Home Medicine Analytical evaluation of four faecal immunochemistry tests for haemoglobin
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Analytical evaluation of four faecal immunochemistry tests for haemoglobin

  • Carolyn Piggott ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Magdalen R. R. Carroll ORCID logo , Cerin John ORCID logo , Shane O’Driscoll ORCID logo and Sally C. Benton ORCID logo
Published/Copyright: July 21, 2020

Abstract

Objectives

Faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) for haemoglobin (Hb) are being used in the investigation of colorectal cancer. These tests use antibodies raised to the globin moiety of human Hb. Here, four automated quantitative FIT systems (HM-JACKarc, NS-Prime, OC-Sensor PLEDIA and SENTiFIT 270) are evaluated analytically to confirm whether the performance of the systems meet the manufacturers’ claims.

Methods

Assessment of the analytical performance of the FIT systems was undertaken using Hb lysates, real patient samples and external quality assessment (EQA) samples. This analytical assessment focused on detection characteristics, imprecision, linearity, prozone effect, recovery and carryover.

Results

All four methods demonstrated good analytical performance, with acceptable within- and between-run imprecision, good recovery of f-Hb and limited carryover of samples. They also all show good linearity across the range of concentrations tested. The results of EQA samples showed different variations from the target values (−52 to 45%), due to the absence of standardisation across the different methods.

Conclusions

All four systems are fit for purpose and have an analytical performance as documented by their manufacturers.


Corresponding author: Carolyn Piggott, NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme – Southern Hub, Royal Surrey County Hospital, 20 Priestley Road, Surrey Research Park, Guildford, GU2 7YS, UK; Berkshire and Surrey Pathology Services,Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, England, UK, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

We thank FIT system suppliers (HM-JACKarc: Alpha Laboratories, Eastleigh, UK; NS-Prime: originally supplied by Alere Ltd., Chester, UK, with continuing support from Abbott, Maidenhead, UK, and Alfresa Pharma, Osaka, Japan; OC-Sensor PLEDIA: Mast Diagnostics Division, Bootle, UK; SENTiFIT 270: Sysmex UK Ltd., Milton Keynes, UK) for supplying the analysers and consumables. We also thank Berkshire and Surrey Pathology Services (Royal Surrey Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK) for supplying samples used in the assessment and the United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Services (UK NEQAS, Birmingham, UK) for the external quality assessment (EQA) samples they provided.

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  3. Competing interests: None declared.

References

1. Schreuders, EH, Ruco, A, Rabeneck, L, Schoen, RE, Sung, JJ, Young, GP, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: a global overview of existing programmes. Gut 2015;10:1637–49. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2014-309086.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Quantitative faecal immunochemical tests to guide referral for colorectal cancer in primary care, 2017 DG30. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/dg30.pdf [Accessed 12 Nov 2019].Search in Google Scholar

3. Kato, J, Hiraoka, S, Nakarai, A, Takashima, S, Inokuchi, T, Ichinose, M. Fecal immunochemical test as a biomarker for inflammatory bowel diseases: can it rival fecal calprotectin?. Intest Res 2016;14:5–14. https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2016.14.1.5.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Hippisley-Cox, J, Coupland, C. Identifying patients with suspected colorectal cancer in primary care: derivation and validation of an algorithm. Br J Gen Pract 2012;62:e29–37. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp12x616346.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Halloran, SP. Intelligent use of the fecal immunochemical test in population-based screening (editorial). Ann Int Med 2018;169:496–7. https://doi.org/10.7326/m18-2257.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Koivunen, ME, Krogsrud, RL. Principles of immunochemical techniques used in clinical laboratories. Lab Med 2006;37:490–7. https://doi.org/10.1309/mv9rm1fdlwauwq3f.Search in Google Scholar

7. Carroll, MRR, Piggott, C, Pearson, S, Seaman, HE, Halloran, SP. Evaluation of quantitative faecal immunochemical tests for haemoglobin. Guildford Medical Device Evaluation Centre (GMEC); 2012. Available at: http://www.worldendo.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/gmec_fit_evaluation_report_update-final.pdf [Accessed 28 Feb 2020].Search in Google Scholar

8. Fraser, CG, Allison, JE, Young, GP, Halloran, SP, Seaman, HE. Improving the reporting of evaluations of faecal immunochemical tests for heamoglobin: the FITTER standard and checklist. Eur J Cancer Prev 2015;24:24–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/cej.0000000000000016.Search in Google Scholar

9. Fraser, CG, Benton, S. Detection capability of quantitative faecal immunochemical tests for haemoglobin (FIT) and reporting of low faecal haemoglobin concentrations. Clin Chem Lab Med 2019;57:611–6. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2018-0464.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Evaluation of detection capability for clinical laboratory measurement procedures. In: Approved guideline, 2nd ed. Wayne PA, USA: CLSI document EP17-A2; 2012.Search in Google Scholar

11. Broughton, PM, Gowenlock, AH, McCormack, JJ, Neill, DW. A revised scheme for the evaluation of automatic instruments for use in clinical chemistry. Ann Clin Biochem 1974;11:207–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/000456327401100164.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Piggott, C, John, C, Bruce, H, Benton, SC. Does the mass of sample loaded affect faecal haemoglobin concentration using the faecal immunochemical test. Ann Clin Biochem 2018;55:702–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004563218778701.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Ahn, A, Kim, J, Jin Ko, Y, et al. Perofrmance evaluation of two automated quantitative fecal occult blood tests. Lab med Online 2016;6:233–9. https://doi.org/10.3343/lmo.2016.6.4.233.Search in Google Scholar

14. Kusaka, T, Nozaki, T, Shibata, M, et al. Measurement performance evaluation of fecal occult blood analyzer OC Sensor PLEDIA. J Clin Lab Inst and Reag 2014;37:643–8.Search in Google Scholar

15. Lee, C, O’Gorman, P, Walsh, P. Immunochemical faecal occult blood tests have superior stability and analytical performance characteristics over guaiac-based tests in a controlled in vitro study. J Clin Pathol 2011;64:524–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.2010.085399.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Rubeca, T, Cellai, F, Confortini, M, Fraser, CG, Rapi, S. Impact of preanalytical factors on fecal immunochemical tests: need for new strategies in comparison of methods. Int J Biol Markers 2015;30:e269–74. https://doi.org/10.5301/jbm.5000150.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Benton, SC. IFCC – FIT Working Group (FIT-WG). IFCC e-news; 2017, pp. 16–7. Available at: http://www.ifcc.org/media/461890/IFCCeNewsJune2017.pdf [Accessed 6 March 2019].Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-03-04
Accepted: 2020-06-29
Published Online: 2020-07-21
Published in Print: 2021-01-26

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. 10.1515/cclm-2020-frontmatter1
  2. Mario Plebani turns 70
  3. Editorial
  4. Measurement uncertainty and the importance of correlation
  5. Reviews
  6. Untangling the association between prostate-specific antigen and diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  7. The emerging role of cell senescence in atherosclerosis
  8. Mini Review
  9. Minimum retesting intervals in practice: 10 years experience
  10. Opinion Paper
  11. Cardiotoxic effects and myocardial injury: the search for a more precise definition of drug cardiotoxicity
  12. EFLM Papers
  13. The CRESS checklist for reporting stability studies: on behalf of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group for the Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE)
  14. Thoughts and expectations of young professionals about the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)
  15. Guidelines and Recommendations
  16. Evidence on clinical relevance of cardiovascular risk evaluation in the general population using cardio-specific biomarkers
  17. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  18. A systematic evaluation of stool DNA preparation protocols for colorectal cancer screening via analysis of DNA methylation biomarkers
  19. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  20. The new IVD Regulation 2017/746: a case study at a large university hospital laboratory in Belgium demonstrates the need for clarification on the degrees of freedom laboratories have to use lab-developed tests to improve patient care
  21. Evaluation of serum electrolytes measurement through the 6-year trueness verification program in China
  22. Feasibility for aggregation of commutable external quality assessment results to evaluate metrological traceability and agreement among results
  23. Sample size and rejection limits for detecting reagent lot variability: analysis of the applicability of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) EP26-A protocol to real-world clinical chemistry data
  24. Effects of calcium dobesilate (CaD) interference on serum creatinine measurements: a national External Quality Assessment (EQA)-based educational survey of drug-laboratory test interactions
  25. Mass spectrometric sample identification with indicator compounds introduced via labeled sample tubes
  26. Automation and validation of a MALDI-TOF MS (Mass-Fix) replacement of immunofixation electrophoresis in the clinical lab
  27. A new strategy implementing mass spectrometry in the diagnosis of congenital disorders of N-glycosylation (CDG)
  28. Analytical evaluation of four faecal immunochemistry tests for haemoglobin
  29. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  30. Study of total error specifications of lymphocyte subsets enumeration using China National EQAS data and Biological Variation Data Critical Appraisal Checklist (BIVAC)-compliant publications
  31. Mass spectrometric quantification of urinary 6-sulfatoxymelatonin: age-dependent excretion and biological variation
  32. Establishment of international autoantibody reference standards for the detection of autoantibodies directed against PML bodies, GW bodies, and NuMA protein
  33. Hematology and Coagulation
  34. Appropriate thresholds for accurate screening for β-thalassemias in the newborn period: results from a French center for newborn screening
  35. Cardiovascular Diseases
  36. Analysis of B-type natriuretic peptide impurities using label-free data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry technology
  37. Diabetes
  38. Hemoglobin variants in southern China: results obtained during the measurement of glycated hemoglobin in a large population
  39. Potential of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry to overcome the interference of hemoglobin variants on HbA1c measurement
  40. Acknowledgment
  41. Acknowledgment
  42. Letter to the Editors
  43. Measurement uncertainty estimation for derived biological quantities
  44. Non-reproducible cardiac troponin results occurring with a particular reagent lot
  45. Successfully meeting analytical expectations for the fast 0/1-h algorithm for NSTEMI by internal control procedures for cardiac troponin T
  46. Performance of perpendicular drop versus tangent skimming gating of M-protein in proficiency testing challenges
  47. Analytical evaluation of Reebio procalcitonin latex-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay on the HITACHI Labospect 008AS
  48. Assessment of intraindividual agreement in prolactin results after post-polyethylene glycol precipitation test for the estimation of macroprolactin. Should the precipitation procedure be repeated in the same patient?
  49. Aggregation kinetic and temperature optimum of an EDTA-dependent pseudothrombocytopenia
Downloaded on 25.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2020-0251/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button