Abstract
The selective dissolution of ferrite phase from the pearlite was studied in fuel-grade ethanol (FGE) to understand how it affects the stress corrosion cracking (SCC) mechanism of carbon steel in FGE. It was shown that microgalvanic coupling occurs between ferrite and cementite phases of the pearlite, leading to localized corrosion, which affects the SCC mechanism. The intergranular SCC mechanism stops at the pearlite, and the selective dissolution promotes the transgranular SCC mechanism. Cathodic polarization curves were measured for pure iron and cementite exposed to various FGE conditions. According to the results, cementite phase is, in most cases, a more favorable cathode in FGE.
1 Introduction
Fuel-grade ethanol (FGE) is used as biofuel additive for gasoline in many countries. The material used for handling gasoline or FGE is mainly carbon steel, which is susceptible to stress corrosion cracking (SCC) in FGE or ethanol-gasoline blends with sufficient amount of ethanol. There have already been some failures in the industry due to this phenomenon, mainly in storage tanks and piping handling FGE (Kane et al., 2007).
The vast majority of information available on SCC of carbon steels in ethanol is from laboratory studies made using commercial or simulated FGE (SFGE) as the environment. The most common method to study SCC of carbon steel in FGE has been slow strain rate testing (SSRT). The SCC fracture mode in majority of the laboratory studies has been transgranular or mixed transgranular and intergranular mode of cracking, while in the industrial cases, the SCC fracture mode is mainly intergranular (Kane et al., 2007). This is because small amounts of chlorides cause transition in the SCC fracture mode from intergranular to cleavage-like transgranular (Sridhar et al., 2006; Torkkeli et al., 2014). Only 2 mg/l of chlorides that leaked from a commonly used silver/silver chloride/ethanol (Ag/AgCl/EtOH) reference electrode was found to cause transition from intergranular to transgranular SCC in an ethanol-gasoline blend (Torkkeli et al., 2014). Most of the laboratory studies have been made using SFGE with added chlorides, and the electrochemical measurements, by using the same Ag/AgCl/EtOH reference electrode with buffer solution of ethanol containing lithium chloride (LiCl) (Sridhar et al., 2006; Maldonado & Sridhar, 2007; Lou et al., 2009, 2010; Lou & Singh, 2010, 2011a; Beavers et al., 2011; Torkkeli et al., 2011, 2013, 2014). Intergranular SCC has been successfully produced in two studies using the Ag/AgCl/EtOH reference electrode, but the electrochemical measurements are difficult due to the low conductivity of the test solution (Sridhar et al., 2006; Maldonado & Sridhar, 2007; Beavers et al., 2011). Fully intergranular SCC has also been produced in ethanol-gasoline blends without chlorides, when no electrochemical measurements were used (Torkkeli et al. 2014).
The roles of different environmental parameters on ethanol SCC are known (Kane et al., 2005; Sridhar et al., 2006; Maldonado & Sridhar, 2007; Gui et al., 2009; Lou et al., 2009, 2010; Gui et al., 2010; Lou & Singh, 2010; Beavers et al., 2011; Torkkeli et al., 2011, 2013; Cao et al., 2013a,b,c; Samusawa & Shiotani, 2015, 2016), and lately, also microbially influenced corrosion in FGE environments have been studied (Sowards et al., 2014; Williamson et al., 2015). Sulfate-reducing bacteria can increase the hydrogen sulfide concentrations and acid-producing bacteria can increase the acetic acid concentrations in FGE (Sowards et al., 2014). However, the conditions within the ethanol SCC cracks are still not known very well. One way to get information on the conditions within the SCC crack is to separately study the occurring different unit processes, as was done in a previous study by investigating the dissolution of the manganese sulfide (MnS) inclusions inside the SCC cracks (Torkkeli et al., 2015). Another unit process occurring inside the SCC cracks is selective dissolution of ferrite phase from the pearlite. Selective dissolution of ferrite phase from the pearlite was observed inside the SCC cracks in all of the previous studies (Hirsi et al., 2011; Torkkeli et al., 2011, 2013, 2014, 2015).
Selective dissolution of ferrite phase from the pearlite has been previously studied in aqueous solutions. Staicopolus (1963) studied the role of cementite in the acidic corrosion of steel by making electrochemical measurements with cementite isolated from specially made steel. It was found that cementite is an active cathodic site in corrosion of steel, as it does not polarize at low current densities. At high current densities, cementite polarizes to the potential of iron in similar conditions. This was considered to be due to chemical decomposition of cementite to iron and predominantly methane and carbon monoxide under the influence of cathodically evolving hydrogen. Galvanic coupling between the steel and a layer of undissolved cementite (Fe3C) was studied by Crolet et al. (1994, 1998). According to the studies, galvanic coupling of steel and cementite is considered to affect the carbon dioxide corrosion of steels. The galvanic coupling can lead to acidification and localized corrosion inside the oxide layers.
Many observations have been made in our previous studies (Hirsi et al., 2011; Torkkeli et al., 2011, 2013, 2014, 2015) related to the selective dissolution of ferrite phase from pearlite and on how it affects the SCC mechanism of carbon steel in FGE. These findings have not yet been published, as they were not related to the topics of the previous publications. All of these observations together give valuable information on the differences between the intergranular and transgranular SCC mechanisms of carbon steel in FGE. In this article, the findings from previous studies related to selective dissolution of ferrite phase from the pearlite are reviewed and compared to the cathodic polarization curves measured for pure cementite and iron exposed to various FGE conditions.
2 Review of findings from previous studies
The research on SCC of carbon steel in FGE was started due to failure in refinery pipeline in FGE service. The original carbon steel pipeline material used in the refinery before 1990 for methanol or FGE service was St35. After 1990, methanol has no longer been used and the carbon steel pipeline material used for the FGE service has been SA-106 with post-weld heat treatment (PWHT). Due to this reason, our studies have been made using St35 or SA-106 steel. The microstructure for both steels consists of pearlite and ferrite. The differences in the distribution of these two phases in both studied steels were shown by Torkkeli et al. (2013). The SA-106 steel has the banded pearlite structure, while in St35 steel, the pearlite is more evenly distributed.
After the first pipeline failure, a first study was made to confirm that the FGE used in the refinery can cause SCC for the carbon steel used (Hirsi et al., 2011; Torkkeli et al., 2013). The aim of the second study was to confirm whether PWHT can be used to prevent SCC (Torkkeli et al., 2011). In the third study, the aim was to find the minimum ethanol concentration required to initiate SCC in ethanol-gasoline blend (Torkkeli et al., 2014). The work was continued by studying the conditions inside the SCC cracks (Torkkeli et al., 2015). Finally, in this paper, the differences between the intergranular and transgranular SCC mechanisms are studied by making a review of the unpublished data from the previous studies.
In the previous publications, it was shown that selective dissolution of ferrite phase can occur at the pearlite in FGE. In this study, it is shown how selective dissolution affects the intergranular and transgranular SCC cracking mechanisms.
Pearlite has lamellar structure of alternating layers of ferrite and cementite. A pearlite nodule in SA-106 steel exhibiting the lamellar structure of the pearlite is shown in Figure 1A, and the dimensions of the ferrite and cementite lamellae can be seen at the higher magnification of the pearlite structure in Figure 1B.

(A) Single pearlite nodule in SA-106 steel. (B) The pearlite structure showing the distribution of ferrite and cementite lamellae in pearlite. Average thickness of the cementite lamellae is approximately 70 nm and for ferrite lamellae, approximately 110 nm.
It was estimated that the average thickness of the ferrite lamellae is approximately 110 nm, and the average thickness of the cementite lamellae is approximately 70 nm. Selective dissolution of ferrite phase from the pearlite has been observed in all our previous studies including the laboratory SSRT and notched constant tensile load testing (NCTLT) specimens as well as the failed refinery pipeline samples. Selective dissolution has been observed on the external surfaces as well as on the fracture surfaces.
2.1 External surfaces
Selective dissolution of ferrite phase from the pearlite was observed on the external surfaces of the SSRT and NCTLT specimens (Torkkeli et al., 2013). As ferrite dissolves selectively, cementite lamellae are left on the steel surface. This can be clearly seen in Figure 2A showing the bands of cementite lamellae (light phase) left on the SA-106 steel surface after SSRT testing in FGE for 2 days. Higher magnification of the cementite lamellae structure left on the St35 steel surface from the selective dissolution of a single pearlite nodule during SSRT testing in FGE for 2 days is shown in Figure 2B.

(A) Bands of cementite lamellae left on the SA-106 steel surface due to selective dissolution of ferrite phase from the pearlite during SSRT testing in FGE. Note also that transgranular SCC initiation sites are related to the pearlite bands. (B) High magnification of the cementite lamellae left on steel surface from selective dissolution of ferrite from a single pearlite nodule of St35 steel during SSRT testing in FGE.
It was also shown in the previous study (Torkkeli et al., 2014) that in FGE with chloride content below the analysis limit, SCC initiates as transgranular cracking in the pearlite and intergranular cracking in the ferrite phase. This can be seen from Figure 3A showing transgranular SCC cracking initiated at the pearlite of SA-106 steel surface during SSRT in 20% ethanol-gasoline blend and Figure 3B showing intergranular SCC cracking initiated at the ferrite phase of the same steel.

(A) Transgranular SCC cracking of SA-106 steel initiated at pearlite during SSRT in 20% FGE and gasoline blend. (B) Intergranular SCC cracking of SA-106 steel initiated at the ferrite phase in the same test.
The cementite structures have also been observed on the surfaces of the failed pipeline samples taken from FGE service. These samples always have a thick oxide layer on the surface, which was studied with scanning electron microscope (SEM) by making cross-section specimens. There were cementite structures inside the oxide layer, as shown in Figure 4.

(A) Cross-section of oxide layer on the pipeline steel surface from FGE service. (B) Some cementite left on the steel surface and empty sites inside the oxide layer are most likely due to the cementite based on their dimensions.
2.2 Fracture surfaces
The first findings from the fracture surfaces were made from a failed process pipeline due to SCC in FGE service (Hirsi et al., 2011). Lamellar cementite structures were observed on the fracture surface of the failed pipeline steel sample, as shown in Figure 5. In this case, the cementite structure was covered by a thick oxide layer.

Lamellar cementite structure on SCC fracture surface of failed St35 pipeline steel sample from FGE service.
After the first pipeline failures, SSRT and NCTLT testing was done, and selective dissolution of ferrite phase from the pearlite was observed on the fracture surfaces of the tested SSRT and NCTLT specimens, as shown in Figure 6 (Torkkeli et al., 2013). It should be noted that the chloride concentration was higher during the NCTLT testing than what is expected in the field samples due to the chloride leakage from the reference electrode.

Selective dissolution at the pearlite phase on SCC fracture surface of SA-106 steel NCTLT specimen in FGE with some chlorides.
The study using SSRT testing was made with various ethanol-gasoline blends, and selective dissolution was observed on the fracture surfaces of the SSRT specimens (Torkkeli et al., 2014). In this case, most of the tests were made without reference electrode, and differences were observed between chloride containing conditions and conditions with negligible chloride concentrations below analysis limit. Selective dissolution of the pearlite on SCC fracture surface in SSRT testing in 85% ethanol-gasoline blend with chloride concentrations below the analysis limit is shown in Figure 7A and in 85% ethanol-gasoline blend with chlorides, in Figure 7B. It is obvious that selective dissolution is much more aggressive in conditions with chlorides.

Selective dissolution of the pearlite on SCC fracture surface in SSRT testing in (A) 85% ethanol-gasoline blend with chloride concentration below analysis limit and (B) 85% ethanol-gasoline blend with some chlorides.
It was also observed that in ethanol-gasoline blends with chloride concentrations below the analysis limit, the SCC fracture mode changes from fully intergranular cracking to transgranular cracking at the pearlite. This effect is clearly seen with the SA-106 steel specimen with banded pearlite microstructure in Figure 8, on the SSRT SCC fracture surface formed in 25% ethanol-gasoline blend with chloride concentrations below the analysis limit. Fully intergranular SCC cracking initiated at the ferrite phase changes to transgranular SCC cracking in the first pearlite band perpendicular to the direction of crack propagation.

Fracture surface of SCC crack of SA-106 steel SSRT specimen tested in 25% ethanol-gasoline blend with chloride concentration below the analysis limit. Fully intergranular SCC cracking changes fracture mode to transgranular cracking inside the pearlite band perpendicular to the direction of crack propagation.
Another failed field pipeline sample was characterized when dissolution of MnS inclusions was previously studied (Torkkeli et al., 2015). Selective dissolution of pearlite was observed inside the SCC cracks. It was observed that the propagation of the intergranular SCC cracks stopped when the pearlite nodules of the carbon steel were reached, as shown in the cross-section SEM image in Figure 9A. Then the pearlite nodules were dissolved, selectively leaving empty spaces inside the crack, as seen from Figure 9B. Partially dissolved pearlite nodule on the fracture surface of the same sample with cementite lamellae visible on the fracture surface is shown in Figure 10.

Intergranular SCC crack in SA-106 carbon steel pipe sample from FGE service. (A) The intergranular crack propagation stops at the pearlite nodule. (B) Partially dissolved pearlite nodules.

Partially dissolved pearlite nodule on SCC fracture surface of SA-106 carbon steel pipe sample from FGE service.
Finally, a newly failed SA-106 pipeline sample from the FGE service was characterized in this study. This pipeline was taken into FGE service in 2013, and it failed in 2015. It was observed that the propagation of the intergranular SCC stopped at the pearlite nodules and selective dissolution of the pearlite nodule started leaving empty spaces filled with oxide inside the intergranular SCC crack. The fact that the crack propagation stopped at the pearlite nodules is shown in Figure 11A, and a partially dissolved pearlite nodule, in Figure 11B.

Intergranular SCC cracking in a carbon steel pipe sample from FGE service. (A) The intergranular SCC crack propagation stops at the pearlite nodules. (B) A partially dissolved pearlite nodule inside the crack.
2.3 Discussion of the findings
Conclusions can be drawn on how cementite phase affects the SCC cracking mechanism of carbon steel in FGE service by considering the observations together. The most important observations are below:
The selective dissolution of ferrite phase from the pearlite occurs in FGE even with negligible chloride concentrations, but the conditions become more aggressive with higher chloride concentrations leading to higher selective dissolution rates.
The selective dissolution occurs at the external surfaces as well as on the fracture surfaces.
The SCC cracking of carbon steel in FGE initiates as transgranular cracking at the pearlite and as intergranular cracking in the ferrite phase during the SSRT testing in FGE with negligible chloride concentrations.
The SCC cracking of carbon steel in FGE initiates at the ferrite phase as intergranular cracking changes to transgranular cracking in the pearlite during SSRT testing in FGE with negligible chloride concentrations.
The propagation of intergranular SCC cracking of carbon steel in FGE stops at the pearlite nodules, and the pearlite is selectively dissolved, leaving empty spaces inside the SCC cracks. The SCC cracking mechanism does not change from intergranular cracking to transgranular cracking in the failed FGE pipeline samples.
As the propagation of the intergranular SCC cracks stops at the pearlite nodules and changes to localized corrosion at the pearlite nodule, it indicates that there is a microgalvanic coupling between the cementite and ferrite lamellae of the pearlite nodule. Due to the microgalvanic coupling, the cementite seems to become the cathode, while ferrite dissolves as the anode, leading to localized corrosion of ferrite phase of the pearlite. As a result, crevices are generated between the cementite lamellae left on the steel surface. The most important observation is that, as the cementite becomes the cathode, the intergranular SCC cracking mechanism stops.
It is known that chlorides can cause acidification of the localized anodic corrosion sites during pitting or, for example, inside the SCC cracks of austenitic stainless steels in chloride containing conditions. The influence of chlorides on corrosion of martensitic stainless steel in ethanol-containing gasoline was studied by Abel and Virtanen (2015). It was observed that pitting corrosion occurs with extremely low chloride concentrations, which did not lead to passivity breakdown in a purely aqueous solution. In this case, it can be considered that the result of localized corrosion at the pearlite due to microgalvanic coupling is that chlorides get concentrated at these locations. This leads to acidification and more severe localized corrosion, as were observed in the investigated samples. The FGE specifications limit the chloride concentrations so that, usually, the chloride concentration of the bulk FGE is below 10 wt.-ppm. In ethanol-gasoline blends with 85% ethanol, only 2 wt.-ppm of chlorides is enough to cause localized corrosion at the pearlite (Torkkeli et al., 2014). In similar, ethanol-gasoline blends with negligible chloride concentration the corrosion appeared to be more general, and similar localized corrosion was not observed. These observations show that, with carbon steels, the chlorides concentrate at the pearlite in a similar way as they concentrate inside the pits in pitting corrosion of stainless steels. Although our observations of how chlorides affect the corrosion of carbon steel in FGE are related to localized corrosion at the pearlite nodules or inside the transgranular SCC crack, it is important to note that chlorides can also increase the dissolution rate of iron oxides or lead to oxide film breakdown even in neutral solutions.
The propagation of the intergranular SCC cracks stops at the pearlite nodules even with negligible chloride concentrations below the analysis limit. Chlorides increase this localized corrosion effect at the pearlite phase significantly. This is most likely why only 2 wt.-ppm of chlorides in the FGE can prevent the intergranular SCC from occurring (Torkkeli et al., 2014). Transgranular SCC can initiate at the pearlite even with negligible chloride concentrations during SSRT testing. Also, the intergranular SCC changes its fracture mode to transgranular cracking at the pearlite during SSRT testing. With the field samples, the intergranular SCC does not change the fracture mode at the pearlite, but localized corrosion occurs instead. The difference in these two conditions is the stress/strain level, which is much higher during the SSRT testing. The most important observation here is that even though the intergranular SCC mechanism stops at the pearlite with lower stress levels based on the field samples, it can continue as transgranular SCC with higher stress/strain levels of the SSRT specimens.
These observations give some information of the differences between the intergranular and transgranular SCC. As the propagation of the intergranular SCC cracks stops at the pearlite nodules and changes to localized corrosion at the pearlite nodule, it indicates that there is a microgalvanic coupling between the cementite and ferrite lamellae of the pearlite nodule. Due to microgalvanic coupling, the cementite becomes the cathode, which affects the potential at the intergranular crack tip enough to stop the crack propagation. This also explains why the intergranular SCC cannot initiate in conditions containing chlorides. This is because the chlorides catalyze the effect of the microgalvanic coupling by increasing the localized corrosion and conductivity of the solution, and the cementite lamellae on the steel surface become stronger cathodes. As the conductivity of the solution increases, the galvanic coupling between the cementite and ferrite affects a wider area around the pearlite bands, preventing the initiation and propagation of the intergranular SCC.
In most cases, the failures in the field service have been due to intergranular SCC. All the failed field samples studied by us have shown only intergranular SCC. Small amounts of chlorides are able to prevent the intergranular SCC while promoting transgranular SCC, which indicates that the transgranular SCC mechanism is more likely in more conductive conditions, especially containing chlorides. With negligible amounts of chlorides, the intergranular SCC stops at the pearlite but is able to continue as transgranular SCC at a high stress level. The transgranular SCC mechanism does not initiate at the stress levels of 80% of yield strength of the steel, while for the intergranular SCC mechanism, it is possible. This indicates that the transgranular SCC mechanism requires higher stress levels than does the intergranular SCC mechanism. In field conditions, the pipelines are usually designed with high safety factors, and due to this reason, stress levels in the field service are mainly weld residual stresses and can be relatively low, especially after PWHT. In laboratory SSRT testing, the test specimen is strained until fracture, so the stress levels are much higher than what are expected in the field service, which promotes the transgranular SCC mechanism. In commercial FGE, the chloride levels are usually low, as the chloride concentration is limited by the specifications. In the laboratory testing, in addition to leaking reference electrodes, simulated FGEs are often used, with higher concentrations of chlorides and other impurities to simulate the most impure FGE. Therefore, in the laboratory studies, the conductivity of the simulated FGE can be higher than what is expected in the field service, which promotes the transgranular SCC mechanism. It is therefore important to separate these two mechanisms as they seem to behave differently.
It is unclear whether something forming at the pearlite, for example, in the cathodic reaction, can change the SCC mechanism from intergranular to transgranular cracking. An attempt to measure the compounds formed at the cementite during acidic corrosion of steel in aqueous conditions was made by Staicopolus (1963) by using mass spectrometric techniques, and the results were as follows: H2, 87.8%; CH4, 4.5%; CO, 3.2%; C3H8 and C4H8 (each), <1.0%; C2H2, C2H6, C4H10, and H2O (each) <0.5%; and traces of CO2. This shows that quite high amounts of carbon monoxide can form at the cementite. The corresponding cathodic reactions were considered to be as follows:
Hypothesis made by Newman (2008) related the transgranular SCC mechanism to CO-CO2 SCC and the intergranular SCC to a mechanism caused by the incomplete electrochemical oxidation products of ethanol. It is well known that CO-CO2 can cause transgranular SCC of carbon steel (Kirkham, 1996). Depending on the CO-CO2 concentrations and pHe conditions, the SCC mechanism could also be a form of carbonate cracking. The similarities between the mechanisms observed here and the SCC mechanisms in carbonate solutions are clear. The SCC mechanisms in carbonate solutions can be divided into high pH intergranular SCC and near-neutral transgranular SCC (Sutcliffe et al., 1972; Parkins et al., 1994; Fang et al., 2003; Lu et al., 2010). Selective dissolution of pearlite nodules has been observed in carbonate solutions at specific potential range, which is also the potential range where the high pH intergranular SCC occurs (Sutcliffe et al., 1972). In these conditions, a more dense oxide layer containing magnetite and iron carbonate forms. It could also be the potential range where iron carbonate and magnetite have stability boundary, which is where intergranular SCC has been observed in DI-isopropanolamine (DIPA) solutions used in refinery amine systems containing sulfur (Aaltonen et al., 1988, 1989). The near-neutral transgranular SCC prefers to initiate at the pearlite bands (Fang et al., 2003). It was also found that the steels with ferrite-pearlite structures are more susceptible for both SCC mechanisms (Fang et al., 2003). The near-neutral transgranular SCC occurs often in dilute bicarbonate-carbonate groundwater containing small quantities of chloride in coating disbonding of pipelines (Liu & Mao, 1995). All the mechanistic findings related to the SCC mechanisms in carbonate solutions are very similar if not identical to our observations on the SCC mechanisms in FGE solutions. This supports the hypothesis made by Newman that the carbon steel SCC in FGE can be a form of CO-CO2 or carbonate cracking (Newman, 2008).
3 Materials and methods
3.1 Electrochemical measurements
Electrochemical measurements were made with rectangular (1.65 cm2) specimens of pure iron (99.99% pure iron, Goodfellow, Huntingdon, UK) and cylindrical specimens (2.00 cm2) of pure cementite (Cylindrical rod, CAS: 12011-67-5, American Elements, Los Angeles, CA, USA) to get a better understanding of the electrochemical differences between these two phases. All specimens were dry-polished to 2000 grit, degreased with acetone, and dried in blowing air just before every measurement. The cementite specimen was porous, containing pores with an average diameter of 9.1 μm and pore density of 8100 pores/cm2. This was taken into account for current density calculations for cementite by assuming spherical pores (0.01-cm2 pore surface area). Due to the pores, the current density values for cementite show a small random error. It should also be noted that the bottoms of these pores are not dry-polished. The electrochemical measurements were made in FGE with some added NaCl (CAS: 7647-14-5, Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) and with various hydrochloric acid (HCl) (Product number 258148, CAS: 7647-01-0, Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) concentrations. The chemical composition of the FGE used is given in Table 1.
The composition of the FGE used for the electrochemical measurements.
Component | Method | Value | Unit |
---|---|---|---|
Density | ENISO12185 | 788.1 | kg/m3 |
Watera | EN15489 | 0.17 | wt% |
Conductivity | EN15938 | 1.60 | μS/cm |
Acetic acid | ASTM D1613 | 0.0021 | wt% |
Chloride | EN15492 | <1 | mg/l |
Methanol | NM40 | 0.05 | vol% |
Ethanol | NM40 | 92.0 | vol% |
ETBE | NM40 | 0.13 | vol% |
TAEE | NM40 | 0.32 | vol% |
Gasoline | 7.68 | vol% |
-
aThe water content is most likely slightly higher than the measured value due to water pick-up during preparation of the experiments.
All the potentiodynamic polarization curves were measured using potentiostat (PCI4, Gamry Instruments, Warminster, PA, USA) in a sealed three-electrode electrochemical testing cell. The reference electrode used was a silver-silver chloride-based reference electrode Ag/AgCl/1 m LiCl, EtOH. The purging gas used for unaerated measurements was dry nitrogen and for aerated measurements, dry air. The electrochemical measurements in pure FGE were not possible due to very low conductivity, which is why some chlorides were added to the FGE for the measurement. Due to the very low conductivity, IR compensation was needed for the measurements. For IR compensation, positive feedback and current interrupt methods were both evaluated. Positive feedback method could have been used with lower conductivity than that of current interrupt method, but it was not taken into account that the conductivity of the solution may change quite significantly during the long measurement. Due to this reason, the current interrupt method by Gamry Instruments was used for the IR compensation. During testing, it was noticed that at least 50 wt.-ppm of chlorides was required for the current interrupt method to work reliably down to the target potential of −1.2 V. Cathodic potentiodynamic polarization measurements were started quickly as soon as the potential reached steady slope after the specimens were placed to the electrochemical testing cell to minimize the oxidation of the surface before the measurement. Open circuit potential (OCP) was measured versus time and before starting the cathodic potentiodynamic polarization measurement. All tests were performed at ambient temperature.
4 Results and discussion
Before starting the cathodic potentiodynamic polarization measurements, OCP was measured in all test conditions to see how the potential stabilizes. The results from the OCP measurements are shown in Figures 12–14.

OCP of iron and cementite in aerated and deaerated FGE with 50 wt.-ppm of chlorides.

OCP of iron and cementite in aerated FGE with various concentrations of HCl.

OCP of iron and cementite in deaerated FGE with various concentrations of HCl.
Cathodic potentiodynamic polarization curves in Figure 15 were measured in aerated FGE and in unaerated FGE with 50 wt.-ppm chlorides added as sodium chloride with scan rate of 1 mV/s. A series of cathodic potentiodynamic polarization curves in Figure 16 were measured with various HCl concentrations in aerated and unaerated conditions with the scan rate of 1 mV/s to study how pHe affects the behavior of cementite and pure iron.

Cathodic potentiodynamic polarization curves of pure iron and cementite measured in (A) aerated and (B) unaerated FGE with 50 wt.-ppm chlorides added as sodium chloride with scan rate of 1 mV/s.

Cathodic potentiodynamic polarization curves of pure iron and cementite measured in (A) aerated and (B) unaerated FGE with various HCl concentrations with scan rate of 1 mV/s. The cathodic polarization curves are marked as (a) iron, 10 wt.-ppm HCl; (b) cementite, 10 wt.-ppm HCl; (c) iron, 30 wt.-ppm HCl; (d) cementite, 30 wt.-ppm HCl; (e) iron, 80 wt.-ppm HCl; (f) cementite, 80 wt.-ppm HCl; (g) iron, 1000 wt.-ppm HCl; (h) cementite, 1000 wt.-ppm HCl.
According to the findings made from the SSRT and NCTLT testing as well as from the failed field samples, there are differences in the behavior of ferrite and cementite phases exposed to FGE and there is an apparent micro-galvanic coupling between these two phases. However, according to the electrochemical measurements, the differences are not that clear. The OCP of cementite was always higher than that for pure iron, as can be seen from Figures 12–14. In aerated conditions, the OCP of cementite was approximately 120 mV higher and in unaerated conditions, approximately 40 mV higher than that for pure iron, as seen from Figure 12. In deaerated conditions with HCl, the OCP of pure iron declined faster than did the OCP of cementite, as seen from Figure 13, but similar effect was not visible in aerated conditions. Also, as seen from Figure 12, the cementite phase has more positive potentials for the cathodic reactions than pure iron. This indicates that the cementite phase can be a more favorable cathode compared to pure iron, but this is not clear when looking at the Tafel slopes. Possibly four linear regions are seen on the cathodic polarization curves, shown in Figure 12. The behavior of the four regions is compared by using Tafel slopes. It is seen that the Tafel slope for Region I in aerated conditions is lower for cementite, while in unaerated conditions, it is lower for pure iron. This indicates faster and easier reaction kinetics for the cathodic reactions occurring at Region I for cementite in aerated conditions and for pure iron in unaerated conditions. In Region II, the behavior is reversed. The pure iron has lower Tafel slope in aerated conditions, and the cementite has lower Tafel slope in unaerated conditions. In Region III, the behavior is reversed, compared with that of Region II, although the differences in aerated conditions are very small. In Region IV, the Tafel slope is always lower for cementite. The Tafel slopes for iron and cementite are much lower in unaerated conditions in Region IV. It is likely that, in Region IV, the cathodic reaction rates are no longer limited by charge transfer, as the current is almost independent of the applied potential. It is likely that the cathodic reactions in Region IV are ionic mass transport controlled, which is also the case with the cathodic polarization curves in acidic conditions seen in Figure 13. The current density for the cathodic polarization curves depends mainly on the HCl concentration. The OCP of iron and cementite was similar in aerated conditions with all HCl concentrations tested, but in unaerated conditions, the OCP of cementite was always approximately 30 mV higher. This can indicate that in acidic conditions, selective dissolution will be stronger in unaerated conditions. This can be why Lou et al. (2009) observed selective dissolution of ferrite phase from pearlite only in unaerated conditions.
The cathodic reactions observed are similar to what was obtained by (Lou & Singh, 2011b), who measured cathodic polarization curves for carbon steel in SFGE with various impurity levels. The difference is that the SFGE used by Lou & Singh had much higher concentration of water and acetic acid than the FGE used here. Due to this reason, the conductivity of our FGE was much lower. This can be the reason for lower limiting current density observed in this study. As acetic acid concentration was much lower in the FGE, the reactions associated with acetic acid and oxygen were not as clearly visible.
The cathodic polarization curves do indicate that cementite acts as a more favorable cathode in most cases. Still it seems based on the Tafel slopes that in some specific conditions, pure iron can act as a cathode leading to selective dissolution of cementite, although this has not been observed yet. In any case, it is difficult to compare the cathodic polarization curves to the conditions at the selectively dissolving pearlite nodule on the steel surface under the oxide layer or inside an SCC crack as the exact solution composition at these locations is not known. As was observed by looking at the dissolution of MnS inclusions during the previous study (Torkkeli et al., 2015), the conditions inside an intergranular SCC crack are most likely not acidic, while the conditions inside a transgranular SCC crack can be very acidic. There are also impurities, which affect the cathodic or anodic reactions occurring inside the SCC crack, such as the sulfur species from dissolving MnS inclusions or carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide forming at the cementite acting as the cathode. All the findings together support the hypothesis by Newman (2008) that the transgranular SCC mechanism can be a form of CO-CO2 cracking. CO-CO2 can form in the cathodic reactions, for example, at the pearlite either by reactions (1) and (2) or as the ethanol oxidation products.
Cathodic polarization curves were measured in acidic aqueous solutions containing 3% NaCl and 0.3 mol fraction of glycerine by Staicopolus (1963). It was considered that the reduced corrosion rates in aqueous glycerine/NaCl or ethanol/NaCl solutions are probably due to the rapid irreversible conversion of cementite to ferrite (iron), which reduces the potential difference between the local anodes and cathodes. The cementite used in the testing was separated from specially prepared steel containing 1.8 wt% and 6.7 wt% of carbon. The separation of cementite was done by selectively dissolving ferrite from the steel in alcoholic HCl containing one part of concentrated HCl, one part of water, and one part of ethanol. The selective dissolution process in alcoholic HCl is mentioned to be chemical dissolution although there is no reference to how this was derived. In any case, it is known that selective dissolution of ferrite from pearlite occurs in alcoholic HCl solutions, but the process is not fully understood yet. This can be another indication that chlorides cause acidification at the pearlite, which leads to more aggressive selective dissolution of ferrite, as was observed in this study. The difference is that in this case, the selective dissolution process is considered to be electrochemical in nature, as it affects the intergranular SCC mechanism.
5 Conclusions
Selective dissolution of pearlite was studied to obtain more information on the SCC mechanism of carbon steel exposed to FGE. It was shown that the selective dissolution of ferrite phase from the pearlite occurs on the external steel surfaces as well as inside the SCC cracks of carbon steel exposed to FGE. The most important findings related to the phenomena are the following:
Selective dissolution of ferrite phase from the pearlite in carbon steel exposed to FGE occurs even with chloride concentration below the analysis limit of 1 wt.-ppm. This effect increases significantly with chloride concentrations above this limit.
The SCC of carbon steel exposed to FGE with chlorides below the analysis limit of 1 wt.-ppm initiates as transgranular SCC at the pearlite and intergranular SCC at the ferrite phase.
The intergranular SCC of carbon steel in FGE stops at the pearlite but can change to transgranular SCC at high stress/strain levels. Usually, this type of transition does not occur in the field process conditions at lower stress levels. At lower stress levels, localized selective dissolution of ferrite phase from the pearlite occurs instead.
Intergranular SCC of carbon steel in FGE does not occur with chloride concentrations above 2 mg/l.
There is apparent micro-galvanic coupling between cementite and ferrite phases of the pearlite. Cementite is a more favorable cathode, as the OCP of cementite is higher than that of pure iron. The OCP of cementite is approximately 120 mV higher in aerated FGE and approximately 40 mV higher in unaerated FGE.
The compounds formed in the cathodic reactions at cementite in FGE should be measured in detail, and for example, marked amounts of carbon monoxide may form.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge Neste Oyj for providing the FGE used in the dissolution rate measurements and especially for providing the carbon steel pipeline samples from the failure cases. The authors also wish to acknowledge PhD Olga Todoshchenko for providing the pure iron sample as well as PhD Teemu Sarikka for SEM study of the latest failure case.
References
Aaltonen P, Hänninen H, Rintamäki K. Stress corrosion cracking of mild steels in sulfur and carbonate containing environments. In 11th Scandinavian Corrosion Congress. Stavanger, 19–21 June 1989. F-29/1–6.10.5006/C1989-89572Suche in Google Scholar
Aaltonen P, Hänninen H, Tanskanen L, Rintamäki K. Intergranular stress corrosion cracking of mild steel in di-isopropanolamine (DIPA) solutions. Corrosion prevention in the process industries. Amsterdam, Nov. 8–11, NACE, Houston, TX, 1988, 225–237.Suche in Google Scholar
Abel J, Virtanen S. Corrosion of martensitic stainless steel in ethanol-containing gasoline: influence of contamination by chloride, H2O and acetic acid. Corros Sci 2015; 98: 318–326.10.1016/j.corsci.2015.05.027Suche in Google Scholar
Beavers JA, Gui F, Sridhar N. Effects of environmental and metallurgical factors on the stress corrosion cracking of carbon steel in fuel-grade ethanol. Corrosion 2011; 67: 025005:1–15.10.5006/1.3553341Suche in Google Scholar
Cao L, Frankel GS, Sridhar N. Effect of oxygen on ethanol stress corrosion cracking susceptibility: part 1 – electrochemical response and cracking-susceptible potential region. Corrosion 2013a; 69: 768–780.10.5006/0885Suche in Google Scholar
Cao L, Frankel GS, Sridhar N. Effect of oxygen on ethanol stress corrosion cracking susceptibility: part 2 – dissolution-based cracking mechanism. Corrosion 2013b; 69: 851–862.10.5006/0895Suche in Google Scholar
Cao L, Frankel GS, Sridhar N. Effect of chloride on stress corrosion cracking susceptibility of carbon steel in simulated fuel grade ethanol. Electrochim Acta 2013c; 104: 255–266.10.1016/j.electacta.2013.04.112Suche in Google Scholar
Crolet JL, Olsen S, Wilhelmsen W. Role of conductive corrosion products on the protectiveness of corrosion layers. In Corrosion 1994: Conference & Expo. Houston, TX, Maryland: NACE International. Paper no. 4.Suche in Google Scholar
Crolet JL, Olsen S, Wilhelmsen W. Role of conductive corrosion products in the protectiveness of corrosion layers. Corrosion 1998; 54: 194–203.10.5006/1.3284844Suche in Google Scholar
Fang BY, Atrens A, Wang JQ, Han EH, Zhu ZY, Ke W. Review of stress corrosion cracking of pipeline steels in “low” and “high” pH solutions. J Mater Sci 2003; 38: 127–132.10.1023/A:1021126202539Suche in Google Scholar
Gui F, Sridhar N, Beavers JA. Techniques for monitoring conditions leading to SCC of carbon steel in fuel grade ethanol. In: Corrosion 2009: Conference & Expo. Houston, TX, Georgia: NACE International. Paper no. 09531, 2009.10.5006/C2009-09531Suche in Google Scholar
Gui F, Sridhar N, Beavers JA. Localized corrosion or carbon steel and its implications on the mechanism and inhibition of stress corrosion cracking in fuel-grade ethanol. Corrosion 2010; 66: 125001-1-12.10.5006/1.3524831Suche in Google Scholar
Hirsi V, Torkkeli J, Hänninen H. Stress corrosion cracking of carbon steel in ethanol. Weld Cutting 2011; 10: 188–193.Suche in Google Scholar
Kane RD, Sridhar N, Brongers MP, Beavers JA, Agrawal AK, Klein LJ. Stress corrosion cracking in fuel ethanol: a recently recognized phenomenon. Mater Perform 2005; 44: 50–55.10.5006/MP2005_44_12-50Suche in Google Scholar
Kane RD, Eden D, Sridhar N, Maldonado J, Agarwal AK, Beavers JA, Brongers MPH. Stress corrosion cracking of carbon steel in fuel-grade ethanol: review, experience survey, field monitoring, and laboratory testing. API Technical Report 939-D. Washington, DC 2007.Suche in Google Scholar
Kirkham KK. CO-CO2 SCC failures of carbon steel equipment. In Corrosion 1996: Conference & Expo. Houston, TX, Colorado: NACE International. Paper no. 597. 1996.10.5006/C1996-96597Suche in Google Scholar
Liu X, Mao X. Electrochemical polarization and stress corrosion cracking behaviours of a pipeline steel in dilute bicarbonate solution with chloride ion. Scripta Metall Mater 1995; 33: 145–150.10.1016/0956-716X(95)00112-9Suche in Google Scholar
Lou X, Singh PM. Role of water, acetic acid and chloride on corrosion and pitting behavior of carbon steel in fuel-grade ethanol. Corros Sci 2010; 52: 2303–2315.10.1016/j.corsci.2010.03.034Suche in Google Scholar
Lou X, Singh PM. Phase angle analysis for stress corrosion cracking of carbon steel in fuel-grade ethanol: experiments and simulation. Electrochim Acta 2011a; 56: 1835–1847.10.1016/j.electacta.2010.07.024Suche in Google Scholar
Lou X, Singh PM. Cathodic activities of oxygen and hydrogen on carbon steel in simulated fuel-grade ethanol. Electrochim Acta 2011b; 56: 2312–2320.10.1016/j.electacta.2010.11.098Suche in Google Scholar
Lou X, Yang D, Singh PM. Effect of ethanol chemistry on stress corrosion cracking of carbon steel in fuel-grade ethanol. Corrosion 2009; 65: 785–797.10.5006/1.3319105Suche in Google Scholar
Lou X, Yang D, Singh PM. Film breakdown and anodic dissolution during stress corrosion cracking of carbon steel in bioethanol. J Electrochem Soc 2010; 157: C86–C94.10.1149/1.3269927Suche in Google Scholar
Lu BT, Luo JL, Norton PR. Environmentally assisted cracking mechanism of pipeline steel in near-neutral pH groundwater. Corros Sci 2010; 52: 1787–1795.10.1016/j.corsci.2010.02.020Suche in Google Scholar
Maldonado JG, Sridhar N. SCC of carbon steel in fuel ethanol service: effect of corrosion potential and ethanol processing source. In: Corrosion 2007: Conference & Expo. Houston, TX, Tennessee: NACE International. Paper no. 07574, 2007.10.5006/C2007-07574Suche in Google Scholar
Newman RC. Review and hypothesis for the stress corrosion mechanism of carbon steel in alcohols. Corrosion 2008; 64: 819–823.10.5006/1.3279915Suche in Google Scholar
Parkins RN, Blanchard WK, Delanty BS. Transgranular stress corrosion cracking of High-pressure pipelines in contact with solutions of near neutral pH. Corrosion 1994; 50: 394–408.10.5006/1.3294348Suche in Google Scholar
Samusawa I, Shiotani K. Influence and role of ethanol minor constituents of fuel grade ethanol on corrosion behavior of carbon steel. Corros Sci 2015; 90: 266–275.10.1016/j.corsci.2014.10.020Suche in Google Scholar
Samusawa I, Shiotani K, Kami C. The influence of cyclic load on environmentally assisted cracking of carbon steel in simulated fuel grade ethanol. Corros Sci 2016; 108: 76–84.10.1016/j.corsci.2016.02.039Suche in Google Scholar
Sowards JW, Williamson CHD, Weeks TS, McColskey JD, Spear JR. The effect of Acetobacter sp. and a sulfate-reducing bacterial consortium from ethanol fuel environments on fatigue crack propagation in pipeline and storage tank steels. Corros Sci 2014; 79: 128–138.10.1016/j.corsci.2013.10.036Suche in Google Scholar
Sridhar N, Price K, Buckingham J, Dante J. Stress corrosion cracking of carbon steel in ethanol. Corrosion 2006; 62: 687–702.10.5006/1.3278295Suche in Google Scholar
Staicopolus DN. The role of cementite in the acidic corrosion of steel. J Electrochem Soc 1963; 110: 1122–1124.10.1149/1.2425602Suche in Google Scholar
Sutcliffe JM, Fessler RR, Boyd WK, Parkins RN. Stress corrosion cracking of carbon steel in carbonate solutions. Corrosion 1972; 28: 313–320.10.5006/0010-9312-28.8.313Suche in Google Scholar
Torkkeli J, Hirsi V, Saukkonen T, Hänninen H. Evaluation of post-weld heat treatment as a method to prevent stress corrosion cracking of carbon steel in ethanol by notched constant tensile load testing. In EUROCORR 2011 Proceedings. Stockholm: DECHEMA and Swerea KIMAB. Paper no. 1036.Suche in Google Scholar
Torkkeli J, Hirsi V, Saukkonen T, Hänninen H. Mechanistic study of stress corrosion cracking of carbon steel in ethanol. Mater Corros 2013; 64: 866–875.10.1002/maco.201206844Suche in Google Scholar
Torkkeli J, Saukkonen T, Hänninen H. Stress corrosion cracking of carbon steel in ethanol–gasoline blends. Mater Corros 2014; 65: 605–612.10.1002/maco.201206899Suche in Google Scholar
Torkkeli J, Saukkonen T, Hänninen H. Effect of MnS inclusion dissolution on carbon steel stress corrosion cracking in fuel-grade ethanol. Corros Sci 2015; 96: 14–22.10.1016/j.corsci.2015.03.002Suche in Google Scholar
Williamson CHD, Jain LA, Mishra B, Olson DL, Spear JR. Microbially influenced corrosion communities associated with fuel-grade ethanol environments. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2015; 99: 6945–6957.10.1007/s00253-015-6729-4Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- In this issue
- Reviews
- Technological applications of volatile corrosion inhibitors
- Performance of green corrosion inhibitors from biomass in acidic media
- Corrosion inhibition of steel in phosphoric acid
- Original articles
- Effect of pearlite on stress corrosion cracking of carbon steel in fuel-grade ethanol
- Gravimetric and electrochemical methods to evaluate the performance of corrosion inhibitors for galvanized steel strips
- Zeolites as reservoirs for Ce(III) as passivating ions in anticorrosion paints
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- In this issue
- Reviews
- Technological applications of volatile corrosion inhibitors
- Performance of green corrosion inhibitors from biomass in acidic media
- Corrosion inhibition of steel in phosphoric acid
- Original articles
- Effect of pearlite on stress corrosion cracking of carbon steel in fuel-grade ethanol
- Gravimetric and electrochemical methods to evaluate the performance of corrosion inhibitors for galvanized steel strips
- Zeolites as reservoirs for Ce(III) as passivating ions in anticorrosion paints