Startseite Agreement of lymphocyte subsets detection permits reference intervals transference between flow cytometry systems: direct validation using established reference intervals
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Agreement of lymphocyte subsets detection permits reference intervals transference between flow cytometry systems: direct validation using established reference intervals

  • Mei Liu , Sihua Yu , Siyao Li , Xiaowen Yu , Heqiao Wang , Jiaqi Wang , Pan Wang , Zihan Su , Yajing Fu , Yongjun Jiang , Min Zhao , Zining Zhang EMAIL logo und Hong Shang EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 23. September 2024
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Objectives

With the increasing demand and application of lymphocyte subsets detection in clinical laboratories, different single-platform flow cytometer (FCM) systems have been developed. There is an urgent need to establish the reference intervals (RIs) for different single-platform FCMs and transferring them from one FCM system to another provides a much more feasible and convenient approach. This study aimed to explore the transferability of RIs for lymphocyte subsets across different flow cytometry platforms.

Methods

We first conducted the pairwise method comparison across four FCM platforms, including NovoCyte, BriCyteE6, DxFLEX, and FACSCantoII systems. Next, the transferability of RIs of lymphocyte subsets was evaluated. Furthermore, we conducted the RIs transference based on the FACSCantoII system, BriCyteE6 system and DxFLEX system, except for NK cells. The transferred RIs were further verified by calculating the bias (CV) between the established ones.

Results

The results of lymphocyte subsets detection based on the NovoCyte, BriCyteE6, DxFLEX, and FACSCantoII systems were comparable and it was feasible to transfer the RIs of lymphocyte subsets detected by the four FCM systems. The RIs of lymphocyte subsets detection using FACSCantoII, DxFLEX, and BriCyteE6 systems were established. Upon transferring the RIs of lymphocyte subsets from the FACSCantoII system to the BriCyteE6 system, and DxFLEX system except for NK cells, the CV between the transferred RIs and the established ones was below 20 % for all parameters.

Conclusions

The present study illustrated that the RIs of lymphocyte subsets could be transferred across different flow cytometry systems except for NK cells with different definition strategies.


Corresponding authors: Hong Shang and Zining Zhang, State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, NHC Key Laboratory of AIDS Prevention and Treatment, National Clinical Research Center for Laboratory Medicine, The First Hospital of China Medical University, China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, Liaoning Province, China, E-mail: (H. Song), (Z. Ning)
Mei Liu and Sihua Yu contributed equally to this work.

Funding source: National Key Technologies R&D Program provided by Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China

Award Identifier / Grant number: Project Grant # 2022YFC3602300, Sub-project Grant #2022YFC3602302

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Prof. Wei Wang and Jia Li of the Physical Examination Center of the First Hospital of China Medical University for their assistance and help during the process of volunteer recruitment and sample collection. We also thank all the individuals for their participation in this study.

  1. Research ethics: The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the study protocol was approved by the local Ethics Committee.

  2. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study, or their legal guardians or wards.

  3. Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  5. Research funding: This study was supported by National Key Technologies R&D Program provided by Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (Project Grant # 2022YFC3602300, Sub-project Grant # 2022YFC3602302).

  6. Data availability: The raw data can be obtained on request from the corresponding author.

References

1. Douek, DC, Brenchley, JM, Betts, MR, Ambrozak, DR, Hill, BJ, Okamoto, Y, et al.. HIV preferentially infects HIV-specific CD4+ T cells. Nature 2002;417:95–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/417095a.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Mandala, WL, Gondwe, EN, Molyneux, ME, MacLennan, JM, MacLennan, CA. Leukocyte counts and lymphocyte subsets in relation to pregnancy and HIV infection in Malawian women. Am J Reprod Immunol 2017;78. https://doi.org/10.1111/aji.12678.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Wang, F, Hou, H, Yao, Y, Wu, S, Huang, M, Ran, X, et al.. Systemically comparing host immunity between survived and deceased COVID-19 patients. Cell Mol Immunol 2020;17:875–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41423-020-0483-y.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Akbari, H, Tabrizi, R, Lankarani, KB, Aria, H, Vakili, S, Asadian, F, et al.. The role of cytokine profile and lymphocyte subsets in the severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Life Sci 2020;258:118167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118167.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Wang, YY, Zhou, N, Liu, HS, Gong, XL, Zhu, R, Li, XY, et al.. Circulating activated lymphocyte subsets as potential blood biomarkers of cancer progression. Cancer Med 2020;9:5086–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3150.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Yakovlev, P, Klyushin, D. Lymphocyte count in peripheral blood is a sensitive tool in pretreatment assessment of patients with urological cancer. Exp Oncol 2018;40:119–23. https://doi.org/10.31768/2312-8852.2018.40(2):119-123.10.31768/2312-8852.2018.40(2):119-123Suche in Google Scholar

7. Lübbers, J, van Beers-Tas, MH, Vosslamber, S, Turk, SA, de Ridder, S, Mantel, E, et al.. Changes in peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets during arthritis development in arthralgia patients. Arthritis Res Ther 2016;18:205. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-016-1102-2.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Tong, C, Guo, Z, Lou, JX, Liu, XD, Yang, K, He, XP, et al.. [Clinical significance of monitoring T lymphocyte subsets after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation]. Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 2016;24:167–72. https://doi.org/10.7534/j.issn.1009-2137.2016.01.032.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Llinàs-Mallol, L, Redondo-Pachón, D, Pérez-Sáez, MJ, Raïch-Regué, D, Mir, M, Yélamos, J, et al.. Peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets change after steroid withdrawal in renal allograft recipients: a prospective study. Sci Rep 2019;9:7453. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42913-4.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Gossez, M, Malcus, C, Demaret, J, Frater, J, Poitevin-Later, F, Monneret, G. Evaluation of a novel automated volumetric flow cytometer for absolute CD4+ T lymphocyte quantitation. Cytometry, Part B 2017;92:456–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.b.21360.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Whitby, L, Whitby, A, Fletcher, M, Helbert, M, Reilly, JT, Barnett, D. Comparison of methodological data measurement limits in CD4⁺ T lymphocyte flow cytometric enumeration and their clinical impact on HIV management. Cytometry, Part B 2013;84:248–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.b.21094.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Sun, H, Kang, X, Chen, X, Cai, L, Li, Y, Yu, J, et al.. Immunosenescence evaluation of peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets in 957 healthy adults from 20 to 95 years old. Exp Gerontol 2022;157:111615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2021.111615.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Wei, B, Guo, Y, Zhang, L, Zhong, H, Miao, Q, Yan, L, et al.. Reference ranges of T lymphocyte subsets by single-platform among healthy population in southwest China. BMC Immunol 2021;22:80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12865-021-00474-0.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Liu, W, Xu, J, Pu, Q, Lan, M, Zhang, X, Gu, Y, et al.. The reference ranges and characteristics of lymphocyte parameters and the correlation between lymphocyte parameters and routine health indicators in adults from China. Immun Ageing 2022;19:42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12979-022-00298-5.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Xu, K, Miao, L, Chen, W, Wu, H, Gong, Y, Tu, X, et al.. Establishment of the reference intervals of lymphocyte subsets for healthy Chinese Han adults and its influencing factors. Ann Transl Med 2021;9:1495. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-4031.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. CLSI. Defining, establishing, and verifying reference intervals in the clinical laboratory; approved guideline, 3rd ed. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2010.Suche in Google Scholar

17. CLSI. Measurement procedure comparison and bias estimation using patient samples; approved guideline, 3rd ed. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2013.Suche in Google Scholar

18. Higgins, V, Truong, D, Woroch, A, Chan, MK, Tahmasebi, H, Adeli, K. CLSI-based transference and verification of CALIPER pediatric reference intervals for 29 Ortho VITROS 5600 chemistry assays. Clin Biochem 2018;53:93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.12.011.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Mu, R, Yun, K, Yu, X, Cheng, S, Ma, M, Zhang, X, et al.. A study on reference interval transference via linear regression. Clin Chem Lab Med 2019;58:116–29. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2019-0055.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Ezra, S, Winstone, TML, Singh, R, Orton, DJ. Agreement of LC-MS assays for IGF-1 traceable to NIST and WHO standards permits harmonization of reference intervals between laboratories. Clin Biochem 2023;116:75–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2023.04.002.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Kalla, GCM, Voundi, EV, Tanghu, FM, Sike, CM, Noubom, M, Nkodo, JM, et al.. [Evaluation of the performances of the “MUSE AUTO CD4/CD4%” flow cytometer vs “GUAVA AUTO CD4/CD4%” flow cytometer for measuring the rate of CD4 lymphocytes in patients infected with HIV in Cameroon]. Pan Afr Med J 2019;32:2. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2019.32.2.16990.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Mbopi-Kéou, FX, Sagnia, B, Ngogang, J, Angwafo, FF3rd, Colizzi, V, Montagnier, L, et al.. Validation of a single-platform, volumetric, flow cytometry for CD4 T cell count monitoring in therapeutic mobile unit. J Transl Med 2012;10:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-10-22.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. Pattanapanyasat, K, Phuang-Ngern, Y, Sukapirom, K, Lerdwana, S, Thepthai, C, Tassaneetrithep, B. Comparison of 5 flow cytometric immunophenotyping systems for absolute CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts in HIV-1-infected patients living in resource-limited settings. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2008;49:339–47. https://doi.org/10.1097/qai.0b013e31818c1721.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Dieye, TN, Vereecken, C, Diallo, AA, Ondoa, P, Diaw, PA, Camara, M, et al.. Absolute CD4 T-cell counting in resource-poor settings: direct volumetric measurements versus bead-based clinical flow cytometry instruments. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2005;39:32–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.qai.0000160515.20581.ad.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Mossoro-Kpinde, CD, Kouabosso, A, Mboumba Bouassa, RS, Longo, JD, Kokanzo, E, Féissona, R, et al.. Performance evaluation of the touchscreen-based Muse™ Auto CD4/CD4% single-platform system for CD4 T cell numeration in absolute number and in percentage using blood samples from children and adult patients living in the Central African Republic. J Transl Med 2016;14:326. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-016-1082-7.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26. Ichihara, K, Ozarda, Y, Klee, G, Straseski, J, Baumann, N, Ishikura, K. Utility of a panel of sera for the alignment of test results in the worldwide multicenter study on reference values. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:1007–25. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2013-0248.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Schnizlein-Bick, CT, Mandy, FF, O’Gorman, MR, Paxton, H, Nicholson, JK, Hultin, LE, et al.. Use of CD45 gating in three and four-color flow cytometric immunophenotyping: guideline from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Division of AIDS. Cytometry 2002;50:46–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.10073.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Degandt, S, Peeters, B, Jughmans, S, Boeckx, N, Bossuyt, X. Analytical performance of an automated volumetric flow cytometer for quantitation of T, B and natural killer lymphocytes. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56:1277–88. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2017-0638.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Araújo, PA, Thomas, D, Sadeghieh, T, Bevilacqua, V, Chan, MK, Chen, Y, et al.. CLSI-based transference of the CALIPER database of pediatric reference intervals to Beckman Coulter DxC biochemical assays. Clin Biochem 2015;48:870–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2015.06.002.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Xu, P, Zhou, Q, Xu, J. Reference interval transference of common clinical biomarkers. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2021;81:264–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2021.1907858.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Estey, MP, Cohen, AH, Colantonio, DA, Chan, MK, Marvasti, TB, Randell, E, et al.. CLSI-based transference of the CALIPER database of pediatric reference intervals from Abbott to Beckman, Ortho, Roche and Siemens Clinical Chemistry Assays: direct validation using reference samples from the CALIPER cohort. Clin Biochem 2013;46:1197–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2013.04.001.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Abou El Hassan, M, Stoianov, A, Araújo, PA, Sadeghieh, T, Chan, MK, Chen, Y, et al.. CLSI-based transference of CALIPER pediatric reference intervals to Beckman Coulter AU biochemical assays. Clin Biochem 2015;48:1151–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2015.05.002.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Ichihara, K, Ceriotti, F, Kazuo, M, Huang, YY, Shimizu, Y, Suzuki, H, et al.. The Asian project for collaborative derivation of reference intervals: (2) results of non-standardized analytes and transference of reference intervals to the participating laboratories on the basis of cross-comparison of test results. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:1443–57. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2012-0422.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Lykkeboe, S, Nielsen, CG, Christensen, PA. Indirect method for validating transference of reference intervals. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56:463–70. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2017-0574.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

35. Ozarda, Y, Higgins, V, Adeli, K. Verification of reference intervals in routine clinical laboratories: practical challenges and recommendations. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;57:30–7. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2018-0059.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

36. Wood, B, Jevremovic, D, Béné, MC, Yan, M, Jacobs, P, Litwin, V. Validation of cell-based fluorescence assays: practice guidelines from the ICSH and ICCS – part V – assay performance criteria. Cytometry, Part B 2013;84:315–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.b.21108.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Cooper, MA, Fehniger, TA, Caligiuri, MA. The biology of human natural killer-cell subsets. Trends Immunol 2001;22:633–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1471-4906(01)02060-9.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

38. Parks, DR, Moore, WA, Brinkman, RR, Chen, Y, Condello, D, El Khettabi, F, et al.. Methodology for evaluating and comparing flow cytometers: a multisite study of 23 instruments. Cytometry, Part A 2018;93:1087–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.23605.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

39. López-Ruíz, R, Martín-Torres, S, Jiménez-Carvelo, AM, Romero-González, R, Cuadros-Rodríguez, L. Instrument-agnostizing methodology for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry systems. Methods Mol Biol 2023;2571:257–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2699-3_22.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2024-0603).


Received: 2024-05-15
Accepted: 2024-08-06
Published Online: 2024-09-23
Published in Print: 2025-01-29

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. CD34+ progenitor cells meet metrology
  4. Reviews
  5. Venous blood collection systems using evacuated tubes: a systematic review focusing on safety, efficacy and economic implications of integrated vs. combined systems
  6. The correlation between serum angiopoietin-2 levels and acute kidney injury (AKI): a meta-analysis
  7. Opinion Papers
  8. Advancing value-based laboratory medicine
  9. Clostebol and sport: about controversies involving contamination vs. doping offence
  10. Direct-to-consumer testing as consumer initiated testing: compromises to the testing process and opportunities for quality improvement
  11. Perspectives
  12. An improved implementation of metrological traceability concepts is needed to benefit from standardization of laboratory results
  13. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  14. Comparative analysis of BCR::ABL1 p210 mRNA transcript quantification and ratio to ABL1 control gene converted to the International Scale by chip digital PCR and droplet digital PCR for monitoring patients with chronic myeloid leukemia
  15. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  16. IVDCheckR – simplifying documentation for laboratory developed tests according to IVDR requirements by introducing a new digital tool
  17. Analytical performance specifications for trace elements in biological fluids derived from six countries federated external quality assessment schemes over 10 years
  18. The effects of drone transportation on routine laboratory, immunohematology, flow cytometry and molecular analyses
  19. Accurate non-ceruloplasmin bound copper: a new biomarker for the assessment and monitoring of Wilson disease patients using HPLC coupled to ICP-MS/MS
  20. Construction of platelet count-optical method reflex test rules using Micro-RBC#, Macro-RBC%, “PLT clumps?” flag, and “PLT abnormal histogram” flag on the Mindray BC-6800plus hematology analyzer in clinical practice
  21. Evaluation of serum NFL, T-tau, p-tau181, p-tau217, Aβ40 and Aβ42 for the diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases
  22. An immuno-DOT diagnostic assay for autoimmune nodopathy
  23. Evaluation of biochemical algorithms to screen dysbetalipoproteinemia in ε2ε2 and rare APOE variants carriers
  24. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  25. Allowable total error in CD34 cell analysis by flow cytometry based on state of the art using Spanish EQAS data
  26. Clinical utility of personalized reference intervals for CEA in the early detection of oncologic disease
  27. Agreement of lymphocyte subsets detection permits reference intervals transference between flow cytometry systems: direct validation using established reference intervals
  28. Cancer Diagnostics
  29. Atypical cells in urine sediment: a novel biomarker for early detection of bladder cancer
  30. External quality assessment-based tumor marker harmonization simulation; insights in achievable harmonization for CA 15-3 and CEA
  31. Cardiovascular Diseases
  32. Evaluation of the analytical and clinical performance of a high-sensitivity troponin I point-of-care assay in the Mersey Acute Coronary Syndrome Rule Out Study (MACROS-2)
  33. Analytical verification of the Atellica VTLi point of care high sensitivity troponin I assay
  34. Infectious Diseases
  35. Synovial fluid D-lactate – a pathogen-specific biomarker for septic arthritis: a prospective multicenter study
  36. Targeted MRM-analysis of plasma proteins in frozen whole blood samples from patients with COVID-19: a retrospective study
  37. Letters to the Editor
  38. Generative artificial intelligence (AI) for reporting the performance of laboratory biomarkers: not ready for prime time
  39. Urgent need to adopt age-specific TSH upper reference limit for the elderly – a position statement of the Belgian thyroid club
  40. Sigma metric is more correlated with analytical imprecision than bias
  41. Utility and limitations of monitoring kidney transplants using capillary sampling
  42. Simple flow cytometry method using a myeloma panel that easily reveals clonal proliferation of mature B-cells
  43. Is sweat conductivity still a relevant screening test for cystic fibrosis? Participation over 10 years
  44. Hb D-Iran interference on HbA1c measurement
Heruntergeladen am 20.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2024-0603/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen