Home Does an autonomising scheme contribute to changing university students’ representations of language learning?
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Does an autonomising scheme contribute to changing university students’ representations of language learning?

  • Anne Chateau , Nicolas Molle EMAIL logo and Kossi Seto Yibokou
Published/Copyright: May 13, 2025

Abstract

Since 2018, a language-learning scheme has been specifically designed for first-year students at the University of Lorraine. Its intended objective is to make them aware of the many possibilities, strategies and methodologies to learn languages, other than simply attending classes. Developing learner autonomy and inciting the students to use all the affordances offered to them at our university (e.g.: self-access centres, digital platform) is indeed one of the main aims encouraged by the language centre. In order to study the outcomes and efficiency of such a scheme, we sought to examine the representations (or beliefs as defined by Bidari 2021). These students had regarding language learning when they enter university, and compare them with those after completing the scheme. To reach this objective, the participants were asked to complete a questionnaire before and after the course. The paper first describes the language scheme, which involves a combination of class sessions and self-directed activities, and focuses on the questionnaire to explain its theoretical rationale. The next step of the article is dedicated to the analysis of the obtained data. The results show that, although some of the students already had a ‘positive’ representation of the way they could learn a language, the scheme helped those, whose belief was different, to modify it. Their answers also seem to show some engagement in autonomisation activities. The results are discussed in terms of their pedagogical implications for Language Centres in Higher Education.


Corresponding author: Nicolas Molle, UFR Lansad – Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France, E-mail:

Appendix

Questionnaire[8]

  1. Apprendre une langue est difficile

  2. Pour apprendre une langue, le plus important c’est de parler

  3. Pour apprendre une langue, il faut pratiquer le plus possible

  4. Si j’apprends une langue, c’est pour la parler comme une personne dont c’est la langue (langue maternelle)

  5. On ne peut pas bien apprendre une langue sans rester longtemps dans un pays où elle est parlée

  6. Certaines personnes sont plus douées pour apprendre les langues que d’autres

  7. Pour bien apprendre, il ne faut pas faire d’erreurs

  8. Pour bien connaître une langue, il faut bien en connaître la grammaire

  9. On ne peut pas s’exprimer si on n’a pas les mots justes

  10. Les langues étrangères sont identiques à l’écrit et à l’oral

  11. On n’a qu’une façon de lire quels que soient les textes

  12. Pour chaque mot français, il existe un équivalent en langue étrangère

  13. Pour comprendre, il est nécessaire de traduire

  14. Pour comprendre une conversation, il faut entendre tous les sons

  15. Pour comprendre un texte, il faut déchiffrer tous les mots

  16. Pour apprendre une langue, on a besoin d’un professeur, de préférence quelqu’un dont c’est la langue maternelle

  17. La seule évaluation valable c’est la note

  18. Pour bien apprendre, il faut suivre un cours dans une classe

  19. Seul un enseignant peut évaluer ce qui a été appris

  20. On peut apprendre une langue tout.e seul.e

  21. Il n’y a qu’une seule bonne façon d’apprendre

  22. Vous vous êtes inscrit(e) à un/des services ‘EDOlang’ ce semestre ?[9]

  23. Au cours du semestre, vous avez utilisé des ressources proposées par EDOlang ?[10]

References

Banze, Jacinto Cipriano Junior. 2015. Rôles du locuteur natif en apprentissage autodirigé: analyses de conversations natif/non natif à distance, dans un dispositif de formation en Français Langue Étrangère. Thèse de doctorat: Université de Lorraine.Search in Google Scholar

Bernat, Eva. 2006. Assessing EAP learners’ beliefs about language learning in the Australian context. Asian EFL Journal 8(2). 202–227.Search in Google Scholar

Bernat, Eva & Inna Gvozdenko. 2005. Beliefs About language learning: Current knowledge, pedagogical implications, and new research directions. Tesl-ej 9(1). 1–21.Search in Google Scholar

Bidari, Samikshya. 2021. Beliefs about language learning inventory: A brief review. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation 4(7). 221–224.10.32996/ijllt.2021.4.7.22Search in Google Scholar

Carette, Emmanuelle & Maria Giovanna Tassinari. 2019. Enhancing autonomy in self-access language centres: Experiences, reflections, new directions. Mélanges CRAPEL 40(1). 1–135.Search in Google Scholar

Castellotti, Véronique & Danièle Moore. 2002. Social representations of languages and teaching. Guide for the development of Language education policies in Europe. In From linguistic diversity to plurilingual education – reference study. Language Policy Division. Directorate of School, Out-of-School and Higher Education. DGIV. Council of Europe, Strasbourg. https://rm.coe.int/0900001680872d02.Search in Google Scholar

Chateau, Anne. 2012. Représentations d’apprenants dans un dispositif d’apprentissage auto-dirigé. Synergies France 9. 75–89.Search in Google Scholar

Chateau, Anne & Nicolas Molle. 2023. Institutionalised autonomisation of language learning in a French language centre. Language Learning in Higher Education 13(1). 231–245. https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2023-2013.Search in Google Scholar

Chateau, Anne & Maria Giovanna Tassinari. 2021. Autonomy in language centres: Myth or reality? Language Learning in Higher Education 11(1). 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2021-2002.Search in Google Scholar

Council of Europe. 2021. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dam, Leni. 2018. Learners as researchers of their own language learning: Examples from an autonomy classroom. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal 9(3).10.37237/090303Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Alan. 2004. The native speaker in applied linguistics. In Alan Davies & Catherine Elder (eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics, 431–450. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.10.1002/9780470757000.ch17Search in Google Scholar

Holec, Henri. 1981. Autonomy and foreign language learning. Pergamon. First published 1979. Council of Europe. Oxford/New York: Pergamon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Horwitz, Elaine K. 1988. The beliefs about language learning of beginning university foreign language students. The Modern Language Journal 72(3). 283–294. https://doi.org/10.2307/327506.Search in Google Scholar

Horwitz, Elaine K. 1999. Cultural and situational influences on foreign language learners’ beliefs about language learning: A review of BALLI studies. System 27(4). 557–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0346-251x(99)00050-0.Search in Google Scholar

Little, David. 1991. Learner autonomy 1: Definitions, issues and problems. Dublin: Authentik. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259874253_Learner_Autonomy_1_Definitions_Issues_and_Problems.Search in Google Scholar

Little, David, Leni Dam & Lienhard Legenhausen. 2017. Language learner autonomy: Theory, practice and research. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781783098606Search in Google Scholar

Long, Michael H. 2001. Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In N. Candlin Christopher & Neil Mercer (eds.), English language teaching in its social context: A reader, 180–190. London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Maetz, Isabelle. 2017. Les parcours et la réussite en Licence, Licence professionnelle et Master à l’université. L’état de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche en France 10.Search in Google Scholar

Riley, Phillip. 1989. Learners’ representations of language and language learning. Mélanges Pédagogiques du CRAPEL. 65–72.Search in Google Scholar

Saleh, Amany & Krishna Bista. 2017. Examining factors impacting online survey response rates in educational research: Perceptions of graduate students. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation 13(29). 63–74. https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v13i29.487.Search in Google Scholar

Uysal, Hacer Hande & Mehmet Bardakci. 2014. Teacher beliefs and practices of grammar teaching: Focusing on meaning, form, or forms? South African Journal of Education 34(1). https://doi.org/10.15700/201412120943.Search in Google Scholar

Van Mol, Christof. 2016. Improving web survey efficiency: The impact of an extra reminder and reminder content on web survey response. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 20(4). 317–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1185255.Search in Google Scholar

Vyatkina, Nina. 2024. Focus on meaning and form for advancing proficiency: The case of a multimedia online German course. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/tger.12289.Search in Google Scholar

Yibokou, Kossi Seto. 2024. Quelles influences de l’apprentissage informel de l’anglais sur la perception et la prononciation des apprenants français ? In Beatrice Vaxelaire, Fabrice Marsac, Safa Chebil & Georsges Kleiber (eds.), Perception, parole et apprentissages, Vol. 2, 141–158. Mons: Éditions du CIPA.Search in Google Scholar

Yibokou, Kossi Seto. 2023. Influence of television series on pronunciation. In Denyze Toffoli, Geoffrey Sockett & Meryl Kusyk (eds.), Language learning and leisure : Informal language learning in the digital age, 121–139. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110752441-006Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Haiyu. 2021. The term ‘Native Speaker’: Myth or reality? Acceptable or problematic? Nuanced Garbling: The Journal of LING—the University of Melbourne Linguistics Student Society Issue 1.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-11-29
Accepted: 2025-03-03
Published Online: 2025-05-13
Published in Print: 2025-05-26

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Introduction
  3. Integration, collaboration, friendship as core messages for younger generations
  4. Research Articles
  5. Research practice and culture in European universities’ Language Centres. Results of a survey in CercleS member institutions
  6. Language practices in the work communities of Finnish Language Centres
  7. Fostering transparency: a critical introduction of generative AI in students’ assignments
  8. Expert versus novice academic writing: a Multi-Dimensional analysis of professional and learner texts in different disciplines
  9. Raising language awareness to foster self-efficacy in pre-professional writers of English as a Foreign Language: a case study of Czech students of Electrical Engineering and Informatics
  10. Does an autonomising scheme contribute to changing university students’ representations of language learning?
  11. Investigating the relationship between self-regulated learning and language proficiency among EFL students in Vietnam
  12. Students’ perspectives on Facebook and Instagram ELT opportunities: a comparative study
  13. Designing a scenario-based learning framework for a university-level Arabic language course
  14. Washback effects of the Portuguese CAPLE exams from Chinese university students and teachers’ perspectives: a mixed-methods study
  15. Students’ perception of the impact of (meta)linguistic knowledge on learning German
  16. Language policy in Higher Education of Georgia
  17. Activity Reports
  18. Intercomprehension and collaborative learning to interact in a plurilingual academic environment
  19. Teaching presentation skills through popular science: an opportunity for a collaborative and transversal approach to ESP teaching
  20. Japanese kana alphabet retention through handwritten reflection cards
  21. Decolonising the curriculum in Japanese language education in the UK and Europe
Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cercles-2024-0104/html
Scroll to top button