Vaccine-related conspiracy and counter-conspiracy narratives. Silencing effects

References

Baines, A., Ittefaq, M., & Abwao, M. (2021). #Scamdemic, #plandemic, or #scaredemic: What Parler social media platform tells us about COVID-19 vaccine. Vaccines, 9(5), 421. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines905042110.3390/vaccines9050421Suche in Google Scholar

Bârgăoanu, A., & Radu, L. (2018). Fake news or disinformation 2.0: Some insights into Romanians’ digital behaviour. Romanian Journal of European Affairs, 18(1), 24–38.Suche in Google Scholar

Caulfield, T. (2020). Does debunking work? Correcting COVID-19 misinformation on social media. OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/5uy2f10.31219/osf.io/5uy2fSuche in Google Scholar

Chadwick, A., Kaiser, J., Vaccari, C., Freeman, D., Lambe, S., Loe, B. S., Vanderslott, S., Lewandowsky, S., Conroy, M., Ross, A. R. N., Innocenti, S., Pollard, A. J., Waite, F., Larkin, M., Rosebrock, L., Jenner, L., McShane, H., Giubilini, A., Petit, A., & Yu, L.-M. (2021). Online social endorsement and Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy in the United Kingdom. Social Media + Society, 7(2), 20563051211008817. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305121100881710.1177/20563051211008817Suche in Google Scholar

Chan, M. P. S., Jones, C. R., Hall Jamieson, K., & Albarracín, D. (2017). Debunking: A meta-analysis of the psychological efficacy of messages countering misinformation. Psychological Science, 28(11), 1531–1546. https://doi.org/10.1177/095679761771457910.1177/0956797617714579Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, L., Zhang, Y., Young, R., Wu, X., & Zhu, G. (2021). Effects of vaccine-related conspiracy theories on Chinese young adults’ perceptions of the HPV vaccine: An experimental study. Health Communication, 36(11), 1343–1353. https://doi.org/10.1177/095679761771457910.1080/10410236.2020.1751384Suche in Google Scholar

Cox, D. A., & Clemence, J. (2021, February 26). When it comes to conspiracy theories, education matters. Survey Center on American Life. Retrieved January 8, 2022, from https://www.aei.org/articles/when-it-comes-to-conspiracy-theories-education-matters/Suche in Google Scholar

Dascălu, S., Geambașu, O., Covaciu, O., Chereches, R. M., Diaconu, G., Dumitra, G. G., Gheorghiță, V., & Popovici, E. D. (2021). Prospects of COVID-19 vaccination in Romania: Challenges and potential solutions. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 644538. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.64453810.3389/fpubh.2021.644538Suche in Google Scholar

Douglas, K. M. (2021). COVID-19 conspiracy theories. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(2), 270–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/136843022098206810.1177/1368430220982068Suche in Google Scholar

Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., Callan, M. J., Dawtry, R. J., & Harvey, A. J. (2016). Someone is pulling the strings: Hypersensitive agency detection and belief in conspiracy theories. Thinking and Reasoning, 22, 57–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/12546783.2015.105158610.1080/13546783.2015.1051586Suche in Google Scholar

Dubé, E., Vivion, M., & MacDonald, N. E. (2014). Vaccine hesitancy, vaccine refusal and the anti-vaccine movement: Influence, impact and implications. Expert Review of Vaccines, 14(1), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1586/14760584.2015.96421210.1586/14760584.2015.964212Suche in Google Scholar

Ennis, R. H. (1985). A logical basis for measuring critical thinking skills. Educational Leadership, 43, 44–48.Suche in Google Scholar

Farias, J., & Pilati, R. (2021). COVID-19 as an undesirable political issue: Conspiracy beliefs and intolerance of uncertainty predict adhesion to prevention measures. Current Psychology, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01416-010.31234/osf.io/97gn4Suche in Google Scholar

Fell, L. (2020). Trust and COVID-19: Implications for interpersonal, workplace, institutional, and information-based trust. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 2(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1145/342847210.1145/3428472Suche in Google Scholar

Fodor, S. (April 1, 2021). PM: Romania to receive more than 8 mln Covid-19 vaccine doses over the next two months. Romania-Insider.com. Retrieved June 16, 2021 from https://www.romania-insider.com/pm-ro-8-mln-vaccine-doses-apr-2021Suche in Google Scholar

Friedman, R. A. (2021). Why humans are vulnerable to conspiracy theories. Psychiatric Services, 72(1), 3–4. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.202000348.10.1176/appi.ps.202000348Suche in Google Scholar

Hampton, K. N., Rainie, L., Lu, W., Dwyer, M., Shin, I., & Purcell, K. (2014, August 26). Social media and the ‘spiral of silence’. Pew Research Center. Retrieved January 8, 2022, from http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/08/26/social-media-and-the-spiral-of-silence/Suche in Google Scholar

#ROVACCINARE. (n.d.). Platforma națională de informare cu privire la vaccinarea împotriva COVID-19. Vaccinuri autorizate [National vaccination information platform against COVID-19. Authorized vaccines]. Retrieved June 24, 2021 from https://vaccinare-covid.gov.ro/vaccinuri-autorizate/Suche in Google Scholar

Hayes, A. F. (2016). The PROCESS macro for SPSS and SAS.Suche in Google Scholar

Hayes, A. F., Matthes, J., & Eveland, W. P., Jr. (2013). Stimulating the quasi-statistical organ: Fear of social isolation motivates the quest for knowledge of the opinion climate. Communication Research, 40, 439–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502114286010.1177/0093650211428608Suche in Google Scholar

Hiaeshutter-Rice, D., & Weeks, B. (2021). Understanding audience engagement with mainstream and alternative news posts on Facebook. Digital Journalism, 9(5), 519–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.192406810.1080/21670811.2021.1924068Suche in Google Scholar

Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 635–650. https://doi.org/10.1086/26635010.1086/266350Suche in Google Scholar

Hughes, S., & Machan, L. (2021). It’s a conspiracy: Covid-19 conspiracies link to psychopathy, machiavellianism and collective narcissism. Personality and Individual Differences, 171, 110559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.11055910.1016/j.paid.2020.110559Suche in Google Scholar

Jamison, A., Broniatowski, D. A., Smith, M. C., Parikh, K. S., Malik, A., Dredze, M., & Quinn, S. C. (2020). Adapting and extending a typology to identify vaccine misinformation on Twitter. American Journal of Public Health, 110(S3), S331–S339. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.30594010.2105/AJPH.2020.305940Suche in Google Scholar

Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2014). The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. PLoS ONE, 9(2), e89177. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.008917710.1371/journal.pone.0089177Suche in Google Scholar

Kamau, S. C. (2016). Engaged online: Social media and youth civic engagement in Kenya. In B. Mutsvairo (Ed.), Digital activism in the social media era (pp. 115–140). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40949-8_610.1007/978-3-319-40949-8_6Suche in Google Scholar

Kata, A. (2010). A postmodern Pandora’s box: Anti-vaccination misinformation on the internet. Vaccine, 28(7), 1709–1716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.02210.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.022Suche in Google Scholar

Kim, M. (2015). Partisans and controversial news online: Comparing perceptions of bias and credibility in news content from blogs and mainstream media. Mass Communication and Society, 18(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2013.87748610.1080/15205436.2013.877486Suche in Google Scholar

Ku, K. Y. L., Kong, Q., Song, Y., Deng, L., Kang, Y., & Hu, A. (2019). What predicts adolescents’ critical thinking about real-life news? The roles of social media news consumption and news media literacy. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 100570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.05.00410.1016/j.tsc.2019.05.004Suche in Google Scholar

Leibovitz, T., Shamblaw, A. L., Rumas, R., & Best, M. W. (2021). COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs: Relations with anxiety, quality of life, and schemas. Personality and Individual Differences, 175, 110704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.11070410.1016/j.paid.2021.110704Suche in Google Scholar

Leonard, M.-J., & Philippe, F. L. (2021). Conspiracy theories: A public health concern and how to address it. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 682931. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.68293110.3389/fpsyg.2021.682931Suche in Google Scholar

Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3), 106–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/152910061245101810.1177/1529100612451018Suche in Google Scholar

Mancosu, M., & Vegetti, F. (2020). “Is it the message or the messenger?”: Conspiracy endorsement and media sources. Social Science Computer Review, 0894439320965107. https://doi.org/10.1177/089443932096510710.1177/0894439320965107Suche in Google Scholar

Mărcău, F. C., Purec, S., & Niculescu, G. (2022). Study on the refusal of vaccination against COVID-19 in Romania. Vaccines, 10(2), 261. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines1002026110.3390/vaccines10020261Suche in Google Scholar

Matthes, J. (2015). Observing the “spiral” in the spiral of silence. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 27, 155–176. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edu03210.1093/ijpor/edu032Suche in Google Scholar

Matthes, J., Knoll, J., & von Sikorski, C. (2018). The “spiral of silence” revisited: A meta-analysis on the relationship between perceptions of opinion support and political opinion expression. Communication Research, 45(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365021774542910.1177/0093650217745429Suche in Google Scholar

Matthes, J., Morrison Rios, K., & Schemer, C. (2010). A spiral of silence for some: Attitude certainty and the expression of political minority opinions. Communication Research, 37, 774–800. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365021036268510.1177/0093650210362685Suche in Google Scholar

Miyata, K., Yamamoto, H., & Ogawa, Y. (2015). What affects the spiral of silence and the hard core on Twitter? An analysis of the nuclear power issue in Japan. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(9), 1129–1141. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276421558061810.1177/0002764215580618Suche in Google Scholar

Noelle-Neumann, E. (1973). Return to the concept of powerful mass media. Studies in Broadcasting, 9, 67–112.Suche in Google Scholar

Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence: A theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24(2), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00367.x10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00367.xSuche in Google Scholar

Noelle-Neumann, E. (1993). The spiral of silence: Public opinion, our social skin. University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Pummerer, L., Böhm, R., Lilleholt, L., Winter, K., Zettler, I., & Sassenberg, K. (2020). Conspiracy theories and their societal effects during the COVID-19 pandemic. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 19485506211000217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550621100021710.31234/osf.io/y5grnSuche in Google Scholar

Romer, D., & Jamieson, K. H. (2020). Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of COVID-19 in the US. Social Science & Medicine, 263, 113356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.11335610.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113356Suche in Google Scholar

Salmon, C. T., & Neuwirth, K. (1990). Perceptions of opinion “climates” and willingness to discuss the issue of abortion. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 67, 567–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990900670031210.1177/107769909006700312Suche in Google Scholar

Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J., & Lee, E. (2001). Manipulating the dependent variable in the spiral of silence research. Communication Research, 28, 304–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936500102800300310.1177/009365001028003003Suche in Google Scholar

Sosu, E. M. (2013). The development and psychometric validation of a Critical Thinking Disposition Scale. Thinking skills and creativity, 9, 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.09.00210.1016/j.tsc.2012.09.002Suche in Google Scholar

Šrol, J., Ballová Mikušková, E., & Čavojová, V. (2021). When we are worried, what are we thinking? Anxiety, lack of control, and conspiracy beliefs amidst the COVID‐19 pandemic. Applied cognitive psychology, 35(3), 720–729. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.379810.1002/acp.3798Suche in Google Scholar

Ståhl, T., & van Prooijen, J. W. (2018). Epistemic rationality: Skepticism toward unfounded beliefs requires sufficient cognitive ability and motivation to be rational. Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.10.02610.1016/j.paid.2017.10.026Suche in Google Scholar

Stein, R. A., Ometa, O., Shetty, S. P., Katz, A., Popitiu, M. I., & Brotherton, R. (2021). Conspiracy theories in the era of COVID‐19: A tale of two pandemics. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 75(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.1377810.1111/ijcp.13778Suche in Google Scholar

Sundar, S. S., & Nass, C. (2001). Conceptualizing sources in online news. Journal of Communication, 51(1), 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02872.x10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02872.xSuche in Google Scholar

Tedesco, J. C. (2004). Changing the channel: Use of the internet for communicating about politics. In L. L. Kaid (Ed.), Handbook of political communication research (pp. 525–550). Routledge.10.4324/9781410610584-31Suche in Google Scholar

Tonković, M., Dumančić, F., Jelić, M., & Čorkalo Biruški, D. (2021). Who believes in COVID-19 conspiracy theories in Croatia? Prevalence and predictors of conspiracy beliefs. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 643568. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.64356810.3389/fpsyg.2021.643568Suche in Google Scholar

Ullah, I., Khan, K. S., Tahir, M. J., Ahmed, A., & Harapan, H. (2021). Myths and conspiracy theories on vaccines and COVID-19: Potential effect on global vaccine refusals. Vacunas, 22(2), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacun.2021.01.00110.1016/j.vacun.2021.01.001Suche in Google Scholar

Uscinski, J. E., DeWitt, D., & Atkinson, M. D. (2018). A web of conspiracy? Internet and conspiracy theory. In A. Dyrendal, D. G., Robertson, & E. Asprem (Eds.), Handbook of conspiracy theory and contemporary religion (pp. 106–130). Brill.10.1163/9789004382022_007Suche in Google Scholar

van der Linden, S. (2015). The conspiracy-effect: Exposure to conspiracy theories (about global warming) decreases pro-social behavior and science acceptance. Personality and Individual Differences, 87, 171–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.04510.1016/j.paid.2015.07.045Suche in Google Scholar

van Prooijen, J. W. (2017). Why education predicts decreased belief in conspiracy theories. Applied cognitive psychology, 31(1), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3301.10.1002/acp.3301Suche in Google Scholar

van Prooijen, J. W., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). Belief in conspiracy theories: Basic principles of an emerging research domain. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(7), 897–908. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.253010.1002/ejsp.2530Suche in Google Scholar

van Prooijen, J. W., Klein, O., & Milošević Đorđević, J. (2020). Social-cognitive processes underlying belief in conspiracy theories. In M. Butter & P. Knight (Eds.), Routledge handbook of conspiracy theories (pp. 168–180). Routledge.10.4324/9780429452734-2_2Suche in Google Scholar

van Prooijen, J. W., Krouwel, A. P. M., & Pollet, T. V. (2015). Political extremism predicts belief in conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 570–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/194855061456735610.1177/1948550614567356Suche in Google Scholar

Wadley, J. (January 13, 2022). Mainstream news more reliable than social, alternative media for accurate health information. Michigan News. Retrieved Retrieved January 28, 2022, from https://news.umich.edu/mainstream-news-more-reliable-than-social-alternative-media-for-accurate-health-information/Suche in Google Scholar

Ward, J. K. (2016). Rethinking the antivaccine movement concept: A case study of public criticism of the swine flu vaccine’s safety in France. Social Science & Medicine, 159, 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.05.00310.1016/j.socscimed.2016.05.003Suche in Google Scholar

Wardle, C., & Singerman, E. (2021). Too little, too late: Social media companies’ failure to tackle vaccine misinformation poses a real threat. BMJ, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2610.1136/bmj.n26Suche in Google Scholar

Wood, M. J., & Douglas, K. M. (2015). Online communication as a window to conspiracist worldviews. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 836. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.0083610.3389/fpsyg.2015.00836Suche in Google Scholar

Xiaodong, Y., & Li, L. (2016). Will the spiral of silence spin on social networking sites? An experiment on opinion climate, fear of isolation and outspokenness. China Media Research, 12(1).Suche in Google Scholar