Home Ecological Risk Assessment
Article Publicly Available

Ecological Risk Assessment

  • J.B. Unsworth EMAIL logo and N. Gras
Published/Copyright: March 19, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

As part of the ongoing project “A Global Framework for Implementing Consistent Ecological Risk Assessment for Pesticides for Sustainable Agriculture” (IUPAC project 2014-038-2-600), a 3rd Ecological Risk Assessment Workshop was held in Santiago, Chile on 9-10 May 2015, in conjunction with the 5th Latin American Pesticide Residue Workshop (LAPRW2015). Previous Ecological Risk Assessment Workshops were held in Beijing, China and Bogota, Colombia (see Chem Int 35(6) 20, 2013).

Pesticides are a necessary tool in increasing global food production in order to feed the growing population, however, with their use comes the need to ensure that the ecological impact is kept to a minimum. Many countries include an ecological risk assessment in their registration requirements but as risk assessment is an evolving science it is important, particularly in scientifically emerging regions, that the current best practices are understood and implemented properly.

The aim of the Workshop was, therefore, to present the current thinking on ecological risk assessment and to underline the pros and cons of various approaches. Presentations were made by nine lecturers from industry, academia and government which covered principles of good regulation, regulatory risk assessment, protection goals and their implementation, principles of ecotoxicity testing and international test requirements, exposure assessments, risk characterization and uncertainties in risk estimation, risk mitigation, risk perception, communication and management, implementation and enforcement, risk perception and a “road map” for conducting risk assessments with a guide to incorporating local conditions. The presentations were well-received by the 64 participants coming mainly from Chile but also including participants from Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru and Uruguay. After each presentation, and during breaks in the programme, participants were able to discuss all aspects of ecological risk assessment, including good modelling practices, scenario development and local requirements, in addition they were able to network with the experts present.

Each participant received copies of the presentations and a supplementary guidance document on the development of ecological risk assessments was also made available to them. As with the previous Workshops the participants agreed that much useful information was given which enabled them to better understand the complexities of ecological risk assessment.

Thanks are due to IUPAC, ACS-AGRO and CropLife International for supporting the Workshop.

For further information contact Task Group Chair John Unsworth, <>.

www.iupac.org/project/2014-038-2-600

 Participants at the ERA Workshop, 9-10 May 2015, Santiago, Chile

Participants at the ERA Workshop, 9-10 May 2015, Santiago, Chile

Published Online: 2016-3-19
Published in Print: 2016-3-1

©2016 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Masthead - Full issue pdf
  2. Guest Editorial
  3. Outer Limits: Pushing the Extremities
  4. Contents
  5. Officer’s Column
  6. Secretary General’s Column
  7. Features
  8. The Three-letter Element Symbols:
  9. Procedures for the Naming of a New Element
  10. The Chemical Structure Association Trust
  11. IUPAC Wire
  12. Discovery and Assignment of Elements with Atomic Numbers 113, 115, 117 and 118
  13. Open Data in a Big Data World
  14. UN Secretary General Appoints ICSU Executive Director to Special Advisory Group on the SDGs
  15. Project Place
  16. Company Associates Reengineering Project
  17. Postgraduate Course in Polymer Science, Prague, Czech Republic
  18. Critically Evaluated ESR (EPR) Spectra of Important Polymerization-related Radicals
  19. Which Elements Belong in Group 3 of the Periodic Table?
  20. Making an imPACt
  21. Discovery of the elements with atomic numbers Z = 113, 115 and 117 (IUPAC Technical Report)
  22. Discovery of the element with atomic number Z = 118 completing the 7th row of the periodic table (IUPAC Technical Report)
  23. Glossary of terms used in computational drug design, part II (IUPAC Recommendations)
  24. Standard electrode potentials involving radicals in aqueous solution: inorganic radicals (IUPAC Technical Report)
  25. Maritime pollutants in shipping and commercial European ports based on relevant physical and biogeochemical environmental parameters (IUPAC Technical Report)
  26. Latest Updates from PAC Conferences & More—Brief
  27. IUPAC Provisional Recommendations
  28. Glossary of Terms Used in Developmental and Reproductive Toxicology
  29. How to Name Atoms in Phosphates, Polyphosphates, their Analogues, and Transition State Analogues for Enzyme-catalysed Phosphoryl Transfer Reactions
  30. Comprehensive Definition of Oxidation State
  31. Stamps International
  32. Berzelius and the Chemical Alphabet
  33. Conference Call
  34. Latin American Pesticide Residue Workshop—Food and Environment
  35. Ecological Risk Assessment
  36. Where 2B & Y
  37. New Chemistries for Phytomedicines and Crop Protection Chemicals
  38. Function Through Disorder: Intrinsically Disordered Proteins in Biology and Medicine
  39. Phosphorus Chemistry
  40. Self-assembly in the World of Polymers
  41. Solubility Phenomena
  42. Blood-Biomaterial Interactions
  43. CODATA-RDA School of Research Data Science
  44. 28th National [Turkish] Chemistry Congress with International Participation
  45. The Power of Norms
  46. Selenium Research (Se2017)
  47. Mark Your Calendar
Downloaded on 19.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ci-2016-0225/html
Scroll to top button