Abstract
The field of language learning has undergone considerable changes with the emergence of new technologies. This digitalization process has led us to reconsider the format of our language courses and has subsequently had an impact on course design, the teacher’s role as well as the student’s role. Language courses at the Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm (KTH) aim to prepare students for their future professional lives and have a strong focus on language for specific purposes (LSP). Our experience has shown that a blended learning course design as well as student-owned learning are especially well suited for these language courses. In this report, we wish to present a multi-dimensional course-design which provides several pedagogical added values by combining three dimensions of teaching and learning; online/face-to-face, synchronous/asynchronous and teacher-led/student-owned. We will illustrate the combination of the three dimensions by presenting how we have integrated international collaborative activities in French and German courses for engineers. Collaborative online international learning projects (COIL) are well suited for our teaching model as they combine online meetings with asynchronous work and are typically a student-owned activity. As a virtual mobility experience, this activity assists students in creating a global engineer profile by emphasizing collaboration and developing intercultural and multilingual competence.
1 Introduction
We are in a period of change, characterized both in terms of globalization, as the world is becoming more interconnected, and change in terms of digitalization, as we have transitioned into the digital age. To embrace these changes, we need a more holistic approach to engineering education which integrates broader skills, that is, not only technical and engineering skills, but also skills as leadership and communication, cooperation ability and teamwork as well as intercultural mindset and intercultural communication competences. Understanding diversity and operating in intercultural environments are key elements since future engineers will work in multilingual, multicultural and multidisciplinary environments. Moreover, global teams and hybrid work have become prevalent in numerous workplaces. The action of working globally and digitally requires a certain skillset. Language and communication departments at technical universities can equip students with the necessary skills to navigate the international arena in their future professional lives. By providing virtual mobility experiences, through internationalization at home and by teaching relevant skills, the role of these departments has shifted from “preparing to” to “doing”. Whereas virtual exchanges may have been a substitute for physical travel during the first phase of the pandemic, they can now claim to have a right on their own, providing possibilities for students to work in multilingual teams in hybrid work environments.
The integration of collaborative tasks in our language courses provides a learning environment that meets the requirements of today’s working life.
2 A multidimensional-format – why?
Language courses at the Royal Institute of Technology of Stockholm, KTH, have a strong focus on language for specific purposes (LSP), preparing students to use language in future globalized workplaces in the field of engineering. These courses are elective outside the curricula. Even though this means that the students who choose these courses are very motivated, it also means an extra workload on top of the rest of the curricula as they take these courses alongside their engineering programs. Classes are often held in the evenings and with a few teaching hours per week and an intensive syllabus. To meet the constraints of extra workload and schedule issues, and at the same time maintain the students’ engagement, we have integrated virtual mobility experiences into the language courses. By doing so we want to provide engaging and flexible learning and teaching formats that enable students to practice skills for an international and hybrid work environment. Moreover, the field of language learning has gone through considerable changes with the emergence of new technologies, endless resources available on the Internet and machine translation tools. This constant and instant range of online possibilities is another aspect we have considered when rethinking the format of our language courses which has subsequently had an impact on the course design, especially the teacher’s versus the student’s role.
Rethinking the design of our courses has thus led to a multi-dimensional teaching and learning format. This course-design provides several pedagogical added values and creates a blended learning environment, which enables international collaborative activities as a virtual mobility experience.
2.1 The three dimensions
Our language courses actively combine three dimensions of teaching and learning: online/face-to-face, synchronous/asynchronous as well as student-owned/teacher-led learning. The combination of online and face-to-face teaching is often referred to as blended learning, meaning that some classes are physical meetings taking place on campus and others are online meetings in a digital environment. It integrates both in-person classroom interaction and digital resources to enhance the learning experience. In a blended learning environment, students may engage in online modules, virtual discussions, or multimedia presentations outside of the classroom, while also attending physical classes for group work, direct instruction, or hands-on activities.
A practical implementation of the synchronous and asynchronous dimension is known as the flipped classroom, and includes scheduled activities taking place during a class, as well as tasks that can be performed prior to and/or following a class. These activities can encompass preparatory assignments or the practical application of acquired knowledge. This means that students can prepare for a discussion or group work prior to a class, or they can deepen the knowledge they have acquired after a synchronous session. The blended learning approach, with the possibility to work online and asynchronously, is particularly suited to the flipped classroom. Preparatory tasks free up time for interaction exercises during the synchronous session – less time needs to be spent on e.g., introducing vocabulary and activities after the synchronous session are a good way to deepen and consolidate knowledge. The third dimension, student-owned/teacher-led learning refers to teaching led by a teacher versus activities where students take more responsibility for planning and implementation of an activity. Student ownership is usually seen as the last step in a learning process, where the student can apply the new knowledge in a broader context (National Institute for excellence in teaching 2022). Student-owned activities can take advantage of the huge availability of online material, i.e., videos, apps, interactive websites, and benefit from the possibilities of exposure online to the target language.
A combination of these dimensions enables a wide range of activities and the use of different learning strategies. Figure 1 illustrates examples of activities in different combinations of teaching formats. Each learning dimension suits specific activities. As an illustration, a language tandem is an example of an asynchronous, student-owned, online activity. Effective use of these teaching and learning-dimensions provides several pedagogical advantages: a holistic approach, individualization, contextual learning, engagement, and flexibility.

Activities in the different teaching and learning formats.
2.2 Pedagogical benefits
2.2.1 Holistic approach
The variety of learning and teaching formats provided by a multidimensional teaching model enables a holistic approach which enhances the training of various skills e.g., listening, spoken production and interaction, reading and writing, teamwork, collaboration, intercultural communication. Different instructional formats are better suited for training different specific skills thereby giving the students the optimal conditions for training a comprehensive range of skills.
2.2.2 Individualization
The combination of synchronous/asynchronous tasks along with online/face-to-face tasks enables a higher degree of individualization. Students can process materials at their own pace, prepare for online/face-to-face meetings and fully engage in content of their choosing. This can free time for the teacher, which for example can be used for qualitative feedback. Moreover, this flexibility can meet the needs of different learning profiles (Lust et al. 2013).
2.2.3 Contextual learning (internationalization, language in a professional context)
Online teaching and student-owned learning provide the best prerequisites for international collaborative projects and virtual visits. These can include ‘study-visits’ to companies or institutions or a digital presentation by an external guest. These activities enable us to integrate LSP naturally into the course syllabus. These contextual learning experiences are social and contextual, which has shown to lead to deeper learning: “Research shows that educational experiences that are active, social, contextual, engaging, and student-owned lead to deeper learning” (Cornell University 2022).
2.2.4 Engagement
Blended learning, as well as the use of synchronous and asynchronous activities, increases student engagement (Heilporn et al. 2021).
Learning processes are described as continuous processes from student-engagement (to do and to understand) to student-ownership, where students take responsibility and lead their own learning processes. The teacher’s role shifts from teacher-led teaching to a role as a “facilitator” and later “co-facilitator”, giving more and more space and responsibility to the students (National Institute for excellence in teaching 2022).
2.2.5 Flexibility
A flexible course design meets the needs of our students that take a language course as an elective course in addition to their technical education. Students have the flexibility to align their language-learning activities with the demands of their technical program, enabling them to distribute the workload effectively (Jost et al. 2021).
3 Collaborative online international learning – an example of a multidimensional learning activity
Collaborative online international learning (COIL) is well suited for our teaching model, COIL projects combining online meetings with asynchronous work, which is typically a student-owned activity. COIL is also an excellent opportunity to integrate LSP in a natural way in a language course when students work together with students from technical universities in other countries, in the target language. Engaging in this activity facilitates the development of a global engineering profile among students, highlighting the importance of collaboration. It prepares student to work in hybrid work environments, including the use of digital modes of communication. Additionally, it develops intercultural and multilingual competence in an authentic communication situation (language through content learning). All these aspects foster student engagement and successful learning. As teachers, our role in this context is that of a facilitator and coordinator. This entails offering a framework of required knowledge, organizing the activity, and providing support, such as assisting with the preparation of presentations or texts.
We have integrated the COIL projects in the French and German courses for engineers that we will describe in the following sections.
3.1 Collaborative activities French–English
Collaboration has been established with CentraleSupélec in Paris and integrated into the French B1 and French B2 courses, for KTH-students, and advanced English, for CS students.
In the B1-course, students conducted a comparative study of the educational systems and student life in the two countries (courses, schedule, costs, perspectives on the future). They presented the results orally with graphs and charts where the specific vocabulary could be reused. In the B2-course students chose a research question in subjects such as environment, energy, inventions, and SDG. The projects led to oral group presentations as well as individual reflective reports, where comments and reflections of intercultural matters could be lifted.
These collaborative activities are typically student-oriented and student-owned as the students have the freedom to organize and plan online meetings, the use of both languages, the subject and the choice of a research question. The teacher acts as a facilitator and the focus is on LSP. It is also an opportunity to train multilingual and intercultural skills enhanced by contextual learning in authentic situations.
3.2 Collaborative activities German–Swedish
In the German-courses (students at levels B1, B2) the Swedish students collaborate with German students from the Technical University in Munich. They work together in small groups on topics such as sustainability, technical products or technical developments. The teacher acts here as a facilitator – the task is formulated widely; the students choose their focus and organize their meetings and work on their own. By working together, they must use vocabulary and expressions belonging to the technical field. Furthermore, they train discussion- and negotiation skills in the target language – a true possibility for contextual learning and focus on LSP. This collaboration gives students the opportunity to solve problems and interact with students from another country and cultural environment. Organising the meetings, working on the common assignment, but also getting to know each other and learning about each other’s university environment and studies make this a holistic learning experience.
4 Forward-looking language teaching tailored to meet the needs of engineering students
Online teaching and a willingness to change the teaching methods at universities is increasing markedly, not least after the pandemic (Heilporn et al. 2021). Many universities offer programs and courses online, develop and present online teaching as an integral part of their activities. The same applies to language courses. Online-teaching is also a key element of KTH’s vision and the Department of Learning in Engineering Sciences at KTH is working with the development of digital learning tools to support learning and education. At the European level, the ECML (European Centre for Modern Languages), in collaboration with the European Commission, launched an initiative regarding the impact of the pandemic on language learning and explores the benefits of lasting changes in the teaching and learning of languages (Council of Europe ECML/CELV 2022).
Our experience has shown that a blended learning course design as well as student-owned learning are especially well suited for meeting the needs of our students as they provide flexibility, variety and prepare the students to actively use the language. COIL activities give students opportunities to be creators and to have an active role in their learning, due to the fact that they learn by solving real-life problems. These activities support virtual mobility, have a transnational perspective, as well as enhance the use of LSP. COIL activities fit into and benefit very well from the multidimensional teaching format since they include online activity and a combination of student owned work, both individual and in a group.
Our teaching format, including various dimensions and COIL activities, responds to the ongoing process of digitalization in Higher Education and the demands of skills that our students will meet in professional life. It is further a reflection of today’s workplaces, where synchronous versus asynchronous or face-to-face versus online work is a reality. In this way, language learning has adjusted to the changed reality.
4.1 Work in progress and conclusive remarks
To further develop and optimize our teaching, we intend to investigate the students’ learning in the various dimensions of our teaching model, i.e., what the students learn and how they receive optimal training in the different teaching formats. By doing so, we also want to better understand which activities in which of the learning dimensions best support the various pedagogical advantages. We are now conducting a quantitative and qualitative analysis based on a survey and in-depth interviews with students.
In our teaching, we intend to maximize the advantages offered by the various dimensions. We see the opportunities that blended learning gives and believe that, in combination with synchronous/asynchronous as well as teacher-led/student-owned activities, it will provide the conditions for creating engaging, context-based and forward-looking language teaching.
References
Cornell University. 2022. Center of teaching innovation. In Collaborative learning https://teaching.cornell.edu/teaching-resources/active-collaborative-learning/collaborative-learning Collaborative Learning | Center for Teaching Innovation (cornell.edu) (accessed 13 November 2022).Search in Google Scholar
Council of Europe (ECML/CELV). 2020. The future of language education in the light of Covid. https://www.ecml.at/ECML-Programme/Programme2020-2023/Thefutureoflanguageeducation/tabid/5491/language/en-GB/Default.aspx ECML/CELV > ECML-Programme > Programme 2020-2023 > The future of language education (accessed 13 November 2022).Search in Google Scholar
Heilporn, Géraldine, Sawsen Lakhal & Marilou Bélisle. 2021. An examination of teachers’ strategies to foster student engagement in blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 18. 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00260-3.Search in Google Scholar
Jost, Nathanael S., Sina L. Jossen, Nicolas Rothen & Corinna S. Martarelli. 2021. The advantage of distributed practice in a blended learning setting. Education and Information Technologies 26. 3097–3113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10424-9.Search in Google Scholar
Lust, Griet, Jan Elen & Géraldin Clarebout. 2013. Students’ tool- use within a web enhanced course: Explanatory mechanisms of students’ tool-use pattern. Computers in Human Behavior 29(5). 2013–2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.03.014.Search in Google Scholar
National Institute for excellence in teaching. 2022. Learning acceleration resources: Student engagement versus student ownership. https://www.niet.org/assets/Resources/523891961b/student-engagement-versus-student-ownership.pdf (accessed 13 November 2022).Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- Introduction: the variety of realities of language learning and teaching in Higher Education throughout the world. A step forward to keep on sharing ideas
- Research Articles
- Model United Nations: a thematic analysis of Japanese EFL students’ reflections on intercultural communicative competence
- Japanese tertiary students’ perceptions of group work with explicit scaffolding
- A critical literacy class: beyond English learning and teaching in Higher Education
- Predictors of English Medium Instruction academic success in Vietnamese Higher Education
- University English-medium instruction in Türkiye – what instructors say
- Testing English for Medical Purposes: the effects of traditional and distance education on learning outcomes
- Using corpora in teaching vocabulary to advanced EFL learners in a higher education context
- Digital multimodal PechaKucha presentations in ESP: insights from students’ learning experiences
- From face-to-face tuition to online classes: ‘Re-styling’ a course of English for academic purposes
- Turning the tables on online exam cheating via language mediation tasks
- Attitudes to Spanish language variation. A study on Portuguese students of Spanish as a Foreign Language
- “Mur de paroles” – ou tentative de promotion de l’expression orale en langue française
- Activity Reports
- « Being plurilingual is a gift we make to ourselves. » : amener les étudiants à valoriser et développer leurs compétences plurilingues et pluriculturelles
- International collaborative tasks in language courses for engineers integrated in a multidimensional teaching format
- Training citizens as users of languages and digital technology. Real-world tasks to tame the digital wilds
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- Introduction: the variety of realities of language learning and teaching in Higher Education throughout the world. A step forward to keep on sharing ideas
- Research Articles
- Model United Nations: a thematic analysis of Japanese EFL students’ reflections on intercultural communicative competence
- Japanese tertiary students’ perceptions of group work with explicit scaffolding
- A critical literacy class: beyond English learning and teaching in Higher Education
- Predictors of English Medium Instruction academic success in Vietnamese Higher Education
- University English-medium instruction in Türkiye – what instructors say
- Testing English for Medical Purposes: the effects of traditional and distance education on learning outcomes
- Using corpora in teaching vocabulary to advanced EFL learners in a higher education context
- Digital multimodal PechaKucha presentations in ESP: insights from students’ learning experiences
- From face-to-face tuition to online classes: ‘Re-styling’ a course of English for academic purposes
- Turning the tables on online exam cheating via language mediation tasks
- Attitudes to Spanish language variation. A study on Portuguese students of Spanish as a Foreign Language
- “Mur de paroles” – ou tentative de promotion de l’expression orale en langue française
- Activity Reports
- « Being plurilingual is a gift we make to ourselves. » : amener les étudiants à valoriser et développer leurs compétences plurilingues et pluriculturelles
- International collaborative tasks in language courses for engineers integrated in a multidimensional teaching format
- Training citizens as users of languages and digital technology. Real-world tasks to tame the digital wilds