly. The sentence becomes more focused and unequivocal, contributing to the overall directness of the writing style.

  1. He had been convinced, as he walked back, that not only could he mention Katharine’s name, but that it was his duty to do so. (Jacob’s Room)

In examples (10), (11) and (12), the use of that complements and that relatives contributes to the explicitness and directness of the writing style in Woolf’s early works. Including these complements helps articulate specific actions, beliefs, or theories without ambiguity, creating clarity and straightforwardness in the narrative. This explicitness and directness enhance the reader’s understanding of the characters’ thoughts, motivations, and experiences. In Virginia Woolf’s later works, however, she employs structures alternative to that complements and that relatives such as premodifiers, -ing phrases, -ed phrases, and post adjectives for modification instead of using complete that clauses to convey the complete meaning of verbs, adjectives, and objects. These forms contribute to the unique style of her prose.

Overall, in line with Zwerdling’s (1986) observations on Woolf’s transition from traditional narratives to more fragmented structures, our analysis supports this evolution. Furthermore, our findings resonate with Beers (2019) discussion on the resistance to dominant narratives through multiple voices. Theoretically, our qualitative interpretations are framed within Humm’s (2002) work on the stream-of-consciousness technique which aligns with our observations on the use of fragments and symbolic language in Woolf’s later works.

5 Conclusions

This study identifies and quantifies the perceived changes in Virginia Woolf’s writing style, specifically the transition from a Victorian- and Edwardian-influenced approach to an experimental style characterized by the prominent use of stream of consciousness. It is conducted through a quantitative analysis using MAT. By comparing two separate self-compiled corpora representing her early and later works and rigorously analysing the six dimensions of the multi-dimensional analysis approach and various linguistic features, this study provides a quantitative and objective analysis of Virginia Woolf’s writing style evolution, which has been widely recognized but not before systematically measured. The study contributes to the understanding of Woolf’s literary development and achievements, as well as the broader context of the modernist movement and its impact on the literary styles of the authors at that time. The study also demonstrates the applicability and usefulness of the multi-dimensional analysis method for studying stylistic variation and change in literary texts.

The analysis of Virginia Woolf’s Early Works Corpus and Later Works Corpus using the multi-dimensional analysis tagger reveals distinct linguistic features that differentiate the two stages of her writing style. In terms of Dimension 4 (Overt Expression of Persuasion), Dimension 5 (Abstract vs. Non-Abstract Information), and Dimension 6 (On-line Informational Elaboration), Early Works Corpus scores higher than Later Works Corpus. This indicates a more persuasive, abstract, and online communication style, combined with the usage of explicit complement clauses and complex sentence structures. Early Works Corpus scores higher than Later Works Corpus on personal involvement and subjective expression compared to her later works. This finding suggests a shift in Virginia Woolf’s writing style towards a more detached and informational approach in her later works.

Furthermore, the analysis identifies specific linguistic features that are more prevalent in EWC, including amplifiers (AMP), infinitives (TO), split auxiliaries (SPAU), conjuncts (CONJ), by-passives (BYPA), verb complements led by that (THVC), adjective complements led by that (THAC), and relative clauses on object position introduced by that (TOBJ). These features contribute to the distinct stylistic characteristics of Virginia Woolf’s early works, highlighting a more frequent utilization of complex sentence structures, a variety of amplification techniques, the strategic employment of subordinate clauses, and the clear articulation of explicit complement clauses.

This study contributes to a deeper understanding of Virginia Woolf’s artistic development and how this stylistic novelty and sophistication may help explain her impact. It underscores the importance of analysing linguistic features to unveil the stylistic changes in an author’s works. Future studies could explore the stylistic evolution of other renowned authors or investigate additional dimensions of writing style. Furthermore, a qualitative analysis of selected passages or a comparative analysis with other authors from the same period could provide further insights into the uniqueness and significance of Virginia Woolf’s writing style.


Corresponding author: Lei Huang, Department of Linguistics, 12656 Shanghai International Studies University , Shanghai, 200083, China, E-mail: 

I would like to thank Esther Pascual for comments on the early versions of the paper. Thanks also go to the anonymous reviewers for helpful comments.


References

Alyousef, H. S. 2023. “A Multidimensional Analysis of Linguistic Realizations and Rhetorical Move Structure in Geography Research Article Abstracts: A Corpus-Based Study.” Atlantis-Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies 45 (1): 190–212. https://doi.org/10.28914/atlantis-2023-45.1.11.Search in Google Scholar

Banfield, A. 2000. The Phantom Table: Virginia Woolf, Fry, Russell and Modernism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Beer, G. 1990. Virginia Woolf: The Common Ground. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Beer, G. 2019. Virginia Woolf: The Common Ground: Essays by Gillian Beer. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bell, Q. 1996. Virginia Woolf: A Biography. London: Vintage.Search in Google Scholar

Biber, D. 1988. Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511621024Search in Google Scholar

Biber, D. 1989. “A Typology of English Texts.” Linguistics 27 (1): 3–43. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1989.27.1.3.Search in Google Scholar

Biber, D. 1992. Using Computers in English Language Research: A Practical Introduction. Birmingham: University of Birmingham Press.Search in Google Scholar

Biber, D. 1995. Dimensions of Register Variation: A Cross-Linguistic Comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511519871Search in Google Scholar

Biber, D. 2003. “Compressed Noun-Phrase Structures in Newspaper Discourse: The Competing Demands of Popularization vs. Economy.” In New Media Language, edited by J. Aitchison, and D. M. Lewis, 169–81. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Biber, D., S. Conrad, and R. Reppen. 1998. Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804489Search in Google Scholar

Biber, D., S. Johansson, G. N. Leech, S. Conrad, and E. Finegan. 2021. Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.232Search in Google Scholar

Caws, M. A. 2000. Virginia Woolf: The Poetics of Exploration. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Conrad, S., and D. Biber. 2001. Variation in English: Multi-Dimensional Studies. Harlow: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Crosthwaite, P. 2016. “A Longitudinal Multidimensional Analysis of EAP Writing: Determining EAP Course Effectiveness.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 22: 166–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.04.005.Search in Google Scholar

DeSalvo, L. 1989. Virginia Woolf: The Impact of Childhood Sexual Abuse on Her Life and Work. Boston: Beacon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Egbert, J., and D. Biber. 2018. “Do All Roads Lead to Rome? Modeling Register Variation with Factor Analysis and Discriminant Analysis.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 14 (2): 233–73. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2016-0016.Search in Google Scholar

Friginal, E., and S. Weigle. 2014. “Exploring Multiple Profiles of L2 Writing Using Multi-Dimensional Analysis.” Journal of Second Language Writing 26 (2): 80–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.007.Search in Google Scholar

Humm, M. 2002. Modernist Women and Visual Cultures: Virginia Woolf, Vanessa Bell, Photography and Cinema. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9781474469395Search in Google Scholar

Lee, H. 1999. Virginia Woolf. London: Chatto and Windus.Search in Google Scholar

Leech, G. N., and M. H. Short. 1981. Style in Fiction, Vol. 11. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Marcus, J. 2000. Art and Anger: Reading like a Woman. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Moretti, F. 2013. “Network Theory, Plot Analysis.” New Left Review 68: 80–102.Search in Google Scholar

Neuman, S. 2003. Virginia Woolf and the Politics of Style. Albany: State University of New York Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nini, A. 2019. “The Multi-Dimensional Analysis Tagger.” In Multi-Dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues, edited by T. Berber Sardinha, and M. Veirano, 67–94. London: Pinto.10.5040/9781350023857.0012Search in Google Scholar

Panken, S. 1993. “Virginia Woolf and the ‘Lust of Creation’.” In A Psychoanalytic Exploration. Albany: State University of New York Press.Search in Google Scholar

Zwederling, A. 1986. Virginia Woolf and the Real World. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-01-07
Accepted: 2024-06-05
Published Online: 2024-06-19

© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter on behalf of Shanghai International Studies University

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 28.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/csh-2024-0002/html
Scroll to top button