Home Automation and validation of a MALDI-TOF MS (Mass-Fix) replacement of immunofixation electrophoresis in the clinical lab
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Automation and validation of a MALDI-TOF MS (Mass-Fix) replacement of immunofixation electrophoresis in the clinical lab

  • Mindy Kohlhagen , Surendra Dasari , Maria Willrich , MeLea Hetrick , Brian Netzel , Angela Dispenzieri and David L. Murray EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: August 3, 2020

Abstract

Objectives

A matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) method (Mass-Fix) as a replacement for gel-based immunofixation (IFE) has been recently described. To utilize Mass-Fix clinically, a validated automated method was required. Our aim was to automate the pre-analytical processing, improve positive specimen identification and ergonomics, reduce paper data storage and increase resource utilization without increasing turnaround time.

Methods

Serum samples were batched and loaded onto a liquid handler along with reagents and a barcoded sample plate. The pre-analytical steps included: (1) Plating immunopurification beads. (2) Adding 10 μl of serum. (3) Bead washing. (4) Eluting the immunoglobulins (Igs), and reducing to separate the heavy and light Ig chains. The resulting plate was transferred to a second low-volume liquid handler for MALDI plate spotting. MALDI-TOF mass spectra were collected. Integrated in-house developed software was utilized for sample tracking, driving data acquisition, data analysis, history tracking, and result reporting. A total of 1,029 residual serum samples were run using the automated system and results were compared to prior electrophoretic results.

Results

The automated Mass-Fix method was capable of meeting the validation requirements of concordance with IFE, limit of detection (LOD), sample stability and reproducibility with a low repeat rate. Automation and integrated software allowed a single user to process 320 samples in an 8 h shift. Software display facilitated identification of monoclonal proteins. Additionally, the process maintains positive specimen identification, reduces manual pipetting, allows for paper free tracking, and does not significantly impact turnaround time (TAT).

Conclusions

Mass-Fix is ready for implementation in a high-throughput clinical laboratory.


Corresponding author: David L. Murray, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55906, USA, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: DLM and SD have intellectual property rights encompassing the Mass-Fix process which have been licensed to The Binding Site. All other authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Ethical approval: The local Institutional Review Board deemed the study exempt from review.

References

1. Litwin, CM, Anderson, SK, Philipps, G, Martins, TB, Jaskowski, TD, Hill, HR. Comparison of capillary zone and immunosubtraction with agarose gel and immunofixation electrophoresis for detecting and identifying monoclonal gammopathies. Am J Clin Pathol 1999;112:411–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/112.3.411.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Mills, JR, Murray, DL. Identification of friend or foe: the laboratory challenge of differentiating M-proteins from monoclonal antibody therapies. J Appl Lab Med 2017;1:421–31. https://doi.org/10.1373/jalm.2016.020784.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Martinez-Lopez, J, Lahuerta, JJ, Pepin, F, Gonzalez, M, Barrio, S, Ayala, R, et al.. Prognostic value of deep sequencing method for minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma. Blood 2014;123:3073–9. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2014-01-550020.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Barnidge, DR, Tschumper, RC, Theis, JD, Snyder, MR, Jelinek, DF, Katzmann, JA, et al.. Monitoring M-proteins in patients with multiple myeloma using heavy-chain variable region clonotypic peptides and LC-MS/MS. J Proteome Res 2014;13:1905–10. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr5000544.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Bergen, HR3rd, Dasari, S, Dispenzieri, A, Mills, JR, Ramirez-Alvarado, M, Tschumper, RC, et al.. Clonotypic light chain peptides identified for monitoring minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma without bone marrow aspiration. Clin Chem 2016;62:243–51. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2015.242651.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Zajec, M, Jacobs, JFM, de Kat Angelino, CM, Dekker, LJM, Stingl, C, Luider, TM, et al.. Integrating serum protein electrophoresis with mass spectrometry, A new workflow for M-protein detection and quantification. J Proteome Res 2020;19:2845–53. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00705.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Barnidge, DR, Dispenzieri, A, Merlini, G, Katzmann, JA, Murray, DL. Monitoring free light chains in serum using mass spectrometry. Clin Chem Lab Med 2016;54:1073–83. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2015-0917.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Barnidge, DR, Griffin, TJ, Murray, DL. Using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry to detect monoclonal immunoglobuli light chains in serum and urine. Rapid Commun Mass Sp 2015;29:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.7314.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Mills, JR, Kohlhagen, MC, Dasari, S, Vanderboom, PM, Kyle, RA, Katzmann, JA, et al.. Comprehensive assessment of M-proteins using nanobody enrichment coupled to MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Clin Chem 2016;62:1334–44. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2015.253740.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Milani, P, Murray, DL, Barnidge, DR, Kohlhagen, MC, Mills, JR, Merlini, G, et al.. The utility of MASS-FIX to detect and monitor monoclonal proteins in the clinic. Am J Hematol 2017;92:772–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.24772.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Kyle, RA, Therneau, TM, Rajkumar, SV, Larson, DR, Plevak, MF, Offord, JR, et al.. Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. The New Engl J Med 2006;354:1362–9. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa054494.Search in Google Scholar

12. Jacobs, JFM, Turner, KA, Graziani, MS, Frinack, JL, Ettore, MW, Tate, JR, et al.. An international multi-center serum protein electrophoresis accuracy and M-protein isotyping study. Part II: limit of detection and follow-up of patients with small M-proteins. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020;58:547–59. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2019-1105.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Turner, KA, Frinack, JL, Ettore, MW, Tate, JR, Graziani, MS, Jacobs, JFM, et al.. An international multi-center serum protein electrophoresis accuracy and M-protein isotyping study. Part I: factors impacting limit of quantitation of serum protein electrophoresis. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020;58:533–46. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2019-1104.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Murray, D, Kumar, SK, Kyle, RA, Dispenzieri, A, Dasari, S, Larson, DR, et al.. Detection and prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: a study utilizing mass spectrometry-based monoclonal immunoglobulin rapid accurate mass measurement. Blood Cancer J 2019;9:102. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-019-0263-z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Kumar, S, Murray, D, Dasari, S, Milani, P, Barnidge, D, Madden, B, et al.. Assay to rapidly screen for immunoglobulin light chain glycosylation: a potential path to earlier AL diagnosis for a subset of patients. Leukemia 2019;33:254–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-018-0194-x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Mills, JR, Barnidge, DR, Dispenzieri, A, Murray, DL. High sensitivity blood-based M-protein detection in sCR patients with multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J 2017;7: e590. https://doi.org/10.1038/bcj.2017.75.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2020-04-24
Accepted: 2020-07-03
Published Online: 2020-08-03
Published in Print: 2021-01-26

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. 10.1515/cclm-2020-frontmatter1
  2. Mario Plebani turns 70
  3. Editorial
  4. Measurement uncertainty and the importance of correlation
  5. Reviews
  6. Untangling the association between prostate-specific antigen and diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  7. The emerging role of cell senescence in atherosclerosis
  8. Mini Review
  9. Minimum retesting intervals in practice: 10 years experience
  10. Opinion Paper
  11. Cardiotoxic effects and myocardial injury: the search for a more precise definition of drug cardiotoxicity
  12. EFLM Papers
  13. The CRESS checklist for reporting stability studies: on behalf of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group for the Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE)
  14. Thoughts and expectations of young professionals about the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)
  15. Guidelines and Recommendations
  16. Evidence on clinical relevance of cardiovascular risk evaluation in the general population using cardio-specific biomarkers
  17. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  18. A systematic evaluation of stool DNA preparation protocols for colorectal cancer screening via analysis of DNA methylation biomarkers
  19. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  20. The new IVD Regulation 2017/746: a case study at a large university hospital laboratory in Belgium demonstrates the need for clarification on the degrees of freedom laboratories have to use lab-developed tests to improve patient care
  21. Evaluation of serum electrolytes measurement through the 6-year trueness verification program in China
  22. Feasibility for aggregation of commutable external quality assessment results to evaluate metrological traceability and agreement among results
  23. Sample size and rejection limits for detecting reagent lot variability: analysis of the applicability of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) EP26-A protocol to real-world clinical chemistry data
  24. Effects of calcium dobesilate (CaD) interference on serum creatinine measurements: a national External Quality Assessment (EQA)-based educational survey of drug-laboratory test interactions
  25. Mass spectrometric sample identification with indicator compounds introduced via labeled sample tubes
  26. Automation and validation of a MALDI-TOF MS (Mass-Fix) replacement of immunofixation electrophoresis in the clinical lab
  27. A new strategy implementing mass spectrometry in the diagnosis of congenital disorders of N-glycosylation (CDG)
  28. Analytical evaluation of four faecal immunochemistry tests for haemoglobin
  29. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  30. Study of total error specifications of lymphocyte subsets enumeration using China National EQAS data and Biological Variation Data Critical Appraisal Checklist (BIVAC)-compliant publications
  31. Mass spectrometric quantification of urinary 6-sulfatoxymelatonin: age-dependent excretion and biological variation
  32. Establishment of international autoantibody reference standards for the detection of autoantibodies directed against PML bodies, GW bodies, and NuMA protein
  33. Hematology and Coagulation
  34. Appropriate thresholds for accurate screening for β-thalassemias in the newborn period: results from a French center for newborn screening
  35. Cardiovascular Diseases
  36. Analysis of B-type natriuretic peptide impurities using label-free data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry technology
  37. Diabetes
  38. Hemoglobin variants in southern China: results obtained during the measurement of glycated hemoglobin in a large population
  39. Potential of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry to overcome the interference of hemoglobin variants on HbA1c measurement
  40. Acknowledgment
  41. Acknowledgment
  42. Letter to the Editors
  43. Measurement uncertainty estimation for derived biological quantities
  44. Non-reproducible cardiac troponin results occurring with a particular reagent lot
  45. Successfully meeting analytical expectations for the fast 0/1-h algorithm for NSTEMI by internal control procedures for cardiac troponin T
  46. Performance of perpendicular drop versus tangent skimming gating of M-protein in proficiency testing challenges
  47. Analytical evaluation of Reebio procalcitonin latex-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay on the HITACHI Labospect 008AS
  48. Assessment of intraindividual agreement in prolactin results after post-polyethylene glycol precipitation test for the estimation of macroprolactin. Should the precipitation procedure be repeated in the same patient?
  49. Aggregation kinetic and temperature optimum of an EDTA-dependent pseudothrombocytopenia
Downloaded on 7.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2020-0581/html
Scroll to top button