Home Lot-to-lot reagent verification: challenges and possible solutions
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Lot-to-lot reagent verification: challenges and possible solutions

  • Tze Ping Loh EMAIL logo , Sverre Sandberg and Andrea Rita Horvath
Published/Copyright: February 22, 2022

Abstract

Lot-to-lot verification is an important laboratory activity that is performed to monitor the consistency of analytical performance over time. In this opinion paper, the concept, clinical impact, challenges and potential solutions for lot-to-lot verification are exained.


Corresponding author: Tze Ping Loh, Department of Laboratory Medicine, National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119074, Singapore, Phone: (+65) 67724345, Fax: (+65) 67771613, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  5. Ethical approval: Not applicable.

References

1. Hicks, AJ, Carwardine, ZL, Hallworth, MJ, Kilpatrick, ES. Using clinical guidelines to assess the potential value of laboratory medicine in clinical decision-making. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2021;31:010703. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2021.010703.Search in Google Scholar

2. Sikaris, K, Pehm, K, Wallace, M, Picone, D, Frydenberg, M. Review of serious failures in reported test results for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing of patients by SA Pathology. Available from: http://www.sapathology.sa.gov.au/wps/wcm/connect/1fa1d43f-08ab-49e0-9875-369da73bc731/Final+Report+-+SA+PSA+Review+-+July+2016.pdf?MOD=AJPERES [Accessed 2 Feb 2022].Search in Google Scholar

3. Algeciras-Schimnich, A, Bruns, DE, Boyd, JC, Bryant, SC, La Fortune, KA, Grebe, SK. Failure of current laboratory protocols to detect lot-to-lot reagent differences: findings and possible solutions. Clin Chem 2013;59:1187–94. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2013.205070.Search in Google Scholar

4. Chai, JH, Ma, S, Heng, D, Yoong, J, Lim, WY, Toh, SA, et al.. Impact of analytical and biological variations on classification of diabetes using fasting plasma glucose, oral glucose tolerance test and HbA1c. Sci Rep 2017;7:13721. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14172-8.Search in Google Scholar

5. Larsen, ML, Fraser, CG, Petersen, PH. A comparison of analytical goals for haemoglobin A1c assays derived using different strategies. Ann Clin Biochem 1991;28:272–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/000456329102800313.Search in Google Scholar

6. Petersen, PH, Jørgensen, LG, Brandslund, I, De Fine Olivarius, N, Stahl, M. Consequences of bias and imprecision in measurements of glucose and hba1c for the diagnosis and prognosis of diabetes mellitus. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl 2005;240:51–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365510500236135.Search in Google Scholar

7. Petersen, PH, Klee, GG. Influence of analytical bias and imprecision on the number of false positive results using Guideline-Driven Medical Decision Limits. Clin Chim Acta 2014;430:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2013.12.014.Search in Google Scholar

8. Koerbin, G, Liu, J, Eigenstetter, A, Tan, CH, Badrick, T, Loh, TP. Missed detection of significant positive and negative shifts in gentamicin assay: implications for routine laboratory quality practices. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2018;28:010705. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2018.010705.Search in Google Scholar

9. Hammarsten, O, Jacobsson, CE, Widegren, M, Danylchenko, T, Jaffe, AS. Long-time quality assessment of the Elecsys Troponin T hs assay. Clin Biochem 2013;46:1055–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2013.03.022.Search in Google Scholar

10. Apple, FS, Jaffe, AS. Clinical implications of a recent adjustment to the high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay: user beware. Clin Chem 2012;58:1599–600. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2012.194985.Search in Google Scholar

11. Wildi, K, Twerenbold, R, Jaeger, C, Rubini Giménez, M, Reichlin, T, Stoll, M, et al.. Clinical impact of the 2010–2012 low-end shift of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2016;5:399–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/2048872616642952.Search in Google Scholar

12. Solsvik, AE, Kristoffersen, AH, Sandberg, S, Gidske, G, Stavelin, AV, Eikeland, J, et al.. A national surveillance program for evaluating new reagent lots in medical laboratories. Clin Chem Lab Med 2022;60:351–60. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2021-1262.Search in Google Scholar

13. Hickman, PE, Koerbin, G, Badrick, T, Oakman, C, Potter, JM. The importance of low level QC for high sensitivity troponin assays. Clin Biochem 2018;58:60–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.05.007.Search in Google Scholar

14. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. CLSI document EP26-A. Wayne, PA, USA: CLSI; 2013. User evaluation of between-reagent lot variation; Approved guideline.Search in Google Scholar

15. Liu, J, Tan, CH, Badrick, T, Loh, TP. Moving sum of number of positive patient result as a quality control tool. Clin Chem Lab Med 2017;55:1709–14. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2016-0950.Search in Google Scholar

16. Liu, J, Tan, CH, Loh, TP, Badrick, T. Detecting long-term drift in reagent lots. Clin Chem 2015;61:1292–8. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2015.242511.Search in Google Scholar

17. Thompson, S, Chesher, D. Lot-to-Lot Variation. Clin Biochem Rev. 2018;39:51–60. PMC6223607.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. van Schrojenstein Lantman, M, Çubukçu, HC, Boursier, G, Panteghini, M, Bernabeu-Andreu, F, Milinković, N, et al.. An approach for determining allowable between reagent lot variation. Clin Chem Lab Med 2022;60:681–8.10.1515/cclm-2022-0083Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Stavelin, A, Riksheim, BO, Christensen, NG, Sandberg, S. The importance of reagent lot registration in external quality assurance/proficiency testing schemes. Clin Chem 2016;62:708–15. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2015.247585.Search in Google Scholar

20. van der Hagen, EAE, Weykamp, C, Sandberg, S, Stavelin, AV, MacKenzie, F, Miller, WG. Feasibility for aggregation of commutable external quality assessment results to evaluate metrological traceability and agreement among results. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020;59:117–25. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2020-0736.Search in Google Scholar

21. Miller, WG. Time to pay attention to reagent and calibrator lots for proficiency testing. Clin Chem 2016;62:666–7. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2016.255802.Search in Google Scholar

22. Badrick, T, Bietenbeck, A, Cervinski, MA, Katayev, A, van Rossum, HH, Loh, TP, et al.. Patient-based real-time quality control: review and recommendations. Clin Chem 2019;65:962–71. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2019.305482.Search in Google Scholar

23. Duan, X, Wang, B, Zhu, J, Zhang, C, Jiang, W, Zhou, J. Regression-adjusted real-time quality control. Clin Chem 2021;67:1342–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvab115.Search in Google Scholar

24. Goossens, K, Van Uytfanghe, K, Twomey, PJ, Thienpont, LM, Laboratories Participating. Monitoring laboratory data across manufacturers and laboratories—a prerequisite to make “Big Data” work. Clin Chim Acta 2015;445:12–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2015.03.003.Search in Google Scholar

25. De Grande, LAC, Goossens, K, Van Uytfanghe, K, Das, B, MacKenzie, F, Patru, MM, et al.. Monitoring the stability of the standardization status of FT4 and TSH assays by use of daily outpatient medians and flagging frequencies. Clin Chim Acta 2017;467:8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2016.04.032.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-02-03
Accepted: 2022-02-09
Published Online: 2022-02-22
Published in Print: 2022-04-26

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Lot-to-lot variation: no longer a neglected issue
  4. Review
  5. Health Technology Assessment to assess value of biomarkers in the decision-making process
  6. Mini Review
  7. Diagnostic performance of the fully automated Roche Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 antigen electrochemiluminescence immunoassay: a pooled analysis
  8. Opinion Papers
  9. Preanalytical quality improvement – an interdisciplinary journey
  10. Metrological traceability and clinical traceability of laboratory results – the role of commutability in External Quality Assurance
  11. Lot-to-lot reagent verification: challenges and possible solutions
  12. EFLM Paper
  13. An approach for determining allowable between reagent lot variation
  14. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  15. Introduction of BD Vacutainer® Barricor™ tubes in clinical biobanking and application of amino acid and cytokine quality indicators to Barricor plasma
  16. Delays during PBMC isolation have a moderate effect on yield, but severly compromise cell viability
  17. Investigation of the effects of pneumatic tube transport system on routine biochemistry, hematology, and coagulation tests in Ankara City Hospital
  18. Comparison of three different protocols for obtaining hemolysis
  19. Report from the HarmoSter study: impact of calibration on comparability of LC-MS/MS measurement of circulating cortisol, 17OH-progesterone and aldosterone
  20. Point-of-care testing in primary healthcare: a scoring system to determine the frequency of performing internal quality control
  21. Hematology and Coagulation
  22. The flagging features of the Sysmex XN-10 analyser for detecting platelet clumps and the impacts of platelet clumps on complete blood count parameters
  23. Cancer Diagnostics
  24. Thyroglobulin and thyroglobulin antibodies: assay-dependent management consequences in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma
  25. Infectious Diseases
  26. Hyris bCUBE SARS-CoV-2 rapid molecular saliva testing: a POCT innovation on its way
  27. Ultrasensitive assay for saliva-based SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection
  28. Identification of contagious SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals by Roche’s Rapid Antigen Test
  29. Monocyte distribution width (MDW) as a screening tool for early detecting sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  30. Perinatal asphyxia partly affects presepsin urine levels in non-infected term infants
  31. Letters to the Editors
  32. Spurious results for total and free prostate-specific antigen (PSA); sometimes really “a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma”
  33. Reply to: Spurious results for total and free prostate-specific antigen (PSA); sometimes really “a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma”
  34. Spike vs. nucleocapsid serum antigens for COVID-19 diagnosis and severity assessment
  35. A rapid semi-quantitative test for determination of SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels
  36. Diagnostic potential of leukocyte differential and cell population data in prediction of COVID-19 among related viral and bacterial infections at Emergency Department
  37. Added value of drug-laboratory test interaction alerts in test result authorisation
  38. Pre-analytical considerations for the analysis of uracil and 5,6-dihydrouracil in heparin plasma
  39. Rare unstable and low oxygen affinity haemoglobin variant, Hb Hazebrouck, detected on Sysmex XN-9000
  40. Multicancer early detection
Downloaded on 11.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2022-0092/html
Scroll to top button