Home A uterus didelphys with a spontaneous labor at term of pregnancy: a rare case and a review of the literature
Article Publicly Available

A uterus didelphys with a spontaneous labor at term of pregnancy: a rare case and a review of the literature

  • Paola Algeri EMAIL logo , Sonia M. Rota , Elena Nicoli , Orlando Caruso , Giovanna Spinetti and Valentina Stagnati
Published/Copyright: July 26, 2018

Abstract

Uterus didelphys accounts for 13% of uterine anomalies and has been correlated with preterm delivery and fetal malpresentation at delivery. A 37-year-old pregnant woman reported a spontaneous pregnancy in the right horn of a uterus didelphys. The course of the pregnancy was complicated by gestational diabetes, but no miscarriage threat or preterm delivery threat was reported during this pregnancy. She arrived at our division, in labor, at 39.2 gestational weeks’. She delivered by cesarean section due to failure to progress at 5 cm. Her post-operative course was uneventful. Vaginal delivery could be a safe option and the induction of labor or the use of oxytocin could be helpful in such cases, but recommended doses and labor time should be evaluated, so cesarean section is to date the most frequent delivery route in uterus didelphys at term.

Introduction

Müllerian anomalies are congenital defects of the female genital system due to abnormal embryological development of the Müllerian ducts (failure of its development, fusion, canalization or reabsorption). The incidence of uterine malformation is difficult to report considering that the data is usually referred to an infertility cohort, but poor information has been reported in the general population.

Uterus didelphys is characterized by the presence of two separate uterine horns and two different uterine cervix due to an absence of fusion between the two Müllerian ducts. In a study by Hua et al., uterus didelphys accounted for 13% of the uterine anomalies and was correlated with preterm delivery [1]. In a systemic review published in 2011 this malformation presented a significant increase of preterm labor and fetal malpresentation at delivery, however, no higher incidence of first and second trimester miscarriage was found in comparison with the general population [2]. A rate of 45% of pregnancies with uterus didelphys delivered at term [3]. A vaginal delivery could be an option even if a cesarean section is usually the most frequent means of delivery, considering high possibility of the alteration of cervix dilatation or abnormal fetal presentation.

Case report

A 37-year-old pregnant woman reported a spontaneous pregnancy in a malformed uterus. Her gynecological and obstetrical history reported a uterus didelphys and a longitudinal vaginal septum, which divided the right and left uterine cervix, and a first trimester miscarriage. The patient was a normal weight (pre-gestational weight was 55 kg, with 11 kg of weight gain during pregnancy), she is tall, 175 cm; she had been a smoker, who stopped smoking at the beginning of the pregnancy; she had no medical disease and she reported no surgical intervention. The pregnancy was spontaneous and implanted into the right horn. The course of the pregnancy was complicated by gestational diabetes, well controlled by diet. She never had bleeding, a miscarriage threat or a preterm delivery threat during this pregnancy, so she did not receive any medical therapy. The ultrasound examination during pregnancy reported a normal growth fetus with a normal placenta implantation on the fundus of the right uterine horn. She arrived to our division, in labor, at 39.2 gestational weeks’; on arrival, the right cervix was smoothed and the dilatation was 2 cm; the left cervix presented a 3 cm length and was closed. She required and was given an epidural anesthesia. After 4 h, the dilatation was 5 cm. Despite other 5 h of valid contractions, the dilation remained unchanged. We preferred not to use oxytocin for labor augmentation, so she was delivered by cesarean section. At the surgical intervention, we saw a small a left uterine horn and a right one containing the fetus. We performed a transversal incision on the low right uterine segment, with the birth of a healthy male neonate, weighing 2900 g, whose Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min were, respectively, 9 and 10 and the pH of the umbilical cord was 7.31. Blood loss at cesarean delivery was 200 mL. Her post-operative course was uneventful. At discharge, 3 days after surgery, the right horn was contracted and the left horn was not appreciable on abdominal palpation. The ultrasound evaluation demonstrated a regular right horn with a thin intrauterine cavity and a small and regular left horn.

Discussion

Here, we describe a rare case of spontaneous labor at term in a pregnant woman with a uterus didelphys. Even if a higher risk of preterm delivery in cases of this uterine malformation has been reported, our patient’s gestation was regular. During the pregnancy, she underwent frequent obstetrical observations every 2–3 weeks, to evaluate the likely development of complications. She never required progesterone or tocolytic therapy. She desired a vaginal delivery, but unfortunately, she required a cesarean delivery due to the failure of cervical dilation to progress beyond 5 cm.

We describe our case because of the rarity of uterus didelphys and the peculiar gestational age at which our patient came to our division in labor, considering that she never presented a risk of preterm labor in pregnancy, without any preventive therapy [1]. Considering that vaginal delivery has described in the literature as a safe option in such cases, we assisted the labor of our pregnant woman. We did not administer oxytocin as a labor augmentation, even if in the literature, it is occasionally used. We preferred to wait through the spontaneous course of her labor due to the possibility of a uterine rupture in the malformed uterus and because a specific protocol for these cases, with doses and time of augmentation, was not available in our institution.

In the literature, there were only nine cases delivered at term (Table 1). In two cases, the pregnant women had successful vaginal deliveries. Another case described the first twin “had a successful vaginal delivery” while a cesarean section was performed for the second twin. Cesarean section was frequently done, it was performed in 72% of cases, due to abnormal fetal presentation, maternal desire or during labor due to the alteration of the cervix dilatation or a not reassuring cardiotocography. In the cohort reported in Table 1, a cesarean section was performed in six cases (66.7%).

Table 1:

Cases of term delivery in patients with uterus didelphys reported in the literature.

Case no. Author/year Pregnancy course Gestational age at delivery Delivery mode and indication
1 Narayansingh 1998 [4] Vaginal bleeding during pregnancy 38 weeks Cesarean section after premature rupture of the membrane
2 Fedele 1987 [5] Term
3 Giannopoulos T 2004 [6] Uncomplicated pregnancy 38 weeks Cesarean section (patient on her third pregnancy, one termination in the first trimester; second pregnancy delivered by cesarean section at 38 weeks)
4 Chen 2006 [7] No preterm labor during pregnancy 38 weeks Cesarean delivery for breech presentation
5 Rana 2008 [8] Pyocolpos at 10 weeks treated with antibiotics and surgical incision 37 weeks Vaginal delivery
6 Isango 2013 [9] Uncomplicated pregnancy 39.5 weeks Diagnosis of uterus didelphys at cesarean delivery performed for cervix dystocia
7 Park 2013 [10] Uterus didelphys with a blind hemivagina complicated by pyocolpos due to Pediococcus infection, drained and treated with antibiotics 39 weeks Cesarean section for patient refuse to vaginal delivery
8 Maki 2014 [11] Uncomplicated pregnancy 37 weeks Twin pregnancy. Spontaneous labor after premature rupture of the membrane. First twin delivered vaginally after oxytocin augmentation; second twin delivered by cesarean section due to a not reassuring cardiotocography
9 Rezai 2015 [12] Uncomplicated prenatal care; no bleeding or threatened preterm labor 38.4 weeks Induction of labor with misoprostol for membrane rupture; Pitocin augmentation of labor; vaginal delivery

Close monitoring during pregnancy is recommended in patients with uterus didelphys. No routine use of therapy for preventing preterm contractions is required. Future studies, which will define adequate doses and time of augmentation of labor, are required. These data could increase the rate of vaginal delivery in the population with a uterus didelphys.

Conclusion

Vaginal delivery could be a safe option and the induction or augmentation of labor could be helpful in bringing about successful vaginal deliveries, the recommended doses and specific management should be evaluated in future studies, cesarean section is to date the most frequent mode of delivery in uterus didelphys at term.

Acknowledgements

The authors have no acknowledgements to report.

  1. Conflict of interest: The authors reported no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Hua M, Odibo AO, Longman RE, Macones GA, Roehl KA, Cahill AG. Congenital uterine anomalies and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205:558.e1–5.10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.022Search in Google Scholar

[2] Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Tan A, Thornoton JG, Coomarasay A, Raine-Fenning NJ. Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38:371–82.10.1002/uog.10056Search in Google Scholar

[3] Rezai S, Bisram P, Alcantara IL, Upadhyay R, Lara C, Elmadjian M. Case report didelphys uterus: a case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2015, Article ID 865821, 5 pages.10.1155/2015/865821Search in Google Scholar

[4] Narayansingh CV, Serrao C, Ramsewak SS. Innocuous recurrent vaginal bleeding during pregnancy in a patient with uterus didelphys. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;18:592.10.1080/01443619866471Search in Google Scholar

[5] Fedele L, Zamberletti D, D’Alberton A, Vercellini P, Candiani GB. Gestational aspects of uterus didelphys. J Reprod Med. 1988;33:353–5.10.1097/00006254-198901000-00020Search in Google Scholar

[6] Giannopoulos T, Croucher C. Successful consecutive pregnancies in separate horns of a uterus didelphys. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;24:314.10.1080/01443610410001660977Search in Google Scholar

[7] Chen FP, Ng KK. Term pregnancy at the site of atresia following vaginal canalization in a case of uterus didelphys with hemivaginal atresia and ipsilateral renal agenesis. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;45:366–8.10.1016/S1028-4559(09)60264-3Search in Google Scholar

[8] Rana R, Pasrija S, Puri M. Herlyn-Werner-Wunderlich syndrome with pregnancy: a rare presentation. Congenit Anom (Kyoto). 2008;48:142–3. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-4520.2008.00195.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Isango YI, Mukuku O, Ilunga PM, Kakisingi CN, Nsambi J, Kabamba C, et al. Utérus bicorne bicervical perméable: découverte fortuite lors d’une césarienne d’urgence chez une multipare lushoise. Pan Afr Med J. 2013;15:75. DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2013.15.75.2745.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[10] Park TC, Lee HJ. Pregnancy coexisting with uterus didelphys with a blind hemivagina complicated by pyocolpos due to Pediococcus infection: a case report and review of the published reports. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2013;39:1276–9. DOI: 10.1111/jog.12049.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Maki Y, Furukawa S, Sameshima H, Ikenoue T. Independent uterine contractions in simultaneous twin pregnancy in each horn of the uterus didelphys. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014;40:836–9. DOI: 10.1111/jog.12219s.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Rezai S, Bisram P, Lora Alcantara I, Upadhyay R, Lara C, Elmadjian M. Didelphys Uterus: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2015;2015:865821. DOI: 10.1155/2015/865821. Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2018-01-12
Accepted: 2018-06-26
Published Online: 2018-07-26

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Case Reports – Obstetrics
  2. Trisomy 9 presenting in the first trimester as a fetal lateral neck cyst and increased nuchal translucency
  3. A case of intrauterine closure of the ductus arteriosus and non-immune hydrops
  4. Pregnancy luteoma: a rare presentation and expectant management
  5. A pregnant woman with an operated bladder extrophy and a pregnancy complicated by placenta previa and preterm labor
  6. Consecutive successful pregnancies of a patient with nail-patella syndrome
  7. A multidisciplinary management approach for patients with Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome and multifetal gestation with successful outcomes
  8. A uterus didelphys with a spontaneous labor at term of pregnancy: a rare case and a review of the literature
  9. Case Reports – Fetus
  10. Prenatal diagnosis of ring chromosome 13: a rare chromosomal aberration
  11. Case Reports – Newborn
  12. Late-onset pubic-phallic idiopathic edema in premature recovering infants
  13. An unusual cause of neonatal shock: a case report
  14. Early ultrasonographic follow up in neonatal pneumatocele. Two case reports
  15. Nonsyndromic extremely premature eruption of teeth in preterm neonates – a report of three cases and a review of the literature
  16. Successful outcome of a preterm infant with severe oligohydramnios and suspected pulmonary hypoplasia following premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) at 18 weeks’ gestation
  17. Onset of Kawasaki disease immediately after birth
  18. Short rib-polydactyly syndrome (Saldino-Noonan type) undetected by standard prenatal genetic testing
  19. Severe congenital autoimmune neutropenia in preterm monozygotic twins: case series and literature review
  20. Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae sepsis in an extremely premature infant
Downloaded on 18.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/crpm-2018-0001/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button