Home From face-to-face tuition to online classes: ‘Re-styling’ a course of English for academic purposes
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

From face-to-face tuition to online classes: ‘Re-styling’ a course of English for academic purposes

  • Anila R. Scott-Monkhouse EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 17, 2023

Abstract

With the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic and the ensuing total lockdown in 2020, the EAP course for STEM doctoral students at Parma University (Italy) was suddenly forced to online delivery, like many courses in academic institutions worldwide. Confined at home and with no previous experience in remote teaching, the teacher had to redesign the course and rethink strategies and techniques in a matter of days and with little material at hand. The aim was to maintain the interactivity of the face-to-face course and consolidate the group dynamics of a course that had yet to start. As online teaching took centre stage, the teacher and students alike were confronted with didactic issues stemming from the restyling of a traditionally highly interactive course based on face-to-face tuition, and technical problems, which added to the emotional and psychological factors related to an unknown, unexpected situation. In addition to soft skills, students from different academic backgrounds needed to develop productive rather than receptive language skills, so activities focused mainly on collaborative tasks to develop writing and speaking modes but did not concentrate on academic language only. This paper shares insights into the experience of being ‘thrown in at the deep end’, and attempts to highlight the elements which contributed to its overall positive outcome, the strong social connotation it came to bear, the development of class dynamics, and the learning points that emerged. It also hopes to provide some practical suggestions which can add to the creative solutions found by (language) teachers globally.


Corresponding author: Anila R. Scott-Monkhouse, Department of Engineering and Architecture, University of Parma, Parma, Italy, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful to prof. Stefano Caselli, director of the doctoral school of Engineering and Architecture, for his precious teaching tips and constant support. She would also like to thank all those in the IT Engineering Unit who provided practical help and advice at a time when they were overloaded with requests, in particular prof. Armando Vannucci.

Appendix

Some of the comments made by the students are presented here. Some are taken from the anonymous Google form, others from the end-of-course Token of Appreciation and/or Exit Ticket assignments.

  1. “I think the course is very well structured for being an online course: it is hard to make people interact in an online course. I liked the structure: I think that the idea to have a break in the middle of the class in which we had time to prepare our assignments was perfect for our attention and for our work.”

  2. I liked the way the course was structured […] it challenged me to meet deadlines, which is very useful. It was very demanding, however with the exact time to develop all activities. It is based on academic purposes, but we can bring all learned knowledges to our personal and professional life.”

  3. “I really appreciated the fact that we were asked multiple time to be the reviewer of other’s work. I think that it helped me to think consciously not only about the work I was reviewing, but also about my work and how I could improve it the next time.”

  4. “I really did not expect to like to assess other work as much as I did. And also I did not imagine it, to be this useful to improve my work. But the first assignment in which we had to act as assessors, was really difficult, and I did not particularly liked it, then, little by little, as we had more and more assessors work to do, I started to feel more confident in it and to appreciate how it made me actively reflect on what are the things that I mostly appreciate in a work, and how to implement them to improve myself. Also, for the same reason, I found very useful the simulated conferences. Seeing different approaches to a similar task was very interesting and I gained some ideas to implement in my future presentations!”

  5. “For sure I gained a lot of confidence in talking to people in a languages that is different from my mother tongue. Also, I learned to assess my work (and others’ work too) better and to manage my time better, both for the assignments we were given in the lesson break and for the presentations we had to give. My favorite part of the course was when we were put in breakout rooms to work in teams. That is very important to me because it totally simulates how things are being done professionally at the level of organisations, companies, etc.”

  6. “What have I learned from the course? Brain storming approach to writing (doing it right now). I feel I can walk into a conference knowing what to expect. I liked the tasks that made us focus on: definitions, explaining a procedure, what is an abstract, and similar. I felt comfortable doing before (I guess/I hope), but it made me reflect in these things, e.g. What is an abstract?”

  7. “If I think of an object that could symbolize what I have taken from this course, I think it could be a puzzle. We have different backgrounds, different stories, we are like pieces of various colours. With the great help of [the teacher], we have managed somehow to form together a greater picture, different but still linked to any one of us. It is beautiful to learn how people that don’t know each other can reach common goals while enjoying the process. I think I have learned many things from this puzzle.”

  8. “The pandemic has not allowed us to know each other personally but has allowed us to “live” an unforgettable virtual experience. I have never seen your face because of connection problems that not always allowed us to activate our videos. However, through the “fearsome” breakout rooms, I know your favourite objects, your study topic, and your fears/hopes about English. Thanks to the many “completed missions” such as the participation in your interesting presentations, the abstracts read, the LinkedIn profiles you wrote and much more, I was able to learn a lot about you and I hope you about me. Thank you again for this wonderful experience and I hope to meet you soon.”

  9. “I believe I will miss the Study Skills Course because it has represented an interactive and social moment in a very difficult time, like the lockdown. Wednesday and Friday sessions were a fixed engagement which enabled us to distract, besides the possibility to improve our English. I appreciated the commitment and the constancy of all my colleagues in delivering every task with punctuality and accuracy.”

  10. “I want to thank you all for sharing this path together. During this period of isolation, being together in class allowed us to feel less alone and to meet new people.”

  11. “The course has given to us the opportunity to share a lot of things. I am very grateful to be part of this course, but specifically I enjoyed so much the part of the Breakout Rooms when I spoke with a partner. I felt that we were not only doing our task, but we were sharing experiences. I remember in particular the talking with Lorenzo, Martina and Stefania, in which always there was something more than the simple task of the day. We talked about our current work, but also about our past experiences. I felt connected with others, even if we are far away from each other and in a difficult situation.”

  12. In his Token of appreciation one Iranian student explained how important the emotional support from the course was: “The English skills course started on the same day that I was sick. I sent a message in the break-up time of the session to [the teacher] and she replied to my email warmly. Due to my sickness, I was losing my interest to pursue this course and I wanted to drop out of this program, however, her positive attitude dissuaded me from doing so. I don’t know, maybe if the context of the letter was different [sic], I would have made a different decision. Thank you, [teacher] for doing it well. You and all of the students provided a good vibe to see and follow all the English study sessions.”

  13. During the course one Brazilian student had to actually present in a conference which had been transferred online (https://iceis.scitevents.org/?y=2020, accessed 8 November 2022). The previous day he sent an email to the teacher saying “Tomorrow I have to deliver a presentation in a Congress using Zoom, at 13 h (Italy time zone). If you wish, you can send the link to my classmates to learn about it (a real case). The Zoom link is this […], and the password is […].” The teacher and a few of his course mates attended his presentation and in the afternoon he wrote to the teacher again: “I am so happy with your presence at my presentation (I also noticed that Valentina and Silvia were there for a brief period of time). Before starting, I had some problems when I shared my screen, so they decided to stream a backup file (my internet connection did not help me in this moment). Thus, I was a little apprehensive about the questions, but after the first one, I was a little bit more calm, and everything went well). By the way, the room’s Chair was very kind and interested person, I am so happy to deliver this presentation. I am also so glad to hear your suggestion (it is a very important one) [*]. I will do this in my final year presentation and in my lesson presentation. Once again, thank you very much! Your class has been very important for my learning and your care for the students motivates me to always do the same.”

[*The teacher had given positive comments on the presentation as regards timing, slides and delivery, but commented on the fact that the conclusion had appeared to be a little too abrupt and needed improving].

References

Ackerley, Katherine. 2006. Collaborative learning through computer conferencing and distance learning language courses. In Maria Giuseppa Lo Duca, Fiona Dalziel & Daniela Griggio (eds.), IL C.L.A. verso l’Europa: e-Learning, testing, portfolio delle lingue (IL C.L.A. per le lingue straniere, esperienze e prospettive 4), 51–63. Padova: CLEUP.Search in Google Scholar

Aris, Nooraslinda Abdul. 2020. ‘Panicgogy’ effect during COVID-19 pandemic on student empowerment. FACT periodicals. https://accountancy.uitm.edu.my/index.php/en/research-ican/fact-periodicals/62-2020-may/143-panicgogy-effect-during-covid-19-pandemic-on-student-empowerment (accessed 6 November 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Kelly J. 2020. Panic-Gogy: A conversation with sean michael morris. National Teaching and Learning Forum 29(4). 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1002/ntlf.30239.Search in Google Scholar

Berg, Essy Cathrine. 1999. The effects of trained peer response on ESL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing 8(3). 215–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1060-3743(99)80115-5.Search in Google Scholar

Bergman, Jon, Jerry Overmyer & Brett Wilie. 2011. The flipped class: Myths vs. reality. The Daily Riff. https://kmtrosclair.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/the-flipped-class-myths-vs-reality-the-daily-riff-be-smarter-about-education.pdf (accessed 18 June 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Bonanomi, Andrea, Federica Facchin, Serena Barello & Daniela Villani. 2021. Prevalence and health correlates of online fatigue: a cross-sectional study on the Italian academic community during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS ONE 16(10). e0255181.10.1371/journal.pone.0255181Search in Google Scholar

Bosch, Gundula. 2018. Train PhD students to be thinkers not just specialists. Nature 544. 277. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-01853-1.Search in Google Scholar

Caburlotto, Filippo. 2001. La chat come strumento didattico. In.It 2(3). 15–16.Search in Google Scholar

Caplan, Nigel. 2021. How remote learning changed online learning. https://nigelcaplan.com/2021/03/14/how-remote-learning-changed-online-learning/ (accessed 18 October 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Council of Europe. 2018. CEFR-CV – Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment companion volume with new descriptors. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing. https://rm.coe.int/cefr-companion-volume-with-new-descriptors-2018/1680787989 (Accessed 23 August 2023).Search in Google Scholar

de Guerrero, María C. M. & Olga S. Villamil. 2000. Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal 84(1). 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00052.Search in Google Scholar

Dhawan, Shivangi. 2020. Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems 49. 5–22.10.1177/0047239520934018Search in Google Scholar

Di Pietro, Giorgio. 2017. The academic impact of natural disasters: Evidence from the L’aquila earthquake. Education Economics 26(1). 62–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2017.1394984.Search in Google Scholar

East, Martin. 2022. Mediating innovation through language teacher education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781009127998Search in Google Scholar

Gokhale, Anuradha A. 1995. Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology Education 7(1). 22–30. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v7i1.a.2.Search in Google Scholar

Gruber, Alice & Elwira Bauer. 2020. Fostering interaction in synchronous online class sessions with foreign language learners. In Richard E. Ferding, Emily Baumgartner, Richard Hartshorne, Regina Kaplan-Rakowski & Chrystalla Mouze (eds.), Teaching, technology and teacher education during the Covid-19 pandemic: stories from the field., 175–178. AACE (Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education).Search in Google Scholar

Guth, Sarah. 2006. Writing for PhD students: A distance e-learning course in academic writing. In Maria Giuseppa Lo Duca, Fiona Dalziel & Daniela Griggio (eds.), IL C.L.A. verso l’Europa: e-Learning, testing, portfolio delle lingue (IL C.L.A. per le lingue straniere, esperienze e prospettive 4), 321–333. Padova: CLEUP.Search in Google Scholar

Haythornthwaite, Caroline. 2002. Building social networks via computer networks: Creating and sustaining distributed learning communities. In K. Ann Renninger & Wesley Schumar (eds.), Building virtual communities: Learning and change in cyberspace, 159–190. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511606373.011Search in Google Scholar

Hodges, Charles, Stephanie Moore, Barb Lockee, Torrey Trust & Aaron Bond. 2020. The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning (accessed 22 October 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Houlden, Shandell & Veletsianos George. 2020. Coronavirus pushes universities to switch to online classes – but are they ready? The conversation. https://theconversation.com/coronaviruspushes-universities-toswitch-to-online-classes-but-arethey-ready-132728 (accessed 16 October 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Houston, Don, Luanna H. Meyer & Shelley Paewai. 2006. Academic staff workloads and job satisfaction: Expectations and values in academe. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 28(1). 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800500283734.Search in Google Scholar

Hrastinski, Stefan. 2008. Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educause Quarterly 31(4). 51–55.Search in Google Scholar

IVE (Innovating Vocational Education). 2018. Flipped classroom in practice. FlipIT! Flipped Classroom in the European Vocational Education Erasmus+ Project. https://www.flipit.hu/sites/default/files/Public/partner_files/flipped_classrom_in_practice_en.pdf (accessed 23 October 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, Brad & Hal Bowman. 2021. Dear teacher. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781003125280Search in Google Scholar

Kamenetz, Anya. 2020. ‘Panic-gogy’: Teaching online classes during the Coronavirus pandemic. New York Public Radio. https://www.wnyc.org/story/panic-gogy-teaching-online-classes-during-the-coronavirus-pandemic/ (accessed 6 November 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Kane, Cheryl. 2018. Peer-teaching methods in the classroom. Independence IATEFL LASIG 74. 15–18.Search in Google Scholar

Kostopoulou, Stergiani & Fergus O’Dwyer. 2021. “We learn from each other”: Peer review writing practices in English for academic purposes. In Carmen Argondizzo and Gillian Mansfield (eds.), Language learning in higher education, vol. 11, 67–91. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/cercles-2021-2006Search in Google Scholar

La Maestra, Sebastiano, Angelo Abbondandolo & Silvio De Flora. 2020. Epidemiological trends of COVID-19 epidemic in Italy over March 2020: From 1,000 to 100,000 cases. Journal of Medical Virology 92(10). 1956–1961. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25908.Search in Google Scholar

Liang, Mei-Ya. 2010. Using synchronous online peer response groups in EFL writing: Revision-related discourse. Language, Learning and Technology 14(1). 45–64.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Andrew. 2020. How to optimise online learning in the age of Coronavirus. UNSW Newsroom. https://newsroom.unsw.edu.au/news/social-affairs/how-optimise-online-learning-age-coronavirus (accessed 22 October 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Nunan, David. 1988. The learner-centred curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524506Search in Google Scholar

Rapanta, Crysi, Luca Botturi, Peter Goodyear, Lourdes Guàrdia & Marguerite Koole. 2020. Online university teaching during and after the covid-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Science Education 2. 923–945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y.Search in Google Scholar

Savery, John R. 2005. [fall]. BE VOCAL: Characteristics of successful online instructors. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning 4(2). 141–152.Search in Google Scholar

Scott-Monkhouse, Anila R. 2023. Peer reviewing in writing: An ongoing activity. Humanising Language Teaching 25(3). https://www.hltmag.co.uk/jun23/peer-reviewing-in-writing (Accessed 15 June 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Scott-Monkhouse, Anila R., Michal Tal & Maria Yelenevskaya. 2021. International teleconferences in EGAP courses: Preparing students for prospective professional situations. Language Learning in Higher Education, vol. 11, 15–32. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/cercles-2021-2003Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, Wilson, Jane. 2016. Brightening the mind: The impact of practicing gratitude on focus and resilience in learning. The Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 16(4). 1–13. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v16i4.19998.Search in Google Scholar

Terada, Youki. 2020. 5 research-backed tips to improve your online teaching presence. Edutopia. https://www.edutopia.org/article/5-research-backed-tips-improve-your-online-teaching-presence (accessed 16 October 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Valazza, Gerardo. 2006. Process or product? English Teaching Professional 44. 29.Search in Google Scholar

Walker, Tim. 2020. Social-emotional learning should be priority during COVID-19 crisis. NEA Today. https://www.nea.org/advocating-for-change/new-from-nea/social-emotional-learning-should-be-priority-during-covid-19 (accessed 6 November 2022).Search in Google Scholar

WHO (World Health Organization). Date n.a. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019 (accessed 18 January 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Zemach, Dorothy. 2007. The process of learning process writing. Essential Teacher 4(1). 12–13.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-11-20
Accepted: 2023-06-15
Published Online: 2023-10-17
Published in Print: 2023-10-26

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Introduction
  3. Introduction: the variety of realities of language learning and teaching in Higher Education throughout the world. A step forward to keep on sharing ideas
  4. Research Articles
  5. Model United Nations: a thematic analysis of Japanese EFL students’ reflections on intercultural communicative competence
  6. Japanese tertiary students’ perceptions of group work with explicit scaffolding
  7. A critical literacy class: beyond English learning and teaching in Higher Education
  8. Predictors of English Medium Instruction academic success in Vietnamese Higher Education
  9. University English-medium instruction in Türkiye – what instructors say
  10. Testing English for Medical Purposes: the effects of traditional and distance education on learning outcomes
  11. Using corpora in teaching vocabulary to advanced EFL learners in a higher education context
  12. Digital multimodal PechaKucha presentations in ESP: insights from students’ learning experiences
  13. From face-to-face tuition to online classes: ‘Re-styling’ a course of English for academic purposes
  14. Turning the tables on online exam cheating via language mediation tasks
  15. Attitudes to Spanish language variation. A study on Portuguese students of Spanish as a Foreign Language
  16. “Mur de paroles” – ou tentative de promotion de l’expression orale en langue française
  17. Activity Reports
  18. « Being plurilingual is a gift we make to ourselves. » : amener les étudiants à valoriser et développer leurs compétences plurilingues et pluriculturelles
  19. International collaborative tasks in language courses for engineers integrated in a multidimensional teaching format
  20. Training citizens as users of languages and digital technology. Real-world tasks to tame the digital wilds
Downloaded on 25.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cercles-2023-2026/html
Scroll to top button