Startseite An overview of anti-corrosion properties of ionic liquids for corrosion of carbon steel in acidic media
Artikel Öffentlich zugänglich

An overview of anti-corrosion properties of ionic liquids for corrosion of carbon steel in acidic media

  • S. Kshama Shetty

    S. Kshama Shetty received her PhD degree in chemistry from National Institute of Technology, Karnataka, India in 2016. She currently works as an assistant professor in the Department of Chemistry and Bio-engineering Research Center at Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology, Bangalore, Karnataka, India. Her current research interests include corrosion and its control and electrochemical sensors. She has about 10 years of experience in academia and research.

    EMAIL logo
    und H. Sadhana Upadhya

    H. Sadhana Upadhya received her Master’s degree in chemistry from Manipal University, Karnataka, India, in 2012. She is currently an assistant professor in the Department of Chemistry and Bio-Engineering Research Center at Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology, Bangalore, Karnataka, India. She is pursuing her PhD in Visvesvaraya Technological University (VTU). Her field of interests includes electrochemical sensors and corrosion. She has about 10 years of experience in academia and research.

Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 6. Juni 2022

Abstract

The review article summarizes various ionic liquids (ILs) used as corrosion inhibitors reported in the literature during the preceding five years (2016–2020) for corrosion of carbon steel in acidic solutions. The ILs are a green and sustainable choice for corrosion inhibition as compared to natural extracts as corrosion inhibitors due to lack of stability which restricts their application at the industrial level. The review discusses the inhibition efficiency of the ILs as corrosion inhibitors; the evaluation techniques like weight-loss method, potentiodynamic polarization, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, etc., used for determination of inhibition efficiency and plausible mechanism of inhibition, adsorption isotherms are discussed. The review affirms that ionic liquids serve as excellent green corrosion inhibitors for carbon steel dissolution in acidic media. Most of the reported inhibition efficiency values ranged between 80 to 90% at minute concentrations which is valuable. The scope for further improvements is given for the benefit of readers.

1 Introduction

Metals and alloys are a boon to society whereas corrosion is a bane. The word corrosion is derived from the Latin word ‘corrodere’ which means to ‘gnaw to pieces’. It’s spontaneous and irreversible destruction of materials either due to chemical or electrochemical reactions at the electrode–electrolyte interface. Forms of corrosion are many and it includes pitting, differential metal, differential aeration, stress, erosion–corrosion, etc. The world has witnessed several disasters due to corrosion in the past which includes the Bhopal gas tragedy, Aloha airline disaster, a gas pipeline explosion in Mexico to name a few, which had both economic and health impacts. The rate and intensity of the corrosion depend on various factors like corrosive medium pH, temperature, potential differences between the metals in contact, mechanical factors, etc. A report by National Association for corrosion engineers (NACE) in the year 2002, states that the annual global corrosion cost exceeds 3.5% of the world’s gross domestic product. Corrosion of metals and alloys is a global issue (Ardakani et al. 2021). Corrosion cannot be prevented as metals have a natural tendency to go back to their combined form to attain stability but can only be controlled. Various methods have been employed by researchers across the world for corrosion control like electrodeposition, electroplating, coatings, alloying, inhibitors, etc. However, the use of corrosion inhibitors is believed to be the most economical method of corrosion control, as they can control corrosion to a larger extent when used in minute quantities (Verma et al. 2020). The efficiency of the inhibitors in a corrosive medium depends on a variety of factors, such as the chemical nature of the inhibitor molecule, the concentration of the inhibitor used, medium pH, temperature, immersion time, nature of metal, and its surface state, and aerated or de-aerated solution (Ardakani et al. 2021). The corrosion rate mainly depends on the change in the standard Gibb’s free energy (ΔG◦). A more negative change in the ΔG◦ value leads to a higher corrosion rate, and more positive ΔG◦ shows a lower corrosion rate of metal/alloy (Shivakumar and Mohana 2013).

Mild steel or plain carbon steel due to its relatively lower cost and good material properties are widely used in industrial applications (Saraswata et al. 2020). But mild steel is prone to corrosion due to its low corrosion resistance during processes like pickling, well-acidizing, etching, descaling, etc (Quakki et al. 2020). Organic molecules containing heteroatoms have been extensively studied as corrosion inhibitors and literature states that donor atoms in organic molecules like nitrogen, oxygen, sulfur, etc., have exhibited excellent corrosion inhibition on mild steel in acidic media (Alaoui et al. 2018; Ansari et al. 2014). However, the use of organic inhibitors at the industrial level is a challenge owing to low solubility in aqueous media, toxicity, stability, etc. In the past couple of decades, researchers have reported ionic liquids (ILs) as a green and sustainable choice of corrosion of inhibitors due to their low toxicity, high thermal and chemical stability, less volatile and noninflammable characteristics which enable its storage and use at the industrial level (Verma et al. 2017). ILs are organic salts that generally contain an organic cation and inorganic anion with a melting point below 100 °C. ILs have potential applications in the field of batteries, supercapacitors, solar cells, waste recycling, cellulose processing, tribology, etc., owing to their excellent physicochemical properties (Ardakani et al. 2021).

This review gives an overview of ionic liquids (ILs) used as corrosion inhibitors on mild steel in acidic media during the last five years, i.e., between the years 2016–2020. This review aims to give a wide-ranging review of literature and assessment of inhibition effects to enable the possible large-scale employment of ionic liquids as corrosion inhibitors on mild steel in acidic media for certain industrial operations. The operation parameters and efficiency of the inhibitor are discussed. Various approaches adopted for corrosion inhibition evaluation, mechanism, and adsorption isotherm are highlighted in this review.

2 Ionic liquids as corrosion inhibitors for mild steel in acidic media

Several ILs are reported as corrosion inhibitors for mild steel in acidic media. Most reported ILs include imidazolium, benzimidazolium, picolinium, pyrrolidinium, phosphonium cations with bromide, iodide, hexafluorophosphate, or acetate anions.

A summary of the ionic liquids that have been reported as effective corrosion inhibitors for mild steel corrosion in acidic media between the year 2016–2020 is tabulated in Table 1 along with respective efficiencies of inhibition.

Table 1:

Summary of the ionic liquids that have been reported as effective corrosion inhibitors for mild steel corrosion in acidic media between the years 2016–2020.

Sl. no. Ionic liquid Medium Maximum Inhibition efficiency (η%) References
1 1-2-(4-Chloro phenyl) 2-oxoethyl) -4N-Nmethyl) picolinium bromide (CPOMPB) + KI 1 M HCl 94% Bousskri et al. (2016)
2 1-Ethyl-1-methylpyrrolidinium (EMTFB) + KI 0.1 M HCl 75% in the absence of KI and 98% with KI Gerengi et al. (2016)
3 3-(4-Chlorobenzoylmethyl)-1-methylbenzimidazoliumbromide ([BMMB]+Br) 1 M HCl 94% Kannan et al. (2016)
4 Tetra-n-butylammonium l-methioninate [TBA][L-Met] 1 M HCl 94% Kowsari et al. (2016)
5 N1,N1,N1,N2,N2,N2-Hexadodecylethane-1,2-diaminium bromide (G2IL) 1 M HCl 89% Tawfik (2016)
N1,N1,N1,N2,N2,N2-Hexadodecylpropane-1,3-diaminium bromide (G3IL) 90%
N1,N1,N1,N2,N2,N2-Hexadodecylhexane-1,6-diaminium bromide (G6IL) 93%
6 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium ethylsulfate [EMIM]+ [EtSO4] 1 M HCl 92% Yesudass et al. (2016)
1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate [EMIM]+ [Ac] 87%
1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium thiocyanate [BMIM]+ [SCN] 88%
1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate [BMIM]+ [Ac] 90%
1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium dicyanamide [BMIM]+ [DCA] 90%
7 1-2-(4-Nitrophenyl)2-oxoethyl) -4N-Nmethyl)picolinium bromide (NPOMPB) 1 M HCl 96% Bousskri et al. (2017)
8 A1-Benzylpyridazin-1-ium bromide 1 M HCl 84% Aoun (2017a)
9 1-Hexylpyridinium bromide 1 M HCl 82% Aoun (2017b)
10 3-Decyl-1-methyl-1H-imidazole-3-ium tetrafluoroborate (IL1) 1 M HCl 73% Deyab et al. (2017)
3-Dodecyl-1-methyl-1H-imidazole-3-ium tetrafluoroborate (IL2), 75%
3-Decyl-1,2-dimethyl-1H-imidazole-3-ium tetrafluoroborate (IL3) 82%
3-Dodecyl-1,2-dimethyl-1H-imidazole-3-ium tetrafluoroborate (IL4) 93%
11 1-Vinyl-3 aminopropyl imidazolium hexafluorophosphate ([VAIM][PF6]) 1 M HCl 90% Guo et al. (2017)
1-Vinyl-3-aminopropyl imidazolium tetrafluoroborate ([VAIM][BF4]) 64%
12 1-Vinyl-3-hexylimidazolium Iodide ([VHIM]I) 0.5 M H2SO4 96% Feng et al. (2017)
13 1,1′-(1,4-Phenylenebis(methylene))bis(3-carboxymethyl)-1H-imidazole-3-ium bisulfate 0.5 M HCl 88% Cao et al. (2017)
1,1′-(1,4-Phenylenebis(methylene))bis(3-carboxymethyl)-1H-imidazole-3-ium dihydrogen phosphate 91%
14 2-(3-(Carboxymethyl)-1H-imidazole-3-ium-1-yl)acetate (AIZ-1) 1 M HCl 90% Srivastava et al. (2017)
2-(3-(1-Carboxyethyl)-1H-imidazole-3-ium-1-yl)propanoate (AIZ-2) 93%
2-(3-(1-Carboxy-2-phenylethyl)-1H-imidazole-3-ium-1-yl)-3-phenylpropanoate (AIZ-3) 96%
15 (4-Ethoxybenzyl)-triphenylphosphonium bromide (EBTPPB) 0.5 M H2SO4 98% Kumar et al. (2017)
16 1-Methyl-3-propylimidazolium iodide (MPIMI) 1 M HCl 80% Azeez et al. (2018)
1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium iodide (BMIMI) 87%
1-Hexyl-3-methylimidazolium iodide (HMIMI) 93%
17 1-(6-Ethoxy-6-oxohexyl)pyridazin-1-ium bromide (S1) 1 M HCl 84% El-Hajjaji et al. (2018)
1-(2-Bromoacetyl)pyridazinium bromide (S2) 82%
18 (2-Aminobenzyl)triphenylphosphonium bromide (ABTPPB) 0.5 M H2SO4 99% Goyal et al. (2018)
19 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide 1 M HCl 56% Langova et al. (2018)
1-Hexyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide 66%
1-Octyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide 93%
20 2-Hydroxyethyl-trimethylammonium chloride [Chl][Cl] 1 M HCl 94% Verma et al. (2018)
2-Hydroxyethyl-trimethyl-ammonium iodide [Chl][l] 96%
2-Hydroxyethyl-trimethyl-ammonium acetate [Chl][Ac] 97%
21 1-(2-Aminoethyl)-1-dodecyl-2-methyl-4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazole-1-ium chloride ([ADMDI]Cl) 0.5 M HCl 86% Zhang et al. (2018)
1-(2-Aminoethyl)-1-dodecyl-2-(trifluoromethyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H imidazole-1-ium chloride ([ADTDI]Cl) 93%
22 5-Methoxy-1,2,3,3-tetramethyl-3H-indolium iodide (IBIL-I) 0.5 M H2SO4 58% Ahmed et al. (2019)
1-(2-Carboxyethyl)-2,3,3-trimethyl-3H-indolium iodide (IBIL-II) 57%
2,3,3-Trimethyl-1-(pyren-2-ylmthyl)-3H-indolium iodide (IBIL-III) 67%
1-(3-Ethoxy-3-oxopropyl)-2,3,3 trimethyl-3H-indolium bromide (IBIL-IV) 85%
1-(2-Ethoxy-2-oxoethyl)-2,3,3-trimethyl-3H-indolium bromide (IBIL-V) 74%
23 1-Ethyl-3-methyl-imidazolium hexafluorophosphate (EMIMPF6) 1 M HCl 83% Al-Rashed and Nazeer (2019)
1-Methyl-3-pentyl-imidazolium hexafluorophosphate (PenMIMPF6) 88%
1-Methyl-3-octyl-imidazolium hexafluorophosphate (OctMIMPF6) 95%
1-Octylpyridinium hexafluorophosphate (OctpyPF6) 92%
1-Methyl-1-octyl-pyrrolidinium hexafluorophosphate (OctMpyrPF6) 94%
1-Methyl-1-octyl-pyrrolidinium thiocyanate (OctMpyrSCN) 96%
1-Methyl-1-octyl-pyrrolidinium dicyanamide (OctMpyrN(CN)2) 96%
24 3-(4-Fluorobenzyl)-1-methyl-1H-imidazole-3-ium bromide [FBMIm] 0.5 M H2SO4 99% Bhaskaran and Singh (2019)
25 1-(4-Sulfonic acid) butyl-3-ethyl imidazolium hydrogen sulfate (C2-IMIC4-S) 0.5 M HCl 80% Cao et al. (2019a)
1-(4-Sulfonic acid) butyl-3-decyl imidazolium hydrogen sulfate (C10-IMIC4-S) 98%
26 1,1′ (1,4 Phenylenebis(methylene))bis(3 (carboxymethyl) 1H imidazole 3 ium) 0.5 M HCl 94.8% without KI and 96.2% with KI. Cao et al. (2019b)
27 3-((4-Amino-2-methylpyrimidin-5-yl)methyl)-5-(2-hydroxyethyl)-4-methylthiazol-3-ium chloride (AMPMHMC) 1 M HCl 91% Farag et al. (2019)
28 1-Decylpyridazin-1-ium iodide (DPI) 1 M HCl 87% El-Hajjaji et al. (2019)
1-Tetradecylpyridazin-1-ium iodide (TPI) 89%
29 1,4- (Divinyl-imidazolium bromide) butane 1 M H2SO4 88% Jannat et al. (2019)
30 1-Methyl- 3-propylimidazolium iodide 1 M H2SO4 91% Parveen et al. (2019)
31 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride ([bmim][Cl]) 1 M HCl 93% Verma et al. (2019)
1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium trifluoromethanesulphonate ([bmim][CF3SO3]) 96%
1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate ([bmim][Ac]) 97%
32 Poly-{3.butyl-1-vinylimidazolium bromide] (PIL) 1 M HCl 96% Ardakani et al. (2020)
33 L-Phenyl alanine methyl ester saccharinate ([PheME][Sac]) 1 M HCl 79% Aslam et al. (2020)
L-Leucine methyl ester saccharinate ([LeuME][Sac]) 77%
L-Alanine methyl ester saccharinate ([AlaME][Sac]) 70%
34 1-Propyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide ([Pmim]Br) 200 ppm H2S and 1000 ppm HCl solution mixture 84% Cui et al. (2020)
1-Carboxyethyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide ([COOHemim]Br) 85%
1-Hydroxyethyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide ([OHemim]Br 88%
1-Allyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide ([Amim]Br) 95%
1-Aminoethyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide ([NH2emim]Br), 94%
35 Isopentyltriphenylphosphonium bromide (IPTPPB) 0.5 M H2SO4 99% Goyal et al. (2020)
36 1-Ethyl-4-(2-(4-fluorobenzylidene)hydrazinecarbonyl)pyridin-1-ium iodide (IPyr-C2H5) 1 M HCl 88.8% El-Hajjai et al. (2020)
1-Butyl-4-(2-(4-fluorobenzylidene)hydrazinecarbonyl)pyridin-1-ium iodide (IPyr-C4H9) 92.3%
37 3-Hexadecyl-1-methyl-1H-imidazole-3-ium bromide [C16M1Im] [Br] 1 M HCl 78% Subasree and Selvi (2020)
3-Hexadecyl-1,2-dimethyl-1H-imidazole-3-ium bromide [C16M2Im] [Br] 87%
38 1-Hexadecyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide 1 M HCl 97% Tan et al. (2020)
39 N-Methyl-2-hydroxyethylammonium oleate 0.1 M HCl 97% Schmitzhaus et al. (2020)
40 2-Benzyl-1-butyl-3-(3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazolium chloride (BTOSPB) 1 M HCl 99.5% Zafari et al. (2020)

Bousskri et al. (2016) have studied picolinium-based ionic liquid, 1-2-(4-chlorophenyl) 2-oxoethyl) -4N–N–methyl) picolinium bromide (CPOMPB) as corrosion inhibitor for mild steel in 1 M HCl solution. They have conducted gravimetric measurements (GM) and electrochemical measurement techniques like potentiodynamic polarization measurements (PDP) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). The surface morphology of the corroded specimen and inhibited specimen were studied using optical microscope measurements. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic (XPS) method enabled one to understand the relationship between the molecular structure and efficiency of CPOMPB as a corrosion inhibitor. The adsorption of CPOMPB on mild steel surface followed Langmuir adsorption isotherm. The addition of KI to the inhibitor solutions showed increased inhibition due to the synergistic effect. Efficiency up to 94% was obtained using CPOMPB and KI. The mode of adsorption was mainly physisorption and had mixed control on both anodic and cathodic reactions as per Tafel plots. Gerengi et al. (2016) have investigated 1-ethyl-1-methylpyrrolidinium (EMTFB) as a corrosion inhibitor for dissolution of low carbon steel in 0.1 M HCl medium. Surface morphology of the corroded and inhibited specimen was studied using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and surface compositions were recorded using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analyses. Electrochemical measurements like PDP and EIS were carried out to determine the inhibition efficiency. The synergistic effect was observed on the addition of KI into the inhibitor solution and an increase in efficiency from 75% to 98% was reported. Langmuir adsorption isotherm model was proposed for the adsorption EMTFB on the carbon steel surface. Kannan et al. (2016) have synthesized 3-(4-chlorobenzoylmethyl)-1-methylbenzimidazoliumbromide ([BMMB]+Br) characterized using spectroscopic techniques and studied its inhibitive effect on mild steel in 1 M hydrochloric acid solution. The inhibitor showed chemisorption behavior up to 50 °C and then it decreased, suggesting a shift in the equilibrium towards the process of desorption. The adsorption followed Langmuir adsorption isotherm and the quantum chemical calculations supported the adsorption mechanism of adsorption. Tetra-n-butyl ammonium methioninate was synthesized by Kowsari et al. (2016) and was assessed as a corrosion inhibitor for the dissolution of mild steel in 1 M HCl solution. The PDP and EIS results showed improved corrosion control and had predominant control on anodic metal oxidation reaction. The adsorption followed Freundlich isotherm and was due to electrostatic attraction between the metal and the inhibitor molecule. The methionine group of the reported IL was oriented towards the anodic sites and the tetra-n-butyl ammonium group of the IL was oriented towards the cathodic site, as per the proposed mechanism and quantum chemical calculations. SEM and EDX were carried out for surface morphology and composition analyses. Studies by Tawfik (2016) has revealed that the three ionic liquid-based gemini cationic surfactants; N1,N1,N1,N2,N2,N2-hexadodecylethane-1,2-diaminium bromide (G2IL), N1,N1, N1,N2, N2,N2-hexadodecylpropane-1,3-diaminium bromide (G3IL) and N1,N1,N1,N2,N2,N2-hexadodecylhexane-1,6-diaminium bromide (G6IL) could effectively suppress the corrosion of mild steel in 1 M HCl medium. The results of weight loss (WL), EIS, and PDP indicate that the reported ILs can control the rate of corrosion in mild steel effectively with efficiency values ranging between 89-94%. The adsorption mode was mainly physisorption and followed Langmuir adsorption isotherm. Yesudass et al. (2016) have reported five alkyl imidazolium-based ionic liquids (ILs) as corrosion inhibitors for mild steel dissolution in 1 M HCl. All were the mixed type of inhibitors and followed the Langmuir adsorption isotherm model. The quantum chemical calculations revealed that the inhibitive effects of the reported ILs depended strongly on the composite descriptors that involved the molecular weight, the fraction of electrons transferred from the inhibitor to the metal as well as the dipole moment of the ILs.

The picolinium-based ILs reported by Bousskri et al. (2017) displayed 96% efficiency at 0.001 M concentration of the IL as per the electrochemical measurements. For surface morphology, optical microscope images were recorded. Two separate reports by Aoun (2017a,b) on the effect of pyridinium IL, showed mixed inhibition of corrosion reaction as per the results of electrochemical measurements. SEM images supported the formation of a thin film of IL on the surface of the metal. Deyab et al. (2017) have synthesized and characterized four derivatives of 1,2-dimethyl-1H-imidazole-3-ium tetrafluoroborate and evaluated their inhibitory performance on the corrosion of mild steel in 1 M HCl. At 200 ppm levels of the IL, 73 to 92% inhibition was observed depending on the length of the aliphatic chain present on the 1,2-dimethyl-1H-imidazole-3-ium tetrafluoroborate moiety. Guo et al. (2017) have demonstrated the corrosion inhibitory performance of 1-vinyl-3-aminopropylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate ([VAIM][PF6]) and 1-vinyl-3- aminopropylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate ([VAIM][BF4] on mild steel corrosion in 1 M HCl medium. Both showed a mixed type of corrosion control. However, the adsorption of the former IL followed Langmuir monolayer adsorption model and the latter followed EI-Awady kinetic-thermodynamic adsorption model. Feng et al. (2017) discussed the corrosion inhibition performance of 1-vinyl-3-hexylimidazolium iodide ([VHIM]I) both experimentally and theoretically on the surface of mild steel in 0.5 M H2SO4 by providing up to 96% efficiency at 298 K. Theoretical calculations and molecular dynamic simulation model also explained the strong adsorption of the reported IL on the metal surface. Cao et al. (2017) have successfully demonstrated the corrosion control behavior of two Bronsted acid ionic liquids (BAILs) on mild steel in 0.5 M HCl. Both BAILs suppressed the corrosion rate to a greater extent and followed the Langmuir adsorption model. UV–Vis studies indicate chemisorption phenomena apart from the physisorption mode. Srivastava et al. (2017) have reported three amino acid-based imidazolium ILs as novel and green corrosion inhibitors for mild steel in 1 M HCl electrolyte. Both experimental and theoretical findings suggested good inhibitory action of the reported ILs. Quantum chemical calculation results show that protonated inhibitors are better inhibitors than neutral inhibitors. The findings of DFT matched well with the experimental results. MD results showed that the ILs adsorbed through flat orientation and their order of effectiveness followed the experimental order of inhibition efficiency. Kumar et al. (2017) have studied a new phosphonium bromide IL as a corrosion inhibitor on mild steel in 0.5 M H2SO4. SEM, EDX, and AFM were used to study the surface morphology of the corroded and the inhibited specimens. The IL showed a mixed type of inhibition and obeyed the Langmuir adsorption model.

Examination of 1-methyl-3-propylimidazolium iodide (MPIMI), 1-butyl-3-methyl imidazolium iodide (BMIMI), and 1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium iodide (HMIMI) as inhibitors on mild steel in 1 M HCl by Azeez et al. (2018) has shown effective suppression of the corrosion current and improved corrosion resistance values as indicated by the PDP and EIS data, respectively. The results of electrochemical frequency modulation (EFM) are in line with EIS and PDP data. SEM, atomic force microscope (AFM), and Fourier transform infra-red (FTIR) analyses supported the inhibition offered by the IL. El-Hajjaji et al. (2018) have investigated two new pyridazinium-based ionic liquids namely 1-(6-ethoxy-6-oxohexyl)pyridazin-1-ium bromide and 1-(2-bromoacetyl) pyridazinium bromide as corrosion inhibitor on mild steel surface in 1 M HCl from 303–333 K temperature. The highest inhibition was seen at 303 K and decreased as the temperature of the electrolyte was increased to 333 K suggesting a physisorption mode of adsorption. The theoretical studies support the displacement of water molecules by the ILs (2-amino benzyl)triphenylphosphonium bromide.

(ABTPPB) was evaluated as a corrosion inhibitor on the surface of the mild steel dipped in 0.5 M H2SO4 by Ghoyal et al. (2018). The studies suggest an enlarged capacitive loop in the Nyquist plot, which indicates the improved corrosion resistance and results of PDP and quantum chemical calculations, also directs the same. Corrosion inhibition of mild steel in 1 M HCl was achieved by using1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium bromides as reported by Langova et al. (2018), the highest being 94% by the IL 1-octyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide. The results fit well with Langmuir isotherm, Flory–Huggins isotherm, and El-Awady thermodynamic-kinetic model for adsorption. The adsorption ability of choline-based ILs on mild steel in 1 M HCl was demonstrated by Verma et al. (2018) using theoretical as well as experimental methods. These choline-based ILs were efficient up to 92–96% as per the results of weight loss methods and electrochemical analyses and obeyed Temkin adsorption isotherm. The theoretical calculations showed that the adsorption of IL on mild steel occurred spontaneously, and it was mainly through donor-acceptor interactions between the ILs and the metal surface. Two newly synthesized fluoro-substituted imidazolium-based ILs two imidazolium-based ionic liquids i.e., 1-(2-aminoethyl)-1-dodecyl-2-methyl-4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazole-1-ium chloride ([ADMDI]Cl) and 1-(2-aminoethyl)-1-dodecyl-2-(trifluoromethyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazole-1-ium chloride ([ADTDI]Cl) were investigated as the corrosion inhibitor on mild steel in 0.5 M HCl solution at 368 K by Zhang et al. (2018). The PDP measurements show that the IL effectively controlled the cathodic hydrogen evolution reaction, thereby decreasing the overall rate of corrosion. Increasing the temperature of the electrolyte increased the efficiency suggesting the chemisorption mode of inhibition, following the Langmuir adsorption isotherm model. The theoretical calculations also showed that the trifluoromethyl group in [ADTDI]Cl boosts the transfer of more free electrons as compared to the methyl group in [ADMDI]Cl, suggesting the better inhibition ability of the former, especially at a higher temperature.

Ahmed et al. (2019) have reported five ILs with bromide and iodide counter ions as corrosion inhibitors on mild steel in 0.5 M H2SO4. The electrochemical measurements included PDP and cyclic voltammetry (CV). It was inferred that the ILs with bromide counterion were more efficient than the iodide counter ion; the mode of adsorption was both by physisorption and chemisorption process. The effect of the length of the alkyl chain, cation, and the anion of an IL on the corrosion inhibition property of the ILs on mild steel in 1 M HCl was investigated by Al-Rashed and Nazeer (2019) by EIS and PDP techniques. SEM and FTIR were used for surface analyses of the corroded and inhibited specimen. They concluded that the longer the length of the alkyl chain, the better is its inhibition ability, and the efficiency of the IL with N(CN)2 counter ion gave better protection for mild steel than the SCN and PF6 ions. Bhaskaran and Singh (2019) have reported 3-(4-fluorobenzyl)-1-methyl-1H-imidazole-3-ium bromide [FBMIm]Br as an effective green corrosion inhibitor for the dissolution of mild steel in 0.5 M H2SO4 electrolyte. An excellent efficiency up to 98 to 99% at 298 K was reported as per EIS and PDP results. Two ILs namely 1-(4-sulfonic acid) butyl-3-ethyl imidazolium hydrogen sulfate and 1-(4-sulfonic acid) butyl-3-decyl imidazolium hydrogen sulfate were found to suppress the mild steel dissolution in 0.5 M HCl due to both physical and chemical adsorption as per the reports by Cao et al. (2019a) The UV-visible and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis results supported the interaction between ILs and mild steel surfaces. The longer alkyl chains in ILs gave better corrosion protection. The synergistic effect of KI along with the IL 1,1′ (1,4 phenylene bis(methylene))bis(3 (carboxymethyl) 1H- imidazole -3- ium) chloride on corrosion inhibition effect on mild steel in 0.5 M HCl was reported by Cao et al. (2019b). The electrochemical, surface, and theoretical approaches, all of them proved that the IL served as an efficient inhibitor and the presence of KI in 1:1 ratio to IL increased the maximum efficiency further by 2%. 3-((4-amino-2-methylpyrimidin-5-yl)methyl)-5-(2-hydroxyethyl)-4-methylthiazol-3-ium chloride (AMPMHMC) in 1 M HCl solution largely controlled the rate of corrosion of mild steel as per the investigations by Farag et al. (2019). The adsorption of the IL on a mild steel surface followed Langmuir adsorption isotherm and showed 91.4% inhibition at 40 ppm of the IL. Hajjaji et al. (2019) have synthesized two pyridazine derivatives namely, 1-decylpyridazin-1-ium iodide (DPI) and 1-tetradecylpyridazin-1-ium iodide (TPI), and studied them as corrosion inhibitors for corrosion of mild steel in 1 M HCl solution in the temperature range of 303–333 K. Both DPI and TPI served as good corrosion suppressors by exhibiting efficiencies of 86.7% and 88.6%, respectively at 303 K. At an immersion period of 12 h the efficiency reached up to 97.6%. The DFT studies were following the experimental results. A dicationic IL 1,4- (Divinyl-imidazolium bromide) butane was synthesized as a green corrosion inhibitor for mild steel corrosion in 1 M sulfuric acid solution by Jannat et al. (2019). The EIS and PDP measurements were carried out to measure the resistance and corrosion current values and in the presence of the IL, the resistance values increased with a decrease in the corrosion current, suggesting good corrosion control. The quantum chemical calculations were also supporting the experimental results. Parveen et al. (2019) have reported 1-methyl-3-propylimidazolium iodide (MPII) as a corrosion inhibitor on mild steel in 1 M sulfuric acid solution. They have used the weight loss methods, PDP, and EIS methods for efficiency analyses. The IL displayed a mixed type of inhibition with both anodic and cathodic reactions control and followed the Langmuir adsorption isotherm model. Three 1-butyl-3-methyl-imidazolium based ionic liquids are reported as corrosion inhibitors on mild steel dissolution in 1 M HCl by Verma et al. (2019) and the efficiencies ranged between 93–97% as per the results of electrochemical and computational experiments.

Ardakani et al. (2020) have synthesized a polymeric IL derived from imidazolium IL and studied its corrosion inhibition properties on mild steel corrosion in 1 M HCl by EIS and PDP methods. The adsorption of the inhibitor followed the Frumkin isotherm model, and it was a mixed inhibitor with predominant control on the cathodic hydrogen evolution reaction. Aslam et al. (2020) have demonstrated three amino ester salts based ILs as corrosion inhibitors on mild steel in 1 M HCl solution. As per the PDP results the ILs effectively controlled the anodic metal dissolution as well as the cathodic hydrogen evolution reactions. The quantum chemical calculations supported the results that were experimentally determined. Cui et al. (2020) demonstrated the control on the corrosion rate of mild steel in H2S and HCl solutions by using five different imidazolium-based ILs. The ILs inhibited the corrosion by mere electrostatic interactions between the ILs and the metal surface and followed the Langmuir adsorption model. Isopentyltriphenylphosphonium bromide ionic liquid was reported as an effective inhibitor of corrosion of mild steel in 0.5 M H2SO4 by Goyal et al. (2020) Inhibition as high as 99% was achieved with a 0.01 M concentration of the IL. The IL formed a monolayer on the surface of mild steel and followed the Langmuir adsorption isotherm model. The inhibition was due to the physical adsorption of ILs on the mild steel surface. El-Hajjaji et al. (2020) have demonstrated pyridinium-derived ionic liquids as corrosion inhibitors for mild steel in 1 M HCl. These ILs behaved as an anodic inhibitor as per the result of PDP analysis. Both physisorption and chemisorption mode of adsorption was observed. The radial distribution function indicated the adsorption of IL on the metal surface via chemisorption mode. Subasree and Subasree and Selvi (2020) have synthesized and evaluated three imidazolium-based ionic liquids as corrosion inhibitors for mild steel dissolution in a 1 M HCl medium. An increase in the alkyl substituents in the ILs gave better inhibition performance. The formation of a complex between the iron and the inhibitor IL was confirmed by UV–Vis results. Tan et al. (2020) have reported 1-hexadecyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide (HMIBr) as a corrosion inhibitor for mild steel corrosion in 1 M HCl solution. Up to 97% efficiency was obtained at 0.001 M concentration of the IL. N-methyl-2-hydroxyethyl ammonium oleate ([m-2HEA] [Ol]) has been investigated as a corrosion inhibitor on mild steel in 0.1 M HCl medium. The results of PDP indicated a mixed inhibition type. Briefly, the inhibition was also measured in sulfuric acid medium, and it provided up to 54% efficiency by Schmitzhaus et al. (2020). As per the reports by Zafari et al. (2020), 2-benzyl-1-butyl-3-(3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazolium chloride (BTOSPB) provided up to 99.5% corrosion control in 1 M HCl on mild steel surface. The XPS analysis confirmed the film formation on the metal surface by the IL. The maximum efficiency was obtained at higher medium concentrations and temperatures.

From the thorough review of literature, it may be inferred that the ILs serve as excellent candidates for corrosion control application. Almost all ILs reported in the literature mentioned above give excellent inhibition efficiency ranging from 80 percent to 90% except for 5-methoxy-1,2,3,3-tetramethyl-3H-indolium iodide (IBIL-I), 1-(2-carboxyethyl)-2,3,3-trimethyl-3H-indolium iodide (IBIL-II), 2,3,3-trimethyl-1-(pyren-2-ylmthyl)-3H-indolium iodide (IBIL-III) where the authors attribute it to the role of bromide counter ion being more efficient inhibitor than the iodide counter ion inhibitor (Ahmed et al. 2019) (see Table 1). Almost all the reported ILs were of mixed types of inhibitors which has control on both the anodic metal dissolution and cathodic reduction reaction.

The adsorption isotherm studies reveal that almost all reported ILs as corrosion inhibitors for mild steel in acid media obey and fit well to Langmuir adsorption isotherm barring a few which follow Temkin and Frumkin adsorption isotherms (Ayawei et al. 2017). Langmuir adsorption isotherm indicates a dynamic equilibrium phenomenon where the surface coverage by the inhibitor is due to balanced relative rates of adsorption of ILs and desorption of the solvent molecules. Adsorption of the IL onto the surface of the mild steel is proportional to the fraction of the surface of the mild steel that is open while desorption of the solvent molecules is proportional to the fraction of the mild steel surface that is covered. In the case of the Temkin adsorption isotherm model, the effect of adsorbate interactions in the process of adsorption is considered. It assumes that due to the increase in surface coverage by the ILs on the mild steel surface there is a linear decrease in the heat of adsorption of all molecules in the layer. However, this isotherm is valid only for a specific range of IL concentrations. The Frumkin adsorption isotherm model gives an important parameter termed “a”, this refers to the peripheral interaction between IL inhibitor molecules into the adsorbent layer and the surface non-uniformity. When a < 0, it indicates a repulsive interaction, while a > 0 indicates peripheral adsorption amongst the adsorbent IL molecules (Ardakani et al. 2020).

3 Common methods adopted for the evaluation of corrosion rate and inhibition efficiency

Most used electrochemical and non-electrochemical methods of corrosion rate analysis in the absence and presence of inhibitors are discussed in the following sections. Of which, weight loss measurement technique and density functional theory calculations are non-electrochemical and EIS and PDP measurements are electrochemical methods. Both the electrochemical and non-electrochemical techniques have their pros and cons which are discussed below.

The weight loss technique is a simple-to-do method and applies to solid, particulate, gaseous, or aqueous environments. The corrosion products or deposits may be visually inspected. The rate of corrosion in the absence and presence of the inhibitors can be assessed using a high accuracy weighing balance without using many sophisticated tools of analysis which is relatively inexpensive. However, this technique is time-consuming and gives only average readings, and doesn’t account for non-uniform forms of corrosion, and specimens undergoing a lower degree of corrosion cannot be determined by this technique (Speight 2014).

On the other hand, the EIS analysis, an AC technique overcomes most of the downsides of weight loss methods by enabling the determination of low corrosion rates in a short time and high accuracy measurements by application of the small excitation amplitude with minimum perturbation to the corrosion potential. The results of EIS are reliable and repeatable. The EIS data gives enormous information about the various electrochemical reactions and reaction kinetics. The fast processes like electrical double layer formation, ohmic resistance, resistance associated with charge transfer due to electrochemical reactions, and slow processes like the formation of layers due to adsorbed reaction intermediates are all accounted for in EIS data. These data are beneficial in the computation of corrosion rates in the presence and absence of inhibitors. It provides material regarding electrode–electrolyte double layer formation and formation of surface oxide films and their dielectric properties. However, the primary disadvantage of EIS measurements is that conversion of polarization resistance into a corrosion rate without prior knowledge of the Tafel slopes values and the Stern–Geary coefficient is not possible. Apart from these, certain other limitations like lack of determination of relative anodic and cathodic reaction kinetics due to different alloying elements, secondary phases, solutions, etc. exist. Also, single EIS data may fit into different equivalent circuits all of which give low error figures which results in an improper calculation of resistance and capacitance data thereby assessing the corrosion rate. These kinds of errors may be eliminated by choosing a proper equivalent circuit model based on a deep understanding of the mechanism of corrosion reactions, assisted by surface characterization, physicochemical analysis, or from previously published reports (Feliu 2020).

The PDP method is a widely used DC electrochemical tool for corrosion rate analysis using the Tafel plot. The method is built on the electrochemical theory of corrosion developed by Wagner and Traud. The polarization curves may be recorded both under steady-state or non-steady-state potentiostat/galvanostatic conditions using polarization signal amplitudes. However, due to the application of large polarization signal amplitudes, there is a possibility of irreversible changes at the corroding electrode surface which restricts the usage of this technique in corrosion monitoring applications only (Lorenz and Mansfeld 1981).

The density functional theory (DFT) calculations are widely accepted green corrosion inhibition techniques because of a theoretical approach. It is a simple method to study the structure of molecule and corrosion inhibitor behavior. The main disadvantage of the DFT method is the challenge in defining the most appropriate method for a particular application. Before choosing a DFT method, one must consult the literature to determine the suitability of that choice for that particular application (Verma 2018).

A brief description of each of the measurement techniques and analysis mentioned in the above section is given in the following sections.

3.1 Weight loss measurement technique

This has been a conventional method for determining the rate of corrosion; it gives precise results although it’s a time-consuming approach. In this method, the mild steel specimen was polished on different grades of emery papers and then thoroughly washed with acetone and dried using acetone. The specimen was immersed in an acidic medium in the absence and presence of known concentrations of the inhibitor. After a specific time, duration, the specimens were removed and the weight of each was recorded using a high precision weighing scale and recorded as w1 and w2 (El-Naggar 2007, Saleh 2006). Typically, three readings are taken and the averages of three are reported for assessing the reproducibility of the results. The efficiency of the inhibitor (η%) and degree of surface coverage (θ) can be determined using Eqs. (1) and (2) (Xu et al. 2008).

(1)η%=w1w2w1×100

where, w1 and w2 weight of the specimen immersed in an acidic medium in the presence and absence of the inhibitor, respectively, and η% is the percentage inhibition efficiency.

(2)θ=η%100

where, θ is the degree of surface coverage of the inhibitor.

3.2 Potentiodynamic polarization measurements (Tafel plot)

This is a destructive method for measuring the corrosion rate of a specimen, where the metal is drifted away from its rest potential and allowed to undergo redox reactions. In this method, the mild steel is immersed in a known concentration of an acidic medium with and without inhibitor and is allowed to attain the open circuit potential (OCP). After attaining OCP, the Tafel curves were recorded at a scan rate of 1 mV s−1 from −250 mV to +250 mV of OCP, in most of the reported literature (Fu et al. 2011, Kumari et al. 2017, Saranya et al., 2016). The linear portions of the anode and cathode curve are then extrapolated and several corrosion parameters like the anodic slope (βa), cathodic slope (−βc), corrosion current density (icorr) can be obtained by the Tafel extrapolation method and the inhibition efficiency (η%) can be calculated using the Eq. (3) (Tang et al. 2013).

(3)η%=icorricorr(inh)icorr×100

where, icorr and icorr(inh) are the corrosion current densities expressed in μA cm−2 in the absence and presence of inhibitor, respectively.

Apart from the above-mentioned corrosion parameters, the Tafel curves give information about the type of corrosion control the inhibitor has on the metal dissolution. The inhibitor may act either on anode sites or cathode sites. Glancing at the cathode and anode curves in the absence and presence of the inhibitor and comparing the two curves one can easily infer of the inhibitor slows down the anode reaction or the cathode reaction Figure 1. Also, if the corrosion potential (Ecorr) shifts towards more positive values and the shift is beyond 85 mV then the inhibitor acts as an anodic inhibitor, where anodic sites are blocked by the inhibitor thereby slowing down the metal dissolution rate. Similarly, if the corrosion potential shifts towards more negative values and if the shift is beyond −85 mV, then the inhibitor acts as a cathodic inhibitor, where cathodic sites are blocked, and the overall corrosion rate is reduced. However, in a case where the shift in Ecorr is within ±85 mV, then the inhibitor is called a mixed type of inhibitor which has control on both cathodic and anodic reactions (Behpour et al. 2010).

Figure 1: 
						Representative Tafel curves in the presence and absence of the inhibitor.
Figure 1:

Representative Tafel curves in the presence and absence of the inhibitor.

3.3 Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements

The EIS corrosion measurement technique is a powerful and nondestructive measurement tool that gives in-depth information about the electrode–electrolyte interfacial corrosion reactions. Here, a small amplitude of AC signal is applied on the electrode to assess the capacitive and resistive behavior. The EIS measurements yield data in the form of Nyquist plots, Bode phase angle plots, and Bode magnitude plots. In Nyquist plots, the real impedance is plotted against imaginary impedance (Quaraishi and Sardar 2003). For mild steel, usually, the Nyquist plots have a single capacitive loop, which is simulated into an equivalent circuit model. Normally, the best fit was obtained for an Rs(QRct) circuit (Doharea et al. 2017). The capacitor C is replaced with Q called a constant phase element which represents nonideal capacitive behavior and gives a better fit in the simulation model. Rs represents the solution resistance and Rct represents the charge transfer resistance. In Bode phase angle plots, frequency is plotted against the phase angle theta and in Bode magnitude plots, frequency is plotted against the impedance modulus (Zmod). The Bode phase angle and Bode magnitude plots are useful in assessing the frequency-specific impedance behavior which cannot be obtained by Nyquist plots. In the Nyquist plots, the value of Rct increases and Q decreases in the presence of inhibitor which indicates improved corrosion rate (Figure 2). The value of inhibition efficiency is obtained by Eq. (4) (Saha et al. 2016).

(4)η%=Rct(inh)Rct(b)Rct(inh)×100

where, Rct(inh) and Rct(b) are the charge transfer resistances of inhibited and blank specimens, respectively.

Figure 2: 
						Representative Nyquist plot displaying increased resistance in the presence of inhibitor than in the absence of the inhibitor.
Figure 2:

Representative Nyquist plot displaying increased resistance in the presence of inhibitor than in the absence of the inhibitor.

In Bode phase angle plots, a shift in mid-frequency phase maximum (θmax) towards lower frequency, along with an increase in θmax as compared to the value of a blank solution, suggests the improved corrosion resistance. From the Bode magnitude plots, the value of low-frequency impedance modulus (Zmod) increases, indicating better corrosion protection in the presence of inhibitor as compared to its value in the absence of the inhibitor (Shaban et al. 2016).

3.4 Density functional theory (DFT) calculations

DFT has been reported by most researchers as a potential tool for studying the interaction between the mild steel surface and the ILs. An advantage of this tool is that the results of DFT provide mechanistic information about the mild steel-IL interactions even before the synthesis of ILs and practical experimentation. The results of DFT provides important parameters like the energy of highest occupied molecular orbital (EHOMO) and energy of lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (ELUMO) and the energy bandgap (ΔE), dipole moment (µ), softness (s), global electronegativity (χ), global hardness (η), etc. These parameters help in explaining the interaction between the surface of the mild steel and the ILs (Gomez et al. 2005). Mostly, higher EHOMO and lower ELUMO values indicated high inhibition ability, lower ΔE values indicated better inhibitor performance and the lower value of χ indicated the higher electron-donating ability of the ILs.

4 Common methods adopted for the surface analyses of the corroded and inhibited specimens and metal-inhibitor interactions

4.1 Scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis

The visual impact of the corrosive media on the surface of the mild steel, in the absence and presence of the inhibitors, can be achieved by recording the SEM images of the specimens. Here, the mild steel is kept immersed in the corrosive media in the absence and presence of the inhibitors for a specific duration of time, after which the specimen is removed and dried. The SEM images are then recorded at different magnifications and the surface roughness and smoothness are visually assessed. In reported literature, the surface of the inhibited specimens appeared smoother as compared to the surface of the mild steel immersed in the acidic media in the absence of the inhibitor (Raja et al. 2013).

4.2 Energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscopy analysis

EDX is a qualitative analysis tool used to assess the plausible adsorption of the inhibitor on the surface of mild steel. The spectrum records peaks for various atoms present on the surface of the metal. The spectra are recorded both in the absence and presence of the inhibitor. Any additional peaks observed corresponding to the atoms present in the inhibitor, commonly N and O atoms, indicate adsorption of the inhibitor on the mild steel surface (Yadav et al. 2010). However, this is a qualitative indication and does not give any information on the efficiency of the inhibitor.

4.3 Atomic force microscope (AFM) analysis

AFM images are useful in assessing the surface roughness and smoothness in the absence and presence of the inhibitors. AFM images give a three-dimensional visual of the impact of the corrosive medium on the surface of the mild steel. Also, the surface roughness can be calculated by AFM studies which show the roughness value on a nanometer scale. The surface roughness would be lower in the presence of the inhibitor than in its absence (Obot et al. 2015).

4.4 Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy analysis

In this method, the FTIR spectrum is recorded for the inhibitor, and then the spectrum is recorded for the mild steel specimen which was immersed in the inhibitor solution for a specific time. The two spectra are then compared for the presence, absence, or shift of bands which correspond to the interaction between the inhibitor molecules and the metal surface due to physisorption or chemisorption phenomena (Aslam et al. 2020).

4.5 Ultra-violet-visible (UV–Vis) spectroscopy analysis

UV-Visible spectrum gives information on the complex formation between the inhibitor molecules and the Fe in mild steel. The formation of the complex may be confirmed by the shift in the absorption maximum peak and its value. Also, the change in the number of bands before and after interaction with the mild steel surface helps to assess the complex formation (Aslam et al. 2020).

4.6 Measurement of contact angle

As per the wettability analysis, the material with a water contact angle of >90° is said to have a hydrophobic property, whereas the surface showing a water contact angle of <90° is said to be hydrophilic. The contact angles measured for mild steel specimens in the presence and absence of the inhibitor reveal the corrosion resistance of the specimen in the electrolyte. An increase in the contact angle in the presence of the inhibitor suggests improved hydrophobicity and a controlled rate of corrosion. This may be attributed to the polar groups of the ILs interacting with the metal surface and the nonpolar groups of the ILs interacting with the electrolyte thereby increasing the hydrophobicity (Aslam et al. 2020).

5 General mechanism of inhibition reported in the literature

Generally, in acidic media, the corrosion inhibitors get adsorbed onto the surface of mild steel either by the process of physical adsorption or by the chemical adsorption phenomenon. Most of the reported literature shows the mixed type of corrosion control by the ILs on mild steel dissolution in HCl and H2SO4 media. The ILs generally had control on both the anodic metal dissolution reaction as well as the cathodic hydrogen evolution reaction. Some ILs showed inhibition by mere physical adsorption whereas some ILs were chemically adsorbed on the surface of the mild steel. This was inferred based on the results of temperature studies. If the efficiency of the inhibitor reduces as the temperature of the electrolyte was increased, then it was said to be physically adsorbed on the mild steel surface and the ILs desorb when the temperature is increased as the ILs gain kinetic energy. However, if the efficiency values increase with an increase in the temperature, then the ILs are believed to be chemically adsorbed on the mild steel surface. Under acidic conditions, the charge on the mild steel surface is positive since the corrosion potential Ecorr is negative. The chloride or sulfate ions of the acid are then attracted towards the positively charged mild steel surface. In the presence of ILs, which have both positively charged organic moiety and the negatively charged counter ion, the adsorbed chloride or sulfate ions attract the positively charged organic moiety of the ILs. This kind of interaction is purely electrostatic and results in the physisorption of the ILs onto the surface of the mild steel thereby blocking the active metal sites from a further attack of the corrosive ions. Contrarily, the ILs in acidic media largely exist in their protonated form, these cations adsorb on the cathodic sites of the metal surface thereby controlling the cathodic hydrogen evolution reaction. The ILs mostly contain heteroatoms like N, S, and O which have free lone pairs of electrons, these lone pairs are donated to orbitals of the oxidized metal and form a co-ordinate bond (chemisorption). This prevents further dissolution of the mild steel in an acidic medium (Kowsari et al. 2014, Subasree and Selvi 2020, Zheng et al. 2015).

6 Conclusions

  1. The ILs serve as excellent green corrosion inhibitors for mild steel dissolution in acidic media. Most of the reported inhibition efficiency values ranged between 80 to 90% at minute concentrations.

  2. The most used electrochemical tools for corrosion rate analyses are weight loss, EIS, and PDP techniques. Here, only EIS is a nondestructive method of corrosion analysis whereas weight loss and PDP methods are destructive methods of evaluation although they are accurate. Quantum chemical studies and molecular dynamic models are used to support the experimental findings.

  3. Generally, SEM, AFM, EDX, techniques are used to study the surface morphology and interactions of the ILs with a mild steel surface. A few researchers have reported FTIR, UV–Vis, and contact angle measurements for the same.

  4. Largely, the ILs adsorb on the mild steel surface both by physisorption and chemisorption mode and has control on both anodic metal dissolution and cathodic hydrogen evolution reaction.

7 Scope for further expansions

  1. The non-destructive corrosion monitoring technique i.e., electrochemical frequency modulation (EFM) may be explored in the presence of ILs as corrosion inhibitors.

  2. The effectiveness of ILs as corrosion inhibitors for mild steel corrosion in industrial applications may be explored. Also, the reports of IL inhibitor efficiencies in a neutral and alkaline medium are few and the same may be studied.

  3. Mechanism of inhibition reported in the literature are general mechanisms or theoretical and enough experimental evidence is currently scarce in the literature, the same may be worked upon.


Corresponding author: S. Kshama Shetty, Department of Chemistry, Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology, Yelahanka, Bangalore-560064, Karnataka, India, E-mail:

About the authors

S. Kshama Shetty

S. Kshama Shetty received her PhD degree in chemistry from National Institute of Technology, Karnataka, India in 2016. She currently works as an assistant professor in the Department of Chemistry and Bio-engineering Research Center at Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology, Bangalore, Karnataka, India. Her current research interests include corrosion and its control and electrochemical sensors. She has about 10 years of experience in academia and research.

H. Sadhana Upadhya

H. Sadhana Upadhya received her Master’s degree in chemistry from Manipal University, Karnataka, India, in 2012. She is currently an assistant professor in the Department of Chemistry and Bio-Engineering Research Center at Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology, Bangalore, Karnataka, India. She is pursuing her PhD in Visvesvaraya Technological University (VTU). Her field of interests includes electrochemical sensors and corrosion. She has about 10 years of experience in academia and research.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

Ahmed, S.A., Awad, M.I., Althagafi, I.I., Altass, H.M., Morad, M., Alharbi, A., and Obaid, R.J. (2019). Newly synthesized indolium-based ionic liquids as unprecedented inhibitors for the corrosion of mild steel in acid medium. J. Mol. Liq. 291: 111356, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2019.111356.Suche in Google Scholar

Alaoui, K., Touir, R., Galai, M., Serrar, H., Ouakki, M., Kaya, S., Tuzun, B., Boukhris, B., Ebn Touhami, M., and El Kacimi, Y. (2018). Electrochemical and computational studies of some triazepine carboxylate compounds as acid corrosion inhibitors for mild steel. J. Bio. Tribo. Corros. 4: 37, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40735-018-0154-z.Suche in Google Scholar

Al-Rashed, O.A., and Nazeer, A.A. (2019). Ionic liquids with superior protection for mild steel in acidic media: effects of anion, cation, and alkyl chain length. J. Mol. Liq. 288: 111015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2019.111015.Suche in Google Scholar

Ansari, K.R., Quraishi, M.A., and Singh, A. (2014). Schiff’s base of pyridyl substituted triazoles as new and effective corrosion inhibitors for mild steel in hydrochloric acid solution. Corros. Sci. 79: 5–15, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2013.10.009.Suche in Google Scholar

Aoun, S.B. (2017a). Electrochemical investigations of the inhibitive activity of a pyridazinium ionic liquid for the acid corrosion of carbon steel. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 12: 10369–10380, https://doi.org/10.20964/2017.11.88.Suche in Google Scholar

Aoun, S.B. (2017b). On the corrosion inhibition of carbon steel in 1 M HCl with a pyridinium-ionic liquid: chemical, thermodynamic, kinetic, and electrochemical studies. RSC Adv. 7: 36688, https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra04084a.Suche in Google Scholar

Ardakani, E.K., Kowsari, E., and Ehsani, A. (2020). Imidazolium-derived polymeric ionic liquid as a green inhibitor for corrosion inhibition of mild steel in 1.0 M HCl: experimental and computational study. Colloids Surf., A 586: 124195, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.124195.Suche in Google Scholar

Ardakani, E.K., Kowsari, E., Ehsani, A., and Ramakrishna, S. (2021). Performance of all ionic liquids as the eco-friendly and sustainable compounds in inhibiting corrosion in various media: a comprehensive review. Microchem. J. 165: 106049, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2021.106049.Suche in Google Scholar

Aslam, R., Mobin Huda, M., Obot, I.B., and Alamri, A.H. (2020). Ionic liquids derived from α-amino acid ester salts as potent green corrosion inhibitors for mild steel in 1M HCl. J. Mol. Liq. 318: 113982, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.113982.Suche in Google Scholar

Ayawei, N., Ebelegi, A.N., and Wankasi, D. (2017). Modeling and interpretation of adsorption isotherms. J. Chem. 2017: 11.10.1155/2017/3039817Suche in Google Scholar

Azeez, F.A., Al-Rashed, O.A., and Nazeer, A.A. (2018). Controlling of mild-steel corrosion in acidic solution using environmentally friendly ionic liquid inhibitors: effect of alkyl chain. J. Mol. Liq. 265: 654–663, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.05.093.Suche in Google Scholar

Behpour, M., Ghoreishi, S.M., Mohammadi, N., Soltani, N., and Salavati-Niasari, M. (2010). Investigation of some Schiff base compounds containing disulfide bond as HCl corrosion inhibitors for mild steel. Corros. Sci. 52: 4046–4057, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2010.08.020.Suche in Google Scholar

Bhaskaran, Pancharatna, P., Lata, S., and Singh, G. (2019). Imidazolium based ionic liquid as an efficient and green corrosion constraint for mild steel at acidic pH levels. J. Mol. Liq. 278: 467–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2019.01.068.Suche in Google Scholar

Bousskri, A., Anejjar, A., Salghi, R., Jodeh, S., Touzani, R., Bazzi, L., and Lgaz, H. (2016). Corrosion control of carbon steel in hydrochloric acid by new eco-friendly picolinium-based ionic liquids derivative: electrochemical and synergistic studies. J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 7: 4269–4289.Suche in Google Scholar

Bousskri, A., Anejjar, A., Jodeh, S., and Belkhaouda, M. (2017). Investigation of the inhibition effect of 1-2-(4-nitro phenyl) 2-oxoethyl) -4N-N- methyl) picolinium bromide on carbon steel corrosion in hydrochloric acid medium. Appl. J. Envir. Eng. Sci. 3: 96–113.Suche in Google Scholar

Cao, S., Liu, D., Zhang, P., Yang, L., Yang, P., Lu, H., and Gui, J. (2017). Green Brönsted acid ionic liquids as novel corrosion inhibitors for carbon steel in acidic medium. Sci. Rep. 7: 8773, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07925-y.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Cao, S., Liu, D., Ding, U., Wang, J., Lud, H., and Gui, J. (2019a). Task-specific ionic liquids as corrosion inhibitors on carbon steel in 0.5 M HCl solution: an experimental and theoretical study. Corros. Sci. 153: 301–313, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2019.03.035.Suche in Google Scholar

Cao, S., Liu, D., Ding, H., Wang, J., Lud, H., and Gui, J. (2019b). Corrosion inhibition effects of a novel ionic liquid with and without potassium iodide for carbon steel in 0.5 M HCl solution: an experimental study and theoretical calculation. J. Mol. Liq. 275: 729–740, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.11.115.Suche in Google Scholar

Cui, F., Ni, Y., Jiang, J., Ni, L., and Wang, Z. (2020). Experimental and theoretical studies of five imidazolium-based ionic liquids as corrosion inhibitors for mild steel in H2S and HCl solutions. Chem. Eng. Commun. 208: 1–14, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2020.1802257.Suche in Google Scholar

Deyab, M.A., Zaky, M.T., and Nessim, M.I. (2017). Inhibition of acid corrosion of carbon steel using four imidazolium tetrafluoroborates ionic liquids. J. Mol. Liq. 229: 396–404, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.12.092.Suche in Google Scholar

Doharea, P., Ansaria, K.R., Quraishi, M.A., and Obot, I.B. (2017). Pyranpyrazole derivatives as novel corrosion inhibitors for mild steel useful for industrial pickling process: experimental and quantum chemical study. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 52: 197–210, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.03.044.Suche in Google Scholar

El-Hajjaji, F., Messali, M., Aljuhani, A., Aouad, M.B., Hammouti, B., Belghiti, M.E., Chauhan, D.S., and Quraishi, M.A. (2018). Pyridazinium-based ionic liquids as novel and green corrosion inhibitors of carbon steel in acid medium: electrochemical and molecular dynamics simulation studies. J. Mol. Liq. 249: 997–1008, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2017.11.111.Suche in Google Scholar

El Hajjaji, F., Salim, R., Messali, M., Hammouti, B., Chauhan, D.S., Almutairi, S.M., and Quraishi, M.A. (2019). Electrochemical studies on new pyridazinium derivatives as corrosion inhibitors of carbon steel in acidic medium. J. Bio. Tribo. Corros. 5: 4, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40735-018-0195-3.Suche in Google Scholar

El-Hajjaji, F., Ech-chihbi, E., Rezki, N., Benhiba, F., Taleb, M., Chauhan, D.S., and Quraishi, M.A. (2020). Electrochemical and theoretical insights on the adsorption and corrosion inhibition of novel pyridinium-derived ionic liquids for mild steel in 1 M HCl. J. Mol. Liq. 314: 113737, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.113737.Suche in Google Scholar

El-Naggar, M.M. (2007). Corrosion inhibition of mild steel in acidic medium by some sulfa drugs compounds. Corros. Sci. 49: 2226–2236, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2006.10.039.Suche in Google Scholar

Farag, A.A., Migahed, M.A., and Badr, E.A. (2019). Thiazole ionic liquid as corrosion inhibitor of steel in 1 M HCl solution: gravimetrical, electrochemical, and theoretical studies. J. Bio. Tribo. Corros. 5: 53, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40735-019-0246-4.Suche in Google Scholar

Feliu, S.Jr. (2020). Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy for the measurement of the corrosion rate of magnesium alloys: brief review and challenges. Metals, 10: 775.10.3390/met10060775Suche in Google Scholar

Feng, L., Zhang, S., Yan, S., Xu, S., and Chen, S. (2017). Experimental and theoretical studies of 1-vinyl-3-hexylimidazolium iodide ([VHIM]I) as corrosion inhibitor for the mild steel in sulfuric acid solution. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 12: 1915–1928, https://doi.org/10.20964/2017.03.30.Suche in Google Scholar

Fu, J., Pan, J., Liu, Z., Li, S., and Wang, Y. (2011). Corrosion inhibition of mild steel by benzopyranone derivative in 1.0 M HCl solutions. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 6: 2072–2089.10.1016/S1452-3981(23)18168-5Suche in Google Scholar

Gerengi, H., Ugras, H.I., Solomon, M.M., Umoren, S.A., Kurtay, M., and Atar, N. (2016). Synergistic corrosion inhibition effect of 1-ethyl-1-methylpyrrolidinium tetrafluoroborate and iodide ions for low carbon steel in HCl solution. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 30: 2383–2403, https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2016.1183407.Suche in Google Scholar

Gomez, B., Likhanova, N.V., Aguilar, M.A.D., Olivares, O., Hallen, J.M., and Martinez-Magadan, J.M. (2005). Theoretical study of a new group of corrosion inhibitors. J. Phys. Chem. A 109: 8950–8957, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp052188k.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Goyal, M., Vashisht, H., Kumar, S., and Bahadur, I. (2018). Anti-corrosion performance of eco-friendly inhibitor (2-aminobenzyl) triphenyl phosphonium bromide ionic liquid on mild steel in 0.5 M sulfuric acid. J. Mol. Liq. 261: 162–173, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.04.043.Suche in Google Scholar

Goyal, M., Vashisht, H., Kumar, A., Kumar, S., Bahadur, I., Benhiba, F., and Zarrouk, A. (2020). Isopentyltriphenylphosphonium bromide ionic liquid as a newly effective corrosion inhibitor on metal-electrolyte interface in acidic medium: experimental, surface morphological (SEM-EDX & AFM) and computational analysis. J. Mol. Liq. 316: 113838, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.113838.Suche in Google Scholar

Guo, Y., Xu, B., Liua, Y., Yanga, W., Yina, X., Chena, Y., Lea, J., and Chena, Z. (2017). Corrosion inhibition properties of two imidazolium ionic liquids with hydrophilic tetrafluoroborate and hydrophobic hexafluorophosphate anions in acid medium. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 56: 234–247, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.07.016.Suche in Google Scholar

Jannat, A.R., Naderi, R., Kowsari, E., Zandi, H., Saybani, M., Safari, R., and Ehsani, A. (2019). Electrochemical techniques and quantum chemical analysis as tools to study effect of a dicationic ionic liquid on steel behavior in H2SO4. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 99: 18–28, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2019.02.037.Suche in Google Scholar

Kannan, P., Karthikeyan, J., Murugan, P., Rao, T.S., and Rajendran, N. (2016). Corrosion inhibition effect of novel methyl benzimidazolium ionic liquid for carbon steel in HCl medium. J. Mol. Liq. 221: 368–380, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.04.130.Suche in Google Scholar

Kowsari, E., Payami, M., Amini, R., Ramezanzadeh, B., and Javanbakhta, M. (2014). Task-specific ionic liquid as a new green inhibitor of mild steel corrosion. Appl. Surf. Sci. 289: 478–486, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.11.017.Suche in Google Scholar

Kowsari, E., Arman, S.Y., Shahinib, M.H., Zandid, H., Ehsanie, A., Naderif, R., Hanzab, A.P., and Mehdipour, M. (2016). In situ synthesis, electrochemical and quantum chemical analysis of an amino acid-derived ionic liquid inhibitor for corrosion protection of mild steel in 1 M HCl solution. Corros. Sci. 112: 73–85, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2016.07.015.Suche in Google Scholar

Kumar, S., Goyal, M., Vashisht, H., Sharma, V., Bahadur, I., and Ebenso, E.E. (2017). Ionic salt (4-ethoxybenzyl)-triphenylphosphonium bromide as a green corrosion inhibitor on mild steel in acidic medium: experimental and theoretical evaluation. RSC Adv. 7: 31907, https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra27526e.Suche in Google Scholar

Kumari, P.P., Shetty, P., and Rao, S.A. (2017). Electrochemical measurements for the corrosion inhibition of mild steel in 1 M hydrochloric acid by using an aromatic hydrazide derivative. Arab. J. Chem. 10: 653–663, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2014.09.005.Suche in Google Scholar

Langova, S., Panek, P., Fojtaskova, J., and Vicherkova, S. (2018). Alkyl imidazolium bromides as corrosion inhibitors for mild steel in acidic medium. Trans. Indian Inst. Met. 71: 1371–1378, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-017-1272-x.10.1007/s12666-017-1272-xSuche in Google Scholar

Lorenz, W.J., and Mansfeld, F. (1981). Determination of corrosion rates by electrochemical DC and AC methods. Corros. Sci. 21: 647–672, https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-938x(81)90015-9.Suche in Google Scholar

Obot, I.B., Umoren, S.A., Gasem, Z.M., Suleiman, R., and Ali, B. (2015). Theoretical prediction and electrochemical evaluation of 2 vinyl imidazole and allyl imidazole as corrosion inhibitors for mild steel in 1 M HCl. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 21: 1328–1339, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2014.05.049.Suche in Google Scholar

Parveen, G., Bashir, S., Thakur, A., Saha, S. Kr., Banerjee, P., and Kumar, A. (2019). Experimental and computational studies of imidazolium based ionic liquid 1-methyl- 3-propylimidazolium iodide on mild steel corrosion in acidic solution. Mater. Res. Express 7: 016510, https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab5c6a.Suche in Google Scholar

Quakki, M., Galai, M., Rbaa, A., Abousalem, A.S., Lakhrissi, B., Touhami, M.E., Touhami, B.E., and Cherkaoui, M. (2020). Electrochemical, thermodynamic, and theoretical studies of some imidazole derivatives compounds as acid corrosion inhibitors for mild steel. J. Mol. Liq. 319: 114063, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.114063.Suche in Google Scholar

Quraishi, M.A., and Sardar, R. (2003). Hector bases – a new class of heterocyclic corrosion inhibitors for mild steel in acid solutions. J. Appl. Electrochem. 33: 1163–1168, https://doi.org/10.1023/b:jach.0000003865.08986.fb.10.1023/B:JACH.0000003865.08986.fbSuche in Google Scholar

Raja, P.B., Qureshi, A.K., Rahim, A.A., Osman, H., and Awang, K. (2013). Neolamarckia cadamba alkaloids as eco-friendly corrosion inhibitors for mild steel in 1 M HCl media. Corros. Sci. 69: 292–301, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2012.11.042.Suche in Google Scholar

Saha, S.K., Dutta, A., Ghosh, P., Sukul, D., and Banerjee, P. (2016). Novel Schiff base molecules as efficient corrosion inhibitors for mild steel surface in 1 M HCl medium: experimental and theoretical approach. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18: 17898–17911, https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cp01993e.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Saleh, M.M. (2006). Inhibition of mild steel corrosion by hexadecyl pyridinium bromide in 0.5 M H2SO4. Mater. Chem. Phys. 98: 83–89, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2005.08.069.Suche in Google Scholar

Saranya, J., Sowmiya, M., Sounthari, P., Parameswari, K., Chitra, S., and Senthilkumar, K. (2016). N-heterocycles as corrosion inhibitors for mild steel in acid medium. J. Mol. Liq. 216: 42–52, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2015.12.096.Suche in Google Scholar

Saraswata, V., Yadava, M., and Obot, I.B. (2020) Investigations on eco-friendly corrosion inhibitors for mild steel in acid environment: electrochemical, DFT and Monte Carlo Simulation approach. Colloids Surf. A. Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 599: 124881, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.124881.Suche in Google Scholar

Schmitzhaus, T.E., Vega, M.R.O., Schroeder, R., Muller, I.L., Mattedi, S., and Malfatti, C.F. (2020). N‐methyl‐2‐hydroxyethylammonium oleate ionic liquid performance as corrosion inhibitor for mild steel in hydrochloric acid medium. Mater. Corros. 71: 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1002/maco.202011709.Suche in Google Scholar

Shaban, S.M., Abd-Elaal, A.A., and Tawfik, S.M. (2016). Gravimetric and electrochemical evaluation of three nonionic dithiol surfactants as corrosion inhibitors for mild steel in 1 M HCl solution. J. Mol. Liq. 216: 392–400, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.01.048.Suche in Google Scholar

Shivakumar, S.S., and Mohana, K.N. (2013). Corrosion behavior and adsorption thermodynamics of some schiff bases on mild steel corrosion in industrial water medium. Int. J. Corr. 2013: 13.10.1155/2013/543204Suche in Google Scholar

Speight, G.J. (2014). Corrosion monitoring and control. Gulf Professional Publishing, Oxford, UK, pp. 109–149.10.1016/B978-0-12-800346-6.00006-5Suche in Google Scholar

Srivastava, V., Haque, J., Verma, C., Singh, P., Lgaz, H., Salghi, R., and Quraishi, M.A. (2017). Amino acid-based imidazolium zwitterions as novel and green corrosion inhibitors for mild steel: experimental, DFT and MD studies. J. Mol. Liq. 244: 340–352, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2017.08.049.Suche in Google Scholar

Subasree, N., and Selvi, J.A. (2020). Imidazolium based ionic liquid derivatives; synthesis and evaluation of inhibitory effect on mild steel corrosion in hydrochloric acid solution. Heliyon 6: e03498, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03498.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Tan, J., Guo, L., Wu, D., Wang, S., Yu, R., Zhang, F., and Kaya, S. (2020). Electrochemical and computational studies on the corrosion inhibition of mild steel by 1-hexadecyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide in HCl medium. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 15: 1893–1903, https://doi.org/10.20964/2020.03.36.Suche in Google Scholar

Tang, Y., Zhang, F., Hu, S., Cao, Z., Wu, Z., and Jing, W. (2013). Novel benzimidazole derivatives as corrosion inhibitors of mild steel in the acidic media. Part I: gravimetric, electrochemical, SEM and XPS studies. Corros. Sci. 74: 271–281, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2013.04.053.Suche in Google Scholar

Tawfik, S.M. (2016). Ionic liquids based gemini cationic surfactants as corrosion inhibitors for carbon steel in hydrochloric acid solution. J. Mol. Liq. 216: 624–635, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.01.066.Suche in Google Scholar

Verma, C., Ebenso, E.E., and Quraishi, M.A. (2017). Ionic liquids as green and sustainable corrosion inhibitors for metals and alloys: an overview. J. Mol. Liq. 233: 403–417, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2017.02.111.Suche in Google Scholar

Verma, C., Obot, I.B., Bahadur, I., Sherif, E.M., and Ebenso, E.E. (2018). Choline based ionic liquids as sustainable corrosion inhibitors on mild steel surface in acidic medium: gravimetric, electrochemical, surface morphology, DFT and Monte Carlo simulation studies. Appl. Surf. Sci. 457: 149, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.035.Suche in Google Scholar

Verma, C., Olasunkanmi, L.O., Bahadur, I., Lgaz, I., Quraishi, M.A., Haque, J., Sherif, E.M., and Ebenso, E.E. (2019). Experimental, density functional theory and molecular dynamics supported adsorption behavior of environmental benign imidazolium based ionic liquids on mild steel surface in acidic medium. J. Mol. Liq. 273: 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.09.139.Suche in Google Scholar

Verma, C., Quraishi, M.A., and Ebenso, E.E. (2020). Quinoline and its derivatives as corrosion inhibitors: a review. Surf. Interfaces 21: 100634, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2020.100634.Suche in Google Scholar

Verma, D.K. (2018). Ali, A. (Ed.), Density functional theory (DFT) as a powerful tool for designing corrosion inhibitors in aqueous phase, advanced engineering testing. IntechOpen, London, UK.10.5772/intechopen.78333Suche in Google Scholar

Xu, F., Duan, J., Zhang, S., and Hou, B. (2008). The inhibition of mild steel corrosion in 1 M hydrochloric acid solutions by triazole derivative. Mater. Lett. 62: 4072–4074, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2008.05.037.Suche in Google Scholar

Yadav, D.K., Maiti, B., and Quraishi, M.A. (2010). Electrochemical and quantum chemical studies of 3,4-dihydropyrimidin-2(1H)-ones as corrosion inhibitors for mild steel in hydrochloric acid solution. Corros. Sci. 52: 3586–3598, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2010.06.030.Suche in Google Scholar

Yesudass, S., Olasunkanmi, L.O., Bahadur, I., Kabanda, M.M., Obot, I.B., and Ebenso, E.E. (2016). Experimental and theoretical studies on some selected ionic liquids with different cations/anions as corrosion inhibitors for mild steel in acidic medium. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 64: 252–268, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2016.04.006.Suche in Google Scholar

Zafari, S., Sarabi, A.A., and Movassagh, B. (2020). A novel green corrosion inhibitor based on task specific benzimidazolium ionic liquid for carbon steel in HCl. Int. J. Corros. Proc. Corros. 55: 589–601, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1478422x.2020.1766863.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhang, K., Yang, W., Chen, Y., Xu, B., Yin, X., Liu, Y., and Zuo, H. (2018). Enhanced inhibitive performance of fluoro-substituted imidazolium-based ionic liquid for mild steel corrosion in hydrochloric acid at elevated temperature. J. Mater. Sci. 53: 14666–14680, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2616-6.Suche in Google Scholar

Zheng, X., Zhang, S., Li, W., Gong, M., and Yin, L. (2015). Experimental and theoretical studies of two imidazolium-based ionic liquids as inhibitors for mild steel in sulfuric acid solution. Corros. Sci. 95: 168–179, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2015.03.012.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-08-28
Accepted: 2022-04-28
Published Online: 2022-06-06
Published in Print: 2022-10-26

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 1.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/corrrev-2021-0065/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen