Home Analytical performance of eight enzymatic assays for ethanol in serum evaluated by data from the Belgian external quality assessment scheme
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Analytical performance of eight enzymatic assays for ethanol in serum evaluated by data from the Belgian external quality assessment scheme

  • Wim Coucke ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Corinne Charlier , Kathleen Croes , Boris Mahieu , Hugo Neels , Christophe Stove ORCID logo , Jan Tytgat , André Vanescote , Alain G. Verstraete ORCID logo , Sarah Wille and Arnaud Capron
Published/Copyright: June 8, 2022

Abstract

Objectives

Fast and reliable ethanol assays analysis are used in a clinical context for patients suspected of ethanol intoxication. Mostly, automated systems using an enzymatic reaction based on ethanol dehydrogenase are used. The manuscript focusses on the evaluation of the performance of these assays.

Methods

Data included 30 serum samples used in the Belgian EQA scheme from 2019 to 2021 and concentrations ranged from 0.13 to 3.70 g/L. A regression line between target concentrations and reported values was calculated to evaluate outliers, bias, variability and measurement uncertainty.

Results

A total of 1,611 results were taken into account. Bias was the highest for Alinity c over the whole concentration range and the lowest for Vitros for low concentrations and Cobas 8000 using the c702 module for high concentrations. The Architect and Cobas c501/c502 systems showed the lowest variability over the whole concentration range. Highest variability was observed for Cobas 8000 using the 702 module, Thermo Scientific and Alinity c. Cobas 8000 using the c702 module showed the highest measurement uncertainty for lower concentrations. For higher concentrations, Alinity c, Thermo Scientific and Vitros were the methods with the highest measurement uncertainty.

Conclusions

The bias of the enzymatic techniques is nearly negligible for all methods except Alinity c. Variability differs strongly between measurement procedures. This study shows that the Alinity c has a worse measurement uncertainty than other systems for concentrations above 0.5 g/L. Overall, we found the differences in measurement uncertainty to be mainly influenced by the differences in variability.


Corresponding author: Dr. Wim Coucke, Quality of Laboratoreis, Sciensano, J. Wytsmanstraat 14 1050, Brussels, Belgium, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  5. Ethical approval: Not applicable.

References

1. Ishmayana, S, Fadhlillah, M, Kristia, Y, Budiman, H. Validation of a modified alcohol dehydrogenase assay for ethanol determination. Curr Chem Lett 2015;4:77–84. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ccl.2015.1.001.Search in Google Scholar

2. Dubowski, KM. Alcohol determination in the clinical laboratory. Am J Clin Pathol 1980;74:747–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/74.5.747.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Krasowski, MD, Wilcoxon, RM, Miron, J. A retrospective analysis of glycol and toxic alcohol ingestion: utility of anion and osmolal gaps. BMC Clin Pathol 2012;12:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6890-12-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Karch, SB. Drug abuse handbook. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press; 2019:1156 p.Search in Google Scholar

5. Handbook for calculation of measurement uncertainty in environmental laboratories (NT TR 537 - Edition 4). [Internet]. Nordtest; 2017. Available from: https://www.nordtest.info/wp/2017/11/29/handbook-for-calculation-of-measurement-uncertainty-in-environmental-laboratories-nt-tr-537-edition-4/ [Accessed 17 Jan 2022].Search in Google Scholar

6. Coucke, W, Tanasković, JV, Bouacida, L, Broeders, S, China, B, Demarteau, M, et al.. Alternative sample-homogeneity test for quantitative and qualitative proficiency testing schemes. Anal Chem 2019;91:1847–54. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b03313.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Coucke, W, Blerk, MV, Libeer, J-C, Campenhout, CV, Albert, A. A new statistical method for evaluating long-term analytical performance of laboratories applied to an external quality assessment scheme for flow cytometry. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:645–50. https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2010.122.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Pinheiro, J, Bates, D. Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. New York, USA: Springer Science & Business Media; 2006.Search in Google Scholar

9. Coucke, W, Charlier, C, Lambert, W, Martens, F, Neels, H, Tytgat, J, et al.. Application of the characteristic function to evaluate and compare analytical variability in an external quality assessment scheme for serum ethanol. Clin Chem 2015;61:948–54. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2015.240176.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Rilibak - German guidelines for quality - Westgard. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.westgard.com/rilibak.htm [Accessed 21 Mar 2022].Search in Google Scholar

11. Dubois, N, Sqalli, G, Gilson, M, Charlier, C. Analytical validation of a quantitative method for therapeutic drug monitoring on the Alinity®c Abbott. Ann Biol Clin 2020;78:147–55. https://doi.org/10.1684/abc.2020.1535.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Krintus, M, Fernandez, JA, Chesters, C, Colla, R, Ford, C, Frattolillo, D, et al.. Analytical performance of 10 high-volume clinical chemistry assays on the alinity c system. Lab Med 2019;50:e1–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmy053.Search in Google Scholar PubMed


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2022-0285).


Received: 2022-03-23
Accepted: 2022-05-24
Published Online: 2022-06-08
Published in Print: 2022-07-26

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Transdermal measurement of cardiac troponins: the future is now
  4. Reviews
  5. Perinatal presepsin assessment: a new sepsis diagnostic tool?
  6. Hypertriglyceridemia, a causal risk factor for atherosclerosis, and its laboratory assessment
  7. Opinion Paper
  8. The novelties of the regulation on health technology assessment, a key achievement for the European union health policies
  9. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  10. Performance of four regression frameworks with varying precision profiles in simulated reference material commutability assessment
  11. Comparison of six regression-based lot-to-lot verification approaches
  12. Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) at the preanalytical phase for POCT blood gas analysis: proposal for a shared proactive risk analysis model
  13. Evaluation of a pneumatic tube system carrier prototype with fixing mechanism allowing for automated unloading
  14. Analytical performance of eight enzymatic assays for ethanol in serum evaluated by data from the Belgian external quality assessment scheme
  15. Vitamin D metabolism in living kidney donors before and after organ donation
  16. Validation of steroid ratios for random urine by mass spectrometry to detect 5α-reductase deficiency in Vietnamese children
  17. Evaluation of serum neurofilament light in the early management of mTBI patients
  18. Assessment of urine sample quality by the simultaneous measurement of urinary γ-glutamyltransferase and lactate dehydrogenase enzyme activities: possible application to unravel cheating in drugs of abuse testing
  19. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  20. Age and sex specific reference intervals of 13 hematological analytes in Chinese children and adolescents aged from 28 days up to 20 years: the PRINCE study
  21. Cancer Diagnostics
  22. Prostate health index (PHI) as a reliable biomarker for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  23. A comparison of the faecal haemoglobin concentrations and diagnostic accuracy in patients suspected with colorectal cancer and serious bowel disease as reported on four different faecal immunochemical test systems
  24. Circulating cell-free DNA undergoes significant decline in yield after prolonged storage time in both plasma and purified form
  25. Cardiovascular Diseases
  26. Analytical and clinical performance evaluation of a new high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay
  27. Infectious Diseases
  28. Results of a SARS-CoV-2 virus genome detection external quality assessment round focusing on sensitivity of assays and pooling of samples
  29. Letters to the Editors
  30. Improving D-dimer testing appropriateness by controlling periodicity of retesting: prevention is better than cure
  31. Biological variation of serum cholinesterase catalytic concentrations
  32. Three-month ad interim analysis of total anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in healthy recipient of a single BNT162b2 vaccine booster
  33. Fibrin strands in peripheral blood smear: the COVID-19 era
  34. Fragments of alpha-1-antitrypsin in patients with severe COVID-19 and bacterial pulmonary sepsis
  35. Comparison of thyroid stimulating hormone, free thyroxine, total triiodothyronine, thyroglobulin and peroxidase antibodies measurements by two different platforms
  36. Effect of different incubation times on the detection of factor VIII inhibitor in acquired hemophilia A
Downloaded on 15.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2022-0285/html
Scroll to top button