Expert versus novice academic writing: a Multi-Dimensional analysis of professional and learner texts in different disciplines

References

Ansarifar, Ahmad, Hesamoddin Shahriari & Reza Pishghadam. 2018. Phrasal complexity in academic writing: A comparison of abstracts written by graduate students and expert writers in applied linguistics. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 31. 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.12.008.Search in Google Scholar

Aull, Laura L. & Zak Lancaster. 2014. Linguistic markers of stance in early and advanced academic writing: A corpus-based comparison. Written Communication 31(2). 151–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088314527055.Search in Google Scholar

Aull, Laura L., Dineth Bandarage & Meredith Richardson Miller. 2017. Generality in student and expert epistemic stance: A corpus analysis of first-year, upper-level, and published academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 26. 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.01.005.Search in Google Scholar

Bazerman, Charles, Joseph Little, Lisa Bethel, Teri Chavkin, Danielle Fouquette & Janet Garufis. 2005. Reference guide to writing across the curriculum. Indiana: Parlor Press.Search in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511621024Search in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas & Bethany Gray. 2016. Grammatical complexity in academic English: Linguistic change in writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511920776Search in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Jesse Egbert & Daniel Keller. 2020. Reconceptualising register in a continuous situational space. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1. 2–36.Search in Google Scholar

Brůhová, Gabriela & Kateriña Vašků. 2021. Lexical bundles ending in that in academic writing by Czech learners and native speakers of English. Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies 30(2). 53–69.10.7311/0860-5734.30.2.03Search in Google Scholar

Conrad, Susan & Douglas Biber. 2001. Introduction: Multi-dimensional analysis and the study of register variation. In Susan Conrad & Douglas Biber (eds.), Variation in English: Multi-dimensional studies, 13–42. London & New York: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Conrad, Susan. 2001. Variation among disciplinary texts: A comparison of textbooks and journal articles in biology and history. In Susan Conrad & Douglas Biber (eds.), Variation in English: Multi-dimensional studies, 94–107. London & New York: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Crosthwaite, Peter. 2016. A longitudinal multidimensional analysis of EAP writing: Determining EAP course effectiveness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 22. 166–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.04.005.Search in Google Scholar

Egbert, Jesse. 2015. Publication type and discipline variation in published academic writing: Investigating statistical interaction in corpus data. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20(1). 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.20.1.01egb.Search in Google Scholar

Egbert, Jesse & Douglas Biber. 2018. Do all roads lead to Rome? Modeling register variation with factor analysis and discriminant analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 14(2). 233–273. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2016-0016.Search in Google Scholar

Gardner, Sheena, Hilary Nesi & Douglas Biber. 2019. Discipline, level, genre: Integrating situational perspectives in a new MD analysis of university student writing. Applied Linguistics 40(4). 646–674. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy005.Search in Google Scholar

Goulart, Larissa. 2021. Register variation in L1 and L2 student writing: A multidimensional analysis. Register Studies 3(1). 115–143. https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.20012.gou.Search in Google Scholar

Gray, Bethany. 2015. Linguistic variation in research articles: When discipline tells only part of the story. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.71Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. 1988. On the language of physical science. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Registers of written English, 162–172. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Hardy, Jack A. & Ute Römer. 2013. Revealing disciplinary variation in student writing: A multi-dimensional analysis of the Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers (MICUSP). Corpora 8(2). 183–207. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2013.0040.Search in Google Scholar

Hardy, Jack A. 2015. Multi-dimensional analysis of academic discourse. In Paul Baker & Tony McEnery (eds.), Corpora and discourse studies, 155–174. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137431738_8Search in Google Scholar

Hewings, Martin & Ann Hewings. 2002. “It is interesting to note that…”: A comparative study of anticipatory ‘it’ in student and published writing. English for Specific Purposes 21(4). 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-4906(01)00016-3.Search in Google Scholar

Ishikawa, Shinichiro. 2019. The ICNALE: The international corpus network of Asian learners of English. http://language.sakura.ne.jp/icnale/ (accessed 25 February 2025).Search in Google Scholar

Jin, Bixi. 2018. A multidimensional analysis of research article discussion sections in the field of chemical engineering. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communications 61(3). 242–256. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpc.2018.2817002.Search in Google Scholar

Kelly-Laubscher, Rosin F., Natashia Muna & Mathilde van der Merwe. 2017. Using the research article as a model for teaching laboratory report writing provides opportunities for development of genre awareness and adoption of new literacy practices. English for Specific Purposes 48. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.05.002.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Jeong Eun & Hosung Nam. 2019. How do textual features of L2 argumentative essays differ across proficiency levels? A multidimensional cross-sectional study. Reading and Writing 32. 2251–2279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09947-6.Search in Google Scholar

Liu, Liming & Lam Li. 2016. Noun phrase complexity in EFL academic writing: A corpus-based study of postgraduate academic writing. Journal of Asia TEFL 13(1). 48–65. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2016.13.1.4.48.Search in Google Scholar

Malá, Markéta. 2022. Hedging like a professional: A corpus-driven approach to interactional metadiscourse in English learner academic writing. In Patterns and variation in English language discourse. 9th Brno conference on linguistics studies in English, 72–86.10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P280-0212-2022-5Search in Google Scholar

Martin, James R. 2013. Embedded literacy: Knowledge as meaning. Linguistics and Education 24(1). 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2012.11.006.Search in Google Scholar

Mu, Congjun. 2021. A multidimensional contrastive analysis of linguistic features between international and local biology journal English research articles. Scientometrics 126(9). 7901–7916. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04102-x.Search in Google Scholar

Nesi, Hilary & Sheena Gardner. 2012. Genres across the disciplines: Student writing in higher education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781009030199Search in Google Scholar

Nesi, Hilary & Sheena Gardner. 2017. Stance in the BAWE corpus: New revelations from Multidimensional Analysis. In Corpus linguistics 2017 conference, 25–28.Search in Google Scholar

Nesi, Hilary, Neil Matheson & Helen Basturkmen. 2017. University literature essays in the UK, New Zealand and the USA: Implications for EAP. New Zealand Studies in Applied Linguistics 23(2). 25–38.Search in Google Scholar

Nini, Andrea. 2015. Multidimensional Analysis Tagger 1.3 – Manual. https://sites.google.com/site/multidimensionaltagger (accessed August 4, 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Nini, Andrea. 2019. The multi-dimensional analysis tagger. In Tony Berber Sardinha & Marcia Veirano Pinto (eds.), Multi-dimensional analysis: Research methods and current issues, 67–94. London & New York: Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781350023857.0012Search in Google Scholar

Omidian, Taha, Anna Siyanova-Chanturia & Douglas Biber. 2021. A new multidimensional model of writing for research publication: An analysis of disciplinarity, intra-textual variation, and L1 versus LX expert writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 53(101020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101020.Search in Google Scholar

Qiu, Xuyan, Yuen Yi Lo & Xing San Teng. 2022. Development of L2 disciplinary literacy: A multidimensional analysis. System 110(102907). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102907.Search in Google Scholar

Russell, David R. 1990. Writing across the curriculum in historical perspective: Toward a social interpretation. College English 52(1). 52–73. https://doi.org/10.2307/377412.Search in Google Scholar

Smirnova, Elizaveta & Svetlana Strinyuk. 2020. Hedges in Russian EAP writing: A corpus-based study of research papers in management. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 9(1). 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1515/jelf-2020-2033.Search in Google Scholar

Staples, Shelley, Jesse Egbert, Douglas Biber & Bethany Gray. 2016. Academic writing development at the university level: Phrasal and clausal complexity across level of study, discipline, and genre. Written Communication 33(2). 149–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088316631527.Search in Google Scholar